Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What you need to know about the UK snap election on June 8
What you need to know about the UK snap election on June 8
Dec 20, 2025 5:52 AM

On Tuesdaymorning, UK Prime Minister Theresa May announced that she is proposing a snap election for Parliament on June 8. The House of Commons is likely to authorize the vote on Wednesday, leaving just 49 days until the third national election in three years. Here’s what you need to know.

Why is Theresa May calling for this vote now?

May says political opposition from the Labour Party, Scottish nationalists, and “unelected members of the House of Lords” is undermining her ability to negotiate favorable terms for the UK’s departure from the European Union. Speaking outside 10 Downing Street on Tuesday morning, the prime minister said their “political game-playing … jeopardises the work we must do to prepare for Brexit at home and it weakens the government’s negotiating position in Europe.”

Postponing the election, May said, means that campaigning will not ramp up as she is concluding Brexit terms and setting the conditions of the UK’s future access to the EU’s single market.

Why does the House of Commons have to authorize the election?

The Fixed-Term Parliaments Act of 2011 states that national elections will be held only once every five years. The last national election was held in 2015, and the next one was scheduled for 2020. However, two-thirds of the House of Commons’ 650 members can vote to allow a snap election. May said she will ask for that vote on Wednesday. Opposition party leaders support the call.

What issues will be the most important in the campaign?

May will campaign on Brexit, Brexit, Brexit – saying that her opponents are endangering the fragile state of talks with Brussels. Polls show an increasing number of Remain voters wish politicians would “get on” with the business of extricating the UK from the EU in the most advantageous way. “The country ing together, but Westminster is not,” May said. “Division in Westminster will risk our ability to make a success of Brexit, and it will cause damaging uncertainty and instability to the country.” Remain voters, meanwhile, see this as the closest opportunity they will have to hold a second national referendum on EU membership.

May’s chief opponents hope to emphasize domestic issues, such as the intensifying crisis of medical care provided by the National Health System (NHS). Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn promised to run a campaign “challenging the economic narrative that says there have to be huge cuts in public expenditure” and calling on taxpayers to “invest in the future, invest in infrastructure.” Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon vowed to oppose the “increasingly right-wing direction” of May’s government, including opposing “the hardest possible Brexit … more austerity and deeper cuts” to the budget.

Who is likely to win?

Barring a radical upheaval in the electorate – which is always a possibility – May looks to win in a landslide. A YouGov poll performed for the Times this week shows May with an astonishing 21-points lead over Corbyn. That marks Labour’s lowest rating since Margaret Thatcher’s victory in 1983. YouGov forecasts a shift of as many as 56 seats from Labour to the Tories in June. A victory would extend May’s term as prime minister until 2022.

What does the election mean for the nation’s future?

The pound surged to its highest level in months after the announcement. (It briefly dipped this morning over fears May planned to resign.)

Long-term, it strengthens Theresa May’s hand, internally and externally.

“Some are worried that this will allow Mrs. May to push ahead with a ‘super-hard’ Brexit that inflicts unnecessary damage on the economy,” wrote Julian Jessop of the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA). “But these fears are difficult to square with the government’s increasingly moderate rhetoric on many issues – notably migration. Instead, the Conservative leadership is likely to use the election as a chance to secure a mandate for the type of Brexit that most people appear to want. There is already plenty of evidence that the public are swinging behind Mrs. May’s more conciliatory approach.”

Politically, it will give PM May – who was never elected in a national election – a popular mandate to pursue Brexit and carry out her domestic agenda. In 2015, David Cameron won election as prime minister with a 17-seat majority. But he opposed Brexit and stepped down after Remain lostlast June’s Brexit referendum, 52-48.Up to a dozen Tory backbenchers have rebelled against May’s plans on Article 50 and school reform. Former MP Paul Goodman argues that the Conservative Party’s candidate selection rules will allow May to remake the party in her own image.

However, Jessop worries that one negative byproduct of the snap election is that parties will “simply mitments from previous manifestos even though the case for them is (now) weak.” Since there is little time to craft new policy proposals, parties will simply recycle outdated planks, artificially extending their intellectual lives.

Since May’s Tory Party has been governing, its members enjoy a significant advantage in formulating detailed plans for the election they are all but certain to win.

BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Morlino: Religious Freedom Defended with Charity and Reason
Yesterday in his personal column for the Diocese of Madison’s Catholic Herald, Bishop Robert C. Morlino issued a call to arms to Catholics battling for their religious freedom. But such a battle, he says, is one that should emulate Christ’s loving nature, while being resolutely clear and firm in rejecting the obligation of Catholic institutions to provide healthcare that includes contraceptives and abortifacients under the Obama administration’s controversial HHS mandate(see recent reactions below on EWTN by U.S. bishops and Acton’s...
Video: Business as Mission 2.0
If you weren’t able to attend last week’s Acton Lecture Series event here at Acton’s Grand Rapids office, we’ve got you covered. we’re pleased to present video of Rudy Carrasco’s lecture, entitled “Business as Mission 2.0,” below. ...
Marital Status and the Social Safety Net
“Unless incentives suddenly stopped mattering during this recession, saysCasey B. Mulligan, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, “it appears that the expanding social safety net explains some of the excess nonemployment among unmarried women who are heads of households.” An unintended but unavoidable consequence of providing someone a cushion when they are without work is that they are provided with less incentive to get back to work. By definition, married women have husbands and unmarried women do not,...
No ‘Impersonal’ Christian Love
From the first chapter, titled “Preparation for Lent,” of Fr. Alexander Schmemann’s Great Lent: Christian love is the “possible impossibility” to see Christ in another man, whoever he is, and whom God, in His eternal and mysterious plan, has decided to introduce into my life, be it only for a few moments, not as an occasion for a “good deed” or an exercise in philanthropy, but as the beginning of an panionship in God Himself. For, indeed, what is love...
Samuel Gregg: In Praise of Business — A New ‘Note’ from Justice and Peace
On National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg reviews a new document from the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace titled, “The Vocation of the Christian Business Leader.” This follows the PCJP’s controversial “note” on the global financial system issued in October. Gregg says the “Business Leader” document: Though it doesn’t shy away from making pointed criticisms of much contemporary business activity — and there is much to criticize — the Note articulates, perhaps for the first time...
Why Our Struggling Economy Needs More Entrepreneurship
Harvard economics professor Edward Glaeser explains why entrepreneurs are important for our struggling economy: In every year since 1989, panies have created more net jobs than the economy as a whole, which means that panies are, on average, destroying more jobs than they create. In 2009, the latest year for which we have data, new businesses created 2.33 million jobs, while older businesses destroyed, on net, more than 7 million jobs. The share of Americans working in startups has fallen...
Reply to George McGraw and Catholic World News on ‘The Right to Water’
Thanks to George McGraw, Executive Director of DigDeep Right to Water Project, for his kind and thoughtful Counterpoint to my original post. He and his organization are clearly dedicated to the noble cause of providing clean water and sanitation to all, a cause which everyone can and should support. It is also a very sensible objective that would aid the world’s poor much more than trendier causes such as “climate change” and “population control” which tend to view the human...
The Lottery as Aspirational Insurance
Whether the lottery is, as the old adage states, a tax on people who are bad at math, it is most certainly a tax on the poor. Those who have the least spend an inordinate percentage of their e every year on lottery tickets (estimates vary from 4-9%). Yet while it is irrational for those in poverty to waste their limited resources on a one in 176 million chance, there is something almost rational in the reasoning for doing so....
On Call and Chemicals
As part of the On Call in munity, we are interviewing people in different areas of work to showcase what being On Call in Culture looks like on a daily basis. Today we’re introducing Ed Moodie, an environmental engineer at Stepan, a global manufacturer of specialty and intermediate chemicals used in consumer products and industrial applications. It’s not often you get a good report about the environment, so when you do, it sticks with you. About 20 years ago, I...
A Very Funny Conception of Liberty
The recent oral arguments presented before the Supreme Court about ObamaCare’s individual mandate have exposed a profound difference in how American’s conceive of liberty. In the the New York Times, Adam Liptak provides a revealing example: . . . Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., who concluded his defense of the law at the court this week with remarks aimed squarely at Justice Kennedy. Mr. Verrilli said there was “a profound connection” between health care and liberty. “There will be...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved