Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘What Shall Men Remember?’: Relearning the forgotten history of Memorial Day
‘What Shall Men Remember?’: Relearning the forgotten history of Memorial Day
Sep 5, 2025 7:45 AM

A society’s desire to respect its protectors can help heal cultural and racial divisions.

Read More…

Memorial Day has historically been a day set aside memorate the millions of Americans fallen in war. Although the day now involves celebrating America’s war dead regardless of color or creed, what many may not know is that Memorial Day’s origins are actually deeply linked to America’s struggle with racism. Although our racial struggles continue, they were once far worse and we would do well to understand the nuances of that conflict. By understanding the moral dilemmas of the past, we may gain additional wisdom for the issues we face today.

In the years directly following the Civil War, America was in turmoil. Despite Lincoln’s exhortations for malice towards none and charity for all, the divisions from the war had torn apart relationships between munities, and even families. All these divisions were plicated by the inevitable question that follows every war: How ought we to remember the fallen? America had to determine the best way to preserve the memories not only of the Union dead but also of their Confederate counterparts. Oftentimes the Confederate fallen had been close friends with their Union antagonists, plicating matters. On a national level, reconciliation seemed near impossible.

One objective, however, was unavoidable: The dead must be honored. One example involved recently freed slaves and black soldiers. A Confederate camp in Charleston, South Carolina, had been used to hold Union prisoners of war, many of whom died there owing to the deplorable conditions. Those black soldiers led a march around the camp to show respect for the Union soldiers who had fallen to help liberate them. According to reports, “The group sang hymns, gave readings and distributed flowers around the cemetery,” with participants from schoolchildren to black pastors marching around the camp singing songs like “John Brown’s Body” and the “Star-Spangled Banner.” This simple memorial led by freed slaves would plant the seeds for a national movement.

In another instance, the women of Columbus, a small town in Mississippi that had been turned into a medical center in the wake of the casualties in the Battle of Shiloh, decorated the graves of not only the Confederate dead but their Union counterparts as well. With more than 3,000 dead, the New York Tribune in 1867 reported that “the women of Columbus, Mississippi, animated by nobler sentiments than many of their sisters, have shown themselves impartial in their offerings made to the memory of the dead. They screwed flowers alike on the graves of the Confederate and of National soldiers.” This honoring of friend and foe would go on to garner national attention, with the Weekly Standard in Raleigh, North Carolina, reporting that “no distinction should be made between the departed heroes of opposing sides.” And so in 1868 the tradition of Decoration Day began, where the graves of the fallen soldiers would be decorated, often with flowers and speeches, as a reminder of the bravery of those who had died.

The practice spread, and in 1871 a crowd gathered in Arlington National Cemetery to celebrate Decoration Day, marked in part by an address from famed abolitionist Frederick Douglass. A former slave, Douglass minced no words when it came to the moral standing of the thousands who had died in the war—to him, despite its being a national day of remembrance, distinctions had to be made. “We are sometimes asked, in the name of patriotism, to forget the merits of this fearful struggle, and to remember with equal admiration those who struck at the nation’s life and those who struck to save it,” said Douglass, acknowledging the undoubted sacrifice on both sides. And yet, “if we ought to forget a war which has filled our land with widows and orphans … I ask, in the name of all things sacred, what shall men remember?”

To Douglass, it was not enough to remember bravery, but bined with uprightness. “We must never forget that victory to the rebellion meant death to the republic,” he exhorted his audience. “We must never forget that the loyal soldiers who rest beneath this sod flung themselves between the nation and the nation’s destroyers.” With Douglass’ words, the practice of remembrance was elevated from a mere memorial of bravery in war to a memoration of those who gave their all to protect American life and liberty.

As Reconstruction ended, and the attempt to redress the lingering social and economic effects of chattel slavery slowly ended due to a growing political reaction and the rise of white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan, the tide shifted again, and racial politics again came into play. Historian David Blight notes that stories like the 1865 POW camp memorial in Charleston were buried by the white press, uninterested in episodes that did not fit Southern narratives, “that didn’t fit their version of what the war was all about.” By 1890, Decoration Day had taken on a wholly separate meaning in the American South, ing an object of Confederate pride and culture instead of the defense of American liberty that Douglass had envisioned. And yet stories like the Charleston memorial lived on as oral tradition, while historians worked to bring them to the printed page in works like Blight’s own Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory.

As the decades rolled on and America reeled from both the First and Second World Wars, Decoration Day took on a far larger meaning, ing a symbol for honoring America’s fallen defenders in all its many wars. In 1967, it was renamedMemorial Day, and in the wake of the civil rights movement regained some of the focus on emancipation and justice that had been lost in post-Reconstruction narratives. President Barack Obama noted the ideological side of Memorial Day in a 2010 address, asserting that the day meant “something more” than mere remembrance of fallen soldiers: “[a] mitment to serve, to fight, and if necessary, to die, to preserve America and advance the ideals we cherish … mitment witnessed at each defining moment along the journey of this country.”

While Memorial Day has its roots in the horrific cost of the battle against American racial prejudice, much of that remains buried as the celebration has been reduced, as have so many American holidays, to a three-day weekend, the unofficial start of summer, and super-sales shopping sprees. It has taken the faithful efforts of historians like Blight to bring many of the holiday’s pelling stories back into the light: stories about human nature and suffering and plicated ways in which a fractured nation strives to grieve for its dead. Even now, America’s racial struggles still clearly divide and wound, as even racial champions like Douglass plicated for modern readers to understand. It is, however, worth remembering stories like the women of Columbus and the freed slaves of Charleston and the words of Douglass. Their words and deeds paint plex, plicated picture—of how a society’s desire to respect its protectors can transcend cultural and racial division even as it recognizes the division that gave rise to a need for protectors in the first place.

Perhaps Douglass’ words, spoken more than 150 years ago, describe the issue best: “Dark and sad will be the hour to this nation when it forgets to pay grateful homage to its greatest benefactors … whether living or dead, whether in time or eternity, the loyal soldiers who imperiled all for country and freedom are one and inseparable.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Todd Huizinga Talks Global Governance and the New Totalitarian Temptation
Todd Huizinga, Acton’s Director of International Outreach, joined host John J. Miller of National Reviewto discuss his new book,The New Totalitarian Temptation, on the Bookmonger Podcastat Ricochet.They discussed the problems afflicting the European Union, the potential Exit of the UK from the EU, and whether or not the United States faces the same problems with unaccountable government that bedevil Europe. You can listen to the podcast here. If you find the topic interesting, you can join us tomorrow here at...
To Reduce Human Trafficking, Increase Economic Freedom
Trafficking in persons is estimated to be one of the top-grossing criminal industries in the world (behind illegal drugs and arms trafficking), with traffickers profiting an estimated $32 billion every year. So what can be done to end this scourge? A recent report from the Heritage Foundation mends an oft-overlooked solution: adopting policies that promote economic freedom. A close examination of human trafficking and the principles of economic freedom—especially strong rule of law—reveals the robust connections between these two desirable...
Feel the Romantic Bern
“Do voters have a mitment problem’ with Bernie Sanders?” asks Dylan Pahman in this week’s Acton Commentary. So why would someone who seems really to want to be President (unlike candidates who appear to be using their campaigns to promote a book, for example) tell Americans he’s a socialist when half the country says they wouldn’t vote for one? How does that serve his interest? Shouldn’t it hurt his electability? The full text of the essay can be found here....
U.S. House unanimously passes bill declaring Islamic State guilty of genocide
UPDATE: (3/17/16) United States: Islamic mitted genocide against Christians, Shi’ites. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry: “The fact is that Daesh kills Christians because they are Christians. Yazidis because they are Yazidis. Shi’ites because they are Shi’ites,” Kerry said, referring to the group by an Arabic acronym, and accusing it of crimes against humanity and of ethnic cleansing. Video of Secretary Kerry giving his statement on the Islamic State is now included at the bottom of this post. ✶✶✶✶✶ In...
Most Americans Donate Little or Nothing to Charity
Most Americans believe that it is very important for them to be a generous person. Yet almost half did not give to charity in the past year, and less than a quarter gave more than $500. That’s the latest findings in a new Science of Generosity survey. An even more disconcerting discovery is that quarter of Americans were neutral on the importance of generosity and 10 percent disagreed that generosity was not a very important quality. As David Briggs of...
Elon Musk on the Problem with Regulators
“Most of economics can be summarized in four words: ‘People respond to incentives,’” says economist Steven E. Landsburg. “The rest mentary.” When governments create a regulation, they are creating an incentive for individuals and businesses to respond in a particular way. But the people who create the regulations —government regulators — also respond to incentives. As Elon Musk, the CEO of Space X and Tesla Motors, explains, There is a fundamental problem with regulators. If a regulator agrees to change...
Is the Government Ever Big Enough?
Can the government ever be too big? How much spending is enough spending? And if there can be too much spending, where is that point? “When was the last time you heard a liberal politician say, ‘Yeah, we solved that social ill. We’re just going to close up that government agency now, zero out the budget and move on to another problem,'” asks William Voegeli, Senior Editor of the Claremont Review of Books. In the video below, Voegeliexplains why our...
Video: A Gentleman’s Debate – Distributism vs. Free Markets with Jay Richards and Joseph Pearce
On February 18th, the Acton Institute was pleased to e Jay Richards and Joseph Pearce to our Mark Murray Auditorium for an exchange on two distinct ideas on economics: Distributism vs. Free Markets. The gentleman’s debate was moderated by Acton Institute President Rev. Robert A. Sirico. Joseph Pearce, writer in residence at Aquinas College in Nashville, Tennessee, and Director of the college’s Center for Faith and Culture, argued in favor of distributism; Jay Richards,Assistant Research Professor School of Business and...
Breaking: City of Grand Rapids drops property tax dispute against Acton
Acton Building located in downtown Grand Rapids’ Heartside District A two-year dispute between the Acton Institute and the City of Grand Rapids over the non-profit’s exempt status under state property tax law is over, with Acton emerging the victor. In 2014, the City rejected Acton’s request for a tax exemption on its building, parking areas, and personal property at 98 E. Fulton. Acton purchased the property in 2012 and spent much of the next year renovating the property. An appeal...
Shareholder Activists Drop Religious Pretext
Religious shareholder activist group As You Sow released its 2016 Proxy Preview last week, and it’s a doozy. Tellingly, AYS has dropped religious faith as a rationale for its climate-change and anti-lobbying efforts. From the panying press release: More 2016 shareholder proposals than ever before address climate change — pared with 82 in 2015. Of the resolutions, 22 ask energy extractors and suppliers to detail how the warming planet will affect their operations and how they will respond if governments...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved