Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians should know about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
What Christians should know about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
Jul 27, 2024 2:12 AM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

What it means: The Earned e Tax Credit (EITC) is a refundable federal tax credit available to eligible workers earning relatively low wages. (Tax credits provide a dollar-for dollar reductionof your e tax liability.)

The Explanation: As the Congressional Research Service (CRS) points out, the EITC has evolved from a relatively modest tax benefit to a significant antipoverty program.

Before the EITC, federal welfare support mainly took the form of cash payments. Policymakers worried that this was discouraging the poor from working, and so in 1975 Congress enacted a “work bonus” on a temporary basis as part of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975 and renamed it the Earned e Tax Credit. Earned e is any money a person is paid for doing work or performing a service, and includes wages, tips, disability payments, etc.

The original EITC was targeted at the main recipients of welfare—single mothers with children—to encourage them to enter the workforce. It also had the additional purpose of reducing the tax burdens of working poor families with children. (Childless poor adults would not receive the credit until the 1990s.)

In the 1990s, the purpose of the credit was expanded to include poverty reduction, and was seen as a way to ensure that a full-time worker with children would not be in poverty.

The amount of the tax credit depends on several factors, but is generally more valuable for those with children. For 2018, the maximum EITC per taxpayer was:

$519 with no Qualifying Children

$3,461 with one Qualifying Child

$5,716 with two Qualifying Children

$6,431 with three or more Qualifying Children

In 2018, a married couple with three children and adjusted gross e of $54,998 or less could receive up to $6,444. An individual who earns $15,310 and has no children may receive up to $520.

Why it Matters:When es to antipoverty programs, Christians should support policies that encourage work and discourage dependency due to idleness (2 Thessalonians 3:10). By this measure, the EITC—one of the federal government’s largest antipoverty programs—has been a success that deserves our support.

The EITC has had a noticeable influence in encouraging single mothers to enter the workforce. One study found that 34 percent of the increase in employment among single mothers between 1993 and 1999 was due to legislative expansions of the EITC.

The EITC has also had a significant impact on reducing poverty among recipients with children. According to the CRS, the EITC reduces the proportion of unmarried households with three children in poverty from 40.5 percent to 32.3 percent—an astounding 20.2 percent reduction. (The EITC also has a modest effect for childless workers, reducing the proportion of their poverty from 19.9 percent to 19.6 percent—a 1.5 percent reduction.)

And although the EITC was not designed as a health or education benefit, current research suggests that it may improve the health and educational achievement of e populations, especially the health of children born to e mothers.

The U.S. Census Bureau found that when government tax and transfer programs were included in a broader measure of poverty, refundable tax credits like the EITC were estimated to reduce poverty by three percentage points. pares to a 1.6 percentage-point reduction for food assistance (known as SNAP or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and a 0.2 percentage-point reduction for welfare (known as TANF, or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). The EITC is the largest refundable tax credit targeted to the poor, and as the CRS notes, previous research indicates that most of the antipoverty impact of refundable tax credits can be attributed to the EITC.

Overall, the EITC is one of the best tools we have for reducing poverty. If the EITC were treated like earnings, notes the Tax Policy Center, it would have been the single most effective antipoverty program for working-age people, lifting about 5.8 million people out of poverty, including 3 million children.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• The EITC is the third-largest social welfare program in the U.S. after Medicaid and food stamps.

• An estimated one in five people who qualify for the EITC don’t claim iton their tax returns. Those people most in danger of missing out, according to , include: the self-employed, people living in rural areas, grandparents raising their grandchildren, recentlydivorced, recentlyunemployed, taxpayers with no children, and recipients of disability benefits.

• A primary problem with the EITC is that plex rules and formulas make it difficult for taxpayers ply. The 2006-2008 EITC Compliance Study found that the most frequent EITC error made by taxpayers was incorrectly reporting e—in most cases self-employment e—and the largest error was incorrectly claiming a child for the credit.

• In a random survey of 568 members of theAmerican Economic Association taken in 2011, roughly 60 percent of economists agreed (31.7 percent) or agreed with provisos (30.8 percent) that the Earned e Tax Credit program should be expanded.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ripsi’s confession
One of the latest iterations of the reality TV craze is the show, “Bad Girls Club,” on the Oxygen network. The premise of the show revolves around a group of young women of diverse backgrounds brought together to live in one house: “What happens when you put seven ‘bad’ girls in a house together – the type of girls who lie, cheat and flirt their way out of trouble and have serious trust issues with other women?” It doesn’t take...
Dr. Kevin Schmiesing receives 2006 Templeton Enterprise Award
Acton Institute research fellow Dr. Kevin Schmiesing recently received a Templeton Enterprise Award from the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. The 2nd place award in the articles category recognized Dr. Schmiesing’s piece, “Another Social Justice Tradition: Catholic Conservatives.” The article was published in the University of St. Thomas Law Journal in 2005. The article outlines the historic differences between progressive and conservative Catholic approaches to social and economic issues. His states that “the conservative approach represents a tradition of thought that is...
Managing manure
One of the stories told in the Acton’s ing documentary, “The Call of the Entrepreneur,” (trailer available here) is that of Brad Morgan, a Michigan dairy farmer, who bucked the odds and the naysayers and turned the problem posed by the disposal of his herd’s manure into a profitable business venture. His innovative solution to manure disposal, turning it into high post for a variety of purposes, led to the formation of Morgan Composting in 1996, and more than ten...
2007 Acton Lecture Series: The Irresponsibility of Corporate Social Responsibility
Mr. Fred L. Smith, Jr. at the 2007 Acton Lecture Series Mr. Fred L. Smith, Jr. of the Competitive Enterprise Institute was today’s guest speaker as part of the 2007 Acton Lecture Series here in Grand Rapids, speaking on the topic of The Irresponsibility of Corporate Social Responsibility. Smith argues that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has e the new rationale for old policies of transforming private firms into public utilities—and forcing them to perform whatever duties are politically attractive at...
Response to DN letter
Today’s Detroit News ran a brief letter to the editor in response to my Jan. 23 op-ed, “Don’t prevent religion from helping to reform prisoners.” (Joe Knippenberg engaged a previous response on his blog here). David Dery of Central Lake writes, “Jordan Ballor’s article encouraging religious groups in prisons is fine, as far as he goes…. The es when the state attaches some benefit to attending these programs without providing a non-religious alternative.” In response I’ll simply make a few...
Change on farm subsidies?
I’m not quite sure what to make of this story from Catholic News Service. Its quotations concerning agricultural subsidies from Fr. Andrew Small, a “policy adviser for the U.S. bishops,” while not all perfectly clear without their context, seem to indicate a shift in pared to earlier statements from the USCCB. Small notes, for example, that the current system “incentivizes people to overproduce” and that it “isn’t helping the people it’s supposed to help.” Does this discussion signal a change...
A lottery sell-off is a sell-out
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I examine the most recent buzz-worthy trend in the lottery industry: privatization. While most critics of these moves have pointed to the foolhardiness of selling off a long-term e stream for a lump sum jackpot, I argue that privatization by itself does nothing to address the underlying problems afflicting the lottery business. I conclude, “A government-run monopoly would merely be replaced by a government-enforced monopoly.” And as I’ve claimed previously, government reliance on lotteries as...
The business and politics of spiritual journeys
Over the weekend the Grand Rapids Press published an article by Mary Radigan that examines one booming trend in the travel industry, “Spiritual journeys take off in travel industry.” “The market for religious travel has grown into an $18 billion industry worldwide,” writes Radigan. “In the past decade, it has expanded into cruise lines, bus trips, escorted tours, and conventions and meetings.” This growing interest in religiously-based travel underscores the tensions behind the recent controversy over an archaeological dig near...
Friends in low places
PARADE Magazine has published its annual list of “The World’s Worst Dictators.” Topping the list is the man overseeing the genocide in Darfur, Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir. At least three of the top twenty are important friends and allies of the United States in the war on terror: #5 King Abdullah, Saudi Arabia; #9 Muammar al-Qaddafi, Libya; #15 Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan. “See, Lois? I told you we had allies. Slobodan, you made it!” David Wallechinsky, PARADE contributing editor and author of...
The irresponsibility of corporate social responsibility
Last week, Marc posted audio from the Fred Smith’s presentation at the 2007 Acton Lecture Series. Mr. Smith, president and founder of the Competitive Enterprise Institute, spoke about Corporate Social Responsibility and the dangers associated with the socialization of the corporation. Video of this event is now available online and for download. You can watch it online, (a new window with a Flash video player will open), you can download the file via Acton’s podcast, or download directly as an...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved