Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What Christians should know about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
What Christians should know about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
May 16, 2026 2:07 AM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

What it means: The Earned e Tax Credit (EITC) is a refundable federal tax credit available to eligible workers earning relatively low wages. (Tax credits provide a dollar-for dollar reductionof your e tax liability.)

The Explanation: As the Congressional Research Service (CRS) points out, the EITC has evolved from a relatively modest tax benefit to a significant antipoverty program.

Before the EITC, federal welfare support mainly took the form of cash payments. Policymakers worried that this was discouraging the poor from working, and so in 1975 Congress enacted a “work bonus” on a temporary basis as part of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975 and renamed it the Earned e Tax Credit. Earned e is any money a person is paid for doing work or performing a service, and includes wages, tips, disability payments, etc.

The original EITC was targeted at the main recipients of welfare—single mothers with children—to encourage them to enter the workforce. It also had the additional purpose of reducing the tax burdens of working poor families with children. (Childless poor adults would not receive the credit until the 1990s.)

In the 1990s, the purpose of the credit was expanded to include poverty reduction, and was seen as a way to ensure that a full-time worker with children would not be in poverty.

The amount of the tax credit depends on several factors, but is generally more valuable for those with children. For 2018, the maximum EITC per taxpayer was:

$519 with no Qualifying Children

$3,461 with one Qualifying Child

$5,716 with two Qualifying Children

$6,431 with three or more Qualifying Children

In 2018, a married couple with three children and adjusted gross e of $54,998 or less could receive up to $6,444. An individual who earns $15,310 and has no children may receive up to $520.

Why it Matters:When es to antipoverty programs, Christians should support policies that encourage work and discourage dependency due to idleness (2 Thessalonians 3:10). By this measure, the EITC—one of the federal government’s largest antipoverty programs—has been a success that deserves our support.

The EITC has had a noticeable influence in encouraging single mothers to enter the workforce. One study found that 34 percent of the increase in employment among single mothers between 1993 and 1999 was due to legislative expansions of the EITC.

The EITC has also had a significant impact on reducing poverty among recipients with children. According to the CRS, the EITC reduces the proportion of unmarried households with three children in poverty from 40.5 percent to 32.3 percent—an astounding 20.2 percent reduction. (The EITC also has a modest effect for childless workers, reducing the proportion of their poverty from 19.9 percent to 19.6 percent—a 1.5 percent reduction.)

And although the EITC was not designed as a health or education benefit, current research suggests that it may improve the health and educational achievement of e populations, especially the health of children born to e mothers.

The U.S. Census Bureau found that when government tax and transfer programs were included in a broader measure of poverty, refundable tax credits like the EITC were estimated to reduce poverty by three percentage points. pares to a 1.6 percentage-point reduction for food assistance (known as SNAP or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and a 0.2 percentage-point reduction for welfare (known as TANF, or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). The EITC is the largest refundable tax credit targeted to the poor, and as the CRS notes, previous research indicates that most of the antipoverty impact of refundable tax credits can be attributed to the EITC.

Overall, the EITC is one of the best tools we have for reducing poverty. If the EITC were treated like earnings, notes the Tax Policy Center, it would have been the single most effective antipoverty program for working-age people, lifting about 5.8 million people out of poverty, including 3 million children.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• The EITC is the third-largest social welfare program in the U.S. after Medicaid and food stamps.

• An estimated one in five people who qualify for the EITC don’t claim iton their tax returns. Those people most in danger of missing out, according to , include: the self-employed, people living in rural areas, grandparents raising their grandchildren, recentlydivorced, recentlyunemployed, taxpayers with no children, and recipients of disability benefits.

• A primary problem with the EITC is that plex rules and formulas make it difficult for taxpayers ply. The 2006-2008 EITC Compliance Study found that the most frequent EITC error made by taxpayers was incorrectly reporting e—in most cases self-employment e—and the largest error was incorrectly claiming a child for the credit.

• In a random survey of 568 members of theAmerican Economic Association taken in 2011, roughly 60 percent of economists agreed (31.7 percent) or agreed with provisos (30.8 percent) that the Earned e Tax Credit program should be expanded.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Moral Dimension of Work
“The world is not a parsimonious place, in spite of the dogmas of the ecologists,” says James V. Schall in this week’s Acton Commentary. Our most unsettling economic problems are actually not economic but moral—moral ones that cannot be simply passed on from generation to generation. They need to be chosen and internalized by each person in each generation at the risk of deflecting material goods from their proper purposes. Work likewise is not exclusively for its own sake. Rather...
Catholicism’s tension with the Enlightenment
In a recent article for The Stream, Acton’s Director of Research, Samuel Gregg asks the question, “Is Catholicism Compatible with the American Experiment?” Gregg cites an article by political philosopher Patrick Deneen who suggested that “the main argument among American Catholics will concern the relationship of modern liberal democracies–and, at a deeper level, the American Founding–with Catholicism.” Gregg doesn’t necessarily disagree with this assertion, but argues that it “reaches further back to the early modern period often called the Enlightenment.”...
Can Capitalism Save the Arts?
Capitalism is routinely castigated as an enemy of the arts, with much of the finger-pointing bent toward monsters of profit and efficiency. Other critiques take aim at more systemic features, fearing that the type of industrialization that markets sometimes tend toward will inevitably detach artists from healthy social contexts, sucking dry any potential for flourishing as a result. But what if the opposite is true? I offer the argument over at The Federalist. Free economies introduce their own unique challenges...
Creation Care and Catholic Social Teaching
Pope Francis recently declared September 1 as the World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation, an annual day of prayer begun by the Orthodox Church in 1989. In conjunction with the event, Catholic Relief Services and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops have released “Care for God’s Creation,” the first of a seven-part video series on Catholic social teaching. (Via: Crux) ...
Rev. Sirico on Francis’ ‘Year of Mercy’
Pope Francis recently announced a “year of mercy,” making it easier for the Catholic Church to forgive women for having abortions. Acton’s President and Co-founder Robert Sirico went on WSJ Live to discuss this. Watch below: ...
Video: Wayne Grudem And Barry Asmus On A Solution To The Poverty Of Nations
So far, 2015 has given us our busiest Acton Lecture Series ever, and we’re pleased to share more of it with you today on the PowerBlog. Back on April 16, Acton had the privilegeof hosting Wayne Grudem and Barry Asmus, who spoke on the topic of the book they jointly authored,The Poverty of Nations: A Sustainable Solution. First, the bios: Wayne Grudem is Research Professor of Theology and Biblical Studies at Phoenix Seminary; he is the author or co-author of...
Psalm 19 and Human Flourishing
The mission of the Acton Institute is to promote a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. We seek to articulate a vision of society that is both free and virtuous, the end of which is human flourishing. That phrase—“human flourishing”—has e such a buzzword, though, that it’s in danger of losing any real meaning. As Scott Swain says, “Due to its widespread usage across our culture, its susceptibility to multiple meanings, and its...
Acton Institute Selected as Templeton Freedom Award Finalist for Poverty Inc. Documentary
The Acton Institute has been named as one of six finalists for this year’s $100,000 Templeton Freedom Award for its documentary film, Poverty, Inc. The announcement of the finalists was made Monday by the Atlas Network, a Washington-based organization that advances the work of market-oriented public policy organizations all over the world. The winner will be selected Nov. 12 in New York. Atlas’ description of Poverty, Inc. says the documentary “provides prehensive perspective on the issue, giving voice to charity...
Subsidizing Subsidiarity: How Conservatives Failed New Orleans
This week marks the 10th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina making landfall on the Gulf Coast. As always happens when remembering suchignominious events, we look back in hindsight to attempt to learn what could have been done differently. If we’re being honest with ourselves, we conservatives will admit that we share some of the blame for the disaster—just not in the way many of us realize. The colossal failures in leadership in the wake of Hurricane Katrina proved once again that,...
Court Rules March for Life Qualifies for Abortifacient Mandate Exemption Based on Moral, Not Just Religious, Objections
Imagine if the government were to tell an organization dedicated to veganism that, because of a new mandate, they must purchase a meat platter to serve at their monthly meetings and that the chair cushions in their conference room must be made of leather. Appalled by this governmental intrusion, the vegans ask to be excluded from the mandate since none of their members wish to eat bologna while sitting on dead cow skin. They also point out that a group...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved