What Christians should know about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
What Christians should know about the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC)
Jun 23, 2024 4:42 AM

Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post.

What it means: The Earned e Tax Credit (EITC) is a refundable federal tax credit available to eligible workers earning relatively low wages. (Tax credits provide a dollar-for dollar reductionof your e tax liability.)

The Explanation: As the Congressional Research Service (CRS) points out, the EITC has evolved from a relatively modest tax benefit to a significant antipoverty program.

Before the EITC, federal welfare support mainly took the form of cash payments. Policymakers worried that this was discouraging the poor from working, and so in 1975 Congress enacted a “work bonus” on a temporary basis as part of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975 and renamed it the Earned e Tax Credit. Earned e is any money a person is paid for doing work or performing a service, and includes wages, tips, disability payments, etc.

The original EITC was targeted at the main recipients of welfare—single mothers with children—to encourage them to enter the workforce. It also had the additional purpose of reducing the tax burdens of working poor families with children. (Childless poor adults would not receive the credit until the 1990s.)

In the 1990s, the purpose of the credit was expanded to include poverty reduction, and was seen as a way to ensure that a full-time worker with children would not be in poverty.

The amount of the tax credit depends on several factors, but is generally more valuable for those with children. For 2018, the maximum EITC per taxpayer was:

$519 with no Qualifying Children

$3,461 with one Qualifying Child

$5,716 with two Qualifying Children

$6,431 with three or more Qualifying Children

In 2018, a married couple with three children and adjusted gross e of $54,998 or less could receive up to $6,444. An individual who earns $15,310 and has no children may receive up to $520.

Why it Matters:When es to antipoverty programs, Christians should support policies that encourage work and discourage dependency due to idleness (2 Thessalonians 3:10). By this measure, the EITC—one of the federal government’s largest antipoverty programs—has been a success that deserves our support.

The EITC has had a noticeable influence in encouraging single mothers to enter the workforce. One study found that 34 percent of the increase in employment among single mothers between 1993 and 1999 was due to legislative expansions of the EITC.

The EITC has also had a significant impact on reducing poverty among recipients with children. According to the CRS, the EITC reduces the proportion of unmarried households with three children in poverty from 40.5 percent to 32.3 percent—an astounding 20.2 percent reduction. (The EITC also has a modest effect for childless workers, reducing the proportion of their poverty from 19.9 percent to 19.6 percent—a 1.5 percent reduction.)

And although the EITC was not designed as a health or education benefit, current research suggests that it may improve the health and educational achievement of e populations, especially the health of children born to e mothers.

The U.S. Census Bureau found that when government tax and transfer programs were included in a broader measure of poverty, refundable tax credits like the EITC were estimated to reduce poverty by three percentage points. pares to a 1.6 percentage-point reduction for food assistance (known as SNAP or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) and a 0.2 percentage-point reduction for welfare (known as TANF, or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families). The EITC is the largest refundable tax credit targeted to the poor, and as the CRS notes, previous research indicates that most of the antipoverty impact of refundable tax credits can be attributed to the EITC.

Overall, the EITC is one of the best tools we have for reducing poverty. If the EITC were treated like earnings, notes the Tax Policy Center, it would have been the single most effective antipoverty program for working-age people, lifting about 5.8 million people out of poverty, including 3 million children.

Other Stuff You Might Want to Know:

• The EITC is the third-largest social welfare program in the U.S. after Medicaid and food stamps.

• An estimated one in five people who qualify for the EITC don’t claim iton their tax returns. Those people most in danger of missing out, according to , include: the self-employed, people living in rural areas, grandparents raising their grandchildren, recentlydivorced, recentlyunemployed, taxpayers with no children, and recipients of disability benefits.

• A primary problem with the EITC is that plex rules and formulas make it difficult for taxpayers ply. The 2006-2008 EITC Compliance Study found that the most frequent EITC error made by taxpayers was incorrectly reporting e—in most cases self-employment e—and the largest error was incorrectly claiming a child for the credit.

• In a random survey of 568 members of theAmerican Economic Association taken in 2011, roughly 60 percent of economists agreed (31.7 percent) or agreed with provisos (30.8 percent) that the Earned e Tax Credit program should be expanded.

Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Gleaner Tech #2: The Global Village Construction Set
[Note: This is the second in an occasional series ongleaner technology.] The Global Village Construction Setis a collection of 40 machines needed to “create a small civilization with forts…like a life-size Lego set.” ...
No Olympic Dream: Monti’s wake up call to Italy
On Valentine’s Day, just one day before having to tender its application to the International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, Italy’s pragmatic Prime Minister Mario Monti showed no romantic spirit by canceling his nation’s dream to host the 2020 Summer Olympics. In a last-minute decision made Feb. 14, Prime Minister Monti explained at a press conference that the already overburdened Italian taxpayers simply cannot afford to finance the estimated $12.5 billion to bring the 2020 Olympic Games to Rome. “I...
Since Christ Died for Us
Yesterday my son asked me why today is called “Ash Wednesday.” In that question I could hear the echoes of another question, “Since Christ has died for us, why do we still have to die?” The latter question is found in the Heidelberg Catechism, and the brief but poignant answer has stuck with me since I first encountered it. First, the catechism clarifies that our death does not have redemptive power: “Our death does not pay the debt of our...
Government and Gambling
Over at Mere Comments I note the recent invective against gambling leveled by Al Mohler and Russell Moore. I contend that as opposed to casinos, lotteries are in fact the most troubling example of state-sponsored gambling. And I also worry a bit about the use of legal means to prohibit gambling, as it isn’t so clear to me that gambling is always and in every case a moral evil. Thus, I write, that cultural rather than primarily political attempts to...
Biased in Favor of the Entrepreneur State
Yesterday I argued that since bias is inherent in institutions and neutrality between individual and social spheres is illusory we should harness and direct the bias of institutions towards a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. One of the ways we can do that in the economic realm, I believe, is to encourage a bias toward entrepreneurship and away from corporatism. As Derek Thompson, a senior editor at The Atlantic, says, “It would...
Happiness is Subjective
One of the conclusions from last mentary was that the government shouldn’t be in the business of promoting a particular vision of the good life in America. That’s not to say that the government doesn’t have some role in promoting mon good or making some normative judgments about the good life. But it shouldn’t get anywhere near the level of specificity of promising a family, home, college education, and retirement for all. In part this is because while moral good...
Commentary: Human Excellence and the Moral Life
After 50-plus years of social unraveling, many reformers still see the “therapeutic model” as a cure for what ails American society. Or would a return to the classical virtues, as a means of healing first the person and then the culture, be the way of renewal? Rev. Gregory Jensen offers some thoughts in this week’s Acton Commentary (published Feb. 22), spurred by the reading of Charles Murray’s new book, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960–2010. The full text...
Samuel Gregg: Inequality Anyone?
Over at National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg takes a look at a recent Charles Blow op-ed in the New York Times in which the writer hyperventilates about statements made by Rick Santorum on the subject of e inequality. Economically speaking, e inequality reflects the workings of several factors, many of which are essential if we want a dynamic, growing economy. Even your average neo-Keynesian economist will acknowledge that, without incentives (such as the prospect of a higher...
Libertarians, Religious Conservatives, and the Myth of Social Neutrality
When es to our view of individual liberty, one of the most unexplored areas of distinction between libertarians and religious conservatives* is how we view neutrality and bias. Because the differences are uncharted, I have no way of describing the variance without resorting to a grossly simplistic caricature—so with a grossly simplistic caricature we shall proceed: Libertarians believe that neutrality between the various spheres of society—and especially betweenthe government and the individual—are both possible and desirable, and so the need...
What does it mean to be On Call In Culture?
Most of us know what it feels like… this pull toward something. Whether it is art or science or writing or business—there is something inside you that says, “Yes, this is where I belong. This is what I was meant to do!” As Christians this realization e with a bit of disappointment mixed with the excitement of finding our place. We somehow wish that our calling were something of a more spiritual nature…something that mattered more. But here’s a question:...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved