Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
We Need a Menaissance
We Need a Menaissance
May 15, 2026 6:47 PM

This bit in this week’s Telegraph nails something I’ve been wrangling with for a while. Maybe you men out there can relate:

Many men believe the world is now dominated by women and that they have lost their role in society, fuelling feelings of depression and being undervalued. Research shows the extent to which men have had to change within one or two generations, adapting to new rules and different expectations. Asked what it meant to be a man in the 21st century, more than half thought society was turning them into “waxed and coiffed metrosexuals”, and 52 per cent say they had to live according to women’s rules. What they apparently want is what some American academics have dubbed a “menaissance” – a return to manliness, where figures such as Sir Winston Churchill were models of manhood.

It’s not a “feminization” thing really, and to push back here isn’t being chauvinistic. Most guys are cool with being softer around the edges especially when we connect it to loving our wives and daughters in ways that are meaningful to them.

But our culture has fallen into the trap of thinking husbands are supposed to love the way they do. We’re supposed to be our wife’s best girlfriend, with a winkie and chest hair added as a bonus. After all, we rationalize, it’s our wives who understand what love is all about, and men who don’t climb on board their way of thinking are dufuses or oafs and are certainly not interested in the relationship…

But that doesn’t really cut it, does it guys.

A girlfriend that sometimes leaves the toilet seat up? That’s not what you really want either, is it gals.

A brother in our church’s men’s group stuck a copy of Emerson Eggerichs Love & Respect in my hands a couple months ago. Was up most of the night reading it. Also listened to an audio interview by James “What Wives Wished Their Husbands Knew About Women” Dobson, who essentially smacked himself in the forehead for promoting the husbands-must-think-like-wives mantra for so long that he missed the obvious.

It’s the point that the Telegraph’s reporterette finally gets to at the bottom of her article cited above:

Harvey Mansfield, a Harvard professor and America’s best known political philosopher, who tackles the topic in his book Manliness, says the issue is ignored. “A man has to be embarrassed about being a man. I am trying to bring back the word manliness. It’s not respected,” he said.

Men, says Eggerichs, are built for honor and respect. It’s as much our “love language” as when our wives wish we’d listen to them talk about their day or – hubba hubba – do the dishes or laundry.

In my grandad’s generation it was all about respect. Since then our wives rightfully received more fairness in the workplace (not always of course) and elsewhere in society thanks to women’s rights movements. It should be this way. mands men to love our ladies in an understanding way, which means husbands do have a loving obligation to get inside their wives’ lovely heads and find out what their language of love is municate that love to them constantly and passionately.

But when’s the last time you heard any Christian authority figure – any marriage authority for that matter – suggest that wives should be reciprocating by letting her husband know every day that she honors and respects him above all the other people in her life? Our modern culture has gotten too afraid of viewing Paul’s admonition “wives, honor your husbands” as a pretense to domestic abuse [of course, “husbands, love your wives” stays on the table!]. And let’s face it, guys – we don’t expect to be honored anymore. We’d rather just suck it up than make it an issue.

Because of this we’ve denied families and society in general the benefit of strong, confident men who are strengthened daily by the honoring, affirming love guys can relate to.

Since I’m already probably in trouble here, let me run down Eggerich’s list of ways to build up men [source of this list and the women’s list here]:

Conquest – Appreciate his desire to work and achieve

Heirarchy – Appreciate his desire to protect and provide

Authority – Appreciate his desire to serve and lead

Insight – Appreciate his desire to analyze and counsel

Relationship – Appreciate his desire for shoulder-to-shoulder friendship

Sexuality – Appreciate his desire for sexual intimacy

Guys, I don’t know if this is registering with you at all, but it sure did with me. Before this I assumed the sort of love she needed to thrive was supposed to be OK for me too. After reading this list (chapters, etc) I realized why it was sorta like wearing a women’s blouse: It doesn’t fit quite right and the buttons button the wrong way.

Er, not that I, uh; well anyway…

I was also relieved to discover that my propensity to solve problems and lean into concerns about providing for my family were not failings I had to “get over” but God-given tools that I needed to learn how to use properly. Doesn’t relieve me of the responsibility to learn what makes her tick, but knowing what makes me tick helps a lot.

For you ladies out there, let me offer you pliment, then a bit of unsolicited advice:

– You already know an awful lot about what your needs, wants and desires are, and are intuitively smarter at this relationship thing than we are.

– Your man wasn’t built to be your girlfriend. Stop treating him like one. If you’ll forgive me for saying so, you probably treat your girlfriends with more respect. Make it as important to you to figure out what makes him feel honored as it is to get him to understand what makes you feel loved.

Maybe with all of us working together, a menaissance – and a revival of loving, respect-filled and strong marriages – is in the offering.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Don’t Knock the Laffer Curve
Michael Kinsley has a column up at The Politico in which he claims to debunk a series of Reagan myths. The one that annoys me the most is the one that is obviously and clearly incorrect and at the same time gets the least explanation from Kinsley. Here it is: 6. The Reagan tax cuts paid for themselves because of the Laffer Curve. Please. With every other “myth” Kinsley takes on, he at least feels the need to explain himself....
The New Circuit Riders and the Bicycle Economy
God and Money passes along a news story about a church in Nebraska raising money “to buy motorcycles (probably not Harleys) for pastors in the African country of Tanzania. Pastors there serving multiple congregations cannot simulcast their sermons–they have to walk upwards of 60 miles to be with their flock.” It brings to mind the early American Methodist practice of sending out circuit riders. But it also illustrates the kinds of needs that can be met in unconventional ways. This...
Theology at Work & David W. Miller
Jordan Ballor already highlighted Rob Moll’s piece in today’s Wall Street Journal in his earlier post on business and Christian ministry. The piece quotes David W. Miller who was interviewed in the Winter 2008 issue of Religion & Liberty on the topic of theology at work. Earlier on the PowerBlog, I also posted a related PBS interview with Miller on corporate morality. Another great resource from the Religion & Liberty archives on theology and work is an interview with Laura...
Business as a Form of Christian Ministry
In a recent Acton Commentary, Stephen Grabill and Brett Elder reflect on the tension that often exists between conceptions of ministry in the church and in the world. They point especially to the Cape Town Commitment, which on the one hand identifies a “secular-sacred divide as a major obstacle to the mobilization of all God’s people in the mission of God.” But on the other hand, write Grabill and Elder, “The gulf between economics and theology in evangelical social engagement...
Let the Hustlers Hustle
My latest for Acton Commentary. I’m also adding a couple of videos from Hotep and the Institute for Justice. Let the Hustlers Hustle By Anthony Bradley If necessity is the mother of invention, then there is nothing worse than quenching the entrepreneurial spirit of people seeking to improve their situation by imposing arbitrary third-party constraints. America’s unemployment problems linger because hustlers cannot hustle. For many, “hustling” connotes business activity that is shady, or even illegal. But in the munity it...
Video: Rev. Robert A. Sirico on Christian Poverty
If you weren’t able to join us in person for the inaugural lecture of the 2011 Acton Lecture Series, fear not: today, we’re pleased to present Rev. Robert A. Sirico’s “Christian Poverty in the Age of Prosperity” for our loyal PowerBlog readers. The lecture was delivered on February 3rd at the Waters Building here in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The next lecture in the 2011 Acton Lecture Series takes place on March 16 and features Peter Greer, President of HOPE International....
Some Thoughts on Social Media and Publishing
After hearing about an established Christian publisher recently launching an official blog for their products, I did some thinking about the relationship between the traditional publication outlets and social media. I’m sure that traditional publishers have a relatively large budget for print advertising, but it seems that they are very slow to hire professionals to do serious social media work, blogging, and online advertising. This seems true at least in the academic markets and relative to their print marketing outreach....
Hunter Baker Wins 2011 Novak Award
I’m pleased to report that Hunter Baker is the recipient of the 2011 Novak Award from the Acton Institute. Hunter is associate dean of arts and sciences and associate professor of political science at Union University in Jackson, Tenn., and author of The End of Secularism (Crossway Academic, 2009). From the release: With his writing and speaking in a variety of popular and academic contexts, Dr. Hunter Baker has made pelling prehensive case for the integration of the Christian faith...
Reagan Centennial Roundup
Rev. Robert Sirico, president and co-founder of the Acton Institute called Ronald Reagan a “sunny warrior for freedom” with “a clear sense of moral priority.” mentary was written a day after the former president’s death in 2004. If you walk into the Acton office you might notice a photo of Rev. Sirico and Acton executive director and co-founder Kris Mauren with Reagan at his former office in Century City, California. He holds a visible imprint at Acton. Sunday is Ronald...
Acton Lecture Series 2010: Sirico & Ballor
Wrapping up our recap of last year’s Acton Lecture Series, today we present two additional lectures for your enjoyment. The first was delivered in April of 2010 by Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico, and was entitled “Does Social Justice Require Socialism?” In this lecture, Sirico examined the increasing calls for government intervention in financial market regulation, health care, education reform, and economic stimulus in the name of “social justice”. And finally, we present Jordan Ballor’s lecture from July of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved