Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
We Need a Menaissance
We Need a Menaissance
Mar 28, 2026 1:32 PM

This bit in this week’s Telegraph nails something I’ve been wrangling with for a while. Maybe you men out there can relate:

Many men believe the world is now dominated by women and that they have lost their role in society, fuelling feelings of depression and being undervalued. Research shows the extent to which men have had to change within one or two generations, adapting to new rules and different expectations. Asked what it meant to be a man in the 21st century, more than half thought society was turning them into “waxed and coiffed metrosexuals”, and 52 per cent say they had to live according to women’s rules. What they apparently want is what some American academics have dubbed a “menaissance” – a return to manliness, where figures such as Sir Winston Churchill were models of manhood.

It’s not a “feminization” thing really, and to push back here isn’t being chauvinistic. Most guys are cool with being softer around the edges especially when we connect it to loving our wives and daughters in ways that are meaningful to them.

But our culture has fallen into the trap of thinking husbands are supposed to love the way they do. We’re supposed to be our wife’s best girlfriend, with a winkie and chest hair added as a bonus. After all, we rationalize, it’s our wives who understand what love is all about, and men who don’t climb on board their way of thinking are dufuses or oafs and are certainly not interested in the relationship…

But that doesn’t really cut it, does it guys.

A girlfriend that sometimes leaves the toilet seat up? That’s not what you really want either, is it gals.

A brother in our church’s men’s group stuck a copy of Emerson Eggerichs Love & Respect in my hands a couple months ago. Was up most of the night reading it. Also listened to an audio interview by James “What Wives Wished Their Husbands Knew About Women” Dobson, who essentially smacked himself in the forehead for promoting the husbands-must-think-like-wives mantra for so long that he missed the obvious.

It’s the point that the Telegraph’s reporterette finally gets to at the bottom of her article cited above:

Harvey Mansfield, a Harvard professor and America’s best known political philosopher, who tackles the topic in his book Manliness, says the issue is ignored. “A man has to be embarrassed about being a man. I am trying to bring back the word manliness. It’s not respected,” he said.

Men, says Eggerichs, are built for honor and respect. It’s as much our “love language” as when our wives wish we’d listen to them talk about their day or – hubba hubba – do the dishes or laundry.

In my grandad’s generation it was all about respect. Since then our wives rightfully received more fairness in the workplace (not always of course) and elsewhere in society thanks to women’s rights movements. It should be this way. mands men to love our ladies in an understanding way, which means husbands do have a loving obligation to get inside their wives’ lovely heads and find out what their language of love is municate that love to them constantly and passionately.

But when’s the last time you heard any Christian authority figure – any marriage authority for that matter – suggest that wives should be reciprocating by letting her husband know every day that she honors and respects him above all the other people in her life? Our modern culture has gotten too afraid of viewing Paul’s admonition “wives, honor your husbands” as a pretense to domestic abuse [of course, “husbands, love your wives” stays on the table!]. And let’s face it, guys – we don’t expect to be honored anymore. We’d rather just suck it up than make it an issue.

Because of this we’ve denied families and society in general the benefit of strong, confident men who are strengthened daily by the honoring, affirming love guys can relate to.

Since I’m already probably in trouble here, let me run down Eggerich’s list of ways to build up men [source of this list and the women’s list here]:

Conquest – Appreciate his desire to work and achieve

Heirarchy – Appreciate his desire to protect and provide

Authority – Appreciate his desire to serve and lead

Insight – Appreciate his desire to analyze and counsel

Relationship – Appreciate his desire for shoulder-to-shoulder friendship

Sexuality – Appreciate his desire for sexual intimacy

Guys, I don’t know if this is registering with you at all, but it sure did with me. Before this I assumed the sort of love she needed to thrive was supposed to be OK for me too. After reading this list (chapters, etc) I realized why it was sorta like wearing a women’s blouse: It doesn’t fit quite right and the buttons button the wrong way.

Er, not that I, uh; well anyway…

I was also relieved to discover that my propensity to solve problems and lean into concerns about providing for my family were not failings I had to “get over” but God-given tools that I needed to learn how to use properly. Doesn’t relieve me of the responsibility to learn what makes her tick, but knowing what makes me tick helps a lot.

For you ladies out there, let me offer you pliment, then a bit of unsolicited advice:

– You already know an awful lot about what your needs, wants and desires are, and are intuitively smarter at this relationship thing than we are.

– Your man wasn’t built to be your girlfriend. Stop treating him like one. If you’ll forgive me for saying so, you probably treat your girlfriends with more respect. Make it as important to you to figure out what makes him feel honored as it is to get him to understand what makes you feel loved.

Maybe with all of us working together, a menaissance – and a revival of loving, respect-filled and strong marriages – is in the offering.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Moral Calculus of Climate Change
I was thinking this morning about the moral calculus that goes into discussions about climate change policy. It’s the case that for any even or action, there are an infinite number of causes (conditions that are necessary but not sufficient for the event to occur). But only a finite number of causes, perhaps in most cases a single cause, can have any moral relevance. For a cause to be a moral cause, it has to have be related to a...
‘Soul-Killing Collectivism’
I like to think of J. Gresham Machen as the American Presbyterian Chesterton — though he is sometimes more explicit in his mentary than his British Catholic counterpart. In my Sunday reading, I ing across interesting lines from his selected shorter writings (edited by D.G. Hart) that call to mind current campaign rhetoric, especially from senators Obama and Clinton, about the need for expanded or universal preschool and state-subsidized education in general. Here are a few quotes from Machen’s 1933...
‘Business flight will hurt Arabs’
Acton’s Sam Gregg looks at the plight of Middle Eastern Christians in ‘Business flight will hurt Arabs,’ mentary published today in The Australian. Their plight is also the Middle East’s loss as the continuing out migration of Christians saps the economic vitality and entrepreneurial spirit of the region. Sam asks: So where are these Christian migrants going? The vast majority are migrating mercially oriented, business-friendly countries such as the US and Australia. In 2002, 63 per cent of Arab-Americans identified...
The Truth about Force in Reconciliation
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in post-apartheid South Africa has been hailed as the standard for working for restorative justice in the contemporary world. One of the misunderstandings surrounding the work of mission, however, involves the relationship between the forgiveness, reconciliation, and amnesty offered by mission in relation to the coercive power of the state. David Schmidtz, in his recent book Elements of Justice, writes, South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission set out in 1995 to document human rights...
National Urban League Conference Must Address Critical Issues
The National Urban League forgot to invite me to be one of the keynote speakers at their annual conference meeting in St. Louis this week, July 25-28. I’m not mad. I’m sure it was just an oversight. I would have been much cheaper than Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards. But, if had a platform at the conference I would make the case that black America will self-destruct if we don’t address the following issues immediately: (1) The marriage...
Bonaventure, A Defence of the Mendicants
Readings in Social Ethics: Bonaventure, A Defence of the Mendicants (selections), in From Irenaeus to Grotius: A Sourcebook in Christian Political Thought 100-1625, ed. Oliver O’Donovan and Joan Lockwood O’Donovan, pp. 312-19. The references below are to section number. Bonaventure cites a number of authorities in his exposition, including Augustine, Jerome, Bede, Rabanus Maurus, Gregory the Great, and Bernard of Clairvaux.The apostolic way of life is described as consisting in “models of perfection,” and therefore imposing “no obligation on those...
There’s A Joke In Here Somewhere…
…But far be it from me to make it. Fortunately, Spiegel Online does all the joking for us. Headline: Tiny Brain No Problem for French Tax Official. monly spouted wisdom that people only use 10 percent of their brain power may have been dismissed as a myth, but one French man seems to be managing fine with just a small fraction of his actual brain. In fact the man, who works as a civil servant in southern France, has succeeded...
Marxist Narrative and the Rule of Law
If you haven’t checked out this piece in the most recent issue of Religion & Liberty, you owe it to yourself to do so: “The Leaky Bucket: Why Conservatives Need to Learn the Art of Story,” by David Michael Phelps. In this essay, Phelps makes the claim, “While conservativism is now a powerful force in the American political landscape, it is still the underdog in a war of connotation. (This is evident in the fact that the phrase passionate conservative’...
Call of the…
Garbling difficult (and sometimes easy) words is mon and often humorous occurrence among children, as any parent can attest. My daughter did so serendipitously the other day, pronouncing Acton’s film production as “The Call of the Entre-manure.” As chance would have it—and as those who have seen the film or its trailer know—one of the documentary’s stories is about a dairy farmer who turned his animals’ waste into a profitable business. I wondered if Brad Morgan might like to take...
Tony Snow in CT
In the July issue of Christianity Today, White House spokesman Tony Snow offers a moving account of his struggle with colon cancer in “Cancer’s Unexpected Blessings.” Snow, who delivered the keynote speech at the 2001 Acton Annual Dinner, wrote this in response to CT’s question about “the spiritual lessons he has been learning through the ordeal.”: The moment you enter the Valley of the Shadow of Death, things change. You discover that Christianity is not something doughy, passive, pious, and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved