Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Vouchers: the progressive policy loved by the right and hated by the left
Vouchers: the progressive policy loved by the right and hated by the left
Jul 1, 2025 7:55 PM

Growing up, I attended a private, Christian school until 4th grade, when my mother couldn’t afford it any more and my brothers and I switched to a blue collar, suburban public school. Academically, I experienced a clear difference. The worst contrast was in math, where I learned basically nothing for three years. The only subject that was probably better at the public school was science, but I’m not even certain about that. Class sizes were larger too.

None of this is to say that I didn’t have good teachers and experiences and learn a great many things at my public school. I did, and I’m quite thankful for it, in fact. And, of course, private schools are perfectly capable of employing bad teachers and failing to properly educate their students. But this was my experience.

So in high school, for purely anecdotal and self-interested reasons, I supported school vouchers, much to the chagrin of many of my teachers. (There was a state level proposal in the 2000 Michigan election in support of vouchers that I wore a button supporting — I wasn’t old enough to vote at the time. Incidentally, the proposal failed.) After all, I thought, I might not have e such a slacker if I had continued to be challenged in my public school like I was in my private school.

With the recent appointment of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education by president-elect Donald Trump, vouchers may e a national issue. She has championed the cause and supported politicians who do for years.

Able now to take a less self-interested look at the issue (or so I tell myself), I’m actually a bit confused by the politics of vouchers — why isn’t there more skepticism on the right and support on the left?

Sure, the left generally supports public sector teachers unions. Vouchers would introduce petition into the K-12 market that would threaten the public school partial monopoly and thus the power and pull of those unions.

People on the left often will plain that some schools will fail if they lose students and, thus, funding. But people on the right tend to say, “Good. Failing schools should fail! Those students deserve better, petition will motivate improved educational quality. The public schools that already do a good job don’t have anything to worry about, only the bad ones.” So on that level, the left’s opposition and the right’s support for vouchers (speaking generally, of course) makes sense.

But that’s only one angle. Vouchers do petition, but they also increase the potential for government influence. When tuition es from the state, the state can attach strings. Those who hope this could be a boon for private schools may find that if, purely hypothetically, vouchers became universal, down the line the very thing that helped these schools and families in the short term is used as a channel to manipulate them and undermine their sovereignty.

It’s not as if we haven’t recently seen religious organizations like the Little Sisters of the Poor have to fight all the way up to the US Supreme Court just to prove that they should qualify for a religious exemption to the Affordable Care Act. Do we want religious schools across the country to have to fight the same battles, with equal uncertainty of success?

Add to this the fact that for Betsy DeVos (again, only hypothetically at this point — she hasn’t proposed anything yet) to mandate vouchers from her post as Secretary of Education would be a hugely top-down move, violating state’s rights in determining education policy.

So why aren’t more people on the right skeptical?

But that’s not all. There’s another angle to this as well: Vouchers work by redistributing resources from the upper classes (primarily through e and property taxes) to the lower classes. They are explicitly aimed at fighting economic inequality, not only by providing funding but through the goal of better educational es, which in turn correlate with higher es. It reduces the privilege of the privileged. Sounds pretty progressive to me.

So why don’t more people on the left support them?

A libertarian might interject that a better solution would be not using public funding to pick winners and losers in K-12 education in the first place. Just privatize all public schools and stop taxing people! I’m sympathetic to this, but it seems that there should at least be some minimal safety net available for those who, in those circumstances, wouldn’t be able to afford schooling for their kids at all (and truancy is currently illegal anyway). I’m not willing to live with the consequences of doing nothing, even if the results for many would improve. Not only does every child deserve an education — God made our minds to grow in knowledge — but having an educated citizenry is a public good as well.

So where does that leave me? Confused. Or, at least, conflicted.

I do think students from lower e families, especially those stuck in failing public schools, should have more options, and vouchers might be the best, most realistic policy to make that happen. We shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good, after all. But it would be imprudent to ignore the potential negatives on many levels. In particular, a national mandate for vouchers would open the door for national meddling in private education.

Perhaps one could say that private schools need not accept vouchers. In this way, they could prevent themselves from being held hostage by a secular agenda attached to tuition and maintain their sovereignty. But those who did so would be at a clear market disadvantage as artificially created as the current public school monopoly. They would need to (1) charge students more, (2) decrease costs by increasing class sizes or decreasing staff salaries, or (3) increase donations. The first would, of course, lead to excluding more low e students. The second would decrease education quality. And the third might not be feasible.

Further, presuming private schools may hold differing views about any potential conditions placed on voucher funding — some being content ply, some pliance a betrayal of principle, depending on the requirement — those who passed on vouchers would be in a more disadvantaged market position than private schools currently are in states and localities without voucher programs.

Think, for example, of how most Catholic schools teach evolution in biology classes but some Evangelical schools and others do not. If teaching evolution were made a requirement for receiving voucher dollars, the Evangelical schools would be at a huge disadvantage. (This, interestingly, is precisely the opposite of the worry of many on the left that with vouchers taxpayer money might be used to fund schools that teach intelligent design.) Vouchers could, thus, introduce economic incentives promising one’s principles that would otherwise have been absent.

So my final answer is that I don’t have an answer. Not only isn’t this a clear-cut issue to me, but I’m confused as to how the political divide on the issue isn’t plicated. I’m interested to see what Betsy DeVos will do as Secretary of Education and even cautiously optimistic that there are many things she could do to improve K-12 education, not to mention higher ed.

But at the very least, I’d like to see more democratic support for vouchers and more testing at local and state levels before making this a national issue.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Legatus: Celebrating 25 Years of Supporting Catholic Business Professionals
Legatus, an international organization of Catholic business professionals, is celebrating its 25th year of existence. The mission of Legatus is to help its members and spouses live out their Catholic faith and to spread that faith “through good works, good ideas, and high ethical standards.” The current issue of Legatus magazine features an article by the Acton Institute’s Michael Matheson Miller, research fellow and director of Acton media. Entitled ‘Poverty, social justice, and the role of business’, Miller points out...
Natural Law and Winter’s Bone
I was privileged to participate this week in a conference at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, hosted by the Division for Roman Law and Legal History, “Law and Religion: The Legal Teachings of the Protestant and Catholic Reformations.” My paper today was titled, “Natural Law and Subsidiarity in Early Modern Reformed Perspective.” In this paper I explore some of the theological context in the sixteenth century among Reformed theologians like Wolfgang Musculus, Peter Martyr Vermigli, Jerome Zanchi, and Franciscus Junius that...
You Can Keep Preaching About Tax Fairness, Mr. King, But Cut a Check First
Novelist Stephen King recently added his voice to the chorus of superrich clamoring to be taxed more. He knows his critics will call for him to “Cut a check and shut up,” but King says he’s not going to be keep quiet. He believes he and other uberwealthy citizens have a moral imperative to pay more. Clive Cook has a solution that should satisfy both sides of the issue. As Cook says, “it’s childishly simple once you recognize that two...
Samuel Gregg: Europe’s Right in Disarray
France elected a new president yesterday, the socialist Francois Hollande who has vowed to rein in “Anglo-Saxon” capitalism and dramatically raise taxes on the “rich.” Voters turned out Nicholas Sarkozy, the flamboyant conservative whose five-year term was undermined by Europe’s economic crisis, his paparazzi-worthy lifestyle and bative personality. But Sarkozy’s defeat exposes “a crisis of identity and purpose that presently afflicts much of Europe’s center-right,” according to Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg in a new analysis on The American Spectator....
Teachers are Blessing this World Today
“The two most powerful forces in your life are your thoughts and your words.” — Thomas McDaniels When I ponder this quote, I can’t help but think back to the teachers in my life. After all, they were the ones who taught me to read, write, think, and present ideas clearly. They equipped me to harness these “powerful forces” as I now go into the world to bless others. During Teacher Appreciation Week, it is appropriate to think about the...
Victor Claar on Trade
Is ‘fair’ trade really more fair or more just than free trade? Does fair trade create an unfair advantage that hurts the poor more than it helps? There are two different opportunities over the next few days where you can have the chance to explore this topic further. Acton will be hosting Professor Claar for an online discussion tomorrow, May 9, at 6:00pm ET. In the AU Online session of his popular lecture Fair Trade vs. Free Trade, he will...
Why the Federalist Papers Still Matter
Even at America’s top schools, says Peter Berkowitz, graduates leave without reading our most basic writings on the purpose of constitutional self-government: It would be difficult to overstate the significance of The Federalist for understanding the principles of American government and the challenges that liberal democracies confront early in the second decade of the 21st century. Yet despite the lip service they pay to liberal education, our leading universities can’t be bothered to require students to study The Federalist—or, worse,...
Acton on Tap: Calvin Coolidge and the Spirit of Federalism
When es to the presidency, there are times when historians find the need to reevaluate a president. Often it is because of a crisis, war, or other current events. I can think of no other president that needs to be reassessed more than Calvin Coolidge. Thankfully, Amity Shlaes has written a new biography of Coolidge that will be available next month. Coolidge preceded a progressive era and fought not just to shrink government, which he did successfully, but harnessed the...
Kishore Jayabalan: Vatican Radio interview on French election
On May 15, Socialist Francois Hollande will be sworn in as France’s new President following elections this past weekend. According to Vatican Radio, Hollande is vowing to overturn many of current President’s Sarkozy’s economic reforms, in an attempt to relieve France’s current debt crisis. One of Hollande’s goals is to increase taxation on millionaires to 75 percent. With more than a quarter of a million French citizens already working in London, this type of heavy taxation may cause an exodus...
A Field Guide to the Baseless Claims and Outrageous Canards of the Liberal-Progressive
Review of The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas, by Jonah Goldberg, (New York, NY: Sentinel, 2012) With proper training, and maybe a bit of experience on the debate team, it’s easy to recognize logical fallacies in an opponent’s argument. When es to popular give and take, the sort of thing we have so much of now on opinion websites and news channels, there hasn’t been decent preparation for arguments outside the columns and blog...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved