Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Vouchers: the progressive policy loved by the right and hated by the left
Vouchers: the progressive policy loved by the right and hated by the left
Jul 13, 2024 6:38 PM

Growing up, I attended a private, Christian school until 4th grade, when my mother couldn’t afford it any more and my brothers and I switched to a blue collar, suburban public school. Academically, I experienced a clear difference. The worst contrast was in math, where I learned basically nothing for three years. The only subject that was probably better at the public school was science, but I’m not even certain about that. Class sizes were larger too.

None of this is to say that I didn’t have good teachers and experiences and learn a great many things at my public school. I did, and I’m quite thankful for it, in fact. And, of course, private schools are perfectly capable of employing bad teachers and failing to properly educate their students. But this was my experience.

So in high school, for purely anecdotal and self-interested reasons, I supported school vouchers, much to the chagrin of many of my teachers. (There was a state level proposal in the 2000 Michigan election in support of vouchers that I wore a button supporting — I wasn’t old enough to vote at the time. Incidentally, the proposal failed.) After all, I thought, I might not have e such a slacker if I had continued to be challenged in my public school like I was in my private school.

With the recent appointment of Betsy DeVos as Secretary of Education by president-elect Donald Trump, vouchers may e a national issue. She has championed the cause and supported politicians who do for years.

Able now to take a less self-interested look at the issue (or so I tell myself), I’m actually a bit confused by the politics of vouchers — why isn’t there more skepticism on the right and support on the left?

Sure, the left generally supports public sector teachers unions. Vouchers would introduce petition into the K-12 market that would threaten the public school partial monopoly and thus the power and pull of those unions.

People on the left often will plain that some schools will fail if they lose students and, thus, funding. But people on the right tend to say, “Good. Failing schools should fail! Those students deserve better, petition will motivate improved educational quality. The public schools that already do a good job don’t have anything to worry about, only the bad ones.” So on that level, the left’s opposition and the right’s support for vouchers (speaking generally, of course) makes sense.

But that’s only one angle. Vouchers do petition, but they also increase the potential for government influence. When tuition es from the state, the state can attach strings. Those who hope this could be a boon for private schools may find that if, purely hypothetically, vouchers became universal, down the line the very thing that helped these schools and families in the short term is used as a channel to manipulate them and undermine their sovereignty.

It’s not as if we haven’t recently seen religious organizations like the Little Sisters of the Poor have to fight all the way up to the US Supreme Court just to prove that they should qualify for a religious exemption to the Affordable Care Act. Do we want religious schools across the country to have to fight the same battles, with equal uncertainty of success?

Add to this the fact that for Betsy DeVos (again, only hypothetically at this point — she hasn’t proposed anything yet) to mandate vouchers from her post as Secretary of Education would be a hugely top-down move, violating state’s rights in determining education policy.

So why aren’t more people on the right skeptical?

But that’s not all. There’s another angle to this as well: Vouchers work by redistributing resources from the upper classes (primarily through e and property taxes) to the lower classes. They are explicitly aimed at fighting economic inequality, not only by providing funding but through the goal of better educational es, which in turn correlate with higher es. It reduces the privilege of the privileged. Sounds pretty progressive to me.

So why don’t more people on the left support them?

A libertarian might interject that a better solution would be not using public funding to pick winners and losers in K-12 education in the first place. Just privatize all public schools and stop taxing people! I’m sympathetic to this, but it seems that there should at least be some minimal safety net available for those who, in those circumstances, wouldn’t be able to afford schooling for their kids at all (and truancy is currently illegal anyway). I’m not willing to live with the consequences of doing nothing, even if the results for many would improve. Not only does every child deserve an education — God made our minds to grow in knowledge — but having an educated citizenry is a public good as well.

So where does that leave me? Confused. Or, at least, conflicted.

I do think students from lower e families, especially those stuck in failing public schools, should have more options, and vouchers might be the best, most realistic policy to make that happen. We shouldn’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good, after all. But it would be imprudent to ignore the potential negatives on many levels. In particular, a national mandate for vouchers would open the door for national meddling in private education.

Perhaps one could say that private schools need not accept vouchers. In this way, they could prevent themselves from being held hostage by a secular agenda attached to tuition and maintain their sovereignty. But those who did so would be at a clear market disadvantage as artificially created as the current public school monopoly. They would need to (1) charge students more, (2) decrease costs by increasing class sizes or decreasing staff salaries, or (3) increase donations. The first would, of course, lead to excluding more low e students. The second would decrease education quality. And the third might not be feasible.

Further, presuming private schools may hold differing views about any potential conditions placed on voucher funding — some being content ply, some pliance a betrayal of principle, depending on the requirement — those who passed on vouchers would be in a more disadvantaged market position than private schools currently are in states and localities without voucher programs.

Think, for example, of how most Catholic schools teach evolution in biology classes but some Evangelical schools and others do not. If teaching evolution were made a requirement for receiving voucher dollars, the Evangelical schools would be at a huge disadvantage. (This, interestingly, is precisely the opposite of the worry of many on the left that with vouchers taxpayer money might be used to fund schools that teach intelligent design.) Vouchers could, thus, introduce economic incentives promising one’s principles that would otherwise have been absent.

So my final answer is that I don’t have an answer. Not only isn’t this a clear-cut issue to me, but I’m confused as to how the political divide on the issue isn’t plicated. I’m interested to see what Betsy DeVos will do as Secretary of Education and even cautiously optimistic that there are many things she could do to improve K-12 education, not to mention higher ed.

But at the very least, I’d like to see more democratic support for vouchers and more testing at local and state levels before making this a national issue.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Video: Todd Huizinga on Russia and Ukraine.
Todd Huizinga, Acton Institute’s director of international outreach, was a guest analyst recently on Newsmakers, a public affairs program produced by WGVU television in Grand Rapids, Mich. Episode description from Aug. 22: “As tensions heighten between Russia and Ukraine, what is Russian President Vladimir Putin’s worldview and what role does Ukraine play in it? How has the shoot down of Malaysia Airline flight 17 killing 298 on board changed the dynamics of the conflict? We explore the internal and external...
Notes on the Question of Inequality
French economist Thomas Piketty This summer’s issue of The City, which includes an article by myself on Orthodoxy and ordered liberty, opens with a symposium of five articles on “The Question of Inequality.” These include two articles on Pope Francis, two on French economist Thomas Piketty’s recent bookCapital in the Twenty-First Century, and one on the Bible. Having recently written a two part article on the subject for the Library of Law & Liberty (here and here), I took copious...
Video: Sirico Discusses Multiculturalism on Cavuto
Acton Institute President Rev. Robert A. Sirico made an appearance on Thursday afternoon on Fox News Channel’s Your World with Neal Cavuto. Recently, Cavuto has been addressing the topic of multiculturalism in recent shows, featuring guests like Nigel Farage, leader of the UK Independence Party in Great Britian, and Alveda King, niece of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., both of whom share deep concerns about the impact of multicultural philosophy and policy on our cultural cohesion. Yesterday, Neil Cavuto asked...
7 Figures: Prevalence of Violence Against Children
The UNICEF report Hidden in Plain Sight, which draws on the pilation of data on violence against children, reveals the disturbing prevalence of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse of children around the globe. According to the report the effects of violence on children are often lasting and have inter-generational repercussions. Findings reveal that exposed children are more likely to e unemployed, live in poverty, and be violent towards others. The authors of the report note that the data is derived...
Helping No One By Being Socially Aware And Active
If you were told by your doctor to lose weight, you’d likely do what most people do: exercise more and eat healthier food. Jason Scott Jones and John Zmirak have a better plan in mind: Step 1: Start a fitness blog, collecting the best arguments you can find against obesity. Step 2: Comb the Bible, Pope Francis’ Tweets, and the work of your fellow bloggers, for the choicest quotes on the deadly sin of Gluttony. Then post them in ments...
‘Helping Families:’ Let The Government Have Your Kids
Universal daycare. Universal preschool. Regulations on school lunches. Bans on bake sales. Don’t bring ibuprofen to school. The government knows all about keeping your kids safe and educated. (And the underlying note is that you don’t know enough.) In yesterday’s New York Times, law professor Clare Huntington extols the virtues of government child-rearing. While she does acknowledge that families are the “ultimate” preschool, she quickly recovers by adding that our society just makes things too darn hard for parents to...
Kill The Girls, Traffick The Girls
India’s culture, like many others, prefers boys. Not only do they carry on the family name, they don’t cost the family a dowry. (Dowries are officially outlawed in India, but the practice continues.) There is a cottage industry in India of ultrasound machines: if it’s a boy, celebrate! If it’s a girl….the response is often abortion, and “try again.” Like China, India is now suffering the consequences of gendercide. There are not enough brides for the young men of India....
How to Turn Corn into Cars
Imagine if a scientist was able to create technology that turns corn into cars. As economist Bryan Caplan explains, we already have such an innovation: foreign trade. Caplan argues that foreign trade is a form of technology that lowers our cost of living and increases our standard of living. In fact, claims Caplan, from a broader perspective trade is even better than most technology since it not only makes us better off, it makes foreigners better off too. ...
Where Have All The Children Gone?
Journalist Sharyl Attkisson, on Newsmax TV’s “The Steve Malzberg Show,” discusses how the Obama Administration has refused to release information regarding the tens of thousands of illegal immigrant children who have entered the U.S. recently. These children are being sent to munities across the country for shelter and education, but Attkisson says that facts about where the children are going, how much its costing, and other pertinent public information is hard e by. Attkisson discusses the situation in the clip...
Should Prisons Be Purgatorial?
“If Christians cannot help prisoners find meaning behind bars,” wonders Stephen H. Webb, “how can they expect the Gospel to find an audience among those never convicted of a crime?” At First Things, Webb argues that revival of Christianity will e when we reform America’s prisons: Prisoners are test cases of how Christians deal with sinners in extremis. I don’t just mean passion for the imprisoned can serve as a corroboration of Christian charity, although that is surely true. I...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved