Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Tyranny, by any other name
Tyranny, by any other name
Aug 23, 2025 7:25 PM

Not only does tyranny like to hide behind an unintelligible mass of bureaucratic phrases, but it disguises itself with pleasing and pleasant words.

Read More…

Many of us have noticed a trend toward the political misuse of words, both in legacy media and on social media. This isn’t a modern trend.

In the 6th century B.C., the prophet Jeremiah denounced this same practice among his kinsmen, vividly portraying their deceptive verbal gymnastics as bending the tongue like a bow. They were a society that twisted their speech to fit wicked pursuits. “Everyone deceives his neighbor,” Jeremiah cried, “and no one speaks the truth; they have taught their tongue to speak lies” (9:5).

In 1814, a Virginian farmer by the name of John Taylor of Caroline began to notice this tendency intensifying in the halls of Congress and beyond. A true localist at heart, Taylor identified so strongly with his home in Caroline County, Virginia, that the name of his county has been widely affixed to his own. Though he served his nation as a colonel, senator, and farmer, Taylor’s true genius lay in political philosophy, where he became known as the intellectual engine behind Jeffersonian Republicanism.

In his classic book Tyranny Unmasked, published in 1814, Taylor describes the same misrepresentation of words that Jeremiah once decried and specifically identifies it with the onset of tyranny. In his day, he specifically called out fiscal terms: “declamation represents frugality as niggardly and base; and flattery calls extravagance, liberal and exalted.” The definitions of terms were being twisted in political speech to push an agenda.

“We cannot condescend,” Taylor writes elsewhere, “to enter the lists with the wicked artifice of destroying nations by a fraudulent use of words and phrases…because a nation, capable of being subdued by these feeble instruments, is incapable of liberty, as a man is of long life, who can be persuaded to hold out his throat to the knife of an assassin, lest he should cut it himself.”

Just as policemen protect our towns, each American is thus tasked with patrolling our nation with vigilance, keeping watch against threats to usurp constitutional liberty and the rule of law. In the above quotation, Taylor contrasts this civic ideal with a story of a different and dangerous man – one so timid, so obliging that he would rather make a murderer’s job easy than confront the evil standing before him. Far from a noble self-sacrifice, such an act betrays both his own duty and the lives of the innocent who he is charged to protect. It is a stark metaphor for a seemingly simple act: The acceptance of false definitions and meek acquiescence to terminological perversion.

Over a century after John Taylor of Caroline, George Orwell cautioned his audience about this same threat of dishonest words. “The person who uses them,” he specifically warns, “has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to think he means something quite different.” This deception is designed to be hard to identify. But if unrecognized and unchallenged, the integrity of discourse takes another blow.

Say you pass the first test, refusing to yield to an intentional twisting of words. Well done. Yet a second trap awaits: the disguising of tyrannical ideas behind a host of beautiful sounds. “The hooks of fraud and tyranny,” Taylor booms, “are universally baited with melodious words. Fine words are used to decoy, and ugly words to affright.”

Taylor is encouraging us to keep an eye out for verbal rose-colored smokescreens that are rooted in deceit. Not only does tyranny like to hide behind an unintelligible mass of bureaucratic phrases, but it disguises itself with pleasing and pleasant words. For instance, how could someone dare to attack a phrase such as “bold, ambitious, transformational, economy-wide legislation,” or the passage of a law that is called “an economic imperative, a moral obligation?”

Strip the fluff and sugar away, and you might find that a friendly smile hides grim despotism. Tyranny often conceals itself behind a verbal mask – it is our duty to peek behind the words to discern the actions, genial though they may be.

Why have Americans been susceptible to these control tactics since the time of John Taylor? Are we merely naïve creatures that are so easily duped by a pretty turn of phrase? I might be over-confident, but I think we deserve more credit than that. Taylor pinpoints over-abundant generosity as the problem, a friendly and natural faith in authority that can be used against us. Uncritical trust in the truthfulness of leaders – whether they be professors, journalists, or politicians – is no civic duty, but a shirking of responsibility. In the name of trust, we offer up our necks to be sliced by a deceptive legislative saber.

Our challenge, then, is to build our own capacity for analytical political awareness. When you discuss politics with a friend (or an enemy), speak slowly and prudently. When you use a consequential term – the phrases “human right,” “equality,” and “moral e to mind – are your words philosophically and etymologically correct, or have you inserted your own definition? Not all such errors are of Taylor’s fraudulent variety, yet even unconscious mistakes carry sinister ramifications. Hold yourself to a high standard in your speech. Hold your leaders to an even higher one.

Finally, approach any political message with a healthy measure of skepticism. Realize that the more wordy plicated a speech, bill, or lecture is, the more dangerous it may be. Even roadkill may taste fine if it is deep-fried and coated in spices, so beware the heart-warming platitudes, folksy yet ambiguous metaphors, and broad moral appeals that may mask a deceptive message.

We are in an age of political discourse that seeks to trip, ensnare, and demolish rather than listen and debate. Thus, understanding the verbal tactics of tyranny is crucial to avoiding personal demolition. Widespread recognition of them will serve to check the masked and creeping onslaught of tyranny itself.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
HBO’s ‘Chernobyl‘: A scathing rebuke of Soviet secrecy
In case you missed it, the final episode of the highly acclaimed five-part HBO miniseries “Chernobyl” aired last night. When the credits rolled, I let out a pent-up breath that I didn’t know that I was holding in and slumped back in my seat, finally able to relax. The show was over, but the weightiness of its message and atmosphere lingered on, sticking with me even as I laid down to sleep. “Chernobyl” dramatizes the events leading up to and...
What Christians should know about recessions
Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post. What it means: The economy shifts from periods of increasing economic activity, known as economic expansions, to periods of decreasing economic activity, known as recessions. This is known as the business cycle and includes four phases: expansion, peak, contraction, and trough. An expansion is a period between a trough and a peak, and a recession is...
Providence magazine reviews Kuyper’s ‘On Islam’
Last year, in collaboration with the Abraham Kuyper Translation Society, the Acton Institute and Lexham Press teamed together to publish On Islam. The latest in the 12-volume series Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology details Kuyper’s observations while traveling in the Mediterranean. At Providence magazine, Tim Scheiderer reviews On Islam and considers Kuyper’s Christian advice for foreign policy: In the bookOn Islam, the Acton Institute has translated into English for the first time portions from Abraham Kuyper’s larger work,Om...
When the Federal Reserve does too much
Note: This is post #123 in a weekly video series on basic economics. “If you think through all of the variables that shape a country’s economy, it’s no wonder that monetary policy is difficult,” says economist Alex Tabarrok. “It should e as no surprise that the Federal Reserve doesn’t always get it right. In fact, sometimes the Fed’s actions have made the economy worse off.” In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Tabarrok shows what happens when the Fed promotes...
Capitalism and the opportunity for a more united conservative front
Last week the Heritage Foundation hosted an event featuring Samuel Gregg, the Acton Institute’s director of research, in which he highlighted the importance of providing not only an economic justification for capitalism but also a moral justification. At Juicy Ecumenism, Mia Steupert considers Gregg’s talk in light of the recent debate among conservatives: Gregg discussed this topic in the framework ofAlexis De TocquevilleandMichael mentary on the moral justifications of capitalism. Gregg mainly focused on outlining Novak’s views on the connection...
A new Member of European Parliament exposes Europe’s self-doubt
Last week’s elections for European Parliament swept a bountiful harvest of Euroskeptic thorns into the EU’s side. Among them are the Sweden Democrats; Trey Dimsdale has interviewed successful SD candidate Charlie Weimers for the Acton Line podcast, and Weimers contributes a book review of Kasja Norman’s stirring book Sweden’s Dark Soul: The Unraveling of a Utopia to Acton’s transatlantic website. The book’s evocative opening leads to probing questions of Sweden’s searing self-doubt. Weimers writes: Norman starts the book depicting hundreds...
New study exposes career training cronyism
Last week the Mackinac Center — a think tank that focuses on public policy in Michigan — published a new study: “Workforce Development in Michigan.” The study, authored by Hope College economics professor, Acton research fellow, and Journal of Markets & Morality associate editor Sarah Estelle, examines the wide variety of skills-training and employment programs in the state. As the Mackinac Center put it in their press release, The government has been actively involved in job training since the 1960s,...
The Ahmari/French debate: A reading list
“If you printed out and stacked up every piece written about the dispute between First Things contributor Sohrab Ahmari and National Review writer David French, it wouldn’t quite go up 68,000 miles—that would be the $22 trillion national debt, stacked by ones—but it would be towering nonetheless,” says Matt Welch. For those who are late to the debate and want to catch up, I’ve collected a reading list of articles related to the controversy. I’ve included the original essay by...
The European left and immigration
Danish elections are usually not high on the list of must-watch political contests but the ing election on June 5 is one that I think worth watching. As this Guardian article illustrates, it is distinguished by the fact that the Danish Social Democrats—the main center-left party in Denmark—have revisited and substantially changed their approach to immigration. Under the leadership of Mette Frederiksen, the Danish Social Democrats have broken with the reigning consensus on the European left, essentially adopting many of...
How ‘conservatives’ became the war party
The only thing that can e the stupidity of modern-day progressives like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the 24 people contending for the 2020 presidential nomination of the Democratic Party is an understanding of the price—and the consequences — of the policies that they preach. Progressive policy is expensive, very expensive, and a wise person should be extremely reluctant to spend other people’s money on utopian schemes like the Green New Deal. But people are not wise, and that is why America...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved