Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Years of Living Dishonestly
The Years of Living Dishonestly
Nov 2, 2025 12:08 PM

A bit of honesty, please. The premium network Showtime is airing an original series, The Years of Living Dangerously, which pits such intrepid reporters as Hollywood B-list hotties Jessica Alba, Olivia Munn and America Ferrera against climate-change “deniers.” The May 19 episode featured Ms. Ferrera attempting to grill The Heartland Institute’s James Taylor (full disclosure: Taylor is a professional colleague and cigar buddy) on his efforts to roll back renewable energy standards on a state-by-state basis. On this, more below.

In the meantime, clergy, nuns and other religious shareholders are rending their respective garments over lobbying and political contributions performed panies in which they invest. Never mind the religious shareholders directly benefit from corporate lobbying and political donations, what really matters to them is whether panies’ efforts kowtow to the progressive agenda.

Witness the following religious groups and their 2014 shareholder resolutions submitted to the panies:

Sisters of St. Francis, Lobbying: CVS Caremark Corporation; JPMorgan Chase & Co.Episcopal Church, Lobbying: Comcast CorporationWalden Asset Management, Lobbying: United Parcel Service of North America, Inc.; ConocoPhillips Co.; Google; Time Warner Inc.Oblates of Mary Immaculate, Lobbying: United Parcel ServiceBenedictine Sisters of Mount St. Scholastica: Lobbying, FacebookDomini Social Investments, Political Contributions: JetBlue Airways CorporationUnitarian Universalist Association and Mercy Investment Services, Enhance Board Oversight of Political Contributions: Aetna, Inc.Trillium Asset Management, Political Contributions: Yahoo! Inc.

This leads me back to Ms. Ferrera’s attempted gotcha interview with Taylor. Ferrera loves wind turbines and those who build them, and she just, like, you know, is soooo worried about global warming. To prepare for her showdown with Taylor, Ferrera visits Lisa Graves and Brendan DeMelle. Both dish the dirt on Taylor (turns out he’s a lawyer by education, but just ignore the fact he’s quite the polymath) and his employer, including funding sources for the think tank.

Never mind, of course, that Graves is executive director for the George Soros-funded Center for Media and Democracy and an attorney by reputation. DeMelle is executive editor and managing editor of DeSmogBlog, a website that notoriously published purloined documents from The Heartland Institute in 2012. DeMelle, coincidentally, holds a Bachelor of Arts in Sociology and Environmental Sciences, and his website frequently references Center for Media and Democracy and its affiliate SourceWatch for often incorrect information on who funds climate-change skepticism, which Ms. Ferrera dutifully parrots upon meeting Taylor.

Ferrera, of course, never asks Graves and DeMelle who funds their efforts. Further, she never questions the talking points the pair provides her prior to her confrontation with Taylor. When Taylor tells Ferrera her “facts” are, indeed, anything but, the actress sneers at him with disbelief. However, Graves and DeMelle are given plete pass by Ferrera and, one assumes, the program’s producers, which include film director James Cameron.

The gall displayed by the Showtime producers is much the same as the shareholder activists listed above. The investors aren’t really concerned about lobbying and donations per se, but only ensuring proper issues are furthered. Readers doubting this assertion are encouraged to read about the dozens of resolutions filed over the years by the very same religious pertaining directly to hydraulic fracturing, carbon emissions and genetically modified organisms. Likewise, The Years of Living Dangerously crew isn’t interested in candid debate or even educating their audience. What they and religious shareholder activists hold mon is an affinity for agitprop. A little honesty, please.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Curing What Ails Us: Obamacare
Sally C. Pipes, president of the Pacific Research Institute, is interviewed at National Review regarding her new book, The Cure For Obamacare. NRO’s Kathryn Jean Lopez interviews Pipes about what Obamacare means for the US, and whether or not there is a better way. KATHRYN JEAN LOPEZ: What’s the best answer to the question of what Obamacare means for the life of America? SALLY C. PIPES: Obamacare has just celebrated its three-and-a-half-year anniversary. This is the federal government’s largest entitlement...
Who Are You Calling A Tea Party Catholic?
Catholic Vote interviewed Samuel Gregg, Director of Research at the Acton Institute and author of Tea Party Catholic: The Catholic Case for Limited Government, a Free Economy and Human Flourishing. The five question interview covers the historical Tea Party that the book discusses, Catholic social teaching, and virtuous citizenship, among other topics. Here is an excerpt: Among the Founders, you place a great deal of emphasis upon Charles Carroll of Carrollton. Who was he, and why does he figure so...
Property Rights, Rule of Law, and the Spark of the ‘Arab Spring’
Conversations about economic development often gravitate toward such topics as monetary policy, trade regulation, tax structures, infrastructure, etc. These are critical pieces of the puzzle indeed, but there exist even more ponents of prosperity that are often skipped over. In our interview with Samuel Gregg, director of research at the Acton Institute, he lists a few of the foundational elements of growth: Rule of law is essential if you want to have a functioning economy. You cannot have a functioning...
Millennials in the New Meritocracy: What About Those Left Behind?
This is a guest post by Michael Hendrix, following up on his previous post on the economic challenges of millennials, and my own post on the deeper vocational questions that persist for Christians. Michael serves as the director for emerging issues and research at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington, D.C. He is a graduate of the University of St. Andrews and a Texas native. By Michael Hendrix Twenty years from now, we will see an America where merit...
Letter from Rome: What Kind of Liberal is Pope Francis?
Kishore Jayabalan, Director of Istituto Acton in Rome, has issued his October letter. In it, he discusses the idea of Pope Francis as a “liberal,” especially in light of the pope’s recent interview inAmerica magazine: Much of the controversy over the Pope’s interview reminds me of several Gospel passages, where Jesus is criticized by the Pharisees for healing people on the Sabbath, dining with sinners, not condemning the adulteress, and so on, and especially of the parable of the prodigal...
Little Sisters Join Big Fight for Religious Liberty
The Little Sisters of the Poor are an international congregation of Catholic women religious who serve the elderly poor in over 30 countries around the world. Because they provide health insurance for workers who help them in their cause, the Obama administration is forcing them to help provide their employees with free access to abortion-inducing drugs, sterilizations, and contraceptives. If they refuse, the government is threatening them with multi-million dollar fines. The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty has filed a...
Jim Wallis on the Shutdown: ‘It’s Unbiblical’
Christians are frequently accused of conflating politics and religion. And not surprisingly, Christians like me are often frustrated by such claims. Whenever I hear such slurs my first inclination is to push back by asking who exactly can rightfully be accused of such confusion. Can they name even one person who does that? And then I remember, “Oh yeah, there’s Jim Wallis.” In the 2004 presidential election season, Wallis’ group, Sojourners, put out a bumper sticker with these words: “God...
Limiting Religious Freedom to Limit Religion’s Influence
Challenges to religious freedom are not only ing increasingly mon but are being based on a broader range of social, legal, and political arguments. The one unifying feature of these attacks, claims R.R. Reno, is the desire to limit the influence of religion over public life: In the world envisioned by Obama administration lawyers, churches will have freedom as “houses of worship,” but unless they accept the secular consensus they can’t inspire their adherents to form institutions to educate and...
Awakening Dignity
Solving our intractable domestic and foreign policy crises will require much more that promise and diplomatic maneuvering. Our overextended federal systems and diminished influence abroad are signals of deeper issues. Conservatives press for reduced government and increased personal responsibility. Liberal/Progressive voices argue for better distribution of wealth that creates a just society. Conservatives are troubled by social elites proffering new moral standards even as they advocate for more government involvement in family and personal life in all non-sexual arenas. Liberal/Progressive...
Higher Education and Upward Mobility
Today at Public Discourse, I explore the dubious connection between educational attainment and upward e mobility, arguing instead that a focus on cultivating social capital would be far more effective than the conventional wisdom: “Stay out of trouble and stay in school.” Staying out of trouble is still a good idea, but staying in school — when es to higher education — is ing less and less effective on its own at predicting economic improvement. In addition, while I believe...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved