Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Trial of Jimmy Lai
The Trial of Jimmy Lai
Aug 17, 2025 2:07 AM

Hong Kong’s biggest freedom fighter is about to stand trial. Here’s what you need to know.

Read More…

Jimmy Lai is no ordinary political protester. The 76-year-old Hong Kong entrepreneur and newspaper publisher has sat in solitary confinement in 35-pound handcuffs for more than 1,000 days as he prepares for the trial of his life. On one side are Lai and his defenders. On the other side is the Chinese Communist Party, preparing to keep Jimmy in prison for the rest of his life for the crime of defying Xi Jinping and standing up for democracy in his home, Hong Kong. As the trial begins, here’s the three things you need to know about the CCP’s war against Hong Kong’s most outspoken freedom fighter.

Lai is innocent of any real crime.

Jimmy Lai is being charged under the Chinese Communist Party’s National Security Law (NSL), enacted in 2020 in the wake of pro-democracy protests across Hong Kong. Under the NSL, Lai faces three specific charges: two counts of colluding with foreign countries/elements and one count of colluding with foreign forces. Lai’s pro-democracy work took him beyond the borders of Hong Kong and outside CCP jurisdiction, including meeting with such U.S. officials as Vice President Mike Pence, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in 2019.

The collusion charges against Lai betray the CCP’s true motive: to punish democracy advocates by weaponizing the broad statutes of the NSL. Lai’s only crime, and the only crimes of his colleagues at the Apple Daily newspaper Lai published, is participating in Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. If the CCP can achieve a trial victory over Lai, it can do so with every pro-democracy voice left in Hong Kong.

Lai’s trial may determine the future of the rule of law in Hong Kong.

Lai’s trial is the highest profile trial to happen under the NSL since it was imposed in Hong Kong.

The CCP’s pushback in the Lai trial has included denying Lai the legal representation of his choice: British King’s Counsel Timothy Owen. A veteran of the U.K.’s legal system specializing in international law, human rights, and political protest, Owen has drawn opposition from not only the CCP’s advocates in Beijing but also Hong Kong’s Department of Justice, including senior counsel Paul Lam.

The move to block Owen from defending Lai is not simply a quibble over international lawyers in the plex legal scheme, but a desire to maintain the CCP’s stranglehold on Hong Kong’s entire legal process. In blocking Lai from being represented by an advocate of his choosing, the CCP has succeeded in shutting out international lawyers and has further eroded Hong Kong’s past degree of legal freedom that once allowed democracy to flourish in the country.

If Lai is convicted, Hong Kong’s independence may be gone forever.

Since the 1980s, Hong Kong was governed by the “one country, two systems” policy that allowed the 7.5 million­–strong city to maintain its capitalist economic system as a special administrative region of China, which is ruled by the Communist Party and whose own economy is a unique blend of highly centralized and market capitalistic practices. Since the passage of the National Security Law, however, China’s crackdown against democracy advocates like Lai has illustrated the current CCP regime’s readiness to ignore the two-systems policy.

What happens to Jimmy Lai is of international significance. Beginning today, one of Hong Kong’s greatest champions goes on trial against a totalitarian regime dedicated to destroying everything he represents. Nothing less than economic freedom, democracy, basic human rights, and the rule of law are at stake.

The Hong Konger, the Acton Institute’s new award-winning documentary, tells the story of Jimmy Lai’s heroic struggle against dictatorial Beijing and its erosion of human rights in Hong Kong.Banned by TikTok, the film premiered worldwide aton April 18, 2023, and is available in full onYouTubehere.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Creepy Libertarianism, Creepy Statism
Rick Ritchie responds to this New Atlantis article by Peter Lawler, “Is the Body Property?” in a recent post on Daylight. Lawler discusses the increasingly broad push modify the human body, especially in the context of organ sales. Lawler writes of “the creeping libertarianism that characterizes our society as a whole. As we understand ourselves with ever greater consistency as free individuals and nothing more, it es less clear why an individual’s kidneys aren’t his property to dispose of as...
Hasta La Vista, Siesta
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Anthony Bradley takes a look at the Spanish economy as it faces a “dilemma,” as he puts it, “simultaneously needing immigrants and seeking to curb them.” Bradley also notes that “institutions like marriage and family seem silly to many Spaniards.” As APM’s Marketplace reports, shifting trends in Spain might claim another Spanish institution, the siesta. A variety of factors, including petition with labor forces in other nations, are leading some to question the viability of...
Christianity is Big Business in America
“Christian consumption has gone far beyond the book as millions use their buying power to reinforce their faith and mitment to the munity,” reads an article in the current edition of USAToday (HT: Zondervan>To the Point) According to the piece, “Nearly 12% of Americans spend more than $50 a month on religious products, and another 11% spend $25 to $29, according to a national survey of 1,721 adults by Baylor University, out in September.” There has been a great deal...
Would You Change the Sign?
Seth Godin wants to know. ...
Politicians and Pigskin
Geoffrey Norman at NRO offers a delightfully sarcastic discussion of the move by a couple of Michigan state senators to use the BCS title game controversy as an opportunity for political grandstanding. “Keep your hands off our football,” is Norman’s message to government. In point of fact, however, there is a long history of government intervention in American sports. An early and famous example is the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision granting Major League Baseball an exemption from antitrust laws. The...
‘Reforming Natural Law’
The January 2007 issue of First Things features a lengthy review of Stephen Grabill’s new book on Protestant natural law thinking (no link to the review, unfortunately). J. Daryl Charles, an assistant professor at Union University, has this to say about Grabill’s Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics (Eerdmans, 2006): Grabill’s examination of theological ethics in the Protestant Reformed mainstream is pelling, and it represents a shot across the bow of theological ethics, as it were. Protestants for...
Marriage and the Black Family
I recently received a letter from a reader of my Acton Commentary column, "Marriage as a Social Justice Issue," which she had seen reprinted in modified form at Town Hall. My correspondent was concerned that I had overlooked a key fact: the lack of marriageable black men. She said, in part: Education and the lower number of available black men are 2 major things you left out of your article. I know that marriage is important in the munity, but...
Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics
Stephen Grabill delivers his address at today’s Lord Acton Lecture Series Event Stephen J. Grabill, Acton’s Research Scholar in Theology, delivered an address today based upon his new book which explores plex and often-overlooked relationship between Protestantism and natural law. In Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics, Grabill calls upon Christian ethicists, theologians, and laypersons to take another look at this vital element in the history of Christian ethical thought. He appeals to Reformation and post-Reformation era theologians...
Christian Ecology vs Dominionism
In December of last year I had a great back and forth on the topic of Christian dominionism with fellow green blogger Elsa at Greener Side. A friend wrote recently asking about those posts and my take on dominionism specifically. After letting him know we were safely in the anti-dominionism camp, I said I thought there were more folks in progressive/secular circles that saw Christians as dominionists than Christians who actually bought into this trash. I liked his response: It...
Today’s Word from Solzhenitsyn
From the new Solzhenitsyn Reader, which I highly mend (especially if you are behind on your Christmas shopping): Human society cannot be exempted from the laws and demands which constitute the aim and meaning of individual human lives. But even without a religious foundation, this sort of transference is readily and naturally made. It is very human to apply even to the biggest social events or human organizations, including whole states and the United Nations, our spiritual values: noble, base,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved