Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The right attitude about tithing during COVID-19
The right attitude about tithing during COVID-19
Aug 31, 2025 11:27 PM

COVID-19 has caused thousands to lose their jobs and other regular sources of e. As a result, many have had to cut any extra or unnecessary spending to make ends meet. Some of these “extra costs” included donating money to their local church, house of worship, or favorite charity. Whereas many businesses could generate e by moving online during the pandemic, most churches do not have the luxury of pletely “virtual.” In terms of donations, the faithful could certainly wire money, and many others were able to begin tithing online. Yet even such efforts would not offset the losses of parishioners’ offerings made in person during Sunday services.

Now Christian churches of every denomination are finding it ever harder to cover basic costs of running parishes and outreach ministries. About one-third of U.S. churches have no savings, relying heavily on members’ donations to survive. Some denominations and nonprofit organizations reported that donations remained steady or increased in April pared to April 2019. However, as the State of the Plate poll indicates, more than half of U.S. churches saw great decreases in donations during the pandemic, forcing some churches to cut staff, cut salaries, or dip into emergency endowments.

During the quarantine period, many churches offered parishioners the opportunity to donate through popular online applications. According to the website Tithe.ly, roughly 60% of American church-goers say online giving is a positive and safe experience and that they are willing to continue donating this way. However, many churches are not seeing an increase in online giving, despite this positive assessment.

The fact is while some technologically savvy churches and saw their donations remain stable or increase during the lockdowns, many other churches struggled with the shift to online giving and were not as successful in maintaining their pre-coronavirus contributions. Some pastors could not make the shift due to lack of resources, while others simply could not meet the challenge of the required technology. As a direct result of poor funding, many parishioners found themselves without their local Sunday services, because the livestream could not be financed.

This had a further ripple effect of reducing tithing even more, since many “old style” parishioners found themselves progressively disassociated with parish life in general. Simply put, without virtual services and in-person events, parishioners may not have seen the need to continue giving. And, for those whose giving came through a weekly envelope, not attending church services meant not giving at all.

Churches are a primary example of the interconnected nature of human beings. Some are more obvious in everyday life, like the forces of supply and demand in industries or our reliance on farmers for food. Churches and people are also a prime example. It is clear that religious institutions provide spiritual needs to parishioners through worship services or Masses, spiritual guidance, and church charity. These institutions provide the moral instruction and support on which many people depend. The faithful, in turn, respond by financing all these good initiatives. There is a lot of truth to this quid pro quo mentality which we learn in market settings.

While it is perfectly understandable that some people are struggling financially during a global pandemic and simply cannot afford to financially support their local church like they used to, others have chosen not to donate based on “transactional attitudes” because they are not receiving services. This is not what the faithful should be thinking. The church is not a marketplace where only services that are actually rendered deserve to be paid.

Giving without expecting anything in return is an essential part of being human. It teaches us about the gratuitous generosity we are called to in the deepest human relationships. It is what helps us look beyond the useful and transactional to the transcendent, empowering us to fulfill our higher missions on earth. Tithing takes this step higher, as it requires stable giving in good and bad times. Tithing weds our hearts to the Church, which gives us more than we can possibly understand. Our needs might not be met now, but they will in the hereafter. Storing up treasure for that day is the best investment we could ever hope for and one we should cheerfully make.

(Photo credit Glendale United Methodist Church – Nashville. This photo has been cropped. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
There is no moral difference between eating Chick-fil-A and a McChicken
I am grateful to Fr. Ben Johnson for his thoughtful response to my recent post, “The social responsibility of Chick-fil-A is to make delicious sandwiches.”He adds some extra nuance, but I still stand my ground. Fr. Ben begins with an objection I’ve heard several times now: Friedman rightly notes that a CEO who funds a charity with the profits of a publicly held corporation spends the firm’s money, not his own. However, Chick-fil-A is a privately owned business, founded by...
Nibbling at Dylan Pahman’s Chick-fil-A argument
As though guided by an invisible hand Dylan Pahman and I – independently and without coordination – each posted an essay about Chick-fil-A’s philanthropic giving within minutes of one another, each with slightly different emphases. Readers may see this as a conflict; however, probing the space between these analyses helps make sense of customer backlash, illustrates why “woke capitalism” of any variety is a miasma, and underlines that charitable decisions are best made by private individuals. Dylan quotes Milton Friedman’s...
Spare a thought for China’s Muslim Uyghurs
The days in which many Westerners celebrated what many thought was mainland China’s inevitable march towards freedom as a consequence of its limited opening to global trade are now well and truly over. The present battle over Hong Kong, one of the world’s most economically-free regions, is plainly a proxy for a wider fight about China’s future—a future in which Beijing has made clear does not include much room for political freedom and rule of law. Then there is the...
2019 Calihan Lecture Video: Religion, Society, and the Market
Last month, Prof. Giuseppe Franco received the 2019 Novak Award at the University of San Diego where he delivered the 19th Annual Calihan Lecture on “Religion, Society, and the Market: The Legacy of Wilhelm Röpke.” Watch the video now: TheNovak Awardrecognizes scholars early in their academic career who demonstrate outstanding intellectual merit in advancing the understanding of theology’s connection to human dignity, the importance of the rule of law, limited government, religious liberty, and freedom in economic life. Each Award...
The unfortunate lesson from Chick-fil-A’s surrender
Why do I care about Chick-fil-A’s decision to drop Salvation Army and Fellowship of Christian Athletes as they seek to properly “align their values” and make sure people understand “who they are”? prehend why Chick-fil-A wants to escape the censure of progressive elites. pany is a petitor. In terms of profit per square foot, they are the reigning champion in American fast food. When you have that strength and speed, you want to use it. pany has consistently been known...
The rise of ‘woke’ culture: Lessons on the power of institutions
We continue to see the ill effects of “cancel culture” and safetyism, whether through student-led riots and intimidation efforts at colleges and universities, the garden-variety intolerances of “woke capitalism,” or the self-destructive interventionism of “bulldozer parenting.” As far as how it’s e to be, we have explanations aplenty, from declines in religious life to the fraying of the social fabric to rises in political fragmentation and polarization. In an essay at Heterodox Academy, Musa Al-Gharbi points to yet another: a...
Hong Kong demands freedom in landslide election
The citizens of Hong Kong expanded their democratic revolution to the ballot box on Sunday, as pro-democracy parties won control of virtually every local government from pro-Beijing functionaries. Yesterday’s district council elections – the largest in history, with an estimated 71 percent of all registered voters (or 2.94 million of 4.13 million) participating – proved voters’ overwhelming support for the traditional rights enjoyed by the former British protectorate. The South China Morning Post described the landslide election as a “tsunami...
Wealth inequality is a First World problem
As the West has e progressively more interventionist, concern with e inequality” has been eclipsed by “wealth inequality.” However, that focus betrays a certain blindness to a vital economic reality. Measures of equality and inequality tell us nothing about what really matters: a society’s prosperity or poverty. Communist societies were far from equal in practice. However, modern concerns about inequality focus on the fact that the free market does not reward all labor evenly. Yet the West’s efficiency creates the...
Stephanie Slade on markets, planning, and Catholic social teaching
Stephanie Slade writes in next month’s edition of Reason Magazine about, ‘Regulation and ‘the Right Ordering of Economic Life”according to Catholic social teaching: The Church’s surprising lesson for partisans of big government is that the best tools for correctly ordering economic life are found in the choices of individual market actors. Because those choices are based not only on their preferences but also on their convictions, people’s moral sensibilities—the extent to which they believe they have ethical obligations to each...
Fact check: 5 facts about the fifth Democratic debate of 2019
The Democratic Party narrowed the number of presidential hopefuls to 10 at the fifth debate, held Wednesday in Atlanta. Several of their statements deserve greater scrutiny. 1. Elizabeth Warren: Freeloading billionaires? The 99 percent in America are on track to pay about 7.2 percent of their total wealth in taxes. The top one-tenth of one percent that I want to say, “Pay two cents more,” they’ll pay 3.2 percent in America. I’m tired of freeloading billionaires. I think it’s time...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved