Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Greatest Country in the World: What is it to You?
The Greatest Country in the World: What is it to You?
Apr 27, 2026 5:47 AM

I believe that greatness, if defined by power, economic and cultural influence, requires us to acknowledge that the United States of America was once the greatest country in the world. However, as it ceases to lead the world in these areas – as one survey after another shows – and other countries take its place, it can no longer be considered the greatest. If we change our definition of “greatest” however, America might still be great.

I believe we need a new definition of greatness. Americans are known throughout the globe for patriotism, and this is not something of which to be ashamed. The United States, in its mere 239 years of existence, has built great things, has explored vast areas, has developed nothings into somethings, and has undeniably made enormous impacts on the world. Unfortunately, many Americans have taken this to the extreme, perhaps subconsciously, and have concluded that that is the end of the story. America is the best. Period.

This mentality has often bothered me. I was born and raised in Japan, reached adulthood in the States, and am currently living in Lithuania. I have been to almost 30 countries. Many people are stunned when I say that I do not plan on living my entire life in the United States. Many are taken aback by the fact that my love of culture and travel surpasses my patriotism for the country of my nationality, in my case, the United States.

This is mon exchange with people I meet throughout the world; which is what sparked my interest in this blog post. Where should my loyalties lie? And where do others’? Is it where we are from, or where we want to be? No matter how much love one has for their country, I think everyone would agree that no place is perfect. But what makes a country great?

I asked more than 80 millennials from around the world “What is the greatest country in the world and why?” The people I asked were from the 25 countries listed below.

The countries that they believed to be the greatest were as follows. (This is not a scientific study, nor is it displaying official data. It is a survey I did, with my peers from around the world, in order to gain a broader international perspective.)

As shown, their answers covered an extremely large area, and this is only from my small sample. Though their views of greatness clearly differed, there are certain traits that seemed to be universally valued; traits like freedom, influence and diversity. The thing that stood out the most in this data was that no two people’s definition of greatness was equal. In fact, from the majority of people, their answer included, in some form, that this is a difficult question because every country has its roses and its thorns. So, again, what makes a country great? Here is a roundup of recent surveys ranking countries based on different factors.

2015: Heritage Foundation ordered 178 countries by their economic freedom, the top 5 being Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Australia and Switzerland. Their measure of economic freedom was based on 4 factors: Rule of Law, Limited Government, Regulatory Efficiency, and Open Markets.

2015: Freedom House researched the freedom of countries, discovering that out of the 195 countries examined 89 (46 percent) were had freedom, 55 (28 percent) were listed as partly free, and only 51 (26 percent) as not free.

2014: The Huffington Post published an article listing the top most culturally rich and culturally influential countries in the world. The top 5 were listed as China, Spain, Italy, France and Mexico.

2013: Columbia University’s Earth Institute conducted a survey of the world’s happiest countries. They engaged in a new study of the economics of happiness and discovered that out of 156 countries, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Netherlands and Sweden were listed as the top five. The survey was on a scale of 1-10 and measured people’s general satisfaction in their lives.

2013: The Washington Post reported an examination of the most diverse and racially tolerant countries in the world. The top 20 most diverse were all African, while the most tolerant were American and Scandinavian countries, as well as Australia and the UK.

2013: Market Business News published an article listing the most powerful countries in the world. This is taking into consideration economic, military, population and technological capabilities along with energy security and foreign affairs. The top 5 were ranked as the U.S., China, Russia, France and Japan.

None of this data supports the claim that the United States is the greatest country in the world, nor does it support identifying any country as the greatest. All of this research has taken place in the last five years. They do not include the most powerful or influential countries throughout history. It is not arguable that the world in which we now live would be pletely different place without the influence of places like Ancient Greece; though there might be little evidence of Greece’s current influence, especially in the fields in which it once lead the world.

I believe that greatness is not something that any amount of surveys can define. There are great leaders, great films, great views, great food, great trains of thought, great historical events, and all of these would be defined differently depending on the person asked. Without civil society, however, no country can be great. Without the people, no war would be won, no ballot would be filled, no job would be done and no country could exist. This is why every dictator fails and why munist has a limit; they kill the personhood of the people, they abolish opinions, they silence debates, and they follow their own agenda, not the one needed or even wanted. Without civil society, without patriotism, to one’s own country or another, no country could be successful. Yes, there are measurable factors to calculate a country’s plishments, all countries are not equal; but I thought the most powerful answers to my survey were those who chose a country, not based on its influence or prosperity, but by their allegiance to that country. This is not to say that any country is great as long as one believes in it; but, any country could fail or prevail at any point. Perhaps there is something in the humility that must be included when calling any country truly great.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Mission to Moscow
I point you to Paul Kengor’s insightful 2008 piece on Ronald Reagan’s 1988 summit to Moscow in Christianity Today because it is directly related to this Thursday’s Acton on Tap. I will spend some time discussing the Moscow Summit and Reagan’s ments at Spaso House, Danilov Monastery, and Moscow State University. Kengor notes: Ronald Reagan clearly had a personal religious motivation at the summit, which he pursued on his own volition, certainly not at the urging of advisers. For Thursday,...
Hunter Baker Wins 2011 Novak Award
I’m pleased to report that Hunter Baker is the recipient of the 2011 Novak Award from the Acton Institute. Hunter is associate dean of arts and sciences and associate professor of political science at Union University in Jackson, Tenn., and author of The End of Secularism (Crossway Academic, 2009). From the release: With his writing and speaking in a variety of popular and academic contexts, Dr. Hunter Baker has made pelling prehensive case for the integration of the Christian faith...
Some Thoughts on Social Media and Publishing
After hearing about an established Christian publisher recently launching an official blog for their products, I did some thinking about the relationship between the traditional publication outlets and social media. I’m sure that traditional publishers have a relatively large budget for print advertising, but it seems that they are very slow to hire professionals to do serious social media work, blogging, and online advertising. This seems true at least in the academic markets and relative to their print marketing outreach....
Don’t Knock the Laffer Curve
Michael Kinsley has a column up at The Politico in which he claims to debunk a series of Reagan myths. The one that annoys me the most is the one that is obviously and clearly incorrect and at the same time gets the least explanation from Kinsley. Here it is: 6. The Reagan tax cuts paid for themselves because of the Laffer Curve. Please. With every other “myth” Kinsley takes on, he at least feels the need to explain himself....
The New Circuit Riders and the Bicycle Economy
God and Money passes along a news story about a church in Nebraska raising money “to buy motorcycles (probably not Harleys) for pastors in the African country of Tanzania. Pastors there serving multiple congregations cannot simulcast their sermons–they have to walk upwards of 60 miles to be with their flock.” It brings to mind the early American Methodist practice of sending out circuit riders. But it also illustrates the kinds of needs that can be met in unconventional ways. This...
Theology at Work & David W. Miller
Jordan Ballor already highlighted Rob Moll’s piece in today’s Wall Street Journal in his earlier post on business and Christian ministry. The piece quotes David W. Miller who was interviewed in the Winter 2008 issue of Religion & Liberty on the topic of theology at work. Earlier on the PowerBlog, I also posted a related PBS interview with Miller on corporate morality. Another great resource from the Religion & Liberty archives on theology and work is an interview with Laura...
Video: Rev. Robert A. Sirico on Christian Poverty
If you weren’t able to join us in person for the inaugural lecture of the 2011 Acton Lecture Series, fear not: today, we’re pleased to present Rev. Robert A. Sirico’s “Christian Poverty in the Age of Prosperity” for our loyal PowerBlog readers. The lecture was delivered on February 3rd at the Waters Building here in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The next lecture in the 2011 Acton Lecture Series takes place on March 16 and features Peter Greer, President of HOPE International....
Let the Hustlers Hustle
My latest for Acton Commentary. I’m also adding a couple of videos from Hotep and the Institute for Justice. Let the Hustlers Hustle By Anthony Bradley If necessity is the mother of invention, then there is nothing worse than quenching the entrepreneurial spirit of people seeking to improve their situation by imposing arbitrary third-party constraints. America’s unemployment problems linger because hustlers cannot hustle. For many, “hustling” connotes business activity that is shady, or even illegal. But in the munity it...
Business as a Form of Christian Ministry
In a recent Acton Commentary, Stephen Grabill and Brett Elder reflect on the tension that often exists between conceptions of ministry in the church and in the world. They point especially to the Cape Town Commitment, which on the one hand identifies a “secular-sacred divide as a major obstacle to the mobilization of all God’s people in the mission of God.” But on the other hand, write Grabill and Elder, “The gulf between economics and theology in evangelical social engagement...
Acton Lecture Series 2010: Sirico & Ballor
Wrapping up our recap of last year’s Acton Lecture Series, today we present two additional lectures for your enjoyment. The first was delivered in April of 2010 by Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico, and was entitled “Does Social Justice Require Socialism?” In this lecture, Sirico examined the increasing calls for government intervention in financial market regulation, health care, education reform, and economic stimulus in the name of “social justice”. And finally, we present Jordan Ballor’s lecture from July of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved