Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The False Notion Of ‘Checking Your Privilege’
The False Notion Of ‘Checking Your Privilege’
Sep 5, 2025 7:21 PM

Students attending Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government have a new mandatory class: Checking Your Privilege 101. This is, in part, a response to the conversation started by Princeton’s Tory Fortgang, who wanted to be known by the content of his character rather than the color of his skin (which happens to be white.) Reetu Mody, a master’s degree student is thrilled by the Harvard’s new class and describes it thus:

The substance of the training, while still under discussion, is to prepare students to understand the broad impact of identity on their decision-making and to engage them in constructive tools for dialogue,” Mody says. She likens it to the math classes masters candidates are sent to so they can apply economic theories. “If you don’t have an understanding of sociology, political science, critical race theory, feminist critique, and revisionist history,” Mody warns, “it’s going to be very difficult to talk about certain groups’ experiences, and why these other groups continually have this advantage in society.”

I am left to wonder about a couple of things. First, I wonder if this “understanding” will include a critical look at whether or not climate change is junk science, abortion as the taking of a human life, that the choice by a woman to stay home and raise her children is a valid one, or whether or not Catholics experience discrimination in our country. These are all valid topics, and would certainly broaden the scope of these students’ “experiences” yet somehow I doubt that this Harvard class will include such things.

Second, while I know that many students at e from wealthy backgrounds, many are from working-class families, and I bet some of them are right at the poverty line, eating their Ramen noodles and counting pennies til payday. Ms. Mody says the class is designed to help with the mindset of what if you’ve “been told all your life is you’re really talented and you deserve what you have, it’s going to be really hard to find out Maybe I don’t deserve it.” My response to this is, “Wha…?” My parents never told me I was “really talented and deserved what I had.” I don’t know anyone raised this way. But I’m from a small, Midwestern town – does that mean I’m privileged?

My husband worked his way through college (a pricey liberal arts college) by working in the campus food service. He was up at 5 a.m. every day to get breakfast ready for his fellow students. I waited tables, worked lights and sound at a theater, babysat. I did a quick check of my co-workers: campus cleaning crew, parking lot attendant, hotel desk clerk, camp counselor, pool cleaning, and administrative work. I know I learned valuable lessons from the work I did, and I assume the others did as well. But does this sound like “privilege” to you? Do we all need a class in order to “understand the broad impact of identity?”

Writing at American Spectator, Ross Kaminsky tells us that “straight white men are terrible.” Well, not really, but that sure is the message we’re getting when places like Harvard are offering up Checking Your Privilege 101. ments on this course offering:

If e from an inherently powerful group in the United States, which is defined as being a straight white man, you have inherent (and unfair) advantages in life and although you’ll try hard you’ll never really understand anybody else. And you should feel really really bad about that.

Therefore, Mr. Ordinary White Guy, you should look at the world though filters such as “critical race theory, feminist critique, and revisionist history” which are designed to guide to you more correct thinking about people not like you. And everyone who isn’t a straight white man should treat you with great skepticism because you are the vessel for political original sin. In short, Mr. Ordinary White Guy, you must be badgered, scolded, and punished — although we certainly won’t admit that that’s what we’re doing nor let you proclaim your innocence.

And what Ordinary White Guy (other, perhaps, than me) will dare to ask the question: If you think I don’t understand you, why should I assume the reverse is not equally true, or perhaps even more true since you’re willing to make baseless assumptions about a person you’ve never met? The Achilles’ heel of the anti-privilege movement is their insulting necessity to avoid treating people as individuals.

Here’s the real privilege: if you’re an American, you are free to apply to places like Harvard where, if accepted, you are free to spout ideas like checking your privilege. All Americans are privileged: privileged to live in a country where we won’t get beheaded if we don’t convert to a specific religion, where homeless kids can end up at Harvard, and where navel-gazing can be taken to stupendously stupid levels. You can blog, hold up a sign on a street corner, post YouTube ment on Facebook pages, and generally rant and rave to your heart’s content. See, our privilege is this: our Founding Fathers had the foresight to protect our rights as Americans – rights like free speech and the free exercise of religion. Go ahead, Harvard. Check your privilege. Just realize that it’s a privilege that began by a bunch of straight white men about 240 years ago.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Amazon, Kmart, and the Moral Limits of Shopping
Good now, sit down, and tell me, he that knows, Why this same strict and most observant watch So nightly toils the subject of the land, And why such daily cast of brazen cannon, And foreign mart for implements of war; Why such impress of shipwrights, whose sore task Does not divide the Sunday from the week; What might be toward, that this sweaty haste Doth make the night joint-labourer with the day: Who is’t that can inform me? –Marcellus,...
Hope Is a Burning Thing
Tomorrow I’ll be offering up a more mentary on the second movie of the Hunger Games trilogy, “Catching Fire.” Until then, you can read Dylan Pahman’s engagement on the theme of tyranny, as well as that of Alissa Wilkinson over at CT. I’ll be critiquing Wilkinson’s perspective in my own review tomorrow. I think her analysis starts off strong, but she ends up getting distracted by, well, the distractions. But mend her piece to your review, and in the meantime...
Burden Bearing and Biblically Based Healthcare
Over the past year, public discussion about the Affordable Care Act has led many Christians to question the proper roles of government and business in providing healthcare. Too often, though, the question left unexamined is what role the church should have in responding to the medical needs of munity. Throughout the history of the church, Christians have been actively involved in the provision and funding of health and medical resources. But for the past 50 years, these functions have been...
‘This Conversation Doesn’t Apply To You:’ Obamacare Underwhelms Again
CBS This Morning’s Charlie Rose and Sharyl Attkinsson report that a woman who once touted the Affordable Care Act as “NancyCare” is now forced to drop insurance for her eight employees, and let them fend for themselves on HealthCare.gov. It isn’t going well. In the report, White House spokesman Jay Carney tells reporters that, “This conversation doesn’t apply to you” when asked how the Affordable Care Act will affect small business owners like Nancy Clark. As Charlie Rose says, “Another...
Calvin Coolidge and a Thanksgiving of Abundance
My pastor made a good point in his sermon Sunday that the more secular we e as a nation the less we talk about “abundance.” Instead, the national dialogue of our politics shift to discussions about scarcity. Many politicians are stuck in the mindset of talking about things like wealth distribution and rationing. The more materialist and less spiritual we e as a nation, the more inclined we are to fight over the table scraps. If we don’t look to...
The End of Urban Ministry
Derick Scudder, senior pastor at Bethel Chapel Church, an evangelical congregation in the northern part of Philadelphia, pleted a 4-part series explaining why he is “done with urban ministry.” Bethel Chapel is a “Bible-teaching church focused on the Good News that Jesus died on the cross for our sins. We are a racially diverse, multi-generational group of people who want to know Jesus better.” As a pastor of a church deeply embedded in a challenging section of Philadelphia, Scudder has...
ICCR: There Will Be Blood?
Earlier this month, the Fairfield Mirror reported on a speech given at Fairfield University in Connecticut: Many consumers are content in turning a blind eye to the injustices that save them cents on their dollars. While it may be challenging to understand the social responsibilities that affect the world’s most powerful corporations, one group of investors is constantly directing these corporations to increase their social responsibility: the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. Senior economics major Arturo Jaras Watts and Fairfield...
Supreme Court to Decide Obamacare Contraceptive-Abortifacient Mandate
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a pair of cases that challenge the HHS mandate requiring many panies to insure contraceptive and abortifacients. The Obama administration asked the high court to review the issue after a federal appeals court in Colorado found in favor of Hobby Lobby, an Oklahoma-based crafts franchise. The court bine the Hobby Lobby case with lesser-known case involving Conestoga, a pany that lost earlier bids for relief from the mandate. If you haven’t been following...
A Turkey in Every Pot
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Tyranny Is the True Enemy,” I explore the latest film installment of the Hunger Games trilogy, “Catching Fire.” I pick up on the theme that animates Alissa Wilkinson’s review at Christianity Today, but diverge a bit from her reading. As she writes, a major aspect of this second part of the series has to do with fake appearances and real substance, and the need to “remember who the real enemy is.” Wilkinson is upset with...
Israel Really Wants A King (Part II)
Picking up where we left offlast time(in verse 9 of I Samuel 8), the prophet Samuel’s sons have given God’s system of judges a black eye with their corrupt behavior. Not wishing to be upstaged in the “Let’s Disappoint God” department, the people of Israel decide they want to up-the-sin-ante by rejecting God’s order and demanding a monarchy. It’s now time for Samuel to share with the people what is in store for them should they refuse to course-correct. In...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved