Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The economics behind the COVID-19 baby bust
The economics behind the COVID-19 baby bust
Sep 13, 2025 3:33 PM

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, some academics predicted a “baby boom,” as couples found themselves locked down with nothing to do. But those familiar with economics knew differently – and the data have now backed us up.

The coronavirus “baby boom” has turned into a “baby bust.” The CDC reported that U.S. births in the month of December 2020, nine months after the lockdowns began, fell by pared with December 2019. The same pattern is seen in state-by-state results reviewed by the media in places like Hawaii (30%), California (10%), Florida (8%), Ohio (7%), and Arizona (5%).

The impact will be enormous. The Brookings Institution has estimated 300,000 to 500,000 American babies will never be born due to the global pandemic. And there is no end in sight. The Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research forecasts that the baby bust will last until August – the longest streak of lowered fertility in 100 years, including the Great Depression and the 2008 recession.

The baby bust has made life harder for those who wish to adopt children. And it likely increased the number of abortions.

What brought this birth dearth on? Uncertainty and economic hardship.

“People make long-term decisions when they have confidence about the future, andif there’s anything that undermines confidence about the future, it’s this massive pandemic,” Philip Cohen, a demographer at the University of Maryland, told NBCLX. Cohen also found that marriages had declined due to COVID-19. In Italy, the number of new marriages fell by more than half.

“The longer this period of uncertainty lasts, the more it will have lifelong effects on the fertility rate,” said Tomas Sobotka, a researcher at the Vienna’s Wittgenstein Center for Demography and Global Human Capital.

Undoubtedly, the U.S. fertility rate – which has been falling for years – is adversely impacted by the culture of death. Figures including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and (former) Prince Harry have all questioned or asserted that people in the West should have fewer children. But the globalfood supply,dietary supply adequacy, andlife expectancyhave risen asinfant mortality ratesfell – refuting decades of Cassandra warnings that overpopulation would cause a Malthusian depletion of global resources. The rhetoric became so pitched that a UN climate chief told young people to stop worrying and have babies.

Ironically, a higher birthrate may have slowed the spread of COVID-19.

Right or wrong, economics plays a large role in couples’ decisions to have a baby. Government lockdowns decimated the previously roaring U.S. economy, and short-term “stimulus” checks provide no security about the real status of the workplace. “When the labor market is weak, aggregate birth rates decline; when the labor market improves, birth rates improve,” wrote Brookings scholars Melissa Kearney and Philip Levine.

Economics impact all of life, including the formation of new life. Its effects may be worse in poorer and more secular nations. But, as I wrote in 2016:

[T]he life-sapping effects remain the same across continents and cultures.

Witness the fact that, according to one recent study, due to the Great Recession 151,082 American women will never be mothers. Princeton researchers Janet Currie and Hannes Schwandt found that more than 400,000 Americans will never be born, because women became skittish about marriage and childbearing after living through a period of high unemployment and the uncertainty it brings.

This underscores a simple yet underappreciated truth: Economic policy affects the health and well-being of families. Healthy family life and economic flourishing walk hand in hand.

This should hardly be surprising. The root word of “economics,” οἰκονομικά, means the management of a home. Social conservatives concerned about the nation’s plunging marriage and fertility rates should support policies that lead to economic prosperity.

For now, we should all understand that the government has provided incentives to violate God’s very mandment to mankind: “Be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Radio Free Acton is Back / Perspectives on Health Care Reform, Part 1
The Radio Free Acton crew is back in the studio! On today’s broadcast, Dr. Donald P. Condit and Dr. Kevin Schmiesing join our host Marc VanderMaas for a discussion of the ins and outs of the US health care system. Dr. Condit gives us some background on how the current system came into being, the problems associated with it, and the pitfalls of the current healthcare reform proposals in Washington. Next week RFA will be back for part 2, bringing...
Five Simple Arguments Against Government Healthcare
The argument from federalism: One of the great benefits of federalism is that the states can act as the laboratories of democracy. If a new public policy is tried in the states and works (as happened with welfare reform in Michigan and Wisconsin), then a similar program has a good chance of succeeding at the national level. The welfare reform went national and proved to be one of the most successful public policy initiatives of the last half century. On...
The Truth Will Set Us Free
God is rational, and the universe is governed by unchanging natural laws instituted by Him. The Bible tells us in the Book of Genesis that “God created the heavens and the earth.” God is not arbitrary; the Bible also tells us that He is just and that He keeps promises to His people. The prophet Jeremiah tells us that God has established “ordinances of heaven and earth.” Since e from a perfect lawgiver, we know that these laws do not...
Those Seven Deadly Virtues
In the musical Camelot which first appeared on stage in 1960, Mordred — the antagonist, evil traitor and eventual deliverer of a mortal wound to King Arthur — appropriately lauds the antithesis of what good men are to pursue with his signature song titled “The Seven Deadly Virtues” the first line of which ends “those nasty little traps.” The lyrics are clever. “Humility,” Mordred tells us, “means to be hurt. It’s not the earth the meek inherit but the dirt.”...
Biblical Reasons to Give
Dr. David Murray of Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary investigates the concept of “biblical fundraising,” reasons to continue to give in the midst of difficult economic times, in the latest edition of his vcast, “puritanPod.” Dr. Murray uses 2 Corinthians 9 as the basis for his brief but valuable message. Check out the video here. ...
Public Discourse: Rethinking Economics in the Post-Crisis World
The Public Discourse recently published my article, Rethinking Economics in the Post-Crisis World. Text follows: In the wake of the financial crisis, we need an economics with greater humility about its predictive power and an increased understanding of plicated human beings who, when the discipline is rightly understood, lie at its center. Apart from bankers and politicians, few groups have received as much blame for the 2008 financial crisis as economists. “Economists are the forgotten guilty men” was how Anatole...
The Healthcare Debate’s False Premise
Everybody realizes that the current healthcare system in the United States has problems. Unfortunately, much of the discussion about what to do rests on a false premise. The argument goes something like this: Our current free market system is not working: health care costs are astronomically high, and close to 50 million people aren’t insured. Maybe it’s time to let the government try its hand. But we don’t have a free market health system; we have a highly managed, bureaucratic...
Dalrymple on “the right to healthcare”
[update below] British physician Theodore Dalrymple weighs in on government healthcare and “the right to health care” in a new Wall Street Journal piece. A few choice passages: Where does the right to health e from? Did it exist in, say, 250 B.C., or in A.D. 1750? If it did, how was it that our ancestors, who were no less intelligent than we, pletely to notice it? … When the supposed right to health care is widely recognized, as in...
Wilhelm Ropke for Today
Spurred on by listening to and reading Samuel Gregg, I’ve been making my way through Wilhelm Ropke’s A Humane Economy which is really a special book. The following passage (on p. 69) really caught my attention with regard to our current situation: Democracy is, in the long patible with freedom only on condition that all, or at least most, voters are agreed that certain supreme norms and principles of public life and economic order must remain outside the sphere of...
Healthcare–Don’t Forget the Morality of It
One of the main arguments for nationalized health care is a moral argument: Health care is a right and a moral and just society should ensure that its people are taken care of–and the state has the responsibility to do this. Bracketing for the time being whether health care is actually a right or not–it is clearly a good, but all goods are not necessarily rights–whether the state should be the provider of it is another question. But there is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved