Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Batman is a modern noir mess
The Batman is a modern noir mess
Feb 11, 2026 8:44 AM

Warning: This review of the new blockbuster contains minor spoilers and major grievances.

Read More…

The story begins on Halloween, almost exactly 20 years after the murder of Thomas and Martha Wayne. A new killer—an internet sensation, as it turns out—is on the loose, violently ridding Gotham City of its excesses. The Batman, now two years into his mission, must not only solve the mysteries behind the killings but end the killings themselves. He has a great ally in a youngish James Gordon of the Gotham City Police Department and soon also forms an alliance with a jaded bartender and cat burglar, Selina Kyle, as he uncovers the relationship of the Penguin with crime lord Carmine Falcone. Throughout the story, the Batman serves as the ultimate detective, trying to hew some kind of moral and ethical line, especially difficult as his methods and attitude creepily resemble those of the Riddler. The entire story takes place between October 31 and November 6, giving it a Stranger Things feel.

So much for a broad overview. Now things get personal. As a Batman geek working on a book entitled America’s Darkest Knight, I wanted so badly to be enthralled by this movie. I wanted Gotham to sweep me up and immerse me in its wallowing corruption. I wanted every nook and cranny of the city to ooze with anxious anticipation. I wanted villains that cried out with unadulterated anguish, and my Batman dark, gritty, mythic, and obsessed with justice. But I also wanted a fully realized Batcave and Batmobile, a few Batarangs, a fatherly Alfred, and a virtuous Wayne family legacy.

That is, I wanted desperately to fall in love with Matt Reeves’ The Batman. Was I asking too much?

After two viewings, I must admit, I’m only bemused by the spectacle of it all, wondering if those six hours (three per showing) will count against my already steep debt in purgatory.

There were things to love about the movie, I’ll admit. The acting—especially by Robert Pattinson as the Batman, Paul Dano as the Riddler, and Colin Farrell as the Penguin—was superb. That by John Turturro as Carmine Falcone, Zoe Kravitz as Selina Kyle, and Andy Serkis as Alfred, less so, sadly. Often, these latter three seemed stiff and merely going through the motions.

I also deeply appreciated that Reeves and the other creators took ics very seriously, relying upon The Long Halloween, Year One, When in Rome, Hush, Gotham by Gaslight (the suit!), and No Man’s Land as obvious inspirations.

Gotham, to be sure, feels like Gotham. It’s not New York or Newark or Chicago. It’s a metropolis all its plete with all the nuances of Gotham. For example, the film references specific areas of Gotham detailed in ics and also ties together the Waynes and the Arkhams as old and leading families of the city.

But there were as many, if not more, head scratchers as there were plishments in the movie. I’ll offer just seven.

First, at the film’s start, Bruce Wayne offers a voiceover that suits the film noir mood beautifully. “Two years in, and I’m a nocturnal animal … the Bat-Signal is not just a call, but a warning … Fear is a tool … I am the shadows … I’m vengeance … The city is eating itself. Maybe beyond saving, but I have to try to push myself.” It was chilling and excellent. The voiceover ends, however, minutes into the movie and doesn’t return until the conclusion, and then only to state something about the Batman being about hope rather than about vengeance.

Second, about two-thirds into the film, Alfred simply disappears, his last scene capturing a quick reconciliation with Bruce over a bizarre matter, the camera lingering on the two holding hands.

Third, the theme music for the Riddler is Franz Schubert’s “Ave Maria.” Seriously. Every time the psychopathic Riddler does something mischievous (and, truth be told, downright evil), the “Ave Maria” plays. Frankly, it’s diabolic. For some reason, the Batman’s theme (at least at the beginning and end of the movie) is inexplicably Nirvana’s “Something in the Way.”

Fourth, even though Gotham’s political, social, and economic structures are totally corrupt, the mayor elected in the movie—Bella Reál (Jayme Lawson)—suddenly demonstrates moxie, dedication, and downright bravado. It would’ve been far more appropriate to the themes of the story to have made her the mastermind manipulating all things behind the scenes, the devil’s devil, or, at the very least, to have her as a party to the overall corruption. As it is, she seems too good to be true, especially given the tone of the movie.

Fifth, Batman’s relationship with the police and first responders is schizophrenic, to say the least. In some scenes, he’s allowed access to a criminal investigations, working alongside the GCPD, but in others he’s a wanted fugitive, fighting his way through hordes of cops. As a movie, The Batman never makes clear what the true relationship is between the Caped Crusader and the Gotham authorities, weakening the overall atmosphere and plot. Indeed, the Batman’s relationship with the police changes so swiftly in the movie that you’re tempted to throw your hands up in sheer frustration. Is today the day he works with the police? Or is today the day in which the police attack him as an interfering vigilante? James Gordon, thankfully, remains a firm ally throughout the movie at least.

Sixth, this Batman (unlike, say, that of Zach Snyder) disdains the use of guns and seems to have a “no kill” rule, which has been the norm for Batman since the early 1940s. However, given the stunning brutality of the Penguin/Batmobile chase, it’s clear that Reeves’ Batman is totally fine with innumerable highway deaths.

Seven, and this one is surely personal, I despised the fact that Thomas Wayne was made out to be less than utterly virtuous. It’s been the fashion of ics (and the novels) over the past decade to question Thomas’ motivations, but it has always struck me as essential to the character of Bruce Wayne that he live up to his father’s fine, aristocratic, and untarnished example.

There is some unfortunate dialogue regarding Wayne’s family as well. While not knowing that Bruce Wayne is the Batman, Selina Kyle, in a confessional moment in the movie, dismisses those murdered thus far (including Thomas Wayne from 20 years earlier) as “white privileged a—holes.” Further, when the Batman makes a totally appropriate response about ethics, choice, and morality, Selina replies, “Choices? Whoever you are, you had to grow up rich,” implying the poor have no choice but to bend or break the law.

Again, there are things to love and appreciate about this version of The Batman, but they are far and few between, riddled with the strange things just listed. This version of Batman is, at best, a shadow of Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight. If you really need to fall in love with Batman, Nolan’s version is the best. But I would also mend Bruce Timm’s Mask of the Phantasm or any of his animated Batman series, as well as the most recent DC Animated films, such as Under the Red Hood or The Long Halloween. There you will find captured the true spirit of the Caped Crusader.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Politicians and the Pursuit of Happiness
In this week’s Acton Commentary I conclude, “The American people do not need politicians to tell them what happiness is and how it should be pursued.” I admit that I didn’t have this quote in mind (or I would have used it!), but Art Carden (follow him here and read him here) notes the following from Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: What is the species of domestic industry which his capital can employ, and of which the produce is likely...
How Conservatives Fight Poverty
At Public Discourse, Ryan T. Anderson reviews Lawrence Mead’s From Prophecy to Charity: How to Help the Poor: The loudest voices in our national debates about political economy tend to be libertarians and social welfare statists. To our detriment, most public policy discussions are filtered through these two lenses. At the same time, we tend to conflate the policy issues facing our nation as if they were one and the same. But consider the range of America’s political-economic challenges: How...
Report: Acton Institute raises local profile with move into new building
The Grand Rapids Press has a story today about the Acton Institute’s plans to move into new office space in the heart of the city. Stay tuned to the PowerBlog for exciting updates in the days and weeks ahead about the move. GRAND RAPIDS – The Acton Institute, a conservative think tank dedicated to blending Christian doctrine and free market economics, may be better known on the international stage than in its home town. That may change soon. The 22-year-old...
Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?
Al Mohler absolutely dismantles Nicholas Kristof in this new piece. The cause of this skewering? Kristof’s “Beyond Pelvic Politics” column in The New York Times. Mohler notes, After asking his most pressing question, “After all, do we really want to make modations across the range of faith?,” he makes this amazing statement: “The basic principle of American life is that we try to respect religious beliefs, and modate them where we can.” That sentence caught the immediate attention of many....
Subsidiarity vs. Soft Totalitarianism
While the recent contraceptive mandate controversy has exposed the Obama Administration’s disregard for religious freedoms, it has also reveled their natural disdain for subsidiarity. As George Weigel notes, this incident tells us “something very important, and very disturbing, about the cast of mind in the Executive Branch.” It is no exaggeration to describe that cast of mind as “soft totalitarianism”: an effort to eliminate the vital role in health care, education and social service played by the institutions of civil...
The End of Secularism and the HHS Mandate
The primary point of my first book, The End of Secularism, was to demonstrate that secularism doesn’t do what it claims to do, which is to solve the problem of religious difference. As I look at the administration’s attempt to mandate that religious employers pay for contraceptive products, I see that they have confirmed one of my charges in the book. I wrote that secularists claim that they are occupying a neutral position in the public square, but in reality...
The “Right to Be Insured” Trumps Religious Liberty?
New York pundit Al Sharpton and California Senator Barbara Boxer agree: The “right” to insurance paid for by an employer trumps freedom of conscience and religion. Senator Boxer warned yesterday that if the HHS contraception mandate was repealed it would set a dangerous precedence of religious rights trumping the right to be insured. On MSNBC’s Politics Nation with Al Sharpton last night, Boxer affirmed that under the proposed amendment proposed by Sen. Roy Blunt, an employer would not be forced...
Creeping Crony Corporatism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Corrupted Capitalism and the Housing Crisis,” I contend we need to add some categories to our thinking about political economy. In this case, the idea of “corporatism” helps understand a good deal of what we see in the American system today. Adding corporatism to our quiver helps us to make some more nuanced distinctions than simple “socialism” and “capitalism” allow. Take, for instance, Mitt Romney’s contention this week while campaigning in Michigan that the bailouts...
Welcome to the PowerBlog, Joe Carter
When we launched the PowerBlog in 2005, we had little idea that it would grow into one of the Acton Institute’s most popular and munications channels. Nearly 4,000 posts, and ments later, the PowerBlog is still going strong. And for that, we heartily thank our many readers, contributors menters. Now we have for the first time a dedicated editor to help sustain and grow the blog for the advancement of the “free and virtuous society.” Veteran journalist Joe Carter is...
Befuddled Bureaucrats on the Bayou
I’ve tried to stay on top of the federal government’s response to natural disasters here at Acton. I’ve written a number mentaries, blog posts, and a story in Religion & Liberty covering the issue. “Spiritual Labor and the Big Spill” specifically addressed the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. For extensive background on this short clip of Bobby Jindal at CPAC 2012, see my post “Bobby Jindal on Centralized Disaster Response.” ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved