Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
The Bangladesh Factory Collapse and the Messiness of Economic Development
The Bangladesh Factory Collapse and the Messiness of Economic Development
Aug 25, 2025 3:48 PM

The horrific factory collapse in Bangladesh, now surpassing 1,100 in total deaths, has caused many to ponder how we might prevent such tragedies in the future, leading to plenty of ideological introspection about economic development and free trade.

Describing the situation as “neither too simple nor plex,” Brian Dijkema encourages a healthy mix of confidence and caution. With folks calling for plete take-down of global capitalism on one end and elevating stiff pro-market arguments on the other, Dijkema reminds us that we should respond, first and foremost, to the simple “brutality of death,” with clarity, prayer, passion.

Yet when es to understanding the drivers of the disaster, we should recognize plexity of things. Responding to Pope Francis’s corresponding critique of profit-driven business decisions, Dijkema warns that by “conflating what plex into what is simple or vice-versa,” we riskdishonoring the “dignity of the human person” and “the dignity of labour.”

Over at Ethika Politika, Andrew Haines places a similar emphasis plexity, focusing on an argument free-market advocates routinely make in response to such circumstances:

If you know a free market champion, then you’ve heard the argument that low-wage, low-skill, mostly mindless jobs are better than no jobs at all. The idea works well in theory. I admit, I’ve even made the case myself from time to time.

On the other hand, you might have heard recently about things like the collapse of an industrial building in Savar, Bangladesh—home to five garment factories—where the death toll recently topped one thousand.

I say “on the other hand” since the any-job-is-better-than-no-job argument (AJBNJ) works well, until it doesn’t.

Haines proceeds to offer what I think is a fair critique of the any-job-is-better-than-no-job maxim (AJBNJ), arguing that it “suffers a huge blind spot when es to connecting ‘better’ economics with ‘better” humanity.’”

Haines points out that when AJBNJ proponents speak of “any” job, they don’t really mean any job. Prostitution, for example, would not be considered “better” for many in the AJBNJ crowd. (Similarly, I would add, AJBNJ proponents would not be overly eager to elevate the stereotypical spoon-shovelers of Keynesianism.)

Such flexibility, Haines writes, “provides a flag for why AJBNJ isn’t very cogent”:

Proponents remind us that just because jobs exist doesn’t mean anyone has to take them; but if they are taken, it’s assumed that the risks and rewards have been weighed and that the decision is rational. Something about mass prostitution isn’t rational, though—and presumably for reasons other than its clear, long-term unsustainability (otherwise, the same hesitation would probably have to apply to the mass production of plastic trinkets). Built into AJBNJ is a recognition that, in reality, “better” for people includes something more than calculated economic risks and rewards. It might be a subtle concession—and maybe not a universal one—but it’s there.

What the sad case of Savar, Bangladesh suggests, I think, is that the positive rationality criterion of AJBNJ is far prehensive than most advocates would admit.

Though I’m not sure that this “blind spot” exists as often as Haines believes — his critique seems to be more about the maxim itself, which is, after all,a maxim —his point about a prehensive “positive rationality criterion” is a good one. Just as we would do well to avoid hasty finger-pointing at miserly capitalists, we would benefit by recognizing that whatever rational cost-benefit analyses we concoct on behalf of our distant neighbors, humility is always in order.

But although the cogency of AJBNJ would be improved if we stretched things accordingly, as a simple matter of poking ourselves toward a healthier perspective overall, I’d suggest that it might be more helpful if we pulled back the lens a bit further.Given the inevitably plexities of each economic situation, perhaps the bigger, broader, and more helpful reality to recognize is that economic development is itself an inevitably difficult, messy, plex thing.

With increased es increased opportunity, as globalization has aptly demonstrated, but the road out of poverty is bumpy, both for the person and the people. Whether Crummy Job Y is slightly better than Crummy Job Z or not, the crumminess needn’t be belittled away. We can bring plenty of optimism to the frontier, to be sure, but we mustn’t forget that it is indeed a frontier.

Let us remember, even here in America, economic success was not waved into existence by the flick of a central planner’s wand. Free trade played an integral role in the process, but the overarching narrative is one filled with struggle and supreme sacrifice. Our current position fort and economic security was fought for and toiled for by ancestors who spent years breathing dirty air, working long hours, and bringing in little pay, risking it all along the way. They did so for a purpose: for themselves, for their children, and for their children’s children. Whatever economic lessons we might glean from that about the “true path” to economic progress — and there are many—all of that sacrifice and risk and blood and sweat is something to behold and appreciate with sincerity.

Thus, when we respond to such catastrophes, let us prayerfully mourn the loss of life and try our best to recognize the corresponding conditionsin their fullest context. There is hope, but the practical “response” or the “solution,” with all of its struggle and romance and eventual triumph, is not done justice by talk of cost-benefit spreadsheets.

AJBNJ tells a necessary truth within the bigger, broader messiness of economic development, but we should be careful that we remain acutely aware and appreciative of the full implications, both harsh and hopeful, of that bigger, broader messiness itself.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Housing Alone Doesn’t End Homelessness
Homelessness seems like it should be one of the most straightforward social problems to solve. The obvious solution would be to simply give people in need a place to live. Getting people off the street and into shelter is certainly be beneficial. And in the winter months it can even save lives. But does providing housing end homelessness? Unfortunately, asKevin C. Corinth explains,housing people who are homeless doesn’t necessarily reduce the number of people who are homeless over the long...
Russell Kirk and Christian Humanism
Russell Kirk Writing for the Morning Sun, Acton’s frequent contributor Bruce Walker, discusses Russell Kirk, calling him a “Christian Humanist.” Walker argues that not only was Kirk a talented writer, but he also understood other Christian humanists and was able to clarify some of their works and theories: Kirk may not have been the first, but was the scholar best able to identify [T. S.] Eliot’s nameless targets in the poem “The Hollow Men” as H.G. Wells, Bernard Shaw and...
Yes, New York Times, for Christians Scripture Is Indeed the Rule of Law
“If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people?” The Apostle Paul asked the church in Corinth. “Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world?” Paul continues, And if you are to judge the world, are you petent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this...
Green America’s War on Restaurants
The network of leftist shareholder activism plex and wide-ranging. In the name of progressive causes, they panies to forfeit profitability, reduce investment returns, raise costs to customers and threaten both actual and potential jobs. It’s heartbreaking that religious shareholder groups not only willingly but passionately lend their support to secular causes promoted by US SIF: The Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment and Ceres. As I have noted previously, both organizations count religious shareholder groups among their respective membership rosters...
Chart of the Week: The Fragmented Federal Welfare System
The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service estimates that there are currently over 80 federal programs that provide food, housing, healthcare, job training, education, energy assistance, and cash to e Americans. How do they fit together to serve the poor? During a hearing on Tuesday about better coordinating welfare programs to serve families in need, the chairman of theHouse Ways and Means Human Resources mittee provided the following chart (click to enlarge). Confused? You’re not the only one. As Rep.Charles Boustany (R-LA)...
Radio Free Acton: Jay Nordlinger On The Children of Monsters
Jay Nordlinger speaks at the Acton Lecture Series This week on Radio Free Acton, National Review Senior Editor Jay Nordlinger joins the podcast to talk about his latest book,Children of Monsters: An Inquiry Into the Sons and Daughters of Dictators, a book I enjoyed enough to create the “Radio Free Acton 5 Star Award of Excellence” in order to have an award to bestow upon it. Nordlinger joined us here at Acton on October 29 to deliver an Acton Lecture...
The FAQs: China’s ‘One-Child’ Policy
What was China’s “one-child” policy? In an attempt to limit population growth, China implemented a policy in the late 1970s that forbid families from having more than one child (there were, however, no penalties for multiple births, such as twins or triplets). Over the years, though, numerous exceptions have been allowed and by 2007 the policy only restricted 35.9 percent of the population to having one child. What is the new policy? Starting next March, a change to current family...
Video: Jay Nordlinger On The Children Of Monsters
On October 29th, the Acton Institute was pleased to e author and National Review Senior Editor Jay Nordlinger to the Mark Murray Auditorium as part of the 2015 Acton Lecture Series. Nordlinger’s address shared the title of his latest book,Children of Monsters:An Inquiry into the Sons and Daughters of Dictators, which examines the varied fates of the children of some of the 20th century’s most notorious dictators. We’re pleased to present the video of Nordlinger’s talk here on the PowerBlog....
Welcome to Cuba: Where doctors earn less than taxi drivers
In Cuba, taxi drivers earn far more than doctors, raking in more money in one day than a doctor will make in an entire month. The reason? Unlike most of the Cuban economy, taxi licenses are privately held and wages are not set by the state. Johnny Harris explains: Although Cuba offers fewopportunities for private enterprise — outside of itssprawling black market, that is — the number of self-employed workers has slowly grown in recent years. Seven years after Raul...
Review: That’s a Great Question
A couple of months ago Arkansas’ Secretary of State rejected the request from the Universal Society of Hinduism to erect a statue on state capitol grounds. A good friend from college, himself a Hindu, sent me an email asking me what I thought about it. What could I say? It seemed patiently unfair: Arkansas had approved a monument for the Ten Commandments on state grounds, but rejected the Hindu organization’s privately funded statue. miserated with my friend, saying only that...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved