India has a huge and still-growing medical tourism industry. A $2 billion part of this industry is the surrogacy business. India has few laws regulating surrogacy, and it is a popular place for people from the U.S. and the EU to head to for a baby. But the lack of regulations also means very little help, support and care for the women producing these children. The women literally e cogs in a giant machine. If one cog breaks, it’s simply replaced with another.

Sushma Pandey was a 17 year old scrap worker in 2010. She was lured into the surrogacy industry to produce eggs via hyperstimulation, which causes the woman to over-produce eggs via chemical inducement. She donated eggs three times in 18 months, and then she died.

The Mumbai High Court asked the police to investigate the role of the hospital, but so far no one has been held responsible. Pandey is India’s first known case of death from egg harvesting; she suffered “brain hemorrhage and pulmonary hemorrhages due to ovarian hyper stimulation,” according to news reports quoting her autopsy results.

For each session she had earned a little over $400.

Then there is Yuma Sherpa. She, too, died after surgery to harvest eggs after undergoing hyperstimulation. Sudha Sundararaman, vice president of the All India Democratic Women’s Association, blames the lack of laws regarding surrogacy, and says the industry preys on the poor.

The concept is promoted as a way of easy e generation for women,” said Sundararaman. “Health professionals in the western state of Gujarat have openly accepted they were helping unemployed women stand on their feet. It is no wonder why the private sector is balking at the regulation of assisted reproductive technology.”

“The business volume of this trade is rising with the number of surrogacy cases increasing at a galloping rate,” said Ranjana Kumari, director of the Delhi-based Center for Social Research, in a phone interview. “The lack of regulation also poses a problem for government agencies to initiate legal provisions and take substantive action against those found guilty.”

Pradeep [the attorney representing Sherpa’s family] says Sherpa’s family had turned down the clinic’s offer of about $500 for the eggs it had already harvested. “Many cases of negligence go unreported because families are unable to pursue cases against the medical clinics even when there is disability arising from such procedures, mainly because they are economically disadvantaged and simply accept the money,” said Pradeep.

Viewing the surrogacy industry through the lens of Christian anthropology, there is no doubt that humans are being treated as objects. Given that, the dangers of surrogacy are not just the ones posed to the health of the surrogate mothers, but the children and all of culture. Instead of science being used to serve people, people are being used to serve science…and the es can be tragic. A death need not occur for surrogacy to be considered tragic. Any time a person is “used” as an object for an end, rather than being treated as a “being” in the image and likeness of God, a tragedy occurs.

The medical and parental stakeholders are not loving, but using, the surrogate woman. The reproductive munity and missioning parents know full well that for the surrogate carrier to contractually agree to transfer her maternal rights does not annul but only conceals the existing parental bonds between the gestational mother and her child. So, when missioning parents enter into such a contract, they reduce the surrogate mother and her child to a mere means to their end of getting a baby. When the munity facilitates this contractual agreement, they reduce the surrogate mother to a mere object, a human incubator, who can be manipulated at will.

The questions of ethics surrounding surrogacy are not limited to places like India. Jessica Kern, a woman in Virginia, found out as an adult that she had been conceived via surrogacy. She believes that children borne of surrogacy live a special pain.

Our voice isn’t out there, because the industry has captured the story,” said Kern. She said she wished people had more balanced information about surrogacy.

“[There] are price tags that hang over our heads,” said Kern. “I wouldn’t be here if $10K [hadn’t been exchanged]. [There] is something inherently wrong about turning children modities.”

Alana Newman, founder of The Anonymous Us Project, sums up the surrogacy experience: “If it is illegal to buy and sell a person, it should be illegal to pre-buy a person.”

Read “Donor Deaths in India Highlight Surrogacy Perils” at Womensenews.org.