Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Stiglitz vs. Easterly: Leading economists debate the role of markets in reducing poverty
Stiglitz vs. Easterly: Leading economists debate the role of markets in reducing poverty
Jul 14, 2025 5:26 PM

In a fascinating debate hosted by Reason Magazine, development economists William Easterly and Joseph Stiglitz discuss how to best fight global poverty, responding to a simple question: “Which is a better approach, freer markets or increased government action?”

Easterly, a professor at New York University and author of the popular book, The White Man’s Burden, highlights the importance of freer markets, arguing they provide better incentives, better mechanisms for sharing knowledge, and, most importantly, better rights.

Stiglitz, a Nobel laureate and professor at Columbia University, pushes for increased government action and control, arguing that the potential for market failures makes it necessary to heavily regulate exchange and investment to ensure fairness across our activities.

After their opening remarks, the arguments e alive as a debate ensues on the particulars of real-world examples.

Whereas Stiglitz sees China’s rapid rise out of poverty as the fruit of a wise and well-managed state, Easterly uses the same example to highlight the power and promise of markets to plish what many deemed impossible.

Similarly, around the 30-minute mark, Easterly and Stiglitz debate the economic history of Ethiopa’s deadly famine in 1984. Stiglitz points to the positive influence of foreign aid and infrastructure funding, but Easterly dismisses each as either secondary factors or outright counterproductive, reminding us of the core cause of the famine in the first place: abuse of government power. What actually changed the trajectory, Easterly argues, was the subsequent improvements that bubbled up from Ethiopian civil society. Without everyday Ethiopians resisting and demandingchanges in their government, the problems would likely have gotten worse, not better.

One of the more striking and recurring themes is the role of markets in defending human rights—either in their promotion of certain virtues and social norms, or in the way they offer built-in mechanisms and incentives to protect and empower everyday people.

As Easterly explains:

Markets promote rights…State-dominated societies will see an elite capture the state and be able to oppress the rest of the population through state-sanctioned coercion. Market systems are inherently based on some degree of legal equality of property and contract rights among all the participants, including the poorest and richest. The reason that is is because market transactions will not happen at all unless a minimum level of contract and property rights are recognized on both sides. Otherwise one party would simply cheat or steal or oppress the other and there were would be no markets. There’d just be cheating, stealing, and oppressions.

For markets to exist at all, these kinds of rights need to be accepted by all participants of markets.

…In our own generation, this prophecy of Adam Smith [about markets as a mechanism for equality] has partially, to some e true…Markets are the main way, historically and in our generation, that different races, peoples, nations have peacefully co-existed and cooperated for their mutual benefit. That is, to me, the final and most beautiful benefit of markets.

The entire exchange is well worthwatching. Read more about it here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Stickball and Subsidiarity
Subsidiarity is often described as a norm calling for the devolution of power or for performing social functions at the lowest possible level. At the Manning Networking Conference in Ottawa, Rev. Robert Sirico told a story about stickball that illustrates how the concept of subsidiarity applies in our neighborhoods. (Via: Cardus) ...
What a Teen with Down Syndrome Can Teach Us About the Joy of Work
In an enthusiastic reaction to his first job offer, Ben Sunderman, a 19-year-old with Down syndrome, has spread lots of smiles across the internet. In doing so, he reminds us of the power of work to bring joy to human lives, and ofthe gift-giving capacityGod has givento each of us, including those we often dismiss as“disabled.” Caught on video by his mother, Sunderman literally jumps for joy after reading about his acceptance to aninternship atEmbassy Suites. “I did it!” he...
Remembering Chuck Colson
Yesterday was the third anniversary of Chuck Colson’s passing. The Acton Institute had the privilege of conducting the last public interview with Chuck before his death. It serves as a wonderful introduction to and reminder of Chuck’s love for Christ and his world. ...
Human Trafficking in Michigan
Acton’s Communication’s Specialist, Elise Hilton, recently penned an op-ed for the Detroit News on human trafficking. She argues that not only is it bigger than people realize, but it’s happening in Acton’s home, Michigan. The facts are grim: ■Michigan’s proximity to the Canadian border and waterways increases the likelihood of trafficking in our state. ■Michigan truck stops and hotels are used for sex trafficking. ■Major events such as ArtPrize and the North American International Auto Show are also major draws...
Google Glass And Efficiency: When Technology Fails Us
In a thoughtful blog post from Andy Bannister, he discusses what happens when technology fails us. It’s not that the technology is “bad;” it is only the use of such technology that fails us. Take Google Glass. At this point, they are really no more than an expensive toy. However, there are those who have a bigger vision for Google Glass. Particular controversy has been caused because Google es equipped with a camera and that raises all manner of privacy...
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Human Trafficking Bill
What is the story with the human trafficking bill? The recent human trafficking bill, officially known as the Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015, was originally introduced in in the Senate on January 2015 by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX). The bill had 34 cosponsors in the Senate, 13 Democrats and 21 Republicans (Sen. Barbara Boxer initially signed on as a cosponsor but withdrew her support a day later.) However, after initially supporting the bill, Democrats launched a filibuster...
Why we should celebrate fossil fuels on Earth Day
Every year on Earth Day events are held around the globe todemonstrate support for environmental protection. You aren’t likely to see any celebrations of fossil fuels, though, despite all the ways theyhave improved the environment for human life and flourishing. As Alex Epstein says, maybe we should reflect more on how fossil fuels has made our environment cleaner and healthier. (Via: AEI Ideas) ...
Going Back to the Grammar of Creation
“The primacy of God, which Pope Benedict XVI made a priority of his pontificate, reminds us that reality is intelligible and human reason must be used,” says Bishop Dominique Rey in this week’s Acton Commentary, “reason that is able to recognize the logos, the objective reason that manifests itself in nature.” Some radical environmental movements (such as those who embrace what is often called “deep ecology”) clearly derive their inspiration from a pagan pantheism, which leads to a deification of...
‘Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?’
In this video, Richard Hovannisian, professor emeritus of Armenian and Near Eastern History at the University of California, Los Angeles, explains the Armenian Genocide. Today is April 24, Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, which is held annually memorate the 1.5 million victims of the Armenian Genocide of 1915 by Ottoman Turks. It is also the official remembrance of the centennial of the campaign of human and cultural destruction. Here are more reflections and news items: Message of HH Karekin II at...
The U.S. Government is Stealing Raisins—And Could Take Your iPhone Too
Apolicy started during FDR’s New Deal is being used today by the federal government to steal raisins from farmers. And the implications could lead to government theft of a wide range of personal property. During theNew Deal era, Congress gave the USDA the authority to take raisins from farmers pensation. Actually, the USDA was given the authority to steal a variety of agricultural products—including almonds, walnuts, and cherries—and keep them in a government-controlled “reserve” to prevent them from being sold...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved