Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Review: The Edge of Democracy
Review: The Edge of Democracy
Oct 17, 2026 8:27 PM

The documentary The Edge of Democracy is a personal memoir about the recent political scenario in Brazil. Released on June 19 on Netflix, it is directed by Petra Costa — a Brazilian filmmaker and actress who has close connections with leftist politicians. The film portrays events such as the impeachment of Dilma Rousseff, the Operation Car Wash — that arrested the ex- president Lula da Silva — and the rise of the current President Jair Bolsonaro with a leftist perspective. It has Lula, Dilma and their Worker’s Party in the center of the plot, containing exclusive images of the two never seen before.

The Edge of Democracy is a response to the series The Mechanism, which is also available on Netflix and tells the story of Operation Car Wash. The Mechanism is a fiction series inspired by real facts and does not seek to make a realistic representation, as The Edge of Democracy does. However, The Edge of Democracy is released in a delicate moment of Brazilian politics, when private messages between judges and prosecutors of the Operation Car Wash were leaked by the “The Intercept” website on June 9. The American website accuses them of forming an illegal alliance to arrest the ex-President Lula. In this scenario, the documentary can gain a disproportionate acclamation by the left.

While the personal memoir directed by Costa portrays a few facts with a sense of reality, most of the plot is pure sensationalism. Indeed, Costa does what the left in Brazil is the best at: taking things out of context and spinning the facts.

As stated, the documentary is successful in some regards. It realistically shows the division of the country between two groups: political left and right. Costa correctly portrays a country that pletely polarized. Also, it realistically portrays Lula’s populism, and how he turned the poor against the elite during his time in office. One of the most emblematic scenes of the movie is the famous description made by the American ex-president Barack Obama about Lula: “The most popular politician on Earth” during a meeting between the two of them.

Lastly, The Edge of Democracy correctly represents Dilma Rousseff as Lula’s puppet. The documentary does not try to hide that Dilma is just chosen by Lula to succeed him in the presidency because she was willing to follow his ideology. It shows that the change in office does not represent a change in governability.

In spite of a few realistic representations, The Edge of Democracy is mainly a delusional film. The reason is: its goal is to portray Lula and Dilma as victims of an anti-democratic system.The documentary blames the fall of the Worker’s Party on its political alliances. It creates a conspiracy theory stating that the alliances made by the party eventually destroyed its power. The film tries to convince the viewer about three main things.

The first one is the illusional narrative of the left, where the impeachment process against the ex-president Dilma Rousseff was a coup carefully planned by Congress. It states that there was not enough evidence for impeachment, and that she was impeached because of political weaknesses and her attacks against the elite. The documentary does not clearly demonstrate that mitted a crime called “fiscal maneuver” in Portuguese, which was analyzed and proved in Congress. Dilma’s impeachment was not a revolution –as the film tries to portray– but a lawful process following the Brazilian Constitution.

Secondly, The Edge of Democracy portrays the Car Wash Operation and the arrest of the ex-president Lula as an illegal process. Once again, the film creates the imaginary plot that there was not enough evidence to charge the ex-president, and that he was a victim of political persecution by the leaders of the operation. The documentary does not show that Car Wash was one of the major operations in Brazilianhistory, arresting multiple politicians and businessman. It tries to put Lula in the target of the plot. In reality, he was just one of the criminals sentenced by the operation. The Car Wash is not about Lula, as the documentary tries to convince the viewer. Instead, it was created bat corruption in Latin America, reaching 11 countries in the continent.

Thirdly, the personal memoir makes a sensationalist representation of the rise of the current President Jair Bolsonaro. It portrays the president as the return of authoritarianism, connecting him to the Brazilian military dictatorship which lasted for 21 years (1964 – 1985). Indeed, Bolsonaro is a former military captain and has made statements praising the military dictatorship. However, the reality shows that he has no intention of restoring any kind of authoritarian regime. In fact, in six months of government Bolsonaro has implemented more classical liberal policies than fourteen years in which the Worker’s governed the country (2002-2016).

If you do not follow Brazilian politics, The Edge of Democracy is misleading. In fact, the documentary’s goal is to reach those who do not have an understanding about Brazilian politics and deceive them. The film is really a conspiracy theory, full of speculations that do not match reality. In this case, The Mechanism will be a better choice. Even though it is a fiction series, it does not spin the facts to make a point. If you follow Brazilian politics, The Edge of Democracy may strike you as bizarre, making you wonder how far the left can go in an attempt to reverse the political scenario.

Home page photo White House public domain. Lula meets Barack Obama.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
When Religious Liberty Disappears, Who Remains Behind?
While you’re munching on hot dogs, chasing the kids around the yard with a Super Soaker and generally enjoying a 3-day weekend benefit of the Founding Fathers, remind yourself (at least once) what a gift religious liberty is. Come Friday night, Saturday or Sunday morning, you can (or not!) go to the mosque, synagogue or church of your choice and peacefully enjoy the service. You can sit and be a vaguely interested participant or you can go full-throttle with song...
The Declaration of Independence reminds us to put tyrants on notice
Perhaps the most enduring legacy of the Declaration of Independence is that it sought to overturn the long abuses and powers of tyrants. It revealed the truth of self-government and that power is inherent in the people. In the second introduction of the document, Jefferson declared: …That whenever any Form of Government es destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such...
The Patriot’s Asterisk
We Americans have a peculiar relationship to the term “patriot.” To question someone’s patriotism is considered an insult, while to praise their patriotism is pliment. Yet strangely, the only people who refer to pletely without irony or qualification, as patriots are old veterans, old conservatives, and certainpro athletes in New England. Of course, people who do not fit into those three categories sometimes self-identify with that label. But when they do it’s almost always panied by an asterisk, denoting—whether expressed...
Charles Carroll and Independence Day
This weekend marks another celebration of America’s birthday of Independence from our colonial rulers. It is typical to praise the founding fathers for what they did in 1776 and the subsequent years to lay down the foundation for this country. Very often, when people talk about the founding fathers they are referring to Washington, Franklin, Adams, Jefferson, or one of the many currently well-known statesmen of the Revolution. This year though, when people sing the praises of the Founding Fathers,...
What Christians Should Know About Comparative Advantage
Note: This is the latest entry in the Acton blog series, “What Christians Should Know About Economics.” For other entries inthe series seethis post. The Term:Comparative advantage What it Means:The ability of an individual or group of individual (e.g., a business firm) to produce goods or services at a lower opportunity cost than other individuals or groups. Why it Matters: There is a story of the distinguished British biologist, J.B.S. Haldane, who found himself in pany of a group of...
‘Theological Study’ Masks Progressive Roots
One should always worry when dollar signs replace the letter “S” in discussions related to campaign finance and theology. For example, the title of Auburn Theological Seminary’s inaugural entry in its Applied Theology Series, “Lo$ing Faith in Our Democracy,” leaves little doubt there’s an unhidden agenda lurking within. Auburn Theological is a seminary for continuing education for clergy. It doesn’t grant degrees, but seems to fancy itself a think tank of sorts. If the “scare dollar sign” in its Applied...
Beware of Self-Willed Religion
Last week, I wrote about the danger of self-chosen sacrifice, channeling evangelist Oswald Chambers, who warns us to “never decide the place of your own martyrdom.” “Always guard against self-chosen service for God,” he continues. “Self-sacrifice may be a disease that impairs your service.” As an example of how the process ought to go, Chambers looks to the story of Abraham and Isaac. God demanded something quite peculiar —the sacrifice of Abraham’s son —and Abraham simply obeyed.“God chose the test...
Radio Free Acton: Walter E. Williams, Frederic Bastiat, and American Political Culture
It’s time again for another edition of Radio Free Acton, and we think this one is well worth the listen. Today, Paul Edwards talks with scholar, author, economist, occasional guest host of the nation’s largest talk radio showand all-around great guyDr. Walter E. Williams about Frederic Bastiat’s classic The Law and the insights into modern America by reading that classic defense of limited government, authentic justice and human freedom. Williams wrote the introduction for the latest edition of Bastiat’s work,...
Can We Separate Church And State? Or Church From Anything?
Thomas Jefferson believed that the practice of one’s faith should not be impinged upon by one’s government. He wrote of this in a letter or address to the Danbury Baptist Association: Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions,” he wrote, “I contemplate with sovereign reverence that...
Why Bootleggers and Baptists Align on Regulation
“Politics makes strange bedfellows,” said Charles Dudley Warner. And nowhere is that more true than in the political alliances that form around regulation. In a 1983 paper, regulatory economist Bruce Yandle coined the catch-phrase “Bootleggers and Baptists” for the observation that regulations are often supported by peculiar alliances who have very different end-goals in mind. Yandle explains the Bootleggers and Baptists theory of regulation in this video by LearnLiberty. (Via: Art Carden) ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved