Every so often your writer is reduced to scratching his head bemusedly at what leftist religious shareholder activists deem worthy of prioritization. Whether based on religious faith or not, it always seemed to me shareholders’ concerns should be maximization of return on investments rather than reshaping the world into a progressive utopia.

Yet here we have the religious shareholder activists of the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility and Boston Common Asset Management celebrating a victory that their press release practically equates with alleviating world poverty, hunger and disease. Yes, dear readers, ICCR and BCAM successfully convinced Mondelez International Inc. – the corporate bogeyman responsible for such crimes against humanity as the delicious snack foods Oreos, Cadbury, Ritz Crackers and Triscuits – to drop all advertising aimed at children under 12 years old:

While pany had a policy in place that prohibited any advertising to children under six, and called for any advertising to children 6-11 to meet specific nutritional criteria, the new policy will go even further. According to Mondelez’ website:

We decided to further strengthen our Marketing to Children Policy. Starting January 1, 2016 we will no longer advertise our products directly to children under age 12, irrespective of the product’s nutritional profile. We will focus all advertising efforts towards the parents and adults, giving them information and choices to help make mindful snacking decisions for themselves and their families. Our brands are in the process of transitioning their marketing campaigns.

Boy howdy, the global sigh of relief rushes at me like the sound of a whirlwind. However, the ICCR and BCAM busy-bodies aren’t quite finished preening:

ICCR members have been in dialogue with pany, advocating for stricter policies that will shield kids in the 6-11 age group from direct ads for snack foods and products that promise children’s nutrition. Child-directed advertising for snack foods, sugary drinks and other unhealthy foods has been linked to the epidemic of childhood obesity, as children are considered especially vulnerable to these advertising messages.

The shareholders believe the new policy sets the industry standard for responsible marketing to youth that will result in healthier food choices for children and importantly, establishes a model for other panies to follow.

Said Lauren Compere of Boston Common Asset Management, “Mondelez has shown us that it understands the risks some of these products pose for children’s health and is putting the right safeguards in place to ensure that children aren’t being directly targeted with ads that feature the ‘junk foods’ known to cause obesity and other health problems.”

Readers will note the weasely text of Mondelez – “irrespective of the nutritional profile” – and ICCR’s claim a link exists between advertising and childhood obesity that might promise children’s nutrition.” Good grief, and too bad Mondelez found it necessary to cave to ICCR and BCAM hooey at the expense of shareholders who reasonably expect a major pany to put them first rather than wasting time and precious corporate resources on such silliness.