Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Religion in the public square strengthens public discourse
Religion in the public square strengthens public discourse
Jul 2, 2025 10:29 PM

Robert Wuthnow’s new book demonstrates that religion has provided, not a moral majority, but innumerable moral minorities that uphold free expression and a vibrant culture of dissent.

Read More…

Religious expression in the public square is currently challenged by peting concerns. On the left, some worry that religion is an anti-rational monolith, quietly subverting legitimate expressions of democracy. Others, on the right, worry that religious diversity destroys cultural cohesion, which they see as necessary to democracy. In his latest book, Why Religion Is Good for American Democracy, Robert Wuthnow eases both worries. He argues that religion is good for democracy precisely because of, not despite, its diversity. Rather than a theoretical treatise, Wuthnow provides a historical analysis of precisely how interreligious dialogue has taken place over the past 100 years. Religion has provided, not a moral majority, but innumerable moral minorities that uphold free expression and a vibrant culture of dissent. His analysis gives hope but also a warning for the future of democracy in the United States.

Debate and dissention are inevitable. One means of exchange is peting parties to engage in open fighting, as we have seen on the streets of Portland and Charlottesville. This has been the default for most of human history. A highly appealing alternative is for institutions in civil society to provide a structure for peaceful dissent on contentious issues. For instance, during the debates surrounding the New Deal, different religious denominations coalesced either in support or in opposition to it. Some argued that the New Deal aligned with Christian teachings on serving the poor, while others feared that the increase in government power would lead to authoritarianism, squashing religious expression. Both groups vehemently disagreed. Cross-denominational partnerships eased tensions and allowed room for dissent, furthering the democratic process. Without religion, the debate around the New Deal would have been far less robust.

How do religious groups uniquely administer this space for disagreement? By providing an alternate center of gravity for debates on various issues. For these groups, political realities are secondary to spiritual realities. Political debates can occur in the context of a preexisting agreement on the ultimacy of the transcendent. When individuals believe the government is the totality of reality, they are willing to take certain radical actions to impose their will in that sphere. Religious groups provide an alternative set of higher goods. Political solutions are only part of what is important in the world.

Despite what some naysayers might think, religion has had a profound impact on defending freedom of conscience, for both the religious and nonreligious. Thomas Jefferson’s famous “Wall of Separation” letter was written not to deists but to Baptists fearing their loss of religious freedom to a state church whose tenets they did not embrace. And debates over pacifism resulted in a strong protection of freedom of conscience in the United States. Wuthnow shows how the idea of religious freedom, beginning with strong protections for various Protestant groups, have been broadened and strengthened over time.

Through providing alternate moral framing, religious diversity guards against collective opinion. During the COVID-19 pandemic, religious practitioners displayed a variety of responses. The vast majority adjusted their meetings and practiced social distancing. Their networks were a crucial way municating important information to parishioners. A vocal minority, however, strongly objected to laws concerning social distancing. The back and forth between various groups, Wuthnow explains, helped ensure a “balance of freedom and collective well-being.” Without the crucial input of religious groups, the response to the pandemic might have been quicker, but it would not have adequately weighed relevant trade-offs. The moral frameworks provided by religious traditions lend a greater depth to the types of arguments used in such debates.

Religion’s role in democracy, however, has not resulted in one great campfire “Kumbaya” sing—far from it! Religious disagreement does not guarantee a promise, as is the case in the legislative process. Instead, it allows for both sides to hold opposing views while providing a way to express those differences. “Democracy depends on these opposing groups making themselves heard—rather than timidly adopting a let’s-all-be-friends” attitude,” Wuthnow argues. Democracy does not create a trade-off between peace and dissent; it allows both to exist concurrently. This point is often lost on those who champion diversity. Diversity itself is not the goal; it is a mere necessity of a structure wherein various groups can fully exercise their religious beliefs. The focus for religious groups is always on the importance of their respective beliefs, not on diversity itself.

Wuthnow certainly inspires confidence that religion has been a net benefit for democracy in the past, but what about the future? The U.S. continues to weather fundamental disagreements among religion practitioners, including over government power, war, and health. For those concerned about censorship of ideas, religious institutions remain a significant arena for open discussion to occur. Religion has been and will continue to be a boon to democracy. The plethora of different perspectives ensures that all sides of issues are heard and that the eventual impacts on different groups are thoughtfully considered.

Yet there remains a question: Can religion be a force for good in American democracy if it ceases to be a significant force at all? In the U.S. there has been a precipitous rise in the “nones,” those who adhere to no religion. This group will undoubtedly influence the way we view religious expression. Adding to this, many denominations in the U.S. are being rent apart, not by theological issues, but by political ones. In many congregations, political issues are perceived as the highest good. What happens when political priorities e more important to practitioners of faith than matters of basic doctrine and belief? The ability of religion to provide a platform for debate and to create alternative priorities and moral framing is certainly diminished by such shifts. When politics es all important, each political victory es more crucial, making violence more and more appealing. For the benefits of religion to democracy to be felt, munities must continue to be significant forces in society. The future of religion in the U.S. is uncertain, but Wuthnow’s excellent new book makes a convincing case that our ability to plex and contentious issues in our society is greater with a robust religious sphere than without.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
An economist’s Christmas: Is gift-giving wasteful?
During a season such as Christmas, where hyper-consumerism and hyper-generosity converge in strange and mysterious ways, it’s a question worth asking: How much of our gift-giving is inefficient and wasteful? For some, it’s a buzz-kill question worthy of Ebenezer Scrooge. For an economist, however, it’s a prodthat pushes us to createmore value and better align our hearts and hands with human needs. In a new video at Marginal Revolution, economists Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrock explore this at length, asking...
Financial endeavors can serve the common good
“Gregg lays out a careful and detailed argument for the proposition that, done well, financial endeavors can serve mon good,” says Adam J. MacLeod in a review of Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg’s most recent book For God and Profit: How Banking and Finance Can Serve the Common Good. MacLeod’s review at The Public Discourse, gives praise to Gregg’s book saying that anyone who feels called to the finance industry “can get quite a lot straight by reading this fine...
How humans became consumers
Consumption is arguably the first (or maybe second) economic concept mentioned in the Bible. After creating Adam and Eve and giving them the cultural mandate (“Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it.”), God says to them, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth and all...
The philanthropist’s dilemma — good intentions, harmful effects
Tim Sullivan, editorial director of Harvard Business Review Press, took a look at how difficult it actually is for philanthropists to give their money away and focused on the case of Paul English, founder of . In a Harvard Business Review article titled “The Philanthropist’s Burden” in the December issue, Sullivan talks about how, despite many causes to support, the real trick is to find the most effective organizations. He uses the Acton Institute Poverty, Inc. documentary to show how...
A poetic tonic for today’s psychic distress
When most literature students are asked about literature inspired by World War I, they typically respond with such names as Robert Graves, Wilfred Owen, Siegfried Sassoon and Richard Aldington. As well, T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound are included by extension as both “The Waste Land” and “Hugh Selwyn Mauberley” are largely informed by the 1914 to 1918 conflagration. Largely forgotten is David Jones, a writer of many sensibilities that are all synthesized and informed by his Roman Catholicism. In Parenthesis,...
Samuel Gregg: Protectionism harmful in the long run
In a new article at The Christian Science Monitor titled “Can ‘economic nationalism’ keep more jobs in US?” Acton Director of Research Samuel Gregg is interviewed about President-elect Donald Trump’s stated goal of keeping jobs and businesses from leaving for foreign countries.In the analysis piece by reporter Patrik Jonsson, he cites Gregg as a critic of protectionism: In short, the United States cannot step back from the world without losing out, critics say. Trump’s plans are in the short-term “likely...
Unemployment as Economic-Spiritual Indicator — November 2016 Report
Series Note: Jobs are one of the most important aspects of a morally functioning economy. They help us serve the needs of our neighbors and lead to human flourishing both for the individual and munities. Conversely, not having a job can adversely affect spiritual and psychological well-being of individuals and families. Because unemployment is a spiritual problem, Christians in America need to understand and be aware of the monthly data on employment. Each month highlight the latest numbers we need...
Would you give up the internet for a million dollars?
Are you better off than someone who has a million dollars in the bank? Probably not—at least pared to a millionaire today. But chances are you consider yourself better off than someone who was a millionaire in an previous era—and you may even be better off than someone who had a million dollars in the bank in the 1970s or 1980s. Don’t believe me? Then ask yourself this question: How much is [technological advance X] worth to me? That’s not...
Understanding tax revenue and deadweight loss
Note: This is post #12 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Why do taxes exist? What are their effects? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explainshow taxes affect consumer surplus and producer surplus. He also discusses the concept of deadweight by considering a real-world example from the 1990s: taxing luxury yachts. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the speed. You can...
7 Figures: Marriage, Family, and Economics in America
The 2016 American Family Survey was designed to understand the “lived experiences of Americans in their relationships and families” andprovide “context for understanding Americans’ life choices, economic experiences, attitudes about their own relationships, and evaluations of the relationships they see around them.” Here are seven figures you should know from this recently released survey: 1. When asked what specific challenges are making family life difficult, one-third (32 percent) said the costs associated with raising a family, one-fourth (27 percent) said...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved