Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Payday lending is a debt trap. But regulatory ‘solutions’ may be even worse.
Payday lending is a debt trap. But regulatory ‘solutions’ may be even worse.
May 9, 2025 1:40 AM

What’s the biggest problem with payday loans?

The obvious answer would seem to be “high interest rates.” But interest rates are often tied to credit risk, and so charging high interest rates is not always wrong. Another answer may be that the loans appear to be targeted toward minorities. But research shows that the industry appeals to those with financial problems regardless of race or ethnicity.

No, the problem with payday loans —what makes them a debt trap — is “rollovers.”

A study by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the U.S. government’s consumer protection agency, found that four out of five payday loans are rolled over or renewed within 14 days. 40 percent of borrowers take out only one loan, about 15 percent take out two loans in sequence, and 45 percent take out three or more. But 14 percent of borrowers take out more than 11 loans in a row.

The CFPB is considering proposing rules that would end payday debt traps by requiring lenders to take steps to make sure consumers can repay their loans.

All lenders making covered short-term loans would be required to adhere to one of two sets of requirements. The first set would “prevention requirements” which the CFPB says:

[W]ould eliminate debt traps by requiring lenders to determine at the outset that the consumer can repay the loan when due – including interest, principal, and fees for add-on products – without defaulting or re-borrowing. For each loan, lenders would have to verify the consumer’s e, major financial obligations, and borrowing history to determine whether there is enough money left to repay the loan after covering other major financial obligations and living expenses.

Under this set, the requirements include:

• Lenders would generally have to adhere to a 60-day cooling off period between loans.

• The consumer could not have any other outstanding covered loans with any lender.

• To make a second or third loan within the two-month window, lenders would have to document that the borrower’s financial circumstances have improved enough to repay a new loan without re-borrowing. They would have to verify, for example, that the consumer’s e had increased following the prior loan.

• After three loans in a row, all lenders would be prohibited from making a new short-term loan to the borrower for 60 days.

The second set would be “protection requirements,” aimed at protecting against debt traps by “limiting the number of loans that a borrower can take out in a row and requiring lenders to provide affordable repayment options.”

These protections would include the following restrictions:

• The loan could not exceed $500, last longer than 45 days, carry more than one finance charge, or require the consumer’s vehicle as collateral.

• The consumer could not have any other outstanding covered loans with any lender.

• Rollovers would be capped at two – three loans total – followed by a mandatory 60-day cooling-off period.

• The second and third consecutive loans would be permitted only if the lender offers an affordable way out of debt. The Bureau is considering two options for this. The first would require that the principal decrease over the three-loan sequence so that it is repaid in full when the third loan is due. The second would require the lender to provide a no-cost “off-ramp” if the borrower is unable to repay after the third loan, to allow the consumer to pay the loan off over time without further fees.

• The consumer could not be more than 90 days in debt on covered short-term loans in a 12-month period.

I’ve previously written about my own experience with payday lending and getting caught in a debt trap. In hindsight, would I have still used a payday loan? Absolutely. I did it because I was desperate. And the payday pany was more than willing to take advantage of my desperation. But the alternative was even more dire.

What would I have done if the payday lending option didn’t exist? I don’t know. But if these CFPB regulations are put in place, consumers who find themselves in similar financial straits may soon find out.

“This is rulemaking that could remove an entire product,” says David Newville, director of government affairs at the Corporation for Enterprise Development. “I think most reasonable people who are outside of the core industry recognize that the payday loan, the traditional payday loan, is not a good product. But at the same time, they have reservations: If this goes away, what will happen if there is nothing to fill the void? Will borrowers turn to loan sharks?

This is also my primary concern about these proposed regulations. I hate “predatory”lending and would love to see the underlying business model of most such lending services disappear. But until we have a better model to offer people with short-term financial problems, payday lending may be the best solution for people who have no other options.

Destroying the system with regulations won’t solve the financial problems of those in need. So what will be the effect? Will it prevent rational but desperate people from making systematic mistakes that lower their own financial well-being? Or will it merely push them to seek even worse alternatives. Before we try to “fix” the problem we need to know more about what the solution will cost the poor.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Politics of Hunger
In an otherwise fine piece focusing on innovative techniques used by food banks to increase efficiency, while at the same time improving service and the recognition of the dignity of those they serve, Bread for the World president David Beckmann uses the opportunity to throw a dose of pessimism into the mix. “We can’t food-bank our way to the end of hunger,” said Beckmann, co-recipient of the 2010 World Food Prize. “Christian people need to change the politics of hunger...
Why the Nativity?
Increasingly the Nativity tends to be associated with the political, as the crèche and other overtly religious symbols are banished from the public square by public pressure or the courts. To some municates a baby savior with so little power he can’t even defeat the secular legal authorities who seek his removal. If God is out there, “He must be pretty weak,” could be mon refrain today. Likewise in some churches the Nativity is seen as an activity for the...
In the ‘pressure cooker’
Video: Hundreds of protesters clashed with riot police across central Athens on Wednesday, smashing cars and hurling gasoline bombs during a nationwide labour protest against the government’s latest austerity measures. The former Development Minister Costis Hatzidakis was attacked by protesters outside a luxury hotel. He was escorted, bleeding from the scene as his attackers yelled “thieves” at him. Source: Russia Today In the Greek daily Kathimerini, Alexis Papachelas writes: There are no easy answers and, to make matters worse, we...
The Morality of GM Food
Steve Connor in The Independent (HT: RealClearReligion) speculates about some happenings at the Vatican with regard to genetically-modified (GM) food. It’s important to note, as is the case in this article, that things that happen in mittees and study groups at the Vatican do not by default have some kind of papal endorsement. To wit: A leaked document from a group of scientists linked to Rome has set a hare running about the possible endorsement of GM technology by the...
Understanding Human Behavior
In “Human Nature and Capitalism” on AEI’s The American, Arthur C. Brooks and Peter Wehner look at three different “pictures” of what it means to be human and point to the one, foundational understanding that has undergirded the flourishing American culture of democratic capitalism: “If men were angels,” wrote James Madison, the father of the Constitution, in Federalist Paper No. 51, “no government would be necessary.” But Madison and the other founders knew men were not angels and would never...
Re: The Politics of Hunger
Jordan’s post on hunger raises a timely question, on a day when First Lady Michelle Obama was on hand to watch the president sign the $4.5 billion “Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act” at a Washington elementary school. Despite the media coverage and White House spin that points to this in part as a hunger fighting piece of legislation, the measure is really about obesity. Because in America, the real problem with food is superabundance and waste, not scarcity and hunger. As...
Loss of Institutional Faith
In this mentary I say that part of the reason less money is being given to local churches is that it is reflective of a broader trend of distrust towards institutions. Commentary magazine’s blog contentions has some more recent data confirming this overall shift. The post summarizes the December issue of AEI’s “Political Report” (PDF), which focuses especially on trust in the government. It finds that “contemporary criticisms of the federal government are broad and deep” and that, for instance,...
Samuel Gregg: Socialism and Solidarity
On Public Discourse, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg observes in a new piece that “while moral beliefs have an important impact upon economic life, the manner in which they are given institutional expression also matters. This is illustrated by the different ways in which people’s responsibilities to those in need—what might be called the good of solidarity—are given political and economic form.” Excerpt: … the rather modest welfare and labor-market reforms presently being implemented in Spain, Greece and France have...
Christian Giving Begins with the Local Church
In today’s Acton Commentary I argue that “Christian Giving Begins with the Local Church.” I note some statistics that show that American Christians are increasingly looking beyond their local congregations and churches as outlets for their charitable giving, in spite of the fact that giving to religiously affiliated and religiously focused charities is increasing. What es down to, I think, is that in large part Christians don’t trust their local congregations to spend the money in a way that is...
Addendum to Loss of Institutional Faith
Here’s a final and brief follow-up to the discussion about the loss of faith in institutions over recent decades. We might observe that the increase in charitable giving to religious organizations amidst declines in charitable giving overall might show that at least there is not a corresponding loss of faith by religious people in charitable institutions. This is the implication, in fact, at least for institutions other than local churches. Overall, though, it does seem clear that “big charity” is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved