Today at Ethika Politika, I examine the longstanding claim of the Roman Catholic Church that the universal character of mon good in our present era necessitates a world political authority. The problem, I argue, lies in the tradition’s too closely identifying the good of munities with mon good.

The recently canonized Pope John XXIII, for example, states that “[p]ublic authority” is “the means of promoting mon good in civil society” (Pacem in Terris, 136, emphasis mine). And Pope Benedict XVI continued the call made by John XXIII for a “world political authority” in Caritas in Veritate, specifically mending that the U.N. be “vested with the effective power to ensure security for all, regard for justice, and respect for rights” (57, emphasis mine). The problem with the U.N., to the popes, is that it is not powerful enough.

In response, I write,

I would worry about a U.N. or any other global political authority endowed with such great power and means. If nation states have failed to ensure the mon good, as the pope admits, why should we expect a global government to be free from error in this regard? The only difference would be that the mistakes of such politicians would necessarily have global consequences. I like my U.N. nearly ineffective and mostly powerless, thank you very much. If anything, to ensure subsidiarity, the larger the political authority, the less power and means it should have.

In the Fall 2012 issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality, Antonio Pancorbo made a similar point, writing,

Caritas in Veritate’s global political authority must be organized in a subsidiary and stratified manner in order to prevent the emergence of a dangerous and tyrannical universal power (cf. CV, 57). However, all political powers should already “be marked by subsidiarity, articulated into several layers and involving different levels that can work together” (CV, 57). Reality, however, shows that this condition is rarely met, and the tendency, with continuous attacks on freedoms, is toward increasingly less regard for the principle of subsidiarity and a less effective division of powers. If satisfactory subsidiarity is very difficult to find in existing political authorities, how could a world political authority, with the huge accumulation of power it would involve, be expected to achieve it? Is thisproposal realistic? Does it not pose an excessive risk to the mon good?

As an alternative to the close association between the good of political authority and mon good, I instead offer an insight from the Orthodox saint Nicholas Cabasilas, who wrote that “God … is mon good of all.” Thus, I argue, “Ironically, considered in this light what we need most of all to promote the mon good is not a world political authority, but a world spiritual authority: the Roman Catholic Church is selling itself short!” Indeed, it is my conviction that when people are enabled to truly pursue the kingdom of God, mon good benefits. Or, as Christ himself put it better, “seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things shall be added to you” (Matthew 6:33).

Read my full essay at Ethika Politika here.