Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
On the House of European History: ‘Without Christianity, Europe has no soul’
On the House of European History: ‘Without Christianity, Europe has no soul’
Feb 11, 2026 7:33 AM

The newly opened House of European History has a blind spot: It entirely omits the role that religion played in European history. According to a new essay from Arnold Huijgen at Religion & Liberty Transatlantic, when es to religion, the$61 million museum in Brussels, built by the European Parliament, is “an empty House.” Instead, the EU displaces the Divinein its exhibits.

Walking through the structure the day it opened, he observed:

[I]t is as if religion does not exist. In fact, it never existed and never impacted the history of the continent. On none of the many floors is any attention paid to the Reformation as the great divide between Roman Catholicism and Protestantism, to religious wars between confessions, or the quest for freedom of religion that was at the heart of the Dutch Revolt. If one did not know that the Roman Catholic Church existed, one would not find it out in the permanent exposition of European history that the European Parliament seeks to present toevery European (at thatEuropean’s expense). No longer is European secularism fighting the Christian religion; it simply ignores every religious aspect in life altogether.

The fact that the world’s largest church (Roman Catholicism) is based within Europe, that the world’s second largest church (Eastern Orthodoxy) is the official faith of many Eastern European nations (de jureorde facto), or that the confessions of the Protestant Reformation have their origins on European soil is omitted altogether, according to Huijgen.

Huijgen,a professor of systematic theology at the Theological University Apeldoorn, notes that, instead of the Creator, the top floor of the museum is dedicated to the European Union. He dubs this “literally the apex of the European Union’s narcissism.”

Perhaps his most interesting observation is the self-defeating nature of secular historical revisionism. Technocrats, eager to exclude religious faith from the public square, prepare the ground for an inevitable populist backlash, he writes – a strong rejoinder against both EU conceit and rigorously secularist government at any level. People often remember George Orwell’s dictum in 1984: “He who controls the past controls the future.” However, they often forget its corollary: “He whocontrols the present controls the past.” By his account, the taxpayer-subsidized monument to the EU embodies that phrase in its ownway.

But since the present springs from the past, this living history continues to assert itself in the daily lives of Europeans, including their elected officials:

[I]t is clear that religion did play a crucial role in European history. Social structures in southern European countries cannot be understood without the role of the Roman Catholic Church. The responsibility of the individual, stressed in Protestantism, is a central tenet of European culture. Calvinism may or may not be thefertile soil that buds forthcapitalismasMax Webertheorized, but at least its role in creating the cultural structures of much of Europe needs to be discussed. Until the 1960s, at the very minimum, most Europeans understood themselves as Christians, and – to cite but one example– Christian Democratic political parties still play an important role in the politics of large European countries like Germany.

Read his account and see if you agree with his conclusion, “Without Christianity, Europe has no soul.”

You may read this full essay here.

This photo has been cropped. CC BY-SA 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Cyber Communication
Ever since the popularization of the Internet, a debate has raged—within and without Christian circles—about the effect of the medium on human development and relationships. A serious and plausible charge against the Web came from those who thought its mode of munication would alter the form of human interaction for the worse. (See, for example, Quentin Schultze’s Habits of the High-Tech Heart, reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality by Megan Maloney.) As is usually the case with new...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 4
In Part 3, we examined why many contemporary Protestants have something of a bad conscience when es to natural law. But, of course, the blame for this cannot be laid fully upon Karl Barth. Even a hint of a fuller explanation has to address intellectual currents that begin to gather momentum in the so-called Enlightenment. One popular explanation within the academic mainstream for the demise of the natural-law tradition in modern Protestant theology attributes it to a form of implosion....
Charity vs. Philanthropy
Philanthropy, for all its good intentions, does not necessarily imply a personal connection with the needy person. It can and often does, but it doesn’t have to. Philanthropy is the more institutional, “big-picture” cousin of charity, which is the personal and direct connection to those in need. Andrew Carnegie building hundreds of libraries with the wealth he made in the steel industry, and being celebrated for it to this day, is philanthropy. Your Aunt Evelyn volunteering at the local church-operated...
Buffett, Gates, and Stewardship
It is one thing to create wealth by using our gifts. This is a matter of knowledge. It is quite a different thing to know what to do with the wealth that has been created. That is where es into the picture. Rev. Zandstra, a Senior Fellow with the Acton Institute, examines Warren Buffett’s recent gift of $31 billion to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and offers words of hope that the Gates Foundation can use this wealth with...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wrap-up Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 13, 2006 – Over the course of the week I have offered my reflections that have arisen within the context of the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar offered by the Institute for Humane Studies (previous editons: Weekend, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday). The presentations by the faculty have been in great part engaging, intellectually rigorous, and valuable. I’ll conclude with an observation about the necessity for any intellectual endeavor to pursue scholarship in a rigorous and serious way. This...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 5
In Part 4, we saw that post-Enlightenment philosophical currents such as Humean empiricism, utilitarianism, and legal positivism are the real culprits in the demise of natural law and not theological criticism from within Reformation theology, as many today take for granted. If this is so, why is contemporary Protestant theology so critical of natural law? The mon reason why contemporary Protestants reject natural law is because they think it does not take sin seriously enough. And the second, which we...
Nipsey Russell on Social Security
Nipsey Russell (1918-2005) I was flipping stations tonight and passed the Game Show Network, which was showing reruns of Match Game ’74. Nipsey Russell, the so-called “Poet Laureate of Television,” began the show with this poem for prosperity: To slow down this recession, and make this economy thrive, give us our social security now, we’ll go to work when we’re sixty-five. ...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Tuesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 11, 2006 – One school of libertarian political thought is that of the so-called anarcho-capitalists. Here’s a good summary: “Anarcho-capitalists reject the state as an unjustified monopolist and systematic aggressor against sovereign individuals, and would replace it with cooperatives, neighborhood associations, private businesses and similar non-monopolistic organizations.” I think this view is patible with biblical Christianity. Perhaps you think that this conclusion is rather uncontroversial and obvious. Even so, Christians who are broadly in favor of limited...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Monday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 10, 2006 – Things are progressing smoothly for me here at the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar. Our daily schedule includes four major lectures from seminar faculty, each with built in small group discussion time as well as Q&As with the presenting faculty. One of our first activities was to try and self-identify in terms of our view of the role of government (if any). I identified with the endorsement of a limited government, whose main role...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wednesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 12, 2006 – Yesterday I outlined in brief a biblical case for the legitimate and even divine institution of civil government. Having established that the State is a valid social institution, the next step in what is broadly called social ethics is to outline the scope of the State’s authority and its relations to other social institutions. A valuable place to start might be in defining what the role of the State ought to be, rather than...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved