Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
No racial reconciliation without intersectionality and privilege
No racial reconciliation without intersectionality and privilege
Aug 25, 2025 8:11 AM

In 1988, Peggy McIntosh gave us “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” to expand our thinking about the reality that being born white in America means that one is free from a host of pressures and burdens that racial minorities have no choice but to face. In 1989, UCLA Law professor Kimberlé W. Crenshaw coined the phrase “intersectionality” to help us see that American life is best understood from an integrative perspective, emphasizing the intersection of several attributes like gender, race, class, and nation. There is not one aspect of our lives that defines who we are. For nearly 25 years, “white privilege” and “intersectionality” have been standard categories in discussions of race in American life. After reading about these ideas I am wondering why Christians do not use these themes when talking about “racial reconciliation.”

Perhaps the cause of this reticence is that progressives see inequality and privilege as something to be remedied–as something abnormal — whereas a more virtuous understanding of these issues in an imperfect world sees privilege and inequality as a opportunity to practice charity and spread shalom.

Since the release of my book Aliens In The Promise Land in 2013, I am bringing to a close my work on race and evangelicalism. If the goal is to demonstrate that being made in the image of God and having equality in the gospel (Gen 1:26-28; Gal 3:28) has implications for daily life, there needs be a more dynamic discussion beyond “racial reconciliation.” In fact, it seems to me that evangelicals will not make progress on race until the discussion advances integrative concepts like “white privilege” and “intersectionality.” “Racial reconciliation” does not cut deep enough and often ignores the intersections and the roles of class and social power.

I was delighted to stumble upon a provocative article last week by Gina Crosley-Corcoran, who is white and grew up very poor in rural Illinois in a camper with no hot water or heat. Titled “Explaining White Privilege to a Broke White Person” (language warning), the article is specifically written for those of us with friends who, upon hearing the phrase “white privilege,” get defensive and believe that because their parents were immigrants, or because they were from a lower social class, they are now somehow immune to the privileges of what it means to be white in America:

The concept of Intersectionality recognizes that people can be privileged in some ways and definitely not privileged in others. There are many different types of privilege, not just skin color privilege, that impact the way people can move through the world or are discriminated against. These are all things you are born into, not things you earned, that afford you opportunities others may not have. For example:

Citizenship – Simply being born in this country affords you certain privileges non-citizens will never access. Class – Being born into a financially stable family can help guarantee your health, happiness, safety, education, intelligence, and future opportunities. Sexual Orientation – By being born straight, every state in this country affords you privileges that non-straight folks have to fight the Supreme Court for. Sex – By being born male, you can assume that you can walk through a parking garage without worrying you’ll be raped and that a defense attorney will then blame it on what you were wearing. Ability – By being born able bodied, you probably don’t have to plan your life around handicap access, braille, or other special needs. Gender – By being born cisgendered, you aren’t worried that the restroom or locker room you use will invoke public outrage.

The point, then, of Christian racial discourse and the necessary inclusion of white privilege and intersectionality, as Crosley-Corcoran points out, is not “to make white people feel guilty about their privilege. It’s not your fault you were born with white skin and experience these privileges.” The point is, for white American, financially stable, fully heterosexual males and females, “Whether you realize it or not, you DO benefit from white privilege, and it IS your fault if you don’t maintain awareness of that fact.” In other words, to be an able-bodied, heterosexual, financially stable, evangelical white person walking around in America denying that he or she directly benefits from white privilege, regardless of family background, is to deny the truth. Perhaps the defensiveness is rooted in a particular form of Christian cowardliness because owning privilege means owning responsibility–the responsibility of charity. After all, it is easier to act like the truth is not true. To deny the existence of race or class privilege, then, is to practice truth suppression. Or, perhaps, the es from not knowing what to do in response. This pletely understandable.

As I have said before, whatever cultural privileges we have been given, either by race or class, what matters is whether or not we use our privileges to help those who do not have them. Our economic, genetic, or socially-conditioned privileges are not for the purpose of protecting and conserving said privileges for ourselves, but rather to pass on the benefits to others who are on the margins. Our privileges are bestowed upon us by God so that we may use them to love our neighbors well (Matt 22:36-40). It is by embracing God’s providence in this way that we are protected from the poison of envy or a sense of entitlement. Privilege is an opportunity to honor God through reciprocity and charity. For example, Daniel the Prophet used his privileged status to plish much for the kingdom of God as did Paul the Apostle.

While “white privilege” is something that I have not experienced, I am very honest about the fact that I do benefit from class privilege. I am a phone call or a few internet clicks away from a house or car loan, for example. As such, I’ve had to work hard over the years to step into the lives of those who did not have those privileges and who remain where they are due to the inertia of the middle-class culture in which I was raised. With my level of privilege I have countless opportunities to show thankfulness for the grace God has given me by passing my privileges on to those without them in very ordinary ways. Perhaps this is all that James is referring to in the concept of “true religion” (James 1:26-27).

In the end, if evangelicals want to make serious progress on race, and show the world that the gospel changes the way we live here and now, it is time to bring 1988 and 1989 into 2014 and openly discuss ways to use our privileges to serve others. “Cultural engagement” is more than blogging about Duck Dynasty, Breaking Bad, Mad Men, or popular movies and music. “Engaging” may mean listening well to the cultural conversation and looking for opportunities to highlight the providences of God that invite us to practice virtue and point the world to God’s mission to redeem all things.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Entitlement and the Christian vision of work
Whether directly connected with our passions or not, God calls us first and foremost to do the next thing well, to his glory, with all of our might, says John Stonestreet. Short of this awareness, we risk “Christianizing” a sense of entitlement. Christians are guilty of inculcating false expectations to their young as well. For at least a couple of generations, Christian colleges and other educational institutions, with the noble intention municating the biblical concept of “calling” being more than...
The shepherd motif: Gregory Thornbury on Cain, Abel, and culture-making
“It needs to be our job to envision a different future for the church in which we teach our young people pete in the arena and be so excellent that they cannot be denied—to be shepherds.” -Gregory Thornbury In a recent lecture at the ERLC’s 2016 National Conference, Gregory Thornbury, President ofKing’s Collegein New York City, challenges the church to “stop talking about culture and engaging culture” and begin petitors into the “heart of the arena,” whether in finance, business,...
Help people, not banks – reflections on the 2016 Nobel Prize in economics
Earlier this week the 2016 Nobel Prize in economics was jointly awarded to Oliver Hart and Bengt Holmström on Monday for their shared contributions to our understanding of contract theory. “Taken together the work of Hart and Holmström has allowed all of us to understand more clearly what a “good” contract might look like,” says Victor V. Claar in this week’s Acton Commentary, “even when both parties face an uncertain future.” Most of Professor Hart’s work has dealt with “principal-agent...
Does the government do too much or too little?
“There are many things government can’t do—many good purposes it must renounce,” said Lord Acton. “It must leave them to the enterprise of others. It cannot feed the people. It cannot enrich the people. It cannot teach the people. It cannot convert the people.” Unfortunately for us, too few of our fellow Americans would agree with Lord Acton on that point. Many people think the government can feed, enrich, and teach us—and even convert us to the “right” (i.e., politically...
When it comes to economics, Pope Francis gets caught up in the rhetoric
We all (probably) want to reduce poverty, but how do we actually go about doing that? Pope Francis has been extremely vocal about this problem, but many have taken issue with his suggested solutions.When describing modern capitalism, he’s used phrases like “globalización de la indiferencia” and “cultura del descarte” or a globalization of indifference and a throwaway culture. Beyond soundbites and one-liners, many are trying to get at the exact meaning of the Pope’s statements on economics and poverty. During...
How to read a demand curve
Note: This is the fifthpost in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. In a previous post we looked at how to understand the demand curve. In this video, we take a closer look by examining how to read the demand curve, how demand curves shift, and consumer surplus. And in the one posted below, we look at some important factors that shift the demand curve, such as changes in population, changes in e, prices of substitutes, and changes in...
Mars needs religion!
These Russian Orthodox cosmonauts get it. Click photo for source. … Or does religion need Mars? So argues mentator James Poulos at Foreign Affairs: What’s clear is that Earth no longer invites us to contemplate, much less renew, our deepest spiritual needs. It has filled up so much with people, discoveries, information, and sheer stuff that it’s maddening to find what F. Scott Fitzgerald called a fresh green breast of a new world — the experience of truly open horizons...
What Christ’s kingship means for religious liberty
In the newly translated Pro Rege: Living Under Christ the King, Volume 1, Abraham Kuyper reminds us that Christ is not only prophet and priest, but also king, challenging us to reflect on what it means to live under that kingship in a fallen world. Written with the aim of “removing the separation between our life inside the church and our life outside the church,” Kuyper reminds us that “Christ’s being Savior does not exclude his being Lord,” and that...
Leaked emails reveal Clinton camp mocked Catholics
Have you ever wondered what liberal political activists and politicians think of Catholics? Well, thanks to Wikileaks you can get a glimpse into their views. In a couple ofemails from Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s account there are exchanges in which conservative Catholics are mocked. The first is the amusing titled“Catholic Spring.”Sandy Newman of Voices for Progress tells Podesta that she thinks there needs to be a “Catholic Spring” akin to the “Arab Spring”, the series of protest against...
Bob Dylan wins Nobel Prize in Literature
When Bob Dylan wrote, “The Times They Are A Changin’,” I doubt he had the Swedish Academy in mind. Nevertheless, by awarding him the 2016 Nobel Prize in Literature the Academy has made a bold statement for a change in the way songwriting is viewed as literature. Many people have plained that there were many more worthy potential recipients. But let’s face the facts: Bob Dylan won, and they lost. He likely didn’t even know he peting. (Reportedly, he was...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved