Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
No, Mr. President, we don’t need more socialist policies
No, Mr. President, we don’t need more socialist policies
Jan 28, 2026 11:08 AM

One hundred years ago, automaker Henry Ford announced in a meeting that in the future pany was going to build only one model of car, that the model was going to “Model T,” and that, “Any customer can have a car painted any color that he wants so long as it is black.”

Increasingly, Americans are finding they have the same choice in government: You can have any economic policy you want so long as it’s socialism.

On one side you have the New Deal socialism exemplified by Sen. Bernie Sanders and on the other we have the MAGA socialism of President Donald Trump. Both men are economic nativists, who largely oppose most forms of globalization and abhor international free trade. Where they differ is in which domestic industries they believe the state should begin operating on behalf of the people. For Sanders, it’s the health insurance industry. For Trump, it’s wireless technology.

Trump’s reelection team is backing a plan to give the government a role in managing America’s next-generation 5G wireless networks—which puts him at odds with the remaining free market advocates within his own administration. The purported reason for getting the government involved is to match China’s plan to roll out new and powerful 5G wireless technology across their nation. But as Ross Marchand, director of policy for the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, notes,

The irony of adopting socialist policies to “win” an petition with a socialist country cannot be overstated. The U.S. can only leapfrog China on innovation by embracing markets, which have led to the highest living standards—and rates of innovation—in world history. Politicians and bureaucrats shouldn’t beat the fake drums of war with China to create a rationale for heavy-handed government intervention.

Fortunately, there are still some people within the GOP who did not join the party in the past 10 years (as our president did) and still remember when Republicans (mostly) supported free enterprise. “Turning heel on this successful, free market approach through China-like nationalization is a non-starter,” tweeted FCC Commissioner Brandon Carr.

The concern, though, is not whether a particular industry will be socialized (as troubling as that is) but rather the fact that both major political parties are increasingly embracing socialism. Republicans excuse moderate support for socialism because the Democrats are increasingly expressing more extreme levels of support. What we need is for more political leaders—including our president—to recognize Americans don’t need a greater variety of socialist policies to choose from. What we need is for those with the power to socialize markets to return our God-given economic freedom back to the people.

Image source: Wikimedia Commons

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Why Superman is Bad for the Economy
In the new movie Man of Steel, Superman engages in a fight with his fellow aliens from Krypton that causes significant damage to Metropolis. Disaster expert Charles Watson estimates the costs of the physical damage done to the city to be about $2 trillion. To put that in context, 9/11’s physical damage cost $55 billion, with a further economic impact of $123 billion. What would be the impact of Superman’s fight on the economy? According to some liberal economists, it...
Family Breakdown, Economic Decline, and the Search for Spiritual Capital
When es to integrating family and vocation, modernity has introduced plenty of opportunity. But it has also produced its own set of challenges. Though our newfound array of choices can help further our callings and empower our contributions to society, it can also distract us away from the universe beyond ourselves. Thus far, I’ve limited my wariness on such matters to the more philosophical and theological realms — those areas where our culture of choice threatens to pollute our thinking...
Youth Unemployment: Are we Becoming Europe?
Alejandro Chafuen, president and chief executive officer of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation and board member of the Acton Institute, recently wrote a piece for discussing youth unemployment in the United States. According to the latest report, U.S. youth unemployment is at 16.2 percent which is more than double the adult unemployment rate. The unemployment rate for youth in Europe is currently at 24 percent. Chafuen asks, “Can we learn from the European experience?” Using piled by the economic freedom...
Report: ‘A Clamp-Down on Religious Liberty’
From a June 22 CNA/EWTN news article on the 2013 National Religious Freedom Conference in Washington, sponsored by the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s American Religious Freedom Program. The Very Reverend Dr. Chad Hatfield, Chancellor of St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary, echoed the Rabbi Cohen’s statements, telling CNA that “I think that there is a clamp-down on religious liberty in this country, but it’s so incredibly simple that we aren’t catching the signs.” “If one religious identity’s freedoms are taken,...
The benefits of character education
When Jessica Lahey started teaching English at a “core virtues” school she thought it would only require talking about empathy and courage when discussing To Kill a Mockingbird. She soon learned what it really meant — and what it meant for her students: I e on. Character education? Core virtues? I teach English, not Sunday school, and besides, I teach middle school. If I were to walk into my eighth grade English class and wax rhapsodic about prudence and temperance,...
The Source of Future Wealth: Babies
Would your life be better off if only half as many people had lived before you? That’s the intriguing question Ramez Naam asks in his new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet. As Ronald Bailey says in a review of the book, In this thought experiment, you don’t get to pick which people are never born. Perhaps there would have been no Newton, Edison, or Pasteur, no Socrates, Shakespeare, or Jefferson. “Each additional idea...
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Perhaps for the first time in American history, orthodox and traditional Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and others may need to form a new alliance in order to defend their religious liberties in an America that’s increasingly less tolerant of principled diversity. Religious and cultural progressives, secularists, and militant atheists pose a significant threat to religious freedom all in the name of “fairness.” What is not “unfair” is that munities are not free to not embrace cultural morality. In ing...
Chaplains Concerned About Supreme Court’s DOMA Ruling
The Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, an organization of chaplain endorsers representing more than 2,000 current chaplains actively serving the armed forces, is concerned about the Supreme Court’s decision today to strike down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act. The Chaplain Alliance calls on Congress to pass enhanced religious liberty protections for all military personnel. “The court’s unfortunate decision to strike down the federal definition of marriage highlights the need for the religious liberty protections recently passed...
Proxy Shareholders Losing Their Religion
Perhaps nothing invigorates the left more than climate change and the exercise of free speech in the political arena – imagine bined dyspepsia when these two issues converge. This is what is occurring with regrettable frequency as Walden Asset Management, Ceres and the Interfaith Council on Corporate Relations have joined a rogue’s gallery of progressive organizations issuing proxy shareholder resolutions urging a variety panies to disassociate from the American Legislative Exchange Council. On June 25, Ernst & Young issued a...
Making ‘Good Intentions’ Good
I recently wrote on the implications of “pathological altruism,” a term coined by Oakland University’s Barbara Oakleyto categorize altruism in which “attempts to promote the welfare of others instead result in unanticipated harm.” In a segment from the PovertyCureseries,HOPE International’s Peter Greer offers a good example of how this can play out, particularly in and through various outreaches of the church: Oakley’s paradigm depends on whether such harm can be “reasonably anticipated,” and as Greer’s story indicates, far too often...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved