Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
New issue of Journal of Markets & Morality (Vol. 23, No. 1) released
New issue of Journal of Markets & Morality (Vol. 23, No. 1) released
Aug 31, 2025 11:26 PM

After some delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the newest issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality is live on our website here. Print issues should be in the mail to subscribers sometime in the next few weeks.

This issue marks the final issue for executive editor and longtime Acton research fellow Dr. Kevin Schmiesing. In his editorial to the issue, he highlights the perennial difficulty plex and important ideas:

Spoken or written language is of course the medium by which munication occurs, and language is inherently unstable, culture-bound, and socially constructed. To this extent, it must be conceded that munication of thought or concept from one person to another is unachievable. There is a theological dimension to the problem: The Apostles’ ability at Pentecost to preach to a diverse multitude of auditors who each “heard them speaking in his own language” was an undoing of the cacophony introduced at the Tower of Babel, but it was an extraordinary event, temporary and plete. The incapacity municate fluently with each other remains an obstacle in human relations, even among those who purportedly speak the same language.

For years Dr. Schmiesing edited our weekly Acton Commentary and many books for Acton as well, including our Christian Social Thought series and my own book Foundations of a Free & Virtuous Society. When pleted my manuscript, Kevin was my first choice to edit it: I knew from experience that when he edits an author’s work, the end result is better than that person could have achieved on his or her own. With his help my own “incapacity municate fluently” did not deter from the final product. The absence of his mentorship and partnership I count as one of many losses in this tumultuous year.

Another such loss – and no less of a loss – is the departure of Dr. Andrew McGinnis from his role as our book reviews editor. Drew’s last issue was the second of last year (vol. 22, no. 2), though he had a hand in arranging many of the reviews for this present issue. His scholarly expertise, indefatigable work ethic, and unrelenting patience will be deeply missed.

We have also, beginning with this issue, had to suspend our associate editor role. I here extend my gratitude to Drs. Giovanni Patriarca, Antoinette Kankindi, Sarah Estelle, Hunter Baker, and Jude Chua Soo Meng for their invaluable service.

Dr. McGinnis’s role has been filled for this issue by Acton international relations assistant Joshua Gregor, whose linguistic expertise is also on display in our Status Quaestionis special feature: a discussion and translation of an essay on the economic concept of value by the nineteenth-century Spanish scholar Jaime Balmes.

While continuing as managing editor, I am now currently acting executive editor as well. My own research, as well as many other scholars’, including Acton senior research fellow Dr. Jordan Ballor, is on display in this issue as well in a special Symposium feature on economic terminology, the impetus for Dr. Schmiesing’s editorial. As a teaser to the discussion, I’ve made my own article on self-interest open access here.

Information regarding how to subscribe and subscription prices can be found here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Fact check: 5 facts about the fifth Democratic debate of 2019
The Democratic Party narrowed the number of presidential hopefuls to 10 at the fifth debate, held Wednesday in Atlanta. Several of their statements deserve greater scrutiny. 1. Elizabeth Warren: Freeloading billionaires? The 99 percent in America are on track to pay about 7.2 percent of their total wealth in taxes. The top one-tenth of one percent that I want to say, “Pay two cents more,” they’ll pay 3.2 percent in America. I’m tired of freeloading billionaires. I think it’s time...
Nibbling at Dylan Pahman’s Chick-fil-A argument
As though guided by an invisible hand Dylan Pahman and I – independently and without coordination – each posted an essay about Chick-fil-A’s philanthropic giving within minutes of one another, each with slightly different emphases. Readers may see this as a conflict; however, probing the space between these analyses helps make sense of customer backlash, illustrates why “woke capitalism” of any variety is a miasma, and underlines that charitable decisions are best made by private individuals. Dylan quotes Milton Friedman’s...
Stephanie Slade on markets, planning, and Catholic social teaching
Stephanie Slade writes in next month’s edition of Reason Magazine about, ‘Regulation and ‘the Right Ordering of Economic Life”according to Catholic social teaching: The Church’s surprising lesson for partisans of big government is that the best tools for correctly ordering economic life are found in the choices of individual market actors. Because those choices are based not only on their preferences but also on their convictions, people’s moral sensibilities—the extent to which they believe they have ethical obligations to each...
Wealth inequality is a First World problem
As the West has e progressively more interventionist, concern with e inequality” has been eclipsed by “wealth inequality.” However, that focus betrays a certain blindness to a vital economic reality. Measures of equality and inequality tell us nothing about what really matters: a society’s prosperity or poverty. Communist societies were far from equal in practice. However, modern concerns about inequality focus on the fact that the free market does not reward all labor evenly. Yet the West’s efficiency creates the...
The unfortunate lesson from Chick-fil-A’s surrender
Why do I care about Chick-fil-A’s decision to drop Salvation Army and Fellowship of Christian Athletes as they seek to properly “align their values” and make sure people understand “who they are”? prehend why Chick-fil-A wants to escape the censure of progressive elites. pany is a petitor. In terms of profit per square foot, they are the reigning champion in American fast food. When you have that strength and speed, you want to use it. pany has consistently been known...
2019 Calihan Lecture Video: Religion, Society, and the Market
Last month, Prof. Giuseppe Franco received the 2019 Novak Award at the University of San Diego where he delivered the 19th Annual Calihan Lecture on “Religion, Society, and the Market: The Legacy of Wilhelm Röpke.” Watch the video now: TheNovak Awardrecognizes scholars early in their academic career who demonstrate outstanding intellectual merit in advancing the understanding of theology’s connection to human dignity, the importance of the rule of law, limited government, religious liberty, and freedom in economic life. Each Award...
Hong Kong demands freedom in landslide election
The citizens of Hong Kong expanded their democratic revolution to the ballot box on Sunday, as pro-democracy parties won control of virtually every local government from pro-Beijing functionaries. Yesterday’s district council elections – the largest in history, with an estimated 71 percent of all registered voters (or 2.94 million of 4.13 million) participating – proved voters’ overwhelming support for the traditional rights enjoyed by the former British protectorate. The South China Morning Post described the landslide election as a “tsunami...
Spare a thought for China’s Muslim Uyghurs
The days in which many Westerners celebrated what many thought was mainland China’s inevitable march towards freedom as a consequence of its limited opening to global trade are now well and truly over. The present battle over Hong Kong, one of the world’s most economically-free regions, is plainly a proxy for a wider fight about China’s future—a future in which Beijing has made clear does not include much room for political freedom and rule of law. Then there is the...
There is no moral difference between eating Chick-fil-A and a McChicken
I am grateful to Fr. Ben Johnson for his thoughtful response to my recent post, “The social responsibility of Chick-fil-A is to make delicious sandwiches.”He adds some extra nuance, but I still stand my ground. Fr. Ben begins with an objection I’ve heard several times now: Friedman rightly notes that a CEO who funds a charity with the profits of a publicly held corporation spends the firm’s money, not his own. However, Chick-fil-A is a privately owned business, founded by...
The rise of ‘woke’ culture: Lessons on the power of institutions
We continue to see the ill effects of “cancel culture” and safetyism, whether through student-led riots and intimidation efforts at colleges and universities, the garden-variety intolerances of “woke capitalism,” or the self-destructive interventionism of “bulldozer parenting.” As far as how it’s e to be, we have explanations aplenty, from declines in religious life to the fraying of the social fabric to rises in political fragmentation and polarization. In an essay at Heterodox Academy, Musa Al-Gharbi points to yet another: a...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved