Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Museum of plastic cadavers
Museum of plastic cadavers
May 11, 2025 8:05 PM

Chicago’s Museum of Science and Industry is currently hosting the Body Worlds show, a display of plasticized cadavers and body parts. According to museum publicity, some 16 million people worldwide have seen the show, the creation of Gunther von Hagens, a German inventor who claims to have created the “plastination” technique. This, basically, is a modern-day form of mummification which allows museums to exhibit skinned and otherwise dismembered bodies in interesting and even entertaining postures.

Depending on your point of view, Body Worlds is either an assault on human dignity, or a marvelously educational exhibit designed to point attendees in the direction of healthier lifestyles (see the resinated lungs of smokers! Touch plastinated organs!). But curators at the Museum of Science and Industry knew they were treading into morally problematic territory. Their “parents resource kit” addresses the viscerally repelling nature of the show by equipping parents with a number of morally-neutral inanities such as “Answer your child’s questions honestly — it is okay not to know all the answers,” and “Be sensitive to your own reactions and your children’s reactions.” Presumably, the kids will want to know why the “embryos, fetuses and a pregnant woman who died with her fetus in her womb” are segregated into their own area. No doubt, the impertinent little ones will have embarrassing questions for mom and dad about the polymerized unborn. Suspecting this, curators have helpfully offered that “visitors may choose whether or not to view this area.”

Hagens and his Body World organization dismisses any reservations we might have about the subjects of his entertainment by reminding us that “religion and ideology impeded the study of human anatomy for many centuries.” By the late Middle Ages, he notes, there was a “fundamental shift away from a mythical symbolic understanding of the human body (including corpses and internal organs) and towards a more realistic perspective.” Having kicked the blocks away from the wheels of progress — blocks placed there by religious sorts with “symbolic” views about human person — Hagens has now freed society to view his resinated freak show. He’s also emancipated museum curators to pursue box office success with “dry and odorless” specimens that will “remain unchanged for a virtually unlimited amount of time.” No word how the plastinated will fare at the parousia.

A museum may want to pitch this sideshow as health education or as display of advanced anatomical science. But who are they kidding? This isn’t medical school. Body Worlds is really about spinning the museum turnstiles. The show plays on the public’s ghoulish fascination with freakish oddities. It is carnival culture.

Today, in America, even the death of some pets, and their remains, are treated with more dignity than the unfortunate souls who wound up in plasticized animation at the Museum of Science and Industry. Body Worlds is what happens when bine a gnostic disregard for human flesh with an entrepreneurial flair. As for “symbolic” understandings of the human body, as Hagens puts it, museum goers might be surprised by how concrete was the understanding of human physicality by the very same “ideologues” he blames for slowing our understanding of anatomy (even when anatomy is at the service of traveling cadaver exhibits at $16 per person).

But, in truth, [God] has even called the flesh to the resurrection, and promises to it everlasting life. For where He promises to save man, there He gives the promise to the flesh. For what is man but the the reasonable posed of body and soul? Is the soul by itself man? No; but the soul of man. Would the body be called man? No, but it is called the body of man. If, then, neither of these is by itself man, but that which is made up of the two together is called man, and God has called man to life and resurrection, He has called not a part, but the whole, which is the soul and the body.

St. Justin Martyr, fragments of the lost work, On the Resurrection

HT: L. Prater from Clayton

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Obama Erects Barriers to Business Growth
John Kennedy, President and CEO of Michigan-based Autocam, responded in an editorial to President Obama’s recent remarks regarding business owners and their success. Obama stated, “If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” Kennedy responded: As a business founder, I particularly object to the claim, “If you’ve got a business – you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.” I benefited from my dad, who helped instill the entrepreneurial spirit, when I...
Are We Winning the War on (Spiritual) Poverty?
In America, too many of our citizens suffer from material poverty. But an even greater number suffer from spiritual poverty. Leon Kass asks, “How fares the struggle against our spiritual impoverishment? Are we Americans, despite our continuing freedom and prosperity, really losing the quest for meaningful lives?” It would be easy to argue that life in America is spiritually more impoverished than ever. As evidence, one might cite the rising respectability of public atheism and the falling off of religious...
ResearchLinks – 07.27.12
Call for Papers: “The Spirituality of the Heidelberg Catechism” June 21-22th 2013, an international conference will take place in Apeldoorn on The Spirituality of the Heidelberg Catechism. The Heidelberg Catechism has a characteristic spirituality, which will be explored from historical and theological perspectives, as part of memoration of the 450th anniversary of this Catechism. Call for Papers: “Scientiae 2013: Disciplines of Knowing in the Early Modern World” University of Warwick (UK), 18th-20th April 2013. The premise of this conference is...
A Jump on a Dark Knight
Last night, I went to see the newest “Batman” movie with my fellow Acton interns. I thought it was a great movie, and I mend seeing it and reading Jordan Ballor’s review of it. I also want to echo some of the themes that Jordan discussed in his piece. After the movie was done, it turned out that the people who had parked behind me were in need of a jump for their car. I didn’t know these people, but...
Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Good Ship Liberalism
Over on the Library of Law and Liberty’s website, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg reviews political philosopher John Tomasi’s new book Free Market Fairness: Rather than attempting a synthesis peting schools of liberal thought, Tomasi outlines what he is very careful to specify as a “hybrid” (87) political theory that draws upon classical liberalism and libertarianism on the one hand, and what he calls high or left liberalism on the other. Tomasi does not seek to somehow ground classical liberal...
Calming the Waters
In today’s “On the Square” over at First Things, Leroy Huizenga reflects upon “the technopoly” of our daily lives, where so much of our time is captivated by staring at puter screen, clicking links, reading posts, checking updates, and so on. Huizenga writes, I worry about ing a functional Gnostic, plugged into this new matrix, this new pixelated irreality. My reality easily es the screens, and the interactivity of hyperlinks means I can go where I will and create my...
What gave capitalism a bad name?
In his new book, Defending the Free Market: the Moral Case for a Free Economy, the Rev. Robert Sirico points out that capitalism has been given a bad name that it truly doesn’t deserve: Rightly understood, capitalism is the ponent of the natural order of liberty. Capitalism offers wide ownership of property, fair and equal rules for all, strict adherence to the rules of ownership, opportunities for charity, and the wise use of resources. Everywhere it has really been tried,...
When Politics Trump Economics
That seems to be the story, based on what Veronique de Rugy has written at National Review Online. Calling for tax increases in an economic downturn doesn’t make any sense, even under Keynesian theories. So why do so many Keynesians seem to be supporting the idea of allowing tax increases for those earning more than $250,000 a year? Reason Magazine expanded on this question on their blog. They argue that this trend reveals more about neo-Keynesians like Paul Krugman than...
Self-Appointed Nannys of the Nanny State
Economists have always been moralists, but since the mid-20th century many have also e wannabe technocrats—unelected experts who make public policy decisions based on specialized information rather than public opinion. A prime example is the new “libertarian paternalists” (a group that is definitely paternalistic but not very libertarian) who believe that government should attempt to influence the economic choices of affected parties in a way that will make choosers better off. In a review of Robert and Edward Skidelsky’s new...
Samuel Gregg: The Economic Crisis and Europe’s Rule of Law Problem
Close attention to particular decisions by European institutions and governments, says Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg, suggests that many have significantly infringed the rule of law: Among the many non-economic factors shaping Europe’s current crisis, there is one which, despite its seriousness, has not yet received extensive attention: an emerging rule of law problem throughout the EU. Many will be taken aback by this claim. Isn’t Europe the continent where the very idea of the rule of law was first...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved