Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Mexico begins its own road to hell
Mexico begins its own road to hell
Jan 30, 2026 6:32 PM

All Latin-Americans at some point ask themselves: Why is no Latin American country as well-developed as the United States?

The answer is probably not related to our weather or a lesser disposition to work, as many have tried to claim. The answer is probably simpler: A socialist culture and a strong attachment to the left. Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, and Argentina are all countries that suffered or are suffering devastating economic, political, and social crises. They are all examples of countries that built their own road to the hell through socialism.

This past Sunday was a chance for Mexico to change that trend. Mexico is a country where many people don’t have access to school, where the public health system is extremely deficient, and where it is not safe to walk in the street after 10 p.m. because drug cartels have taken control of some cities. It seems that their citizens took the worst option available to change that reality; they decided to have as a president for the next six years a socialist with damaging populist appeal. His name is Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and is known as AMLO. He is usually described as a nationalist and revolutionary linked with the Party of the Democratic Revolution, which in Spanish is the Partido Revolucionario Democratico. But above all, AMLO is an icon for the Mexican Left.

Mexicans chose, unconsciously or not, the socialist method of changing the reality of their country. There is no doubt that Mexico is going to experience a big transformation after December 2018. The real question is what kind of transformation? With much pain I say the “change” will likely not improve life condition for Mexican people. Conversely, Mexico should prepare for the destruction of the national production workshop as happened in Venezuela and Cuba.

Socialist munist politicians arrive to govern through democratic means, and once in power use democratic institutions to change their Constitutions and to establish anti-democratic governments. They mostly use totalitarian systems, seeming democratic but controlling the whole society, including the economy, religion and education. They forget human dignity and animalize our moral condition through the two fundamental pillars of socialism; fear and lying. When the economy starts to decrease in socialist countries, usually governors lie to the people, pany owners or international bad luck for the internal economic crisis. When they cannot contain the protests generated by the crisis, they use fear-soldiers in the street repressing people, pursuing and torturing opposition leaders.

It is not by chance that Hispano-American socialists have sent public messages of support to AMLO, Dilma Rousseff (the socialist former president of Brazil), Cristina Kirchner (the socialist former president of Argentina), Pablo Iglesias, (a leader of the left in Spain), Evo Morales (socialist president from Bolivia), and of course, munist dictator from Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro. It seems that AMLO is the new socialist support for Latin American countries.

The whole world should have been scared both by the electoral results in Mexico and the support that socialists offer one each other. The most powerful country in Central America, and neighbor to the United States, may start a debacle next December that could deeply harm Mexico. The socialist system, in the words of Winston Churchill, is “Is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inher­ent virtue is the equal shar­ing of misery.”

Now is the chance for the opposition leadership to stand for the 46 percent of Mexican society who rejected the socialist system and voted for the three candidates who represented democratic ideas. Leaders have a moral duty to both the millions of Mexicans who voted for freedom and to the millions of Mexicans who were seduced by AMLO’s socialist charms. Leaders should understand that Mexico changed from a political bipartisan system to a new modern pluralism system. Making political parties strong and organizing civil society are some of the most important tasks that Mexican leaders have in this moment.

México deserves to be strong, free, and democratic, as millions of Mexicans dreamed when they voted for non-socialists candidates this past Sunday. All people of the world want a system which acknowledges their human dignity and allows them to develop. For those reasons, opposition leaders and the munity must have a mitment to Mexican freedom.

Photo source: Wikimedia Commons

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Work as holy war: The spiritual power of a cruciform economics
With the emergence of the faith-work movement, we’ve seen great strides in helping Christians connect their daily work with their spiritual calling, leading many to shift their attitudes and actions when es to economic stewardship. But as we rightly relish in our renewed understanding of the spiritual value of work and vocation, do we recognize the spiritual warfare that it actually involves? It’s one thing to say “God cares about our work.” It’s another to believe that He wields it...
Do unions raise wages?
Note: This is post #59 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Do unions raise wages for workers as a whole? If not, can unions raise the wages of some workers? The answer, says economist Alex Tabarrok, is . . . it depends. Unions have the ability to restrict the supply of labor to a job, which can increase wages for some workers. However, unions can also lower wages. For example, work stoppages and strikes supported by unions can...
What would life be like without free enterprise?
The Fund for American Studies has a superb It’s a Wonderful Life-style video about life without capitalism. The video not only shows what life would be like if we banned free enterprise (i.e., a lot like Soviet Russia) but also makes the point that when you lose economic freedom you lose other freedoms too. As the angel says, “When you take away the carrot, all you’re left with is the stick. My favorite part of the video: Anti-capitalist activist: “I...
When it comes to work-life balance, women know better than government
A series of governments across the West have crafted policies designed to help women achieve their goals. However, they failed to ask women what those goals might be. Economic interventions designed to nudge women into careers they don’t want, or to enter the workforce full-time even if they prefer to work in the home, uniquely disempower the women they are intended to help. Juan A. Soto, executive director of the Barcelona-based think tankFundación Arete, tackles the issue in a new...
Christian freedom isn’t about choice
As supporters of economic freedom, we frequently find ourselves in vigorous defense of personal choice, whether in business, trade, consumer goods, education, or otherwise. But while the elevation of economic choice is based on plenty of principle, not to mention historical and empirical analysis, we ought to be careful that our views about freedom aren’t confused or conflated in the process. Given our cultural appetite for turning choice into an idol above all else, it’s a risk we’d do well...
Brexit: Leaving EUtopia
History’s worst tyrannies began as attempts to create utopia. This longing to inaugurate the heavenly kingdom on earth – to “immanentize the eschaton,” in William F. Buckley Jr.’s memorable phrase – empowers politicians who promise peace and prosperity in exchange for power. The Brexit vote shattered one such imitation kingdom, according to Stephen F. Copp in an insightful and scholarly new essay for the Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website. “Brexit has profound implications for those who care about religion and...
Do we have rights we can’t give away?
If inalienable rights are, as many people seem to believe, rights which the government cannot take away, does it follow that government can then take away rights that are alienable? As James Rogers explains, it is no less wrong for the government to take away an “alienable” right than it is for the government to take away an “inalienable” right. The difference between the two isn’t that one can be taken away while the other cannot but that an inalienable...
Rome conference on Jesuits, globalization reaps record attendance
On November 29 the Acton Institute filled the Pontifical Gregorian University’s aula magna to maximum capacity with at least 380 participants, a record attendance during Acton’s 17 years of academic programming in Rome. The international mix of students, professors, diplomats, journalists and lay professionals representing all continents came in droves for the afternoon conferenceGlobalization, Justice, and the Economy: The Jesuit Contribution which was co-sponsored by Acton and the Gregorian’s Faculty of History and Cultural Heritage of the Church. The discussion,...
Video: Globalization, Justice, and the Economy: The Jesuit Contribution
In the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries, Catholic theologians, many of whom were members of the Society of Jesus, studied the intersection of morality and merce. Jesuits includingJuan de Mariana, Luis de Molina, and Leonardus Lessius explored the ethics of money, economics, and trade.In his famousHistory of Economic Analysis, the distinguished economist and historian of economic ideas, Joseph Schumpeter, described many of these Jesuits’ insights as anticipating similar ideas expressed by Adam Smith two centuries later. The Jesuits contributed greatly...
What you need to know about the world’s youngest ruler
Sebastian Kurz made history when Austrian voters elected him the world’s youngest leader on October 15 at the age of 31. His ascent has been met with jubilation or trepidation across the transatlantic space. Some European media say paint him as dangerously far-Right. For instance, the satirical Titanic magazine in neighboring Germany, has repeatedly called Kurz “Baby Hitler” and depicted his assassination. On the other hand, the Catholic Herald of London dubbed Kurz “Europe’s Christian Chancellor.” Where does the young...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved