Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Lao Tzu: The first libertarian intellectual
Lao Tzu: The first libertarian intellectual
Dec 16, 2025 7:20 AM

Instead of ruling by force, decree, and regulation to achieve societal order, Lao Tzu believed that individuals were self-regulating (or led by an ‘Invisible Hand’), when left alone by the state.

Read More…

Besides the Bible, no other work has as many translations as the Daodejing—the founding scriptural text of Daoism.

Lao Tzu (“the old master”) is the attributed author of the Daodejing and the founder of Daosim. Living in China during late 6th Century B.C., Lao Tzu witnessed never ending conflict between warring oriental kingdoms. Dismayed with all of the violence, oppression, and suffering he saw, Lao Tzu developed a religious body of thought that was highly anti-authoritarian, contemplative, and introspective, in order to get back to the proper and natural cosmological order – i.e., the Way (Dao).

The Dao can be described as eternal, infinite, natural, self-correcting, and non-aggressive. Humans follow the Dao (Way) by “not acting” (wu wei). This is not resignation – rather it is the reception of the Dao and letting it “act” through you. It is somewhat akin to the Protestant idea of God’s grace working in and through a person so they can follow His will, which they would not be able to do apart from it. Think of it like “being in the zone” in sports when a player is so in tune with what is going on that they plish something great without being forceful or overly conscious.

In their political and social applications, Daoism and its concept of wu wei are extremely laissez-faire. In fact, Ken McCormick at the University of Northern Iowa wrote “[l]aissez-faire is simply an extension of ‘wu wei’ to government policy.” Moreover, the notorious libertarian Murray Rothbard called Lao Tzu “[t]he first libertarian intellectual,” and elsewhere he stated that the early Daoists “believed in virtually no interference by the state in economy or society.”

As a proponent of wu wei and laissez-faire socio-political order, Lao Tzu was a sharp critic of government action, laws, regulation, and taxation:

In the kingdom the multiplication of prohibitive enactments increases the poverty of the people;

the more implements to add to their profit that the people

have, the greater disorder is there in the state and clan;

the more acts of crafty dexterity that men possess, the more do strange

contrivances appear;

the more display there is of legislation, the

more thieves and robbers there are…

The people suffer from famine because of the multitude of taxes

consumed by their superiors. It is through this that they suffer

famine.

The people are difficult to govern because of the (excessive)

agency of their superiors (in governing them). It is through this

that they are difficult to govern. – 57 & 75, Daodejing.

Additionally, being concerned with the well-being and peace of the land and its people, Lao Tzu was anti-war; only advocating for violence if it was of the utmost necessity:

He who would assist a lord of men in harmony with the Tao will

not assert his mastery in the kingdom by force of arms. Such a course

is sure to meet with its proper return.

Wherever a host is stationed, briars and thorns spring up. In the

sequence of great armies there are sure to be bad years…

Now arms, however beautiful, are instruments of evil omen,

hateful, it may be said, to all creatures. Therefore they who have

the Tao do not like to employ them.

The superior man ordinarily considers the left hand the most

honourable place, but in time of war the right hand. Those sharp

weapons are instruments of evil omen, and not the instruments of the

superior man;–he uses them only on pulsion of necessity. – 30-31, Daodejing

Instead of ruling by force, decree, and regulation to achieve societal order, Lao Tzu believed that individuals were self-regulating (or led by an “Invisible Hand”), when left alone by the state:

I will do nothing (of purpose), and the

people will be transformed of themselves; I will be fond of keeping

still, and the people will of themselves e correct. I will take

no trouble about it, and the people will of themselves e rich; I

will manifest no ambition, and the people will of themselves attain to

the primitive simplicity…

The government that seems the most unwise,

Oft goodness to the people best supplies;

That which is meddling, touching everything,

Will work but ill, and disappointment bring. – 57-58, Daodejing

Lao Tzu, like Friedrich Hayek, believed that this “hands-off” approach spontaneously creates a more just and tolerable order. Both thought that human nature and knowledge was finite, and that trying to rule from a centralized place that in effect presumes (but does not have) infinite knowledge will inevitably lead to error, miscalculation, restriction, and tyranny. Instead, when we accept that we are finite and are “in tune” with the Dao or the natural order, we can then be content, know our limits, and allow others to thrive and be free.

Jesus taught us to “do unto others” to create moral relationships. Lao Tzu taught us to “Dao unto others” to create a harmonious social order.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Bernanke Versus the Austrians
My essay in today’s American Spectator Online looks at why Ben Bernanke should not be confirmed to a second term as Chairman of the Federal Reserve: Two planks in Bernanke’s recovery strategy: Expand the money supply like a banana republic dictator and throw sackfuls of cash at panies with a proven track record of mismanaging their assets. The justification? According to the late John Maynard Keynes, this is supposed to restore the “animal spirits” of the cowed consumer, the benighted...
Religion, Culture, and Humanity
I recently gave an interview to the Georgia Family Council (where I worked as a younger fellow) about my book for their website. Here is an excerpt I think might interest readers: What made you decide to write your book The End of Secularism? I wrote this book for a few reasons. I detected that the moment might be right for someone to lay out a very rigorous critique of secularism. While it was once plausible to people that secularism...
John Stackhouse’s Strange View of the Manhattan Declaration
The well-known evangelical theologian and historian John Stackhouse has added his name to the ranks of Christians who don’t find much to like about the Manhattan Declaration. There is a twist in this case, though. He plaining about the alliance between evangelicals and Catholics, for example. (Thank you, Lord.) However, one of Dr. Stackhouse’s major objections is equally perplexing. While he declares himself to be pro-life and pro-traditional marriage, he believes the call to enshrine those positions in the law...
The Difference Between the U.S. and China
It’s the end of the semester. A degree of giddiness creeps in. My students and I have been working through the political systems of a variety of nations. Yesterday, we talked about China. China is a wonderful subject because any professor pletely sold out to Marxist fantasy gains the license to speak judgmentally about Mao’s ridiculous policies of The Great Leap Forward (in which the nation stopped producing food and tried to manufacture steel in backyards) and The Cultural Revolution...
How to effectively fight poverty
In advance of the Acton Institute’s conference, “Free Enterprise, Poverty, and the Financial Crisis,” which will be held Thursday, Dec. 3, in Rome, the Zenit news agency interviews Dr. Samuel Gregg, Director of Research. Recipe for Ending Poverty: Think, Then Act Scholar Laments Lack of Reflection in Tackling Issue ROME, NOV. 30, 2009 (Zenit.org).- The recipe for alleviating poverty is not a secret, and yet much of the work being done to help the world’s poor is misdirected, according to...
Short Reply to Dr. Witt Regarding the Economy
I think the country IS discovering its inner Dave Ramsey. The savings rate keeps going up. People are self-consciously trying to protect themselves from uncertainty. At first, it was to protect against a private sector meltdown. Now, it is an attempt to protect against public sector profligacy. In both cases, this new found habit of saving keeps the economic motor running slow and low. Government attempts to e that instinct are bound to fail. The only thing that will loosen...
Deacons, Secularism, and the Welfare State
A few weeks ago Hunter Baker posted some thoughts on secularism and poverty, in which he wrote of mon notion that since private charity, particularly church-based care, had failed to end poverty, it seems only prudent to let the government have its chance. Hunter points out some of the critically important elements in creating a culture of prosperity and abundance, what Micah Watson calls “cultural capital.” But it’s worth examining in more detail the point of departure, that is, considering...
Review: The Modern Papacy
Ryan T. Anderson, editor of the Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse site, reviews Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg’s new book, The Modern Papacy, in the Nov. 28 issue of the Weekly Standard. Anderson says the book is “a significant contribution to the study of John Paul and Benedict’s thought.” Excerpt of “The Holy Seers” follows (for plete article, a Weekly Standard subscription is required): Gregg presents John Paul and Benedict as more or less united in the main trajectory of their...
School Choice and the Common Good
With Afghanistan, health care, and economic distress devouring the attention of media, politicians, and the electorate, school choice may seem like yesterday’s public policy headline. Yet the problems in America’s education system remain. In fact, plummeting tax revenue highlights the necessity of increasing public school efficiency, while unemployment and falling household es heighten the recruitment challenges facing tuition-funded private schools. And quietly, the movement for school choice—improving education by returning power to parents—continues to make progress. This week, news from...
Rand Redivivus?
Heather Wilhelm of the Illinois Policy Institute examines the usefulness of Ayn Rand for political engagement by friends of the market economy in a WSJ op-ed, “Is Ayn Rand Bad for the Market?” She concludes, Rand held some insight on the nature of markets and has sold scads of books, but when es to shaping today’s mainstream assumptions, she is a terrible marketer: elitist, cold and laser-focused on the supermen and superwomen of the world. Wilhelm’s picture of Rand underscores...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved