Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Israel Really Wants A King (Part I)
Israel Really Wants A King (Part I)
Aug 28, 2025 7:17 AM

I recently posted some thoughts at The Power Blog on “God’s Problem With Centralized Power”, which took a macro view of what I believe to be God’s clear disdain for mankind pursuing their own ends instead of His articulated purposes when es to how we organize munally. This time I want to highlight a specific, micro-level example of that same general idea.

The story of Israel’s demand for a king inI Samuel 8contains so many relevant, interesting nuggets of insight that I’ve broken it into two parts. This first post will cover verses 1-9; the second one (on Monday) will explore verses 10-22.

When the elders of e to Samuel on behalf of their people to ask for a king to lead them, the decentralized governing system of “judges” had largely been in place since the Hebrew people’s return from exile in Egypt (some 400 years). What the people were asking for was a massive break with a God-ordained system and time-tested tradition. It marks a major shift in the history of God’s chosen people and, truly, the history of God’s plan for salvation.

It’s also a stark reminder of how big of a deal sin is, and how the way we organize ourselves matters to our Creator.

In I Samuel 8:1-3 we read:

When Samuel became old, he made his sons judges over Israel.The name of his firstborn son was Joel, and the name of his second, Abijah; they were judges in Beersheba.Yet his sons did not walk in his ways but turned aside after gain. They took bribes and perverted justice.

The “judges” were a succession of God-appointed leaders, drawn from among the people of Israel, who were put in place to help coordinate and facilitate the “big picture” logistics that a collection of millions of people would need. This included, but was not limited to, leading the people militarily (aka “Commander-in-Chief”). They were also supposed to be God’s instruments of justice and help keep the people’s focus and allegiance first and foremost directed toward their Maker (and His laws).

The prophet Samuel was a good and honorable man who decided that he would try doing things a little differently than they had been done previously: he appointed his own sons as judges over the people. Not necessarily a horrible idea, except for the fact that his boys were rotten leaders and corrupt trolls. Their wickedness and poor leadership opened the door for the bigger, national sin mitted by rejecting God’s plan for their earthly leadership.

plicates and distorts things. In a munity, or even on a national level, the fallout from sin rarely occurs in a vacuum. There are ripple effects that affect even strangers’ lives.

But the problem here in the opening verses of I Samuel 8 is not the decentralized system God had designed, in which the bulk of day-to-day activities and decisions were handled by the tribes of Israel themselves. The problem is human error. The problem is the perversion of justice, which is always a temptation for those who lead, but easier to do when a handful of people possess more and more of a society’s power.

4 Then all the elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel at Ramah 5 and said to him, “Behold, you are old and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now appoint for us a king to judge us like all the nations.”

Yahweh’s way wasn’t good enough for the Israelites any longer. They wanted a king, and notice the last part of their argument for one: “…to judge us like all the nations.”

In other words: “We don’t like that God expects more from us. We don’t like that we have to rely on neighboring tribes. We want someone to just take care of everything for us. We want to be like our neighbors.”

The Israelites, starting from a legitimate claim (i.e. the corrupt leadership of Samuel’s sons), decide they want to exchange the unique honor es with being the obedient “chosen” people of the God of the universe – a God who had brought them out of Egypt and had protected them for centuries with judges and local leaders – for status in the pagan world’s eyes. It was more important to them to be respected by the munity” than it was to do the right thing, which in this case would have meant finding better leaders and being more actively engaged in the governing of their own society.

6But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, “Give us a king to judge us.” And Samuel prayed to the LORD.7And the LORD said to Samuel, “Obey the voice of the people in all that they say to you, for they have not rejected you, but they have rejected me from being king over them.8According to all the deeds that they have done, from the day I brought them up out of Egypt even to this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are also doing to you.9Now then, obey their voice; only you shall solemnly warn them and show them the ways of the king who shall reign over them.”

I’m sure Samuel might have been personally offended by the peoples’ request, but God reminds Sammy that ultimately the tribes were rejecting Him. God also knew what His own plan for the salvation of mankind would look like, and that only One would ever truly be fit to rule as King.

(More on Monday!)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What economists mean by ‘signaling’
Note: This is post #68 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Economists often make such claims as “a college diploma is an example of signaling.” What exactly do they mean by ‘signaling’? A signal is an action that reveals information, explains Tyler Cowen. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, Cowen looks at higher education, and shows how a a large fraction of the value you receive from your es on the day you earn your diploma. (If...
When does interest become usury?
“Usury humiliates and kills,” Pope Francis recently told the John Paul II Anti-Usury Non Profit Association in Italy. “Usury is a grave sin. It kills life, stomps on human dignity, promotes corruption, and sets up obstacles to mon good.” Catholic social teaching condemns usury, yet many would be at a loss to define the term. Distinguishing it from charging interest on a loan often devolves into the vaguest generalities. Philip Booth – a professor of finance, public policy, and ethics...
Fact check on China as ‘best’ model of Catholic Social Teaching
Dominating the Vatican news cycle over the past week was a controversial statement made by the Chancellor of the Vatican’s Academies of Sciences and Social Sciences. In a Spanish interview, it was the Argentine BishopMarcelo Sánchez Sorondowho said upon returning to Rome from Beijing: “Right now, those who are the best at implementing the [Catholic] Church’s social doctrine are the Chinese.” Just to be clear: Bishop Sánchez was not inferring that the Chinese Catholic Church or Chinese Catholic faithful were...
7 Figures: Trump’s 2019 budget plan
Yesterday, President Trump released his fiscal year 2019 budget plan. The president’s annual budget request tells Congress how much money the president thinks the Federal government should spend on public needs and programs; tells Congress how much money the president thinks the government should take in through taxes and other sources of revenue; and tells Congress how large a deficit or surplus would result from the president’s proposal. Here are seven figures from the proposal you should know: 1. Overall...
NPR: If you have to beg, do it in a capitalist country
Christian life relies on faith, not on sight. But it is a serendipity when social science bears out its teachings about spiritual and religious freedom – and it is particularly delicious when those findings are featured on NPR. “The world’s wealthiest and most individualistic countries also happen to be some of the most altruistic,” wrote Georgetown University’s Abigail March on the news service’s website. A 2017 study (which relies, in part, on the work of Angus Deaton) has found “dramatic...
Herman Bavinck on love, economics, and the reformation of society
When we think about markets, we often think only in terms of mathematics or money. But at a deeper level, markets are simply networks of human relationships. When we participate in economic activity, we aren’t just creating wealth; we are munities, cultures, and civilization, partnering with God and neighbor in a divine exchange of gifts, blessings, and love. Yes, love! Yet the mere existence of markets doesn’t mean that such love will manifest itself accordingly. For that, we’ll need to...
Can capitalism be saved from conservatives?
“The diversity of American conservatism would astound those pundits, politicians, and critics who believe conservatism is a rigid ideology aimed at privileging the wealthy (and the white),” says Gregory L. Schneider in this week’s Acton Commentary. Peter Kolozi’s new bookConservatives Against Capitalism: From the Industrial Revolution to Globalizationshowcases a conservatism fortable with free-market capitalism — which adherents see as revolutionary and disruptive of tradition — and traces its origins from the antebellum South, to the election of Donald Trump, profiling...
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s infrastructure plan
Earlier today, President Trump released his new $200 billion infrastructure plan. Here is what should know about the 53-page legislative outline: What is infrastructure? TheFederal government has defined infrastructureas the framework of interdependent networks and prising identifiable industries, institutions (including people and procedures), and distribution capabilities that provide a reliable flow of products and services essential to the defense and economic security of the United States, the smooth functioning of governments at all levels, and society as a whole. While...
Entrepreneurship by example
Of all the schools founded by Robert Luddy, author of the new book Entrepreneurial Life: The Path from Startup to Market Leader, not one of them has a cafeteria. The schools have gyms and Apple TVs, but none of the facilities needed to provide lunches each day. Yet, when I show visitors around the campus of Thales Academy, a chain of private schools Luddy founded in 2007 where I teach, the absence of a cafeteria is actually a bonus I...
The future of work: How a ‘design narrative’ changes our perspective
Given the breakneck pace of improvements in automation and artificial intelligence, fears about job loss and human obsolescence are taking increasing space in the cultural imagination. The question looms: What is the future of human work in a technological age? In A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and the Future of Work, a new collection of essays from AEI’s Values and Capitalism project, four academics explore those concerns from a Christian perspective.“Will job e in new sectors that we cannot...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved