Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Is Urban Forest Canopy a Threat to Property Rights?
Is Urban Forest Canopy a Threat to Property Rights?
Jul 3, 2025 5:14 AM

Grand Rapids, Mich. has 34.6 percent canopy cover according to the Grand Rapids Urban Forest Project website, and has a goal of reaching 40 percent across the entire city. Canopy cover refers to the amount of space covered by the shade of a trees canopy as seen from overhead. If you have ever parked your car in a blacktop lot on a sunny day with no tree cover you can understand the value of shade, but is it worthy of taxpayer dollars and the sacrifice of property rights?

The 2011 Green Grand Rapids amendment to the City’s Master plan established the new goal of 40 percent canopy cover. The city and organizations pushing for the 40 percent canopy goal believe that munity can gain great economic benefit by plishing this goal. They claim that the urban forest protects against floods, pollution, and even reduces energy usage through increased shade and cooling. This economic benefit has been calculated with the assistance of I-tree, a program developed by USDA to perform benefit analysis of increasing the urban canopy. Over the last couple of years there have been thousands of trees planted along streets and in public areas through the efforts of these organizations and others like Friends of Grand Rapids Parks, the City of Grand Rapids Office of Sustainability and Energy, and Alliance of Community Trees, but this has barely scratched the surface of achieving this goal. Therefore, this goal is unlikely to be achievable using only public land which may lead to some issues with property rights.

The 34.6 percent canopy translates to approximately 1.6 million trees in the Grand Rapids area, but 95 percent of these trees are on private lands. Even the Urban Forest Project recognizes that the most room for retention and expansion of the urban forest is on private lands. Retaining trees on private lands, owners deciding not to remove them, is as important as increasing the amount of trees because there is no guarantee that the trees on private lands will remain. Many people remove trees during renovation or development projects, which is within their current rights as private property owners.

In a recent blog post the Grand Rapids Urban Forestry Project stated:

Trees are frequently removed or abused because it is easier than the alternative and their individual values are not always well recognized – even if munity has stated in multiple documents and strategies that a larger tree canopy is a desire…The Alliance for Community Trees suggests that protecting large “heritage” or “landmark” trees is a best practice for tree conservation nationwide.

This means the city could determine a property owner may not remove certain trees from his/her land without obtaining a costly or time-consuming permit. Two cities with similar laws give parison parison. In Sunnyvale, Calif. it can cost $259.50 for a permit to remove a “protected” tree; in Tampa, Fla. it can cost between $99 and $514 for permission to remove a tree depending on type and level of protection.

Should the city be able to determine what you can remove from your own land? The answer to this question seems to be rooted in one of the ponents of America society, property rights. Property rights is the ability to own things, and be able to use them in any way the owner sees fit, even removal or destruction of that property. Furthermore, if the city does assume the right to prevent the removal of a tree from your property, will the cost of upkeep be a burden upon the individual property owner? Or will it be spread across all of the beneficiaries, the residents of Grand Rapids? If the former, then property owners will be forced to not only give up the ability to add value to your land by developing it, but must also pay the costs of retaining the trees on your land. If the latter, then taxpayers may placent in cost sharing, paying to retain trees across the entire city that you may derive no benefit from personally.

While there are some aesthetic and possible economic benefits to this plan it is important to be cautious. Is the canopy program one with worthy goals that deserves supports, or is it just another government program, funded by tax-payers, that takes away property rights?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Global warming: Step back, take a deep breath…
So yeah, I’m a global warming skeptic. Why? Well, this sort of thing: Maybe for the same reason we believed, 30 years ago, that global cooling was the biggest threat: a matter of faith. “It is a cold fact: the Global Cooling presents humankind with the most important social, political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves,...
‘I was a stranger and you invited me in.’
The story of a Confessing Church pastor and his family who ed in two prisoners who escaped from the Buchenwald concentration camp is told in, “Seeing the Other Side-60 Years after Buchenwald” (RealMedia). The short film, about 14 minutes, is based on Mona Sue Weissmark’s Justice Matters: Legacies of the Holocaust and World War II. Why did Pastor Seebaß and his family help the prisoners and in the process endanger themselves? “It was all about loving your fellow man.” ...
Freedom and the internet in China
Last month Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) reintroduced legislation from the previous Congress, this time as the Global Online Freedom Act of 2007, or GOFA (HT: Slashdot). According to mentary on Slashdot, “GOFA would create a U.S.-government-designated list of ‘Internet restricting countries’ and would in most cases prohibit panies from censoring content or turning over users’ information to the governments of those countries.” This law directly affects the situation panies like Yahoo!, Google, and MSN who have been pretty roundly criticized...
Commerce and war: Poles apart
Make trade, not war? In an excerpt from his new book “The Commercial Society,” Sam Gregg examines the long held view that nations engaged in trade are less likely to wage war. He notes that nations which are busy mercial pursuits, instead of war making, may also be more vigilant about “protecting the fabric of freedoms upon mercial societies depend.” Read mentary here. ...
The labeling conspiracy is expanding
It looks like Julianne Malveaux is going to have to expand plaint against the labeling of milk to a whole new spate of products, including yogurt. It may be that the whole scope of ing from the dairy industry is going to be affected. Here’s the label off a yogurt container that I ate out of last week: Malveaux is concerned that this kind of labeling, which she argues deceives the consumer into thinking that the product approximates “organic” certification,...
Blu-ray closing the gap; Thanks PS3!
Following up on my musings about the potential for the PlayStation 3 to position itself as the “family friendly” next-gen gaming system because of its on-board Blu-ray drive, it looks like Blu-ray is closing the gap on HD-DVD (HT: Slashdot): VideoScan’s numbers indicate that during the seven days between Jan 7 and Jan 14, Blu-ray managed to close the gap of total discs sold since inception with HD DVD by over seven percentage points, suggesting that if the current trend...
Love the sinner, hate the sin
Speaking of the ubiquity of pornography in our culture, last week ABC News’ Nightline highlighted the work of XXXChurch, a ministry aimed at evangelizing porn stars and pornographers, as well as addressing the spiritual problems associated with consuming pornography. Check out the story, “The Porn Pastors: .” JR Mahon of the ministry says in the piece, “Our biggest critics are Christians.” Sadly es as no surprise. When XXXChurch came up with the idea of a New Testament with a cover...
European Union releases comic book; EU unintentional comedy production skyrockets
“We noticed that they took the umbrellas and the pens, but threw away the policy leaflets before they walked out of the door.” You don’t say? It’s the weekend; I can get away with a post like this on the weekend. Update: “If all the legislation the EU has passed were laid out lengthways it would be over 120 miles long, whilst legislation currently in force would be 31.7 miles long.” ...
Questioning “Brain Drain”
I mentioned a long time ago that this book, with its provocative and interesting thesis, was in the works. Stepping Out of the Brain Drain: Applying Catholic Social Teaching in a New Era of Migration, by Michele Pistone and John Hoeffner, is now available from Lexington Books. The blurb: Catholic social teaching’s traditional opposition to “brain drain” migration from developing to developed countries is due for a reassessment. Stepping Out of the Brain Drain provides exactly this, as it demonstrates...
“The Pursuit of Happyness” a hit with libertarians
A favorable review of Will Smith’s The Pursuit of Happyness in Liberty: “The Importance of ‘Happyness’.” And just in case you thought that libertarians have no appreciation for social bonds whatsoever, here’s the conclusion of the piece: “Underlying this free-market philosophy, however, is a film that is unabashedly moving, demonstrating that true happiness does not lie in the accumulation of property alone, but in having someone to share the joy of good fortune. Without someone to tell, someone to care,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved