Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Immigration and the Soul of America
Immigration and the Soul of America
Feb 11, 2026 10:24 AM

In a new book, Roman Catholic Archbishop José H. Gomez proclaims that immigration is always about more than immigration. It’s about families, national identity, poverty, economics and mon good. Elise Hilton reviews the book in this week’s Acton Commentary. The full text of her essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publications here.

Immigration and the Soul of America

byElise Hilton

America was born from the Christian mission. This is not an article of faith or a pious wish. It’s historical fact.– Roman Catholic Archbishop José H. Gomez

There is little disagreement that “something” must be done about illegal immigration in the United States, but what that “something” is has e national debate. Do we close our borders so as to allow only a trickle of carefully chosen people? Do we simply apply the laws we already have? What do we have to gain or lose from a more liberal immigration policy?

Archbishop José H. Gomez of Los Angeles explores the issue of immigration in his new book,Immigration and the Next America: Renewing the Soul of Our Nation(Our Sunday Visitor Publishing, 2013.) Archbishop Gomez recounts his own immigrant roots; he came to the United States as a child when his parents emigrated from Mexico. In this small volume, Archbishop Gomez adds much substance to the national discussion on immigration.

Gomez proclaims that immigration is always about more than immigration. It’s about families, national identity, poverty, economics and mon good. Gomez says fear must not be allowed to play a role in our national discussion; some are afraid America will e something profoundly different than the nation we’ve known since our founding. Gomez gives personal insight on this fear:

I have my own fear. My fear is that in our frustration and anger, we are losing our grip and perspective. If you allow me to say this as a pastor: I’m worried we are losing something of our national soul.

Gomez is aware that there is deep resentment regarding the millions of illegal aliens in our country now. There is a sense of lawlessness, a violation of fair play and law that Americans depend upon, and a sense that illegal immigration is tearing at our nation’s fabric. He notes we are a “nation of laws” and that there is a sense of “chaos” in our nation due to the disrespect of our legal values. Quoting theCatechism of the Catholic Church, Gomez reminds us that, “Immigrants are obliged to respect with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying out civic burdens.”

As California is poised to grant driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants (Connecticut has already done so), Gomez’s discussion is timely. He implores us to find “a better way” than simply deporting those who’ve entered the country illegally but have been here for years, working and contributing to munities. We cannot tear apart families, where some members may be citizens and others here illegally. He urges a change of perspective: These “illegals,” he says, are souls, not statistics.

Economist Andrew Yuengert, in his bookInhabiting the Land: The Case For The Right To Migrate(Acton Institute, 2003), explores the economic effects of immigration in the United States. Typically, he says, immigrants are less-skilled than citizens, so they have little effect on the skilled labor force. Yuengert asks if immigration creates a “drain” on government monies. Immigrants do have a higher rate of receiving welfare than citizens. Further, the larger families of immigrants can strain local schools and since illegal immigrants are typically paid less, they pay less in taxes than citizens. However, “these same immigrants make a net contribution to federal government finances, contributing slightly more in taxes than they consume in governmental services.” This, for Yuengert, means there is no “defensible position,” at least economically, for opposing legal immigration.

Yuengert is mindful that national security is a problem, but makes clear that this is a separate issue from immigration (as does Gomez.) He cites government inefficiency and the lack of enforcing laws already on the books as the cause for foreign terrorists gaining access to the United States.

The economic point that concerns Archbishop Gomez is that much illegal immigration is driven by poverty. People in the developing world have limited access to markets and educational opportunities, as well as often lacking rule of law. Gomez urges us to put effort into increasing economic opportunities, not in the form of foreign aid, but in partnership with our brothers and sisters in the developing world. With better opportunities in their homelands, the need for emigration will decrease.

Gomez’s declaration that “immigration is always about more than immigration” calls us to a thoughtful passionate national discussion. We are, he says, a nation that has always ed the stranger and helped them learn the “American creed.” This “creed” is made up of four essential points: that God is sovereign, humans are a divine creation with a transcendent destiny, humans are endowed with God-given rights and freedoms that are inalienable, and government exists to protect those rights and freedoms at the service of its citizens.

We need secure borders. We also need to be mindful that tearing apart families or deporting people who have lived and worked here for years is not sensible passionate. Gomez urges us to remember that America is and always has been a nation that celebrates diverse heritages, customs and traditions, all rooted in the “American creed.” He reminds us that immigration is not simply about moving people from one place to another; it is about the soul of our nation. By focusing on the vision of our founding, America can continue to be a land of hope and promise for all its citizens.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Slavery In America: 50 Years After ‘I Have A Dream’
Yesterday, as a nation, we spent time reflecting on the American landscape 50 years after Martin Luther King Jr.’s historic “I Have A Dream” speech. In it, Dr. King decried that our nation – while abolishing slavery legally – still had a long way to go “until ‘justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.'” We still have a long way to go. According to the Polaris Project, there are hundreds of thousands of people trafficked in...
Raphael Lemkin: The One-Man NGO Against Genocide
Today marks the 54th year since the passing of one of the world’s most influential international human rights lawyers. Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term ‘genocide’, made the crime illegal under international law, and possessed an almost prophetic sense of the atrocities that would occur under Nazi tyranny in World War II, died a largely unnoticed man. Only seven people attended his funeral, and to this day, many have not heard of Lemkin or the great contributions credited to his...
A Dream Celebrated and Sabotaged
As we mark the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I Have A Dream Speech,” we find reason for pause, for praise, and for lament. There is much to celebrate because MLK’s dream has been experienced for many blacks, albeit imperfectly, especially for the black middle-class. There have been some racial tensions along the way, but the black, middle-class, Civil-Rights generation has plished great things since the 1960s. The private sector has demonstrated some of the greatest gains because skill...
Kuyper for the 21st Century: Calvin College to Celebrate New Biography
James D. Bratt recently released Abraham Kuyper: Modern Calvinist, Christian Democrat, the first full-scale English-language biography of the influential Dutch theologian, minister, politician, newspaper editor, etc. The book has spurred plenty of discussion across the web, and now, Calvin College is hosting a special event to celebrate its publication. The event, “Abraham Kuyper for the 21st Century,” will explore the questions, challenges, and opportunities that Kuyper’s work raises today, as well as how Bratt’s biography helps us respond. In addition...
Lies Our Culture Tells Us About Changing Our Culture
We are told, over and over, we are in the midst of a “culture war” here in the U.S. It’s Right vs. Left, Republican vs. Democrat, Baby Boomers vs. Gen Xers, Pro-Life Vs. Pro-Abortion. You get labeled by the church you attend, the shoes you wear, the type of beer you drink. We want our culture to be “better,” but we can’t seem to agree on what that means. David French, Senior Counsel at the American Center of Law and...
‘I Have a Dream’ and the American Tradition of Liberty
Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream Speech” is steeped in American patriotism, the American Founders, and the Judeo-Christian worldview. Today marks the 50th anniversary of his speech, and King’s remarks are receiving considerable attention. As I mentioned in a mentary, King made no reference to contemporaries except for passing references to his children and Alabama’s governor. He homed in on the significance of the American Founding and the Emancipation Proclamation while lamenting that there was a check marked with...
A Commodities Primer for Confused Clerics
Earlier this month, the Chicago Tribune ran a story by Cezary Podkul on concerns raised by the Missionary Oblates munity modities trading. Titled “For Nuns and Analysts Alike, Bank Commodity Earnings Are a Mystery,” the story focuses on Rev. Seamus Finn, the Oblates’ top dog, and his fears that Goldman Sachs’ trading practices negatively impact energy and food prices. Podkul reports: Driven by a determination to invest in a socially conscious way, Finn’s group has been concerned about modities activities...
Maximizing labor, minimizing wages
For this week’s Acton Commentary, ahead of Labor Day weekend, I write about “working harder and smarter,” lessons we can learn from Ashton Kutcher and Mike Rowe. One of the implications of connecting hard work with smart work is that the difficulty of work on its own does not determine its value in the marketplace. It isn’t a question of how hard you are working, but how hard you are working in productive service. This is why Lester DeKoster writes,...
Working Harder and Smarter: What Ashton Kutcher and Mike Rowe Have to Teach Us
“Opportunity looks a lot like hard work,” says Jordan Ballor, echoing Ashton Kutcher, in this week’s Acton Commentary. “A culture of entitlement and privilege will end in failure.” The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publications here. Working Harder and Smarter: What Ashton Kutcher and Mike Rowe Have to Teach Us byJordan Ballor As the American economy sputters along in the wake of the Great Recession, younger generations are...
How King’s dream turned into a nightmare
In a symposium at National Review Online about where Dr. King’s dream stands, 50 years after his historic speech, Anthony Bradley writes: Fifty years ago, Dr. King provided America with a provocative vision, in which our republic would e a place of greater political and economic liberty for African Americans. However, in 2013, when we examine the black underclass in cities like Detroit, Chicago, and Washington, D.C., we can see how the politics of progressivism singlehandedly turned King’s dream into...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved