Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How will Christians fare in our Strange New World?
How will Christians fare in our Strange New World?
Jun 30, 2025 10:46 AM

A new book by theologian and historian Carl Trueman helps us chart not only the roots of modern self-perception and its destructive effects in the world around us, but also a way of Christian pilgrimage through our maddening modern culture.

Read More…

Virtually every sphere of American culture—from the university to the church to the mass media to multinational corporations and Big Tech—has e host to hotly contested debates over gender, race, sexual orientation, and a host of other issues. As the fight for control of these spaces rages, polarization has only increased. Books written by journalists and campus activists lambast various occurrences of perceived impropriety or “crossed lines” by both right-wing and left-wing actors and provide a picture of a nation gripped by increasing vitriol and partisan division. What the reader may be left short on, however, are solid answers for the why of our current situation. How did we get here, and what should be the response of Christians to current controversies? Attempts to trace the roots of these problems inevitably lead us beyond American history to the philosophical underpinnings of our very civilization. In this quest, Reformed theologian an historian Carl Trueman’s Strange New World: How Thinkers and Activists Redefined Identity and Sparked the Sexual Revolution is a worthy guide.

Trueman made waves in 2020 with his momentous work The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self. Lauded by many in the Christian and broader intellectual world, the book nevertheless clocks in at 432 pages, a length that renders the valuable insights slightly less than accessible for some. Strange New World, at slightly less than 200 pages, presents a more digestible version of Trueman’s philosophical and cultural analysis of the modern self. One hopes this condensation of ideas will help bring his critical thesis to an ever-larger mass of readers.

Trueman begins the book by drawing parallels between the modern state of society and works of dystopian fiction. While this may strike the reader as a bizarre and even parison, he explains why it is necessary. To the average American, the debates echoing throughout our public spaces have taken on a new and worrisome quality. Battles are no longer being waged over how best to achieve realistic goals or order moral behaviors within society; instead, our current discussions have veered into questioning the very nature of reality and whether morality ought even to be part of the discourse in judging behavior. “The Western world in which we live now has a profoundly confusing, and often disturbing, quality to it,” he writes. “Things once regarded as obvious and unassailable virtues have in recent years e to be seen by many as more akin to vices.”

The modern self, as Trueman describes it, is a state of being in which one’s self-perception determines how to manifest oneself in the world, “where authenticity is achieved by acting outwardly in accordance with one’s feelings.” This understanding of the self, Trueman argues, has led to the explosive growth of what he calls expressive individualism, where the core of human purpose is to reconcile one’s real existence—out there—with one’s inwardly perceived state.

Much of Strange New World is dedicated to tracing the origins of this altering of reality to match one’s expressed identity. Trueman focuses much criticism on Jean-Jacques Rousseau, noting how the Enlightenment thinker placed the core of identity within the psyche of the individual, as opposed to the spaces where the individual interacts with other people. While a radical idea at the time of the Enlightenment, Trueman notes how Rousseau’s thinking on this matter raises nary an eyebrow among the modern reader, an indicator of how pervasive his thinking has e over the years. He also draws a political parallel, noting how an increase in the number of politicians expressing their “inner selves” has caused us to judge the authenticity of politicians differently. For example, the use of vulgarity by political figures going back to the Watergate era somehow makes them seems more real to us, as opposed to uncouth. Nixon may be an example suited to an older audience, yet a younger reader can certainly look to the public personas of more recent presidents as proof positive of Trueman’s point. It would admittedly be overselling the point to ascribe all increase in political profanity to a mere shift of what it means to have an authentic self; as political polarization widens and hysteria around politics increases, increased profanity may simply be an outgrowth of an ever-more fervent desire to win at any cost by people on both sides of the political spectrum.

pelling (and troubling) figure Trueman takes note of in the manufacturing of the modern self is Friedrich Nietzsche. One might expect a theologian to harp on the German philosopher’s famous assertion “God is dead,” yet Trueman focuses on Nietzsche’s Superman concept. Trueman argues that the Superman of Nietzschean thought was not likely to be some Aryan or Nazi-like figure, given Nietzsche’s disdain for anti-Semitism. Rather, he is more likely to be in the mold of the Irish poet Oscar Wilde, whose intense individualism, rejection of morals in connection with art (and therefore expression), and conflation of ethics and aesthetics seem to fulfill the Superman ideal to a T.

Trueman further points out how intense individualism, aided by the superficial nature of the modern social media sphere and the increasing sexualization of popular culture, has led to viewing human interaction, sex in particular, through the lens of immediate context. For many, sex has been redefined along lines of mere consent (consensual casual sex is no longer an act that elicits shame). For cultural elites, a transactional view leads one to define sex in terms of power dynamics and the status of the individuals involved; in a case such as Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein’s, even consent is horrifically overlooked in this new sexual ethic. Trueman offers several examples of how this has led to all manner of abuses, including the hypocrisy of many Hollywood celebrities before and after the #MeToo movement. Perhaps even more poignant examples include recent incidents of harassment inside the walls of the church. From Mars Hill to the fall of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, abusive interactions have too often been judged through a lens of context, casting essential moral quandaries aside. If the brand of a dysfunctional church or the status of a wayward church leader is deemed too important to jeopardize, even Christians have avoided making inconvenient moral judgments and taking the steps either to discipline or municate key individuals when necessary.

A cursory examination of Trueman’s public lectures and articles shows him to be a man very careful with his words and argumentation, and Strange New World is no exception. Near the end of the book, he makes clear to the reader that his aim is not to destroy the idea of individualism wholesale or to hold Christians guiltless in the decline he describes, as if this were merely a secular byproduct. In a section entitled “Understanding Our Complicity,” he stresses the importance of being conscious of the inner self, a concept valued by Christian thinkers like Jonathan Edwards, as well as the myriad ways Christians have strayed from biblical sexual ethics in areas like no-fault divorce or how to respond lovingly to a gay or transgender relative. Trueman’s pastoral side shines here, steering clear of the often caustic moral polemics other writers employ. While his tone is firm, he reminds the Christian reader that repentance and humility are vital to correct thinking, even when the moral stands we take run afoul of modern social mores: “There can be no place for the pharisaic prayer whereby we thank the Lord that we are not like other men.”

Trueman’s analytical style makes his arguments and applications easily accessible to the reader. His many insights into the modern self, including extended sections on the influences of Freud, Marx, and the American Founders, are too detailed and numerous to do them justice in a short book review. The reader would do well to pay particular attention, however, to the final chapter, “Strangers in This Strange New World,” for a brilliant illumination of where Christian readers ought to direct their thoughts in this confused and confusing age. While painting a picture he admits is likely to depress the reader at times, Trueman makes clear that action, not regret, is the task of the Christian in this strange new world.

At the same time, however, Trueman steers away from merely drumming up culture war narratives. “The culture is most dramatically engaged by the church presenting it with another culture,” he exhorts, “by offering it a true vision of what it means to be a human being made in the image of God.” Strange New World is no simplistic cultural whine-fest or naive call for cheap unity; his words in this final e across less as mentary and more as those of a concerned pastor calmly urging his congregation to be courageous in the storm. “Let us lament the ravages of the fall as they play out in the distinctive ways our generation has chosen,” he concludes. “But let that lamentation be the context for sharpening our identity as the people of God.” Although Strange New World may seem dark and appear to offer little encouragement for the Christian hoping to reform the culture, its message is one of neither optimism nor pessimism, but that of realistic hope—an educated hope that can still delight the mind and cheer the heart of the 21st-century Christian.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Are Young Millennials Less Religious or Simply Young?
Joe Carter recently posted a summary of a new studyconducted jointly by Public Religion Research Institute and Georgetown University’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs that shows that college-aged Millennials (18-24 year olds) “report significant levels of movement from the religious affiliation of their childhood, mostly toward identifying as religiously unaffiliated.” He also noted the tendency of college-aged Millennials to be more politically liberal. Just yesterday, the same study was highlighted by Robert Jones of the Washington Post,...
Video: Chuck Colson speaks at the Abraham Kuyper & Leo XIII Conference
On October 31, 1998, Charles Colson came to Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan to deliver the closing address at Acton’s “The Legacy of Abraham Kuyper & Leo XIII” conference, sponsored jointly with Calvin Seminary. “This is a momentous time for the Church as we reflect on two thousand years since the birth of Christ, and as we approach the millenium. And the question, I suspect, that all of us are asking and that the Church should be asking across...
The Next Civil Rights Movement
During last year’s Acton University—have you signed up for this year yet?—Nelson Kloosterman gave a lecture on the subject of school choice and private education. In the latest issue of Comment magazine, Kloosterman expands on his claim that parental choice is “the next civil rights movement“: Let me begin with some ments designed to set up the discussion that follows. First, and most importantly, I believe that the fundamental issue in this matter involves parental choice, even though the far...
What Christian Education Is Not
“Each generation needs to re-own the rationale for Christian education,” says philosopher James K.A. Smith, “to ask ourselves ‘Why did we do this?’ and ‘Should we keep doing this?’” In answering such questions, Smith notes, “it might be helpful to point out what Christian education is not”: First, Christian education is not meant to be merely “safe” education. The impetus for Christian schooling is not a protectionist concern, driven by fear, to sequester children from the big, bad world. Christian...
DeKoster excerpted at The High Calling
Thank you to our friends at The High Calling for excerpting this passage of Lester DeKoster’s Work: The Meaning of Your Life, recently republished by The Acton Institute and Christian’s Library Press. DeKoster, the former professor and director of the library at Calvin College and Seminary, also edited The Banner, the Christian Reformed Church’s monthly publication. Acton is grateful for its relationship with both The High Calling and DeKoster, who left his 10,000+ book library to the Acton Institute upon...
Colson Memorial at Washington National Cathedral
A public memorial for Chuck Colson is slated to take place Wednesday, May 16, at 10 a.m. at the Washington National Cathedral. The event is open to the public and will also be streamed live at nationalcathedral.org. Additional information can be found in this DeMoss News news release. For more information on Colson’s life and relationship to the Acton Institute, please visit our Chuck Colson resource page. ...
Writing Tips for Your On Call in Culture Blog Entry
“Think, Think, Think” –Pooh It’s always hard to sit down and write. There are a million distractions that tempt us away from the keyboard or notepad and entangle us in the details of life. Not that these details are bad. In fact, as munity focused on being On Call in Culture, many of those details are the whole purpose. But before you get out there and answer the calling that God has put on your life as a dentist, professor,...
Jacoby, D’Souza debate Religion in the Public Square
Susan Jacoby and Dinesh D’Souza met here in Grand Rapids at Fountain Street Church on Thursday, April 26, to debate the merits of religion in public discourse. The debate, co-sponsored by The Intercollegiate Studies Institute and the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies, was titled, “Is Christianity Good for American Politics?” Susan Jacoby is program director at The Center for Inquiry and author of The Age of American Unreason and Alger Hiss and The Battle for History. She argued for the...
Fair Trade or Free Trade?
Is ‘fair trade’ more fair or more just than free trade? While free trade has been increasingly maligned, The Fair Trade movement has e increasingly popular over the last several years. Many see this movement as a way to help people in the developing world and as a more just alternative to free trade. On the other hand, others argue that fair trade creates an unfair advantage that tends to harm the poor. Dr. Victor Claar addresses this question in...
Was Thomas More a proto-communist?
In Utopia, many modern intellectuals say Sir Thomas More advocates an ideal political and social order without private petition, citizens quarreling over worldly possessions, poverty and other “evils” supposedly brought on by a market-based society. At least that is the way social liberals, including left-leaning Christians, tend to interpret this great saint’s 1516 literary masterpiece, believing the English Catholic statesman’s work presents his vision of an ideal monwealth modeled on the early Church (even ifthose munist experiments failed). Recently, Istituto...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved