Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
How To Turn The American Dream Into A Nightmare
How To Turn The American Dream Into A Nightmare
Jan 28, 2026 10:28 AM

If one decides to destroy the American Dream, there are a few steps that would be necessary.

Put Big Government in charge. The average American can’t figure out his or her own dreams, let alone what it would take to make them a reality.Tell Americans that without the government, the American Dream is hopeless.Produce a lengthy document about the American Dream. Leave out the word “freedom,” let alone the idea of freedom.Let people know that “freedom” (without actually using the word) is quite harmful. Don’t worry, thought, Big Government will protect you.

If you think this sounds like China’s Little Red Book and not an American tale, you’re close to the mark. Unfortunately, this is exactly what Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio wrote about in a piece called “How to revive the American dream,”.”

Michael Osburn of the The Seattle Times isn’t buying it. He sees shades of China too; not the China of today, where capitalism is making steady inroads and people are creating wealth.

The Warren and de Blasio answer for strengthening the American middle class would move us toward the old Chinese economic model. They propose having the government dictate wages, overtime, vacation and leave policies, child-care requirements, and how much men and women are paid. They would dictate tuition levels for colleges. While decrying cronyism, they want a central government empowered to decide panies are “fair,” and only those would receive funding for research and development. According to them, rather than allowing a business to succeed — or fail — on its own merits, government should pick the winners and bail them out with the public’s money when they fail.

They oppose free markets. Instead, they’d create “fair rules” in the marketplace. Let’s cut through the code words here. They don’t want you to be free to make economic decisions. Instead, they want the power to decide what is “fair” for you. Nowhere in their list of new government services and controls is any mention of a cost to us.

The change called for here is necessary because (according to Warren and de Blasio) America no longer invests in our children. Where is the evidence for that? They further claim that “policies” that build the middle class are no longer part of American investment? What policies are those? Are they policies like free health care, food stamps, and Social Security? If so, it is clear we cannot spend our way into creating a middle class.

The government is not in the business of producing wealth, and if they are, they are doing an incredibly bad job. Osburn:

If Warren and de Blasio limited their argument to the need for government assistance to help the poorest and weakest in our society, there wouldn’t be a debate. I would agree with that. But that is not their claim. They claim that a massive expansion of federal power would help the families in the middle. Their prescription requires middle America to surrender freedom. In exchange, they say government control would improve our situation in life more than exercising our own freedom will.

Anytime the government says you need to give up freedom in order to get something in return, you should be quite skeptical. In this case, you should very loudly and with great emphasis say, “Go away! Go away and leave my freedom alone!”

Read “How big government kills the American dream” at The Seattle Times.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Why Superman is Bad for the Economy
In the new movie Man of Steel, Superman engages in a fight with his fellow aliens from Krypton that causes significant damage to Metropolis. Disaster expert Charles Watson estimates the costs of the physical damage done to the city to be about $2 trillion. To put that in context, 9/11’s physical damage cost $55 billion, with a further economic impact of $123 billion. What would be the impact of Superman’s fight on the economy? According to some liberal economists, it...
The Source of Future Wealth: Babies
Would your life be better off if only half as many people had lived before you? That’s the intriguing question Ramez Naam asks in his new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet. As Ronald Bailey says in a review of the book, In this thought experiment, you don’t get to pick which people are never born. Perhaps there would have been no Newton, Edison, or Pasteur, no Socrates, Shakespeare, or Jefferson. “Each additional idea...
Report: ‘A Clamp-Down on Religious Liberty’
From a June 22 CNA/EWTN news article on the 2013 National Religious Freedom Conference in Washington, sponsored by the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s American Religious Freedom Program. The Very Reverend Dr. Chad Hatfield, Chancellor of St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary, echoed the Rabbi Cohen’s statements, telling CNA that “I think that there is a clamp-down on religious liberty in this country, but it’s so incredibly simple that we aren’t catching the signs.” “If one religious identity’s freedoms are taken,...
Making ‘Good Intentions’ Good
I recently wrote on the implications of “pathological altruism,” a term coined by Oakland University’s Barbara Oakleyto categorize altruism in which “attempts to promote the welfare of others instead result in unanticipated harm.” In a segment from the PovertyCureseries,HOPE International’s Peter Greer offers a good example of how this can play out, particularly in and through various outreaches of the church: Oakley’s paradigm depends on whether such harm can be “reasonably anticipated,” and as Greer’s story indicates, far too often...
Youth Unemployment: Are we Becoming Europe?
Alejandro Chafuen, president and chief executive officer of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation and board member of the Acton Institute, recently wrote a piece for discussing youth unemployment in the United States. According to the latest report, U.S. youth unemployment is at 16.2 percent which is more than double the adult unemployment rate. The unemployment rate for youth in Europe is currently at 24 percent. Chafuen asks, “Can we learn from the European experience?” Using piled by the economic freedom...
Chaplains Concerned About Supreme Court’s DOMA Ruling
The Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, an organization of chaplain endorsers representing more than 2,000 current chaplains actively serving the armed forces, is concerned about the Supreme Court’s decision today to strike down a key provision of the Defense of Marriage Act. The Chaplain Alliance calls on Congress to pass enhanced religious liberty protections for all military personnel. “The court’s unfortunate decision to strike down the federal definition of marriage highlights the need for the religious liberty protections recently passed...
Proxy Shareholders Losing Their Religion
Perhaps nothing invigorates the left more than climate change and the exercise of free speech in the political arena – imagine bined dyspepsia when these two issues converge. This is what is occurring with regrettable frequency as Walden Asset Management, Ceres and the Interfaith Council on Corporate Relations have joined a rogue’s gallery of progressive organizations issuing proxy shareholder resolutions urging a variety panies to disassociate from the American Legislative Exchange Council. On June 25, Ernst & Young issued a...
Religious Liberty and the Regulatory Road to Serfdom
Perhaps for the first time in American history, orthodox and traditional Jews, Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and others may need to form a new alliance in order to defend their religious liberties in an America that’s increasingly less tolerant of principled diversity. Religious and cultural progressives, secularists, and militant atheists pose a significant threat to religious freedom all in the name of “fairness.” What is not “unfair” is that munities are not free to not embrace cultural morality. In ing...
The benefits of character education
When Jessica Lahey started teaching English at a “core virtues” school she thought it would only require talking about empathy and courage when discussing To Kill a Mockingbird. She soon learned what it really meant — and what it meant for her students: I e on. Character education? Core virtues? I teach English, not Sunday school, and besides, I teach middle school. If I were to walk into my eighth grade English class and wax rhapsodic about prudence and temperance,...
Family Breakdown, Economic Decline, and the Search for Spiritual Capital
When es to integrating family and vocation, modernity has introduced plenty of opportunity. But it has also produced its own set of challenges. Though our newfound array of choices can help further our callings and empower our contributions to society, it can also distract us away from the universe beyond ourselves. Thus far, I’ve limited my wariness on such matters to the more philosophical and theological realms — those areas where our culture of choice threatens to pollute our thinking...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved