Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Holiday vs. Holy Day: Labor Day and Feast of St. Joseph the Worker
Holiday vs. Holy Day: Labor Day and Feast of St. Joseph the Worker
Nov 2, 2025 10:06 AM

When divorced from God’s plan, work is merely labor, a rudderless everyday job.

Today May 1 is Labor Day in Italy and in virtually all of Europe. Alas, it is hardly festive. There is not much to celebrate here in terms of job growth and wealth creation. Economic figures across this Old and Aging Continent are like proverbial diamonds in the rough: there is much potential for glory, but with a lot of precision cutting and polishing still to do.

Simply read the latest statistical lampoon on European GDP in The Economist on April 14 Taking Europe’s Pulse. With a walking-dead growth of 0.3% in the first quarter of 2015, nation after European nation is stifled by union strongholds on hiring and firing practices, crony capitalist deals born in Brussels’ backrooms, governments’ insatiable appetite for taxation to prop upbankrupt social welfare programs, and many other politico-economic and cultural tentacles holding back a not so free European Union.

Here in Rome, few are celebrating in an anemic peninsula with 12.70% unemployment and virtually no growth in the last 20-plus years. Absolutely no fist pumps are raised on this day in traditionally leftist Spain (23.78 %), nor in munist party-run Greece (25.70%), and by no means in the rebuilding nation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (43.78%).

Nonetheless today, for good measure, is a public ‘holiday’, whether the economic mood is truly merry or not. At least it is a day to put workers’ worries aside. It is a day to forget about the sorry state of many economies on this extended weekend when Europeans head to the mountains, sea and its many cities of art.

The secular ‘holiday’.The religious ‘holy day’.

May 1 is also a ‘holy day’, the Catholic Feast of St. Joseph the Worker instituted by Pius XII in 1955 in response to the May munist celebrations installed across Europe. Therefore, it is no small coincidence of calendar or etymology.

According to the American Catholic web site, Pius XII’s intention was, in effect, to give deeper meaning to a public holiday de-christened merely as ‘Labor’ Day in a hyper-secularized and socialist Europe. It was a day, though mixed with revelry and parades, that had e, spiritually speaking, a hum-drum day off from routine of production lines and cubicles:

In a constantly necessary effort to keep Jesus from being removed from ordinary human life, the Church has from the beginning proudly emphasized that Jesus was a carpenter, obviously trained by Joseph in both the satisfactions and the drudgery of that vocation. Humanity is like God not only in thinking and loving, but also in creating. Whether we make a table or a cathedral, we are called to bear fruit with our hands and mind, ultimately for the building up of the Body of Christ.

When divorced from God’s plan, work is merely labor, a rudderless everyday job. It even can turn us into hunchbacks, as if debilitated and humiliated by meaningless, repetitive, backbreaking activity.

This is exactly what I find lamentable about today. Is not the dire unemployment rates, but the spiritual vacuum that has set in on this first day of May, a month our Church devotes to Mary and begins by celebrating her husband, Joseph, and his economic contribution to the Holy Household. This day is dedicated to a holy man who is the patron saint of all forms of labor, unskilled and skilled, and who was the ideal pater familias. Today is the particular day of the year in the Church’s calendar of saints when she invokes all workers to pay reverence to a man who humbly dedicated himself to a professional vocation he enjoyed, though fatigued, and performed with excellence.

We are invited to contemplate Joseph’s economic contribution to mon good, providing tables and chairs for family homes, desks for offices, and other products of his carpentry, such as the all-important structural beams for roofs and bridges. Imagine all the collapsed buildings and structures without a truly devoted attention and love for such a craft!

We do not know precisely what St. Joseph produced and sold in his shop. Yet, we can well imagine that he served the needs of his time, his particular market, and was reasonably successful. After all, the Holy Family had a stable home, with a true breadwinner, and Jesus was not sent out to provide a second e and beg on the streets for his daily needs. Instead, he apprenticed with Joseph to learn a profitable and most valuable trade.

What we also know about St. Joseph is, like his beloved Mary, his will was in constant union with God’s.

When contemplating and putting into practice his daily labor, work was not merely what we mean by Old English “weorc” (produce, toil) or “gobbe” (lump, mass, or heavy load) from which we derive the dull word “job” and we get the Italian gobbo – “hunchback”. Joseph did not associate heavy beams of wood, his nails, hammers and the other tools of his trade with constant backbreaking, arduous activity. His work certainly had negative effects – even on his upright posture – but he remained a true and dedicated professional, as he “professed” a labor of love and a love of labor. Thus Joseph worked every day for his Lord, the Son of God, the Queen of Heaven, and for munity of Nazareth he served through his creative enterprise.

I am worried by statistics such as those I observed at a Rome sociology conference on work and religion, which correlated a 47% desire among 17-19 year Italian old youth to e entrepreneurs and freelance professionals with roughly 50% of them describing themselves as believing Christians. On the surface, this is not cause for anxiety. After all, believing in God and our human dignity makes us want to be co-creators, co-captains of industry as we cooperate with Him to build His Kingdom on earth.

The worrisome statistic came later with less than a 1/5 of these so-called “believers” declaring themselves also as “practicing”. And then there were surveys that negatively revealed their conception of the nuclear family and divorce as well their association with progressive ideologies of gender and homosexual union.

How can today’s youth put into practice that which they hold to be true in their hearts and heads while other beliefs and opinions are in direct contradiction with some of the core tenets of their Christian faith?

And does this not lead us to think that some other contradictory beliefs to entrepreneurship – like those for security and entitlement – will hinder them from putting into practice a risky professional vocation? I fear this is so, translating into a disjunction of wills and apathy, unless a ‘higher power’ or idolatry such as Materialism, Ego, Fame, or a Big House and Fast Car inspire them to persevere in a stagnant European market.

I fear that these youth may contribute to the already dire unemployment percentages unless infused with religious zeal and a vocational understanding of work.

Like Joseph, because his will to work was undeniably united to God’s, he never gave up. It was not merely a coincidence that this same unwavering, passionate dedication to a vocation was passed on to Jesus, his apprentice carpenter son. It was Jesus who learned from Joseph the divine value of the heavy wood beams, hammers and nails which served as the very materials for his own ultimate calling, his humiliating crucifixion on Calvary.

Note: Originally published for the Catholic World Report: “Labor Day” in Italy and the The Feast of St. Joseph the Worker

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Politicizing Scripture
There’s some discussion at Mirror of Justice (here and here) of Martin Marty’s recent piece in The Christian Century, “Snookered,” which raises the issue of the validity of politicians invoking Scripture, using the example of Tom DeLay. The new progressive Christian approach seems to be to assert, rightly of course, that “God is not a Republican. Or a Democrat,” and is rather more nuanced and convincing than, say, “Jesus is a Liberal.” And since so much politics, aside from a...
Classical Liberalism, Foreign Policy, and Just War
One of the more lively and illuminating discussions at last week’s Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar revolved around the question whether and how classical liberalism is applicable to foreign policy, specifically with regard to questions of war. In the New York Times earlier this week, Robert Wright, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation, wrote a lengthy op-ed that bears on the relevant questions, “An American Foreign Policy That Both Realists and Idealists Should Fall in Love With.” Wright...
How Just Must a Just War Be?
As a follow-up to yesterday’s post about just war, I’m passing along this TCS Daily piece by Prof. Bainbridge, “Just War for the Sake of Argument” (it’s also discussed at The Remedy and Bainbridge’s own blog). Bainbridge’s piece measures the current Lebanon/Israel conflict by the standards of just war, and finds it wanting. He makes the following important point: “Although Catholic scholars and theologians have thus made valuable contributions to the just war tradition down through the centuries, the principles...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 6
If the mon Protestant objection to natural law revolves around sin, as we saw in Part 5, we should now address the second mon objection that natural law is a rival to God and Scripture. Contemporary evangelical critics, such as Carl Henry, object that natural law elevates autonomous human reason above divine revelation. Henry thinks the Thomist doctrine of natural law teaches a universally shared body of moral beliefs that exist independently of divine revelation. This contrasts, he thinks, with...
Milosz
“…can one build something lasting if the goal is not truth, but power? The few, most penetrating minds of that time understood that what constitutes the sickness of contemporary culture is the repudiation of truth for the sake of action…” Czeslaw Milosz, 1942 ...
Transcendence and Obsolescence: The Responsible Stewardship of Oil
In this mentary, “Transcendence and Obsolescence: The Responsible Stewardship of Oil,” I ask the question: “Why did God create oil?” I raise the question within the context of debates about global warming and the burning of fossil fuels, including Al Gore’s movie An Inconvenient Truth and the work of the Evangelical Climate Initiative. I argue that nonrenewable resources, especially fossil fuels, “have the created purpose of providing relatively cheap and pervasive sources of energy. These limited and finite resources help...
Businesspeople are Evil!
A very, very interesting piece in WSJ this week detailing a study by the Business and Media Institute that looks at how businesspeople are portrayed on television: The study, titled “Bad Company,” looked at the top 12 TV dramas during May and November in 2005, ranging from crime shows like “CSI” to the goofy “Desperate Housewives.” Out of 39 episodes that featured business-related plots, the study found, 77% advanced a negative view of the world merce and its practitioners. On...
Debating the Ethics of Chimeras
My piece on the debate over chimera research and the relevance of your worldview to the debate appears today at BreakPoint, “A Monster Created in Man’s Image.” Drawing on the work of C.S. Lewis, and among the questions and conclusions included, I write, “Chimera research may indeed have some potential benefits, but we cannot ignore the question of potential costs. What toll does such research take on the dignity of human beings? Must we destroy the human person in order...
Money for Nothing, or So it Seems
These kinds of stories make me sick, and they are all mon. In today’s Washington Post, a lengthy article examines the Livestock Compensation Program, which ran from 2002-2003, and cost over $1.2 billion. In “No Drought Required For Federal Drought Aid,” Gilbert M. Gaul, Dan Morgan and Sarah Cohen report that over half of that money, “$635 million went to ranchers and dairy farmers in areas where there was moderate drought or none at all, according to an analysis of...
Answers to just war questions
After ruminating earlier this week about foreign policy and just war, I asked a series of interrelated questions yesterday about just war. Prof. Bainbridge was kind enough to respond, and offered the critically important distinction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello, that is, justness up to war and justness in war. This gets at the difference between justification for the cause or occasion for war, causus belli, and the way in which that war is conducted. Bainbridge concludes,...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved