Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Grace in our life together: Community beyond markets, states, and ‘social capital’
Grace in our life together: Community beyond markets, states, and ‘social capital’
Jun 4, 2025 2:20 PM

When discussing the role of economics in our life and world I am always careful to make a distinction: life is economic but economics is not all of life.I’ve suggested this broader understanding of personal and social interests has mon among major free-market theorists since Adam Smith. Economics itself is the product of the sustained reflection of Christians on nature, the scriptures, and their own experience in crafting the institutions, ethics, and law which birthed the tradition of ordered liberty. Lord Acton so ably described this tradition as the belief in, “The society that is beyond the state – the individual souls that are above it.”

Economics is a way of thinking which is essential to guiding our moral action in a world of costs and constraints. It helps us act prudently by drawing our attention to not only the immediate but the long-term effects of action. It then holds that attention on the consequences of that action for the munity. As the economist Kenneth Boulding pointed out most of our actions towards those that we are closest to and most intimate with take the form of gift and not exchange. The theologian Herman Bavinck describes the family itself as the basis for this ‘grants economy’, “In the family we get to know the secret of life, the secret, namely, that not selfishness but self-denial and self-sacrifice, dedication and love, constitute the rich content of human living.” It should not surprise us that the best in life is freely given for our relationship with God, whom we should fear, love, and trust above all things (Ex. 20:3), is entirely gracious.

Modern social scientists will often refer to this economy of gift as ‘social capital’. Ryan Streeter, director of domestic-policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, has a written a short thoughtful history on the diminishing role social capital has had in our policy discourse even as we increasingly recognize its importance to human flourishing,

In the years since, research has taught us that social networks, voluntary activity, and other sources of social capital are positively correlated with a wide range of vital goods, such as better health, less crime, better jobs, more happiness, more effective schools, and more productivity. If we could sum up social capital’s benefits, we might say that they serve two of the things Americans care most about: economic well-being and happiness. But our political leaders have lost the knack for talking about this straightforward fact, and although the case for grounding policy in an appreciation of the importance of social capital is now better supported than ever, it is also much more rarely articulated. To see how that might change, we should begin by considering how our interest in civil society and social capital began — and how we let it slip into the background of public debate.

Streeter is not alone in his concern. Economist Raghuram Rajan in his recent book, The Third Pillar: How Markets and the State Leave the Community Behind, argues that those relationships of gift Bavinck calls the secret of life are essential to give our lives meaning,

They offer their members a sense of identity, a sense of place and belonging that will survive the trials and tribulations of modern life. They do this through stories, customs, rituals, relationships, and joint celebrations or mourning so that when faced with a choice between self-interest munity interest, or munity members and others, members are more inclined to put their munity first. munities inculcate shared values and goals in members, as well as imbue in them a sense of personal utility from various actions that benefit munity.

Rajan argues that the state and the market have crowded out the role once reserved munities. Economist Arnold Kling, in his thought-provoking review, observes,

For a solution to this vicious cycle, Rajan envisions a central government that provides munities with financial support but without the bureaucratic controls e with current programs. He would like to munities develop the leadership and initiative to implement local solutions to their problems.

This is precisely the approach Streeter regrets playing an increasingly small role in our public policy debates. As Joe Carter recently bemoaned it seems, “You can have any economic policy you want so long as it’s socialism.” While mitment to make public policy decisions which empower instead of overwhelm munities is both e and consistent with the principle of subsidiarity Kling notes the paradox of the materialist nature of much of this debate,

This materialist determinism afflicts many economists. I think that we are wiser if instead we allow for beliefs, especially shared beliefs, to act in their own right as a causal force in human affairs. Indeed, if ideas do not matter, then why bother writing this sort of book?

Perhaps the reason why things like ‘social capital’ no longer loom large in the public debate is that we talk about them as if they were just another economic input or output. In thinking of family, religion, munity as things which policy makers can simply conjure by issuing the right kind of tax credit or block grant are we not forgetting the insight even the better economists treasure, that economics is not all of life? Public policy can certainly munity and can, in limited ways, help to safeguard it. Ultimately the graces of family, religion, munity are just that. Gifts from our God and neighbor.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Reading ‘Democracy in America’ (Part 2): What did Tocqueville mean by ‘equality of condition’?
This is the second part in a series on how to read Alexis de Tocqueville’s “Democracy in America.” Read Part 1 and follow the entire series here. As we begin our study of Democracy in America, we bear in mind that the work’s distinguished author, Alexis de Tocqueville, blessed us with a clear, concise introduction to the two-volume work. The introduction is the most important chapter of the work in terms ing to grips with Tocqueville’s overall argument and purpose...
Pulling out of Paris agreement is a ‘market distortion’: European leader
The G20 summit in Hamburg e to an end, and the dominant story remains America’s withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. It’s been less reported that some European leaders have implied that the EU should take economic revenge on the U.S. because – in their words – limiting government intervention in the economy is a “market distortion.” Germany currently holds the presidency of the G20 summit, with Chancellor Angela Merkel overseeing the violence-plagued event. The final declaration notes the U.S....
American students: Raw material or individual persons?
Catherine Pakaluk The quality of K-12 education in America is a major concern. This is largely because, despite marginally high spending per student, the United States does pete very well against other countries on standardized tests. The economics of education particularly interested Catherine Pakaluk, who holds a doctorate in economics from Harvard and is an assistant professor of economics at Catholic University of America. Pakaluk gave a lecture, “Economics of Education,” on June 23 at Acton University. In this talk,...
Dorothy Sayers, school choice, and long run student success
Today’s Wall Street Journal article on education choice, “New Evidence on School Vouchers,” might look oddly familiar for those of us who have read Dorothy Sayers’ The Lost Tools of Learning. The WSJ piece refers to two new studies that investigated student performance in states with voucher programs: Louisiana and Indiana. In Louisiana, a state with a program that allows for vouchers for private schools, 7,100 students attend private or religious schools. Meanwhile, over 34,000 students utilize Indiana’s statewide voucher...
How ordinary economic thinking helps constrain political chaos
In an age where chaos and cronyism seem to be the defining characteristics of our politics, and where the political system is increasingly decried as being “rigged” by populists from both the left and right, the time seems ripe for a renewed focus on political constraints. When such concerns arise, we are quick to point back to the U.S. Constitution, and rightly so. Yet economist Peter Boettke sees another guide that can also offer some value. For Boetkke, our politics...
The ‘end’ of work
In the Q&A part of a session I led at last month’s Acton University on Abraham Kuyper and Leo XIII(based on this recent volume), I was asked about specific areas where the two figures have something concrete to contribute today. One theme I highlighted was to their shared emphasis on the centrality and dignity of human work. Today there is a great deal of anxiety over the future of work in an age of increasing globalization, automation, and structural changes...
Is it cleaner to trade pollution?
Note: This is post #40 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. In an effort to reduce pollution, the government tried two policy prescriptions under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, notes Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution University. The mand and control—mandated that each power plant lower its pollution by a determined amount. However, different firms face different cost curves and, because information is dispersed, policymakers don’t always know those costs. The second policy prescription—tradable pollution permits—empowered firms...
Macron’s African statement ignores human ingenuity
A French media outlet has captured an otherwise ment from French President Emmanuel Macron that Africa is overpopulated. When asked about a possible “Marshall Plan for Africa,” Macron listed among the continent’s current problems the need for “demographic transition,” lamenting the fact that some African “countries still haveseven to eight children per woman.” His concerns seem particularly worth examining today on World Population Day. During a July 8 press conference about the G20 summit, Macron began by naming truly concerning...
Would school choice help conservatives recover from the ‘cultural massacre’?
The Spectator Australia published an article Monday claiming that the “culture war” between conservative and liberal values is, in reality, a “cultural massacre.” The carnage is evident in the numbers, specifically in education: in the United Kingdom, conservatives make up only seven percent of primary school teachers and only eight percent of secondary school teachers. In the United States, conservatives often focus on the lack of intellectual diversity on university campuses. They are not wrong to worry. In September, the...
Can health care be left to the free market?
In one of the worst opinion pieces published in the New York Times in recent memory, Farzon A. Nahvi, an emergency medicine physician, argues the free market cannot provide health care because some patients arrive at the hospital unconscious: As an emergency medicine physician in a busy urban hospital, I have patients brought to me unconscious several times a day. Often, they are found down in the street by a good Samaritan who called 911 on their behalf. We are...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved