Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Golda: The Right Leader at the Right Time
Golda: The Right Leader at the Right Time
Jun 14, 2025 12:43 AM

Fifty years ago, Israel was stunned by a surprise attack, the beginning of what became known as the Yom Kippur War. A new film starring Oscar-winner Helen Mirren as Golda Meir details the arduous decision-making process of a prime minister responsible not only for the lives of young soldiers but the very survival of her country, even as she barely clung to life herself.

Read More…

On the 50th anniversary of the beginning of the Yom Kippur War, Hamas launched an attack on Israel, killing more than 1,500 people and taking mitting, filming, and publicizing on social media acts of terror that the citizens of democracies are simply unprepared to watch or understand. There is again war in the Middle East, and the IDF is now trying to annihilate Hamas in Gaza. But today the State of Israel is not itself in danger; in fact, with the Abraham Accords, there is for the first time a reasonable hope that the Arab states and Israel might find a peaceful modation.

The Yom Kippur War, October 6–25, 1973, the last time the State of Israel was in true existential danger and the precursor of peace with Egypt, the first Arab state to recognize Israel, is the subject of the new film Golda, directed by Israeli filmmaker Guy Nattiv from a screenplay by Nicholas Martin. The film stars Helen Mirren as Golda Meir, prime minister of Israel during the war, and Liev Schreiber as Henry Kissinger, who had just e Nixon’s secretary of state before the war began, and whose diplomacy managed the conflict in search of a mutual modation between deadly enemies.

Golda is not quite a war movie, since it largely plays like an interior drama set in Meir’s apartment, in the residence of the government, and at an mand center. Nor is it a biography, although it focuses on Meir, since the film is primarily about her leadership during the war and framed by her testimony to the Agranat Commission. The government formed mission to investigate the failures of military preparedness in response to popular protests; its critical report led to the resignation of Meir’s government in 1974.

Instead, Golda shows the predicament of Israel, as well as its peculiar character as a democracy, through one leader, Meir. She was born in the Ukraine in 1898 and immigrated to America in 1906 with her family, where she got an education and became a Zionist. She was a strong-willed child who disobeyed her family, wanting to make aliyah, the journey back to (then) the Land of Israel, as an adult, but was prevented by World War I. In 1921, having married, she moved to Palestine, which had just been taken from the Ottoman Empire by the British Empire under the League of Nations Mandate in 1920. She lived a political life after that, facing all the difficulties of preparing the Jews for statehood, and working especially in foreign affairs, rising gradually through all the important offices of state.

All this history is summarized in her attitude and her condition. This is not to say that those events made her what she was, but that in her war leadership we see the full expression of the beliefs and deeds that defined her, just like the prime-ministerial office was the peak of her achievements. Mirren acts the part wonderfully, a rare portrayal of a woman as petent and confident leader, devoid of arrogance or petulance, involved in momentous events rather than in identity politics, and thus an homage to Meir. For the most part, the anger and fear, the uncertainty of events, are expressed by subtle changes in her eyes. Her major prop for characterization is Meir’s chain-smoking; the danger of the moment and the requirements of politics forbid saying what she must be thinking. As for her condition, Meir is old, worn, stooped, and suffering from the lymphoma that will eventually kill her and for which she goes to chemotherapy. It seems only her will is keeping her alive and that the only object of her will is to save Israel.

The camera follows Meir in her home and shows the suffering caused by politics; we are all mortal, but to dedicate oneself to high politics also invites madness, because one has to face the terrible burden of defense, of war, and that means dead soldiers—boys and young men. Their names, their pictures, the corpses in the morgue, the memory of their desperate appeals in the munications, the knowledge of the numbers of men lost in the battles, fill up her lonely private life, where she has only the support of a private secretary who is almost a daughter to her. Mirren’s performance suggests that endurance might be the defining bodily quality of a woman and that it might be better adapted to politics than the more heroic manly qualities. But with that es a weakness, a vulnerability to pain and guilt for all the suffering, a personal and private misery that cannot be assuaged by the political limits of office and authority that define public life.

Golda, as the informal title already suggests, is about democratic leadership. Meir is undoubtedly admirable, but there is nothing glorious in her. You may weep to witness her grandeur in the moment of ordeal and rejoice in her eventual triumph, but you will not be inspired to seek political honors. As much as the title, the frame of the story, the Agranat Commission judging her leadership on behalf of the Israeli democracy, reminds us of the limits of personal achievement, I walked away from the movie thinking that we have bought morality in our politics at the price of splendor; I think Goldais intended to do poetic justice, to give a democratic audience what they deserve, that is, to put them in the shoes of this great woman and experience vicariously some of her suffering, because it was incurred for the sake of democracy and civilization.

Golda also suggests something of the difference between men and women, since all the generals are men, great men, founders of the State of Israel, like Moshe Dayan, then minister of defense, and future great men like Ariel Sharon, then a daring general, famous for the Six-Day War, as well as others. They have a pride Meir doesn’t share, but they are also portrayed as too eager to act and somewhat fragile in the face of the initial surprise attack on October 6, which was devastatingly effective. Meir, on the other hand, is somewhat indecisive, splitting the difference on whether to mobilize entirely or not at all (the contradictory advice of her generals), but she does make decisions and accept the responsibility. Democratic civilian control of the military is asserted, which the constitutional arrangement at that time had not entirely settled. And something in the character of a ruling politician is revealed, a bination of iron will and a female willingness to forgive, to cajole, to wait, to threaten. But the subtlety of the portrayal and its relation to democracy would take too long to spell out in a brief review—watch the movie, you will notice the script is as intelligent as Mirren’s performance is sensitive.

There is, I think, only one important scene where Meir isn’t smoking, during Kissinger’s private visit to impose a ceasefire. All Meir’s qualities of persuasion and resolve show in that scene, encouraging us to see something of the importance of impressive politicians. Kissinger is portrayed as an intelligent and sympathetic friend of Israel, possessed of as much as power as patience, but primarily concerned with American problems: maintaining the balance of power in the Middle East, not least because of the dangers to the American economy posed by OPEC, and containing Soviet power, which was then allied with the Arab states, as it had previously been with Israel. To some extent, for America this is a proxy war. This is an Israeli film, however, so the focus is on their existential struggle and the difficulty of their position: on the one hand seeking an ally, on the other, striving for independence.

es to a conclusion with the victory of Israel, as rapid as its initial defeat, partly dependent on American support—the famous airlift replacing Israeli losses in materiel, Operation Nickel Grass. The political message is the importance of stability in government, since almost everyone in the leadership made serious mistakes in the beginning but then contributed to a remarkable victory. The story ends fittingly with Leonard Cohen’s Who by Fire, inspired by his experience visiting the troops and singing for them during the war. The song takes its theme from one of the Yom Kippur prayers, pares the unpredictable suffering of mankind with divine judgment, calling all to atone.

Golda is available to rent on Amazon Prime, YouTube, and other streaming platforms.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
FAQ: What is the ‘U.S.-Mexico Trade Agreement’?
The United States and Mexico renegotiated the terms of their free trade agreement, President Donald Trump announced this week, replacing NAFTA with something he dubbed the “U.S.-Mexico Trade Agreement.” Here are the facts you need to know. Why did the U.S. negotiate a new trade agreement with Mexico? President Trump promised to renegotiate NAFTA during the 2016 presidential campaign, seeking more favorable terms for the U.S. auto industry and manufacturing sector. As of this writing, Canada has not agreed to...
Review – Arthur Vandenberg: The Man in the Middle of the American Century
^This is a guest post for the Acton PowerBlog. By Gleaves Whitney Some years ago, the bestselling biographer David McCullough outlined the “missing history” of our nation’s capital – the histories that had yet to be written. Among the people he believed merited more in-depth study was Michigan Sen. Arthur Vandenberg. In Hendrik Meijer’s latest biography, Arthur Vandenberg: The Man in the Middle of the American Century, McCullough’s es true – and then some. No less mentator than Cokie Roberts,...
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: The Moral Aspects of Money
Acton’s own Alejandro Chafuen appeared in Forbes to discuss monetary theories from the ancient Greeks to today’s crytocurrencies. The following is an excerpt from Chafuen’s essay, titled Moralists and Money: From Gold to Bitcoin. For the full article, readers may click here. Monetary topics are some of the first economic issues to be studied with some rigor. Since the first writings by the Greek philosophers, such as Plato, Aristotle, Hesiod and Xenophon, and until the 16th century, the moral questions,...
Radio Free Acton: Entrepreneurship in Guatemala; Upstream on the future of the arts
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, host Caroline Roberts speaks with Jonathan Porta, co-founder of merce platform UTZ Market in Guatemala, on his experiences in developing his business and on entrepreneurship in Guatemala. Then on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker talks to David Marcus, New York correspondent for The Federalist on the future of the arts. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: Check out Utz Market Learn more about sustainable development and effective poverty...
What difference does reaching the middle class make?
Too often, advocating for economically sound policies is dismissed as extraneous to the life of a Christian. Faith leaders may see improving the lot of those living in this world as worthwhile but, fundamentally, outside the Christian’s mission. But if they understood the difference these policies make for “the least of these,” they may reconsider. It may be a cliche to say that those in the West take for granted the kind of daily pleasures and amenities denied much of...
From Sunday Stalwarts to the Solidly Secular, the strange mix of American religious groups
In America, we have a problem with religious labels: they no longer fit. As a devout evangelical, I always cringe when I hear the label used—mostly for political purposes—to include a range of heretics, political grifters, and nominal Christians who haven’t been to church in decades. But I also tire of hearing the term “nones” used as a synonym for atheists. The reality is that most people in Western Europe consider themselves to be “Christians,” they are less religious than...
Harry Potter: Venture capitalist
I recently read the first Harry Potter novel to my six-year-old son Brendan, then watched the film with him. It was all the fun I hoped it would be: he is just the right age for it — excitedly asking what is going to happen next and jumping and cheering at the end. As typically happens, I can’t stop at just the first one, so I’ve been watching the rest of the films with my wife Kelly. (I may read...
How we participate in God’s own work
“This is what I have observed to be good,” the Preacher says, “that it is appropriate for a person to eat, to drink and to find satisfaction in their toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given them—for this is their lot” (Ecclesiastes 5:18[NIV]). “Toilsome labor” is work that is incessant, extremely hard, or exhausting. That doesn’t sound all that appealing, does it? So why does the Preacher say such labor isgood? Because, he...
How Switzerland honors the Protestant work ethic and Catholic subsidiarity
In the U.S., Labor Day weekend celebrates the work ethic that made this nation the most prosperous in human history, and federalism is enshrined in our constitution. But Switzerland – so often overlooked by the West – may have much to teach us about how to honor and embrace the profound influence of the Protestant work ethic and Catholic subsidiarity. At Acton’s Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website, political scientist Mark R. Royce discusses how aspects of Switzerland’s little-discussed political system...
Where criminal justice reform meets the redemptive power of work
According to a recent study by the Rand Corporation, “more than 2 million adults are incarcerated in U.S. prisons,” with roughly 700,000 leaving federal and state prisons each year. Of those released, “40 percent will be reincarcerated.” It’s a staggering statistic—one that ought to stir us toward greater reflection on how we might better support, empower, and equip prisoners in connecting with social and economic life. How might we reform our criminal justice system to better help and support these...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved