Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Fortune 100 Companies Begin To Tackle Human Trafficking
Fortune 100 Companies Begin To Tackle Human Trafficking
Jun 16, 2026 3:03 PM

The American Bar Association and Arizona State University’s McCain Institute and School of Politics and Global Studies have issued the first study of its kind: examining Fortune panies for policies regarding human trafficking and forced labor. The study also looked at whether or not Fortune panies had policies regarding conflict minerals (what are often referred to as “blood diamonds:” gems and minerals mined by children and/or forced labor.) The study is entitled, “How Do Fortune 100 Corporations Address Potential Links To Human Rights Violations In A Globally Integrated Economy?”

According to a summary in The Wall Street Journal, the study itself had a straightforward approach:

[The policies] had to be available on pany website or by searching for them on Google. The objective was to go as far as the public would in finding pany policy, said Linda Hayman, of counsel at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP who is co-chair of the American Bar Association’s task force on human trafficking. It also didn’t judge pany’s conduct in relation to the policy, she said.

The majority panies studied are doing well:

Over half of all Fortune panies (54 percent) have publicly available policies on forced labor and nearly two-thirds (66 percent) have policies on human trafficking. Of the Target panies, over three-fourths (76 percent) have publicly available policies on forced labor and two-thirds (66 percent) have policies on human trafficking.

Not all panies studied had any business concerns with conflict minerals, but 43% of panies studied did have policies in place, mainly in response to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act. Almost panies studied (95 percent) have policies regarding supply chain monitoring for trafficking, labor and/or mineral issues.

Companies seem to be lagging in remediation issues; very panies have policies regarding individual remediation in cases of trafficking or forced labor issues. Linda Hayman, of counsel at Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP and co-chair of the American Bar Association’s task force on human trafficking, explains that remediation may be dealt with on a case-by-case basis and a “one size fits all” policy is not always the best idea.

Professor Daniel Rothenberg of Arizona State University led the study, and remarked that while some corporate policies were the result of legislation, most of the policies were driven by corporate responsibility. Cindy McCain, who serves as co-chair of the Arizona Governor’s Task Force on Human Trafficking, calls the study “a milestone” and says it shows that awareness of human trafficking continues to grow, and formal steps are being taken to end it.

The entire study can be read here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Men of God and Country in World War II
I frequently noted in the field, how chaplains – to a man – sought out front line action. And I assume that was because, as one put it, at the time: ‘There is where the fighting man needs God most – and that’s where some of them know him for the first time. – U.S.M.C. Commandant A.A. Vandegrift, 1945 The last two decades has seen a surge in interest in popular historical study of America’s role in the Pacific and...
Not All Exchange Is Created Equal
Jordan Ballor recently reviewed Nicholas Eberstadt’s A Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic, pointing out in some mentary that when “government is contiguous with society…perhaps our conceptions of ‘making’ and ‘taking’ need some re-examination.” Today, he connects some more dots, including a helpful reference toHerman Bavinck. In my own review of the book atValues & Capitalism, I offer a similar response, focusing particularly on William Galston’s critique of Eberstadt, which is included in the book itself. Whereas Eberstadt can be...
Economics Has Consequences
In this abridged version of the video series Economics for Everybody, R.C Sproul Jr. explains why it’s important for Christians to understand economics. Economics Has Consequences pulls together some of the key aspects of the original series into one film, including introductions to such basic principles of economics as stewardship, civil government, work, wealth, and entrepreneurism. The second section explores the impact of government intervention on education, the money supply, welfare, depressions, markets, and more. The video shows why economic...
New Issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality (15.2)
The newest issue of the Journal of Markets & Morality has been published. The issue is available in digital format online and should be arriving in print in the next few weeks for subscribers. This issue continues to offer academic engagement with the morality of the marketplace and with faith and the free society, including articles on economic engagement with Pope Benedict XVI’s encyclical letter Caritas in Veritate, biblical teaching on wealth and poverty, schools as social enterprises, the Reformed...
HHS Mandate: Where Do Things Stand?
According to the Becket Fund, there are currently 44 active cases against the Obama administration’s HHS mandate requiring employers to include abortion, sterilization and abortifacients as “health care”. There have been 14 panies that have filed suit; 11 of those have received temporary injunctions against implementing the mandate. Hobby Lobby‘s case was denied (as were Autocam‘s and Conestoga Wood Specialties‘.) Hobby Lobby has filed an appeal: “Hobby Lobby will continue their appeal before the Tenth Circuit,” said Kyle Duncan, general...
Beyond Makers and Takers: The Real Diversity of Society
As I noted last week, my review of Nicholas Eberstadt’s Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic appears in the current issue of The City, a fine publication produced by Houston Baptist University. Eberstadt provides an important service in bringing home the fiscal realities of the spending crisis facing the American government. But Yuval Levin’s brief reply was, for me, the high point of the book, as it emphasized the indispensability of the so-called “third sector” in social analysis. Eberstadt’s case...
Shareholder Resolutions and the ‘God Card’
The progressive politicization of certain religious orders hurries apace, especially as we enter the season of shareholder activism, proxy ballot initiatives and “corporate social responsibility” lectures from religious groups and churches. This year may generate even more activity as a result of the left’s renewed efforts to undermine Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission. Because many religious organizations are also shareholders in public corporations, their investments grant them a proxy voice in corporate policies. Unfortunately, this voice too often is...
Green Energy Exploits and the Minimum Wage
I came across this intriguing story out of Silicon Valley today: SUNNYVALE (CBS SF) –Bloom Energy Corp. has been ordered by a U.S. District Court Judge to pay $31,922 in back wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages to employees from Mexico after pany was found to have willfully violated the minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Bloom, amanufacturer of solid oxide fuel cells,has been paying 14 workers brought to the United States...
Privilege: The Real Postal Problem
Regarding the USPS decision Wednesday to stop Saturday mail delivery, Ron Nixon at the New York Times writes, The post office said a five-day mail delivery schedule would begin in August and shave about $2 billion a year from its losses, which were $15.9 billion last year. The Postal Service would continue to deliver packages six days a week, and post offices would still be open on Saturdays. Reducing Saturday delivery is in line with mail services in several other...
Which Rights Are Threatened by the Federal Government?
The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center finds that a majority of Americans now believe the federal government threatens their own personal rights and freedoms: The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Jan. 9-13 among 1,502 adults, finds that 53% think that the federal government threatens their own personal rights and freedoms while 43% disagree. In March 2010, opinions were divided over whether the government represented a threat to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved