Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
For St. John Paul II’s 100th birthday, Italy gets gift of religious freedom
For St. John Paul II’s 100th birthday, Italy gets gift of religious freedom
Jun 15, 2026 2:13 AM

Today, May 18, is a very good day, indeed. It is a heroic day for the Italian Catholic Church on the 100th anniversary of Pope St. John Paul II’s birth. There could not be a better birthday gift from a saint who, fluent in 13 languages, was a veritable Paraclete-on-earth. He spoke courageously and often, raising his voice against persecution of religious freedom. He did so not just in his munist Poland, but throughout the entire secularized world.

By the beginning of the 1990s, John Paul II and his allies had won the war on religious freedom when atheistic, Marxist regimes fell across Eastern Europe. But fast-forward 30 years, and the same battle has sprung right back up unexpectedly in the name of preserving public health during a pandemic.

John Paul II’s spirit dwells among us

After over two and half months of ardent appeals, fines, police raids, and civil disobedience by the faithful and pastors alike during the COVID-19 lockdown, public Masses have finally resumed–at least in Italy. In these days of personal trial, the spirit of St. John Paul II has dwelt among us. His words echoed in our troubled hearts, as we remember him exhorting leaders at the height of the Cold War in his 1988 World Day of Peace Message:

Religious freedom, an essential requirement of the dignity of every person, is a cornerstone of the structure of human rights, and for this reason an irreplaceable factor in the good of individuals and of the whole of society, as well as of the personal fulfillment of each individual. It follows that the freedom of individuals munities to profess and practice their religion is an essential element for peaceful human coexistence. … The civil and social right to religious freedom, inasmuch as it touches the most intimate sphere of the spirit, is a point of reference for the other fundamental rights and in some way es a measure of them.

Moreover, every violation of religious freedom, whether open or hidden, does fundamental damage to the cause of peace, like violations of the other fundamental rights of the human person. Forty years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to memorated next December, we have to admit that millions of people in various parts of the world are still suffering for their religious convictions: They are victims of repressive and oppressive legislation, victims sometimes of open persecution, but more often of subtle forms of discrimination aimed at believers munities. This state of affairs, in itself intolerable, is also a bad omen for peace.

Boiling point

The tension between the Italian government and the nation’s Catholic bishops has reached that same boiling point as they did in 1988, if not higher. As proof, hear this video tirade by outspoken Bishop Giovanni D’Ercole of Ascoli Piceno. In his very strong language of a few weeks ago, D’Ercole slammed the Italian government for not reopening churches sooner. He insisted houses of worship were “places of hope” and that the Church wanted “no more favors” from the state but only their natural rights back.

Last May 4, Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte announced a gradual reopening of Italy with no mention of resuming church services in his government’s Fase Due (Phase 2) objectives, thus reneging on his promises. The Italian bishops fumed in unison. They now all stood together with righteous indignity. They no longer wanted to be known to the world as submissive “good and faithful servants” of a secular state administration that no longer viewed the sacraments as “essential” to health, even if suicides in Italy had begun to spike due to ongoing spiritual despair.

Three days later, on May 7, an historic agreement was reached. As Associated Press vaticanista Philip Pullella reported:

Tensions ran high again late last month when the government announced a gradual staged easing of the lockdown but did not include a return to Masses in a phase that began on May 4. The bishops told the government they could “not accept seeing the exercise of freedom of religion promised.” … With Thursday’s [May 7] agreement, Masses for the public can resume on May 18 but under strict conditions outlined in a protocol signed by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte and Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, president of the Italian Bishops Conference.

Any further delays in reopening Italian churches for public worship would surely have led to the revolt of both clerics and laity against the state. Creative solutions to avoid spreading the contagion between the faithful, as with parking lot celebrations in the United States, were not practical in Italy nor in line with Italy’s cultural mores. Religious processions, from Naples to Milan, had been halted immediately or interrupted by police for reasons of “illegal assembly.” Streamed worship services were a popular substitute at first, but parents had quickly grown weary of their children misbehaving and generally being distracted in the non-consecrated space of their living rooms, prompting some websites to give tips for keeping children attentive during online Masses.

First Mass: Witness from the JP II Generation

This morning, an 8 a.m. service was the first Mass I attended in 71 days–70 days too many for a man born and raised in the “JP II Generation.” I had fought for this long-awaited day. I voiced my opinions clearly and without fear, just like the Great Communicator from Poland had asked, in order to return and assemble in worship.

At Mass, I was one of roughly 50 people present, triple the usual attendance for a Monday service. I was panied by pangs of “guilty privilege,” knowing millions of Catholics, and billions believers of other religious backgrounds, remained shut out of their churches. Constitutions that normally enshrine and protect a citizen’s God-given religious liberty have been largely ignored by politicians.

Today, I witnessed how the Italian state and Roman Catholic Church could work together. It wasn’t a perfect union, nor was I in agreement with all the health directives, but I was respectful and overjoyed to be in the house of Christ again.

Passing through the main entrance, I was motioned with a finger-wag that I had done something wrong. I was unaware I had to enter now through a side door. The reason? At this secondary entrance was my parish’s hand sanitizing station. There must have been signs redirecting me, but I was too eager and my faith-filled mind had e numb reading the fine details of so many avvisi pubblici over the last three months.

The parish monitor insisted again about something else. She kept gesturing to me but couldn’t vocalize her concern through a tightly fitted face mask. Then she mimed lathering her hands, which I immediately understood to mean I needed to wash my own hands. However, I had already done so three times that morning. A fellow parishioner turned around and mercifully squeezed some gel onto my digits, which I rubbed to the count of 20.

I was given the nod (presumably with a smile behind the lady’s mask) and was pointed to my seat.

Another public health misstep I made was sitting in the middle of an empty pew. Again, my focus was so intense on the tabernacle and opening prayers that I hadn’t noticed the white squares scotch-taped on the top armrests of each pew, exactly three meters apart and two per bench. I was motioned to move to the end of the pew. I plied, scooting over another meter to social distance from my brothers and sisters in Christ.

We kept our face masks on for the duration of the service. That much I conformed to intuitively after three months of restrained human contact. With masks on, the responses and hymns were “muffled” to say the least.

There was no exchange of peace, nor did the priest even pronounce the sacred words “now let us offer a sign” but moved on speedily to the Agnus Dei following the Our Father. Faithful turned around anyway to wave a little ciaoand nod at one other. No one tried to shake hands, kiss, or hug. This is still a social distancing “no-no” in the land of baci e abbracci.

The big change was Communion. The priest, before distributing, washed his hands thoroughly with sanitizer and put on his white surgical mask. Then something happened that I have never seen in Italy: Each pew emptied out one row at a time, from the top to the bottom of the church’s nave. It was a perfect imitation of the military order of Communion lines conducted in my native United States. Usually, it is an experience like the streets of Mumbai, where traffic is squeezed onto an avenue from every odd direction simultaneously to create one huge bottleneck. Not so, today!

At the conclusion of Mass, many, like me, stayed for some private prayer and contemplation in our own house of worship. After 10 minutes, an announcement was made that the church would have to be closed for re-sanitizing. Faithful would have to go out the main doors (the same I had mistakenly entered). Some stayed a few more minutes in quiet disobedience to authorities, yet in peaceful obedience to the One Almighty Authority.

As we exited, no one spoke to another, and we went out about our solitary domestic routines. It was a good, new beginning. Above all, it was a rarest of gifts on a great saint’s 100th birthday. John Paul II was certainly smiling in Heaven above. pleanno, San Giovanni Paolo!

Severance)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The philanthropist’s dilemma — good intentions, harmful effects
Tim Sullivan, editorial director of Harvard Business Review Press, took a look at how difficult it actually is for philanthropists to give their money away and focused on the case of Paul English, founder of . In a Harvard Business Review article titled “The Philanthropist’s Burden” in the December issue, Sullivan talks about how, despite many causes to support, the real trick is to find the most effective organizations. He uses the Acton Institute Poverty, Inc. documentary to show how...
7 Figures: Marriage, Family, and Economics in America
The 2016 American Family Survey was designed to understand the “lived experiences of Americans in their relationships and families” andprovide “context for understanding Americans’ life choices, economic experiences, attitudes about their own relationships, and evaluations of the relationships they see around them.” Here are seven figures you should know from this recently released survey: 1. When asked what specific challenges are making family life difficult, one-third (32 percent) said the costs associated with raising a family, one-fourth (27 percent) said...
How humans became consumers
Consumption is arguably the first (or maybe second) economic concept mentioned in the Bible. After creating Adam and Eve and giving them the cultural mandate (“Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it.”), God says to them, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. And to all the beasts of the earth and all...
Would you give up the internet for a million dollars?
Are you better off than someone who has a million dollars in the bank? Probably not—at least pared to a millionaire today. But chances are you consider yourself better off than someone who was a millionaire in an previous era—and you may even be better off than someone who had a million dollars in the bank in the 1970s or 1980s. Don’t believe me? Then ask yourself this question: How much is [technological advance X] worth to me? That’s not...
An economist’s Christmas: Is gift-giving wasteful?
During a season such as Christmas, where hyper-consumerism and hyper-generosity converge in strange and mysterious ways, it’s a question worth asking: How much of our gift-giving is inefficient and wasteful? For some, it’s a buzz-kill question worthy of Ebenezer Scrooge. For an economist, however, it’s a prodthat pushes us to createmore value and better align our hearts and hands with human needs. In a new video at Marginal Revolution, economists Tyler Cowen and Alex Tabarrock explore this at length, asking...
Paul Bonicelli on Trump’s Carrier deal and upcoming economic priorities
Paul Bonicelli, Director of Programs at the Acton Institute, appeared on CNBC’s Closing Bell on Thursday afternoon to discuss President-elect Donald Trump’s deal with Carrier to keep 1,000 jobs in Indiana, and to offer analysis of the potential economic priorities of the ing Trump Administration. You can view the interview below. ...
Understanding tax revenue and deadweight loss
Note: This is post #12 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Why do taxes exist? What are their effects? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explainshow taxes affect consumer surplus and producer surplus. He also discusses the concept of deadweight by considering a real-world example from the 1990s: taxing luxury yachts. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the speed. You can...
Samuel Gregg: Protectionism harmful in the long run
In a new article at The Christian Science Monitor titled “Can ‘economic nationalism’ keep more jobs in US?” Acton Director of Research Samuel Gregg is interviewed about President-elect Donald Trump’s stated goal of keeping jobs and businesses from leaving for foreign countries.In the analysis piece by reporter Patrik Jonsson, he cites Gregg as a critic of protectionism: In short, the United States cannot step back from the world without losing out, critics say. Trump’s plans are in the short-term “likely...
What happens when the government ‘forgives’ $108 billion in student debt?
To reduce the number of people defaulting on student loans, President Obama has been promoting e-driven repayment plans. The most widely available e-driven repayment plan for federal student loans—the e-Based Repayment (IBR) plan—provides payment caps based on a borrower’sfamily size and e (150 percent of the poverty level). After making 25 years of these reduced payments, the remaining debt is “forgiven.” (If you work for the government or a non-profit the remainder may be forgiven after 10 years.) This may...
Unemployment as Economic-Spiritual Indicator — November 2016 Report
Series Note: Jobs are one of the most important aspects of a morally functioning economy. They help us serve the needs of our neighbors and lead to human flourishing both for the individual and munities. Conversely, not having a job can adversely affect spiritual and psychological well-being of individuals and families. Because unemployment is a spiritual problem, Christians in America need to understand and be aware of the monthly data on employment. Each month highlight the latest numbers we need...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved