Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
First Amendment Is For Conservatives, Too
First Amendment Is For Conservatives, Too
Aug 27, 2025 6:57 AM

The First Amendment (“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”) is for all Americans. I know that seems obvious, but the folks at Salon seem to need a reminder.

Jenny Kutner has taken offense to a group of Catholic women expressing their opinion. The topic is birth control. (Let me just say that good Christians disagree on this topic. I’m not discussing the legitimate use of artificial birth control here, but rather the right to express one’s opinion on the topic.) In response to the Supreme Court’s decision regarding Hobby Lobby, Buzzfeed featured a group of women holding signs that expressed why they chose to use birth control. About a week later, Buzzfeed featured another group of women who held up signs explaining why they chose not to use artificial birth control. And that’s when Kutner lost it.

She began by pointing out that women who don’t use birth control represent less than 1 percent of American women. Then, she claimed that the reasons given by the women who don’t use birth control were “totally putative,” showed a lack of understanding of how birth control works (everyONE knows Christians don’t grasp science, right?), and “preachy.” All of their responses, Kutner says, are “scary;” clearly these women are “anti-feminist” and they don’t know the facts of reproduction. Their thinking, Kutner opines, is “yet another example of twisted understandings of religion being used to control sex and sexuality, particularly for women.”

Here’s the thing. These signs could have featured a group of vegans and a group of meat-lovers, people who were proud of their fit physiques and those who are happy being larger than average, or one group of folks who loved a daily cocktail and another that believed alcohol is evil. Both sides have a legitimate right to express their opinions. We may disagree – in fact, in the human experience, we WILL disagree about some things. Calling the other side names, telling them their are ignorant, and “twisted”? That’s a middle-school, note-passing, mean girl response.

The First Amendment applies to everyone: minorities, Catholics, conservatives, people we don’t like. The women featured on Buzzfeed on both sides of this issue get this. Why doesn’t Salon?

Read “Women who don’t use birth control explain why not, slut-shame those who do” at Salon.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Why Religion Enjoys Special Privileges
In the latest issue of Christianity Today,Wilfred McClay offers six reasons why religion in America really does—and should—enjoy ‘special privileges’: A third argument for religion’s special place is anthropological:Human beings are naturally inclined toward religion.We are driven to relate our understanding of the highest things to our lives lived munity with others. Whether our “theotropic” impulses derive from in-built endowment, evolutionary adaptation, or some other source, the secular order ought not to inhibit their expression. If believers sense a general...
Raising Taxes without a Balanced Budget is Insane
It makes little, or really no sense for Americans to fork over more taxes without a balanced federal budget and seeing some fiscal responsibility out of Washington. The fact that the United States Senate hasn’t passed a budget in well over three years doesn’t mean we aren’t spending money, we are spending more than ever. The last time the Senate passed a budget resolution was April of 2009. We are constantly bombarded with rhetoric that “taxing the rich” at an...
Misrepresenting Catholic Social Teaching: ‘I’m Sick of It’
Anthony Esolen has written a rollicking piece in Crisis bemoaning the misrepresentation, misuse and mangling of Catholic Social Teaching. In a phrase, he’s sick of it. I’m sick of hearing that Catholic teaching regarding sex and marriage is one thing, in that old-fashioned trinket box over there, while Catholic teaching regarding stewardship and our duties to the poor is another thing, on that marble pedestal over here. I’m sick of hearing that Catholic teaching regarding the Church and her authority...
Solzhenitsyn: ‘There’s Plenty of Freedom, But Little Truth’
, a Russian site, has published an English translation of an interview given by Archpriest Nikolai Chernyshev, who is identified as “the spiritual father of the Solzhenitsyn family during the final years of the writer’s life.” The interview touches on Aleksandr Solzenitsyn’s upbringing in a deeply religious Russian Orthodox family, his encounter with militant atheism ( … he joined neither the Young Pioneers nor the Komsomol [All-Union Leninist Young Communist League]. The Pioneers would tear off his baptismal cross, but...
Africans Join Together to Aid Frozen Norwegians
Africans unite to save Norwegians from dying of frostbite. By joining Radi-Aid, you too can donate your radiator and spread some warmth in the frozen wasteland of Norway. Why Africa for Norway? Imagine if every person in Africa saw the “Africa for Norway” video and this was the only information they ever got about Norway. What would they think about Norway? If we say Africa, what do you think about? Hunger, poverty, crime or AIDS? No wonder, because in fundraising...
New on AU Online: Globalization, Poverty, and Development
Global poverty and its alleviation are often subjects of heated debate. Join us for an AU Online lecture series that explores the theme of human flourishing as it relates to poverty, globalization, and the Church in the developed world. The Globalization, Poverty, and Development series is scheduled for December 6 through December 13, 2012. Online sessions will be held at 6:30 p.m. EST on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Visit auonline.acton.org for more information and to register. You should also check out...
A Conservative Case for Walmart
Every year Black Friday marks the official beginning of two modern American traditions: Christmas shopping and criticizing Walmart. Critics on both the left and the right have found mon enemy in Walmart. Those on the left hate pany because it isn’t unionized while plain because it undercuts mom-and-pop retailers. Some researchers even claim that people are prone to gain weight after a Walmart Supercenter opens nearby. I suspect if the researchers were to conduct a follow-up study they’d also find...
Commentary: Living in the Shadow of the Fiscal Cliff
Jordan Ballor looks at the bipartisan lack of discipline in Washington on debt and spending, and the effect on future generations. “Christians, whose citizenship is ultimately not of this world and whose identity and perspective must likewise be eternal and transcendent, should not let our viewpoints be determined by the tyranny of the short-term,” he writes. “If we continue the current course of American politics, the fiscal cliff will end up being nothing more than a bump in the road...
The Case for Religious Liberty in 16 Seconds
Making the case for religious liberty for those with ultra-short attention spans. Ed Morrissey also provides a30 second argument: Actually, this argument works beyond the issue of religious-organization exemption as well, as I’ve repeatedly argued. Why should we forceanyemployer to directly subsidize birth control? What role does an employer have in the bedroom, anyway? The intrusion on what should be a free-market choice makes even less sense when prehensive long-term studyby the Center for Disease Control shows access plays no...
The Naked Private Square
In his 1984 book The Naked Public Square, Richard John Neuhaus explained how a strict separationist reading of the First Amendment which forbids all religious speech leaves the public square “naked.” Neuhaus described the “naked public square” as “the result of political doctrine and practice that would exclude religion and religiously grounded values from the conduct of public business.” In a recent law review article, Ronald J. Colombo, a law professor at Hofstra University, describes a similar phenomena: the naked...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved