Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Finding civil society as Minneapolis burns
Finding civil society as Minneapolis burns
Jun 14, 2025 8:32 PM

On May 25, George Floyd was murdered on the streets of Minneapolis, killed by “asphyxiation from sustained pressure” after his neck was pressed for over eight minutes under the knee of a police officer—a supposed public servant who was sworn to “serve and protect.”

It’s a tragic example of the moral and institutional rot that pervades society, particularly as it relates to the enduring threats of racism, white supremacy, and over-criminalization among minorities and the poor. As if this injustice weren’t enough, the subsequent chaos, division, and destruction has served to paint a bigger picture—illuminating broader cultural challenges and blind spots, from our growing absence of public virtue to our enduring inability to properly recognize and productively respond to injustice.

The riots began in Minneapolis, where I currently live, finding their ultimate climax in the burning of the third precinct police station. As citizens mourned and the rioters raged, Mayor Jacob Frey and Gov. Tim Walz looked on with a mix of shrugging bewilderment and passive sympathy. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump did his best to further foment the chaos, adding reckless rhetoric and partisan gamesmanship to an already tense and terrible situation. Alas, from our local authorities to the president of United States, character, courage, petence were nowhere to be found.

It was an fortable spectacle to behold, mixing the decadence and detachment of our national politics with a reality that Minnesotans have tried their best to ignore, because it hits too close to home. If the murder of George Floyd challenged our cozy illusions about the “Minnesota niceness” of our approach to race relations, the resulting rioters and placating politicians made the medicine stronger still. Here, in our own subdued, milky, Midwestern way, we had failed to understand what social and racial justice actually is—and what preserving it actually requires.

Until now, it seems, such issues have managed to hide behind our shiny progressive institutions, marked by decades of top-down social engineering and central planning, all routinely couched in carefully crafted, socially conscious sweet-talk. As local columnist James Lileks explains, Minnesotans have long participated in that age-old progressive bargain:

Yes, you will pay a lot, but you’re going to get good roads, good schools, good institutions. It’s going to be clean. It’s not going to be corrupt. It’s going to work.

Unfortunately, despite the flowery rhetoric and the bountiful city budgets, many of our munities and most marginalized people groups have still largely languished, with the state ranking remarkably low when es to various metrics of racial equality. Politicians “say the ‘right’ things; they fund the ‘right’ organizations,” Lileks continues. “Whether or not the money actually gets to the people and changes anything is irrelevant. They have the right formed groups that meet at the city hall and speak the right words, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that anything changes.”

And we aren’t the only ones. As Ross Douthat explains, such an approach has left many of America’s liberal cities with little connective tissue between the individual and the state, making it hard to govern, let alone solve the bigger and more pervasive issues of racial injustice:

The riots engulfing America’s cities aren’t just a testament to Trump’s mix of provocation and abdication. They also reveal how the Democratic coalition’s distillation into a metropolitan formation, a liberalism of the “global city,” has created deep pressures inside the liberal coalition, fissures that can widen with the right cascade of shocks … The weaknesses of the conservative coalition are reversed for liberals. Instead of uniformity, there is Balkanization. Instead of chauvinism against outsiders there is suspicion against neighbors. Instead of a pious Christianity that’s too often distant from the stranger and the orphan, there is a pious liberalism that depends on the cheap labor of immigrants and the surveillance and harassment of the poor.

Above all, the liberal city lacks a middle—the ballast of a substantial middle class, the mediating institutions of old-fashioned machine politics, the cement of shared religious and cultural institutions. Instead, its mediating institutions are the cops, the public schools and welfare bureaucracy, and the professional-activist class. None of these groups have broad legitimacy. The cops are distrusted from below and from above—increasingly regarded by the cosmopolitan class as distasteful mercenaries, a necessary evil to protect gentrification’s gains. The schools and welfare system are stagnant yet resilient, constantly resisting attempted reinventions by elites whose own families rarely use them. The activists portray themselves as spokesmen for their race or class, but their main task appears to be running consciousness-raising sessions to salve the uneasy consciences of white elites.

As America continues to be more polarized—and as religious munity life continue to decline here and there and everywhere—these underlying problems in urban America only e more apparent and their ripple effects more severe. When crisis strikes, as it has with COVID-19 and now this, the dysfunction es impossible to ignore. “Put cops to work enforcing social distancing and their authoritarian temptations are magnified,” Douthat writes, “and then all you need is a particularly brazen injustice to light the spark.” Compounded by consolidated control up top and scattered vice down below, where might we turn for the middle?

Indeed, in “normal life,” this void of virtuous institutions can be hard to feel, taste, or touch. Perhaps we are blinded or overly insulated by our status, class, race, or privilege. Perhaps we suffer from what Kenneth Minogue called “Western ambivalence”—a democracy- and prosperity-induced stupor, wherein we prefer the “servile mind” and the perks of individualist-collectivist dichotomies to the hard work of actual freedom. Or perhaps it’s just too fortable out in middle-class suburbia.

In this particular moment, however, as citizens begin to wake up to some of the painful realities of systemic racism, dehumanization, and civilizational decay, the decline is a bit easier to spot. Thankfully, so are the solutions.

As politicians, police and other public officials continue to abuse their authority and flail in the face of crisis—attacking black people, arresting reporters, gassing peaceful protestors, watching cities burn—we see that just laws and virtuous leaders are critically important, and we ought not twiddle our thumbs, waiting quietly for change. But we also realize that justice is needed from top to bottom. If we hope to restore a right relationship between citizens and public servants, we’d better figure out how to restore it across every other organism and institution, as well, including families, neighborhoods, churches, businesses, schools, charities, and more.

Likewise, as media outlets seek to exploit the moment by stoking fear and resentment, and as the masses on the Left and the Right take their cues accordingly, we are reminded of the need to ground our voices in virtue, conviction, wisdom, and discernment. Surrounded by the foolhardy partisans of cable news and social-media meme battles, we increasingly long and look for those who “hold the center,” as David French puts it, channeling W.B. Yeats’ “The Second Coming.” When “the ceremony of innocence is drowned,” we need those who maintain conviction amid the “passionate intensity.” One would hope that such character and constraint would be prevalent in the halls of power or the podiums of the modern media’s chattering class. But these days, it is more likely to be found among pastors, business leaders, academics, activists, educators, poets, and rappers. In times such as these, we need more than the noise of narrow nitpicking.

More importantly, at a deeper, closer, and more local level, we need to steer our eyes beyond the disarray and destruction, and orient our hands, accordingly. This is where civil society truly begins.

As malicious aggressors attempt to burn and ransack neighborhoods, we look to those brave firefighters and police officers, spunky neighborhood alliances, and armed citizen-activists mounting vigilant, coordinated resistance. As violent factions seek to co-opt the cause of racial justice for their own self-indulgent gains, we quickly realize that the real disruption is in principled civil disobedience that aligns with mon good. As munities are robbed of essential services, we see countless surviving businesses, churches, charities, and residents embodying radical generosity—meeting physical needs, cleaning streets, and providing support to those marked by the devastation. As worshippers gather at 38th and Chicago Ave. to memorialize George Floyd, we are reminded of the power of prayer to break through walls of division and oppression, and the transformative role of our munities and Christian witness in the process of reconciliation.

As I marched in Minneapolis last weekend, surrounded by burnt buildings and a flurry of faithful citizens and cooperating institutions, I was reminded that, while our civilizational decline may burn bright and red at night, a remnant of civil society surely remains. From high up in the clouds of our national politics and media frenzy, those “little platoons” may seem quieter or more confined than they once were, but we should not neglect their role in the long, enduring fight for justice.

The voices are there in the crowded streets—serving, fighting, creating, collaborating. The time is ripe for right relationships, and from there, justice will flow. The “mediating middle” is ours for the taking.

residents clean up the debris after rioters do their damage. Fibonacci Blue. CC BY 2.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Power of Giving from an Eight Year Old Boy
The story of Myles Eckert giving a $20 bill to Lt. Col. Frank Dailey is deserving of the massive amount of attention it has received across the nation. Eckert’s powerful deed has been highlighted and shared frequently all over social media. One of the great qualities I love about many of the old Frank Capra films is how he appealed to the moral conscience of his audience with authenticity and the power of giving. The hero character in Capra films...
What is Innovation?
“Most CEOs now spray the word ‘innovation’ as if it were an air freshener,” says Dennis Berman in the Wall Street Journal, “A little spritz can’t hurt.” A prime example, notes Berman, is what Kellogg’s CEO John Bryant described as one of pany’s most important “innovations”: a peanut butter Pop-Tart. Most of us would probably agree that a new flavor of breakfast pastry isn’t as innovative as, say, the iPhone. But how do we know? What exactly is innovation? As...
Acton Institute Names Lawyer and Economist Oskari Juurikkala the 2014 Novak Award Winner
Today the Acton Institute announced the 2014 Novak Award winner. Full release follows: A rigorous researcher and sound contributor to various academic disciplines and initiatives, Finnish native Oskari Juurikkala has been selected as the recipient of the 2014 Novak Award by the Acton Institute in recognition of his early promise as a scholar. Educated in both law (London School of Economics) and economics (Helsinki School of Economics), he earned a joint Ph.D. in law and economics from the University of...
The Bigger The Government, The Smaller The Citizen
Dennis Prager at Prager University reminds us that big government makes everything else (goodness, charity, self-reliance) smaller. Big government also creates a sense of entitlement amongst citizens, creating ingratitude and resentment – hardly what one wants in society. ...
Video: Kishore Jayabalan on the Changing Face of the Roman Catholic Church
Pope Francis recently installed 19 new cardinals in a ceremony at the Vatican, the first that he has chosen in his pontificate. Most of the new Cardinals hail from outside Europe and North America, and the group includes the first Cardinal from the long-impoverished nation of Haiti. Kishore Jayabalan, Director of Istituto Acton in Rome, spoke with the BBC about what this new group of Cardinals means for the Roman Catholic Church, and how they reflect the changing face of...
Religious Liberty and Business as Culture-Making
Offering yetanother contribution to a series of recentdiscussions about the religious liberties of bakers, florists, and photographers, Jonathan Merritt has a piece atThe Atlantic warning that the type of protections Christians were fighting for in Arizona e back to hurt the faithful.” “These prophets of doom only acknowledge one side of the slope,” Merritt writes. “They fail to consider how these laws could be used against members of their munities. If you are able to discriminate against others on the...
P.J. O’Rourke Defends ‘Truthiness’ Before the Supreme Court
The Supreme Courts is hearing a case that involves a First Amendment challenge to an Ohio law that makes it a crime to “disseminate a false statement concerning a candidate, either knowing the same to be false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false.” During the 2010 elections, the Susan B. Anthony List, a pro-life advocacy group, published ads in Ohio claiming that then-Rep. Steven Driehaus supported taxpayer-funded abortions (because he had voted for the Affordable Care Act)....
How IKEA and Innovation Help Refugees in Iraq
When looking for solutions to humanity’s problems, conservatives and libertarians tend to prefer turning first to free markets rather than government. The reason for such a preference is often misunderstood, and can be difficult to explain since it appears paradoxical: free markets are often better at serving human needs than governments because free markets make it easier to fail. As Arnold Kling explains, the best way to deal with failure depends on the institution. An individual needs to fail with...
Apple’s Tim Cook: Profits Aren’t The Only Thing
From The Independent: He leads pany that some would consider the epitome of ruthless global capitalism. But Apple chief executive Tim Cook has shocked some in the US with an impassioned attack on the single-minded pursuit of profit – and a direct appeal to climate-change deniers not to buy shares in his firm. Eyewitnesses said Cook, who succeeded Steve Jobs as boss of the technology giant in 2011, was visibly angry as he took on a group of right-wing investors...
Acton On Tap: The Threat to Religious Liberty With Ray Nothstine
James Madison called religious liberty the “lustre of our country” and a guaranteed right that is free from political authority. But some politicians are trying to redefine religious freedom in America, preferring instead to call it “freedom of worship.” The implication is that you are free to say and believe what you want as long as it is confined inside the walls of the houses of worship. But how faithful is this to the First Amendment? Only a decade ago...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved