Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Fact facts: President Trump’s new guidance on religion and prayer in schools
Fact facts: President Trump’s new guidance on religion and prayer in schools
May 13, 2026 5:00 PM

When students go back to school Monday morning, they will have more protections to exercise their constitutional freedom of religion than at any time in decades. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos issued updated federal guidelines requiring public schools to respect the religious liberty of students and teachers – or lose federal funding.

The document has the unwieldy title, “Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer and Religious Expression in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools.” However, it contains pithy truths and robust protections for people of every faith in the nation’s 132,853 K-12 public schools.

“Students and teachers do not ‘shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate,’” the document states forthrightly.

It then breaks down the rights of students and teachers, and the privileges school districts enjoy.

For students, the guidance states:

Students may “speak to, and attempt to persuade, their peers about religious topics just as they do with regard to political topics”;“[S]tudents may read their Bibles, Torahs, Korans, or other scriptures; say grace before meals; and pray or study religious materials with fellow students during recess, the lunch hour, or other non-instructional time to the same extent that they may engage in nonreligious activities”;Students may pray during a moment of silence;Students may wear religious symbols or clothing with religious messages to the same extent that they may wear secular-themed clothing;Students may express their faith in their assignments;Student speakers may pray or mention their faith in school assemblies and graduation ceremonies;“Students may organize prayer groups, religious clubs, and ‘see you at the pole’ gatherings before school to the same extent that students are permitted to organize other noncurricular student activities groups. Such groups must be given the same access to school facilities for assembling as is given to other noncurricular groups, without discrimination because of the religious perspective of their expression”;Christian groups must have the same right to advertise their events as secular groups (on school announcements, posters, etc.), and the school cannot force them to add a disclaimer to their ads unless they do so equally for secular student organizations; andSchools may excuse students to partake in religious ceremonies off-campus, provided they don’t punish or reward such activity.

The guidance makes clear that teachers also have rights:

Teachers may pray or hold Bible studies, together or privately, even during the school day, but only during times when they are allowed to engage in private activities; and“Teachers may participate in their personal capacities in privately sponsored baccalaureate ceremonies or similar events.”

Schools may also teach about religious doctrines. However, they may not proselytize on behalf of any faith.

The guidance accepts the Supreme Court status quo ante that “teachers and other public school officials, acting in their official capacities, may not lead their classes in prayer, devotional readings from the Bible, or other religious activities,” or even exert “subtle coercive pressures.” This is not the way the Founding Fathers understood the issue.

The guidance – which, by law must be updated every two years – has not been changed or reissued since 2003. At least two, two-term presidents thought they had more important matters to attend to: George W. Bush pursued “No Child Left Behind,” the Medicare Part D entitlement, and the TARP bailout. Barack Obama enacted Obamcare, funded state Medicaid expansion, and presided over a budget-busting “stimulus” act that failed to stimulate the economy. The evidence indicates both would have fared better had they protected their citizens’ constitutional rights.

President Trump put teeth into his provision by mandating that every school district must certify that it respects students’ constitutional rights every year by October 1, or lose federal funding. This ensures greater protection for people of faith – rights public schools have frequently denied them, as several victims noted in a White House event on January 17.

While protecting liberty is a most appropriate and e use of taxpayer dollars, the power of federal funding is a two-edged sword. The previous administration threatened to defund schools over much different criteria. As long as local school districts receive enormous sums of money from the federal government, the president will have the power to coerce them into hewing to his or her own political preferences.

It is terrifying that public respect for the most fundamental, first liberty depends on the will of the chief executive. Such are the fruits of the growing American welfare state.

For more, on the topic, you may listen to my interview on this week’s “Mornings with Carmen LeBerge” on the Faith Radio Network, embedded below. The segment begins at approximately 12:45. (The first segment discussed President Trump’s 2020 Davos speech, where he encouraged world leaders to “reject the perennial prophets of doom.)

Your browser does not support theaudio element.

You can download the full hour here.

You can read the full guidance here.

Action item: Thank Secretary Betsy DeVos via e-mail at [email protected].

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
CAFTA/Culture of Life: enemies?
John Paul II gave us all a tremendous gift by endorsing the terms Culture of Life and Culture of Death. But as with all great gifts, we must guard these terms carefully so as not to wear them out with misuse, robbing them of their relevance. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is happening in the current debate over CAFTA. A group called Catholics for Faithful Citizenship (PDF) claims the following: “Clearly, supporting CAFTA is inconsistent with upholding a culture of...
Labor unions and free association
The Service Employees International Union and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have broken away from the plaining that the federation has focused too much on political activism in the face of declining union membership and influence. Dr. Charles Baird was a featured guest on yesterday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on Ave Maria Radio, discussing Catholic perspectives on unionism and whether the modern American labor union movement patible with church teachings. Dr. Baird is Chair of the Department of...
Seeing the trees, missing the forest
The United Nations has released a report on the ongoing upheavals in Zimbabwe, where tyrant Robert Mugabe has been punishing his political opponents under the guise of “cleaning up” the country’s cities. The effect of Operation Murambatsvina (meaning either “Operation Restore Order” or “Operation Drive Out Trash,” depending on who’s translation you believe) has been to leave some 700,000 people homeless, jobless, or both. A downloadable copy of the UN report is available here. While the report does illuminate the...
Tocqueville turns 200
Alexis de Tocqueville, author of Democracy in America, was born on this date in 1805. Charles Colson, in his introduction to Carl F.H. Henry’s “Has Democracy Had Its Day?” writes that Tocqueville was a realist and recognized how fragile democracy is. He saw, as many moderns do not, that it could only survive if citizens continue to exercise their civic responsibilities, which is what our founders knew to be the most essential republican virtue. They also understood that democracy is...
Roadside Religion
Alan Warren / Associated Press ...
Close call on CAFTA
Close at Home The House of Representatives voted early this morning (12:03 am) to approve the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) after weeks of intense lobbying on both sides. The final vote was a close 217-215. My predictions: somehow, any dip in employment (if there is one) in the next six months will somehow be linked to CAFTA by its detractors. Detractors will attempt to take the moral high ground in American politics in ’06 and ’08, and even...
Cuba and China
Here’s a great interview from the Marketplace Morning Report with Chris Farrell, in which he argues for the lifting of trade sanctions against dictatorial and oppressive regimes. pares the cases of Cuba and China, in which two different strategies have been used, with vastly different results. We need to “stop the policy of broad based sanctions against nations that we don’t like,” says Farrell. This is directly opposite of the view, for example, which primarily blames economic engagement and the...
You catch more bees with honey
Following months of Zimbabwe’s brutal “Drive Out Trash” campaign, pleasantries exchanged between Mugabe and a UN delegation may have made some headway. The UN report on the situation, according to Claudia Rosett, began “with a delicacy over-zealously inappropriate in itself to dealings with the tyrant whose regime has been responsible for wreck of Zimbabwe” by describing Mugabe’s reception of the UN officials with a “warm e.” Despite the ings of the UN report with respect to policy solutions (more aid!),...
SCOTU$
Slate features an article by Henry Blodget, a former securities analyst, which examines the investments of Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts. In an analysis that has more than you would ever need to know about a person’s finances (and perhaps reads a bit too much into the investments), Blodget writes of Roberts, “His fortune is self-made, which suggests a bias toward self-reliance rather than entitlements and subsidies.” That sounds promising. HT: Fast Company Now ...
ExTORTion
S. T. Karnick over at The Reform ments on a recent suit filed against DuPont over Teflon, claiming that “DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product.” Karnick observes that abuse of the tort system is rampant, in part because “it has been perverted into a proxy for the criminal justice system: a means of punishing supposed wrongdoers through the use of a weaker standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence instead of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved