Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s infrastructure plan
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s infrastructure plan
Jul 1, 2025 11:19 PM

Earlier today, President Trump released his new $200 billion infrastructure plan. Here is what should know about the 53-page legislative outline:

What is infrastructure?

TheFederal government has defined infrastructureas the framework of interdependent networks and prising identifiable industries, institutions (including people and procedures), and distribution capabilities that provide a reliable flow of products and services essential to the defense and economic security of the United States, the smooth functioning of governments at all levels, and society as a whole.

While infrastructure plans traditionally address transportation assets such as roads, bridges, and airports, the Trump administration plan includes “other needs like drinking and wastewater systems, waterways, water resources, energy, rural infrastructure, public lands, veterans’ hospitals, and Brownfield and Superfund sites.”

What new programs are created by the plan?

The president’s plan includes three new programs for funding and financing infrastructure improvements: an infrastructure incentives program, a rural infrastructure program, and the “Transformative Projects Program.”

Infrastructure incentives program

Program: An “infrastructure incentives program” which would “provide for targeted Federal investments, encourage innovation, streamline project delivery, and help transform the way infrastructure is designed, built, and maintained.”

Program’s function: “Under this program, States and localities would receive incentives in the form of grants. Project sponsors selected for award would execute an agreement with express progress milestones. Federal incentive funds would be conditioned upon achieving the milestones within identified time frames.”

Program’s purpose: This program would provide funding for surface transportation and airports, passenger rail, ports and waterways, flood control, water supply, hydropower, water resources, drinking water facilities, wastewater facilities, stormwater facilities, and Brownfield and Superfund sites.

Program’s funding: $100 billion

Rural infrastructure program

Program: A “rural infrastructure program” which would “provide for significant

investment in rural infrastructure to address long-unmet needs.”

Program’s function: “Under this program, States would be incentivized to partner with local and private investments pletion and operation of rural infrastructure projects.”

Program’s purpose: This program would provide funding for roads, bridges, public transit, rail, airports, and maritime and inland waterway ports; broadband and other high-speed data munication conduits); drinking water, wastewater, stormwater, land revitalization and Brownfields; governmental generation, transmission and distribution facilities; flood risk management, water supply, and waterways.

Program’s funding: $50 billion

Transformative Projects Program

Program: The Transformative Projects Program would “provide Federal funding and technical assistance for bold, innovative, and transformative infrastructure projects that could dramatically improve infrastructure.”

Program’s function: “The Transformative Projects Program would support projects that, with Federal support, are capable of generating revenue, would provide net public benefits, and would have a significant positive impact on the Nation, a region, State, or metropolitan area.”

Program’s purpose: The purposes of the Transformative Projects Program would include: significantly improving performance, from the perspective of availability, safety, reliability, frequency, and service speed; substantially reducing user costs for services; introducing new types of services; and improving services based on other related metrics.

Program’s funding: $20 billion

The proposal also establishes a new infrastructure fund in the U.S. Treasury entitled the Interior Maintenance Fund prised of additional revenues from the amounts due and payable to the United States from mineral and energy development on Federal lands and waters.

What new provisions does the plan propose?

The president’s plan proposes several new provisions in a variety of areas related to infrastructure.

Changes to financing programs

Expand Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) Funding and Broaden Program EligibilitySupport airport and non-Federal waterways and ports financing options.Expand Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) and Broaden Program EligibilitySubsidize RRIF for short-line freight and passenger rail.Expand Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Funding and Broaden Program EligibilityExpand EPA’s WIFIA authorization to include non-Federal flood mitigation, navigation and water supply.Eliminate requirement under WIFIA for borrowers to munity water systems.Authorize Brownfield rehabilitation and cleanup of Superfund sitesReduces rating agency opinions from two to one for all borrowers.Provides EPA authority to waive the springing lien in certain lending situations.Increases the base level of administrative funding authorized to ensure EPA has sufficient funding to operate the WIFIA program.Removes the restriction on the ability to reimburse costs incurred prior to loan closing under WIFIA.Expands the WIFIA program to authorize eligibility for credit assistance for water system acquisitions and restructurings.Expands WIFIA authorization to include Federal deauthorized water resource projectsExpands Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Lending Programs FundingCreates Flexibility and Broaden Eligibility to Facilitate use of Private Activity Bonds (PABs)Requires public attributes for public infrastructure projectsBroadens eligibility of PABsEliminates the Alternative Minimum Tax preference on PABsRemoves State volume caps and transportation volume caps on PABs for public purpose infrastructure projects and expand eligibility to ports and airportsProvides change-of-use provisions to preserve the tax-exempt status of governmental bondsProvide change-of-use cures for private leasing of projects to ensure preservation of tax exemption for infrastructure projects.

Disposal of Federal assets

• Changes the provisions to “allow for the disposal of Federal assets to improve the allocation of economic resources in infrastructure investment.”

Transportation

• Provides States flexibility to create tolls on Interstates and reinvest toll revenues in infrastructure.

• Extends streamlined passenger facility charge process from non-hub airports to small hub airports

• Provides states flexibility mercialize Interstate rest areas

• Provides new flexibility for transportation projects with de minimis federal share

• Expands qualified credit assistance and other capabilities for state infrastructure banks

• Authorizes federal land management agencies to use contracting methods available to states

• Raises the cost threshold for major project requirements to $1 billion

• Authorizes utility relocation to take place prior to pletion

• Authorizes repayment of federal investment to eliminate perpetual application of federal requirements

• Provides small highway projects with relief for the same federal requirements as major projects

• Require value capture financing as condition of receipt of transit funds for capital investment grants

• Eliminates constraints on use of public-private and public-public partnerships in transit

• Codifies expedited project delivery for capital investment grants pilot program

• Applies FAST act streamlining provisions to rail projects and shorten the statute of limitations

• Creates more efficient federal aviation administration oversight of non-aviation development activities at airports

• Reduce barriers to alternative project delivery for airports

• Clarifies authority for incentive payments under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP)

• Moves oversight of AIP funds to post-expenditure audits

Water infrastructure

• Authorizes clean water revolving fund for privately owned public-purpose treatment works

• Provides new flexibility for water projects with de minimis federal share

• Provides ERA infrastructure programs with “SEP-15” authorizing language

• Applies identical regulatory requirements to privately owned public-purpose treatment works and publicly owned treatment works

• Expands authority related to non-federal construction and operation of inland waterways projects

• Authorizes user fee collection and retention under the WRRDA Section 5014 pilot program and recreation user fees for operation and maintenance of public facilities

• Expands U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ authority to engage in long-term contracts

• mercial operation and maintenance activities at hydropower facilities

• Deauthorizes certain federal civil works projects

• Expands authority for acceptance of contributed and advanced funds

• Amends water resources development act to allow for waiver of cost limits

Veterans Affairs

• Authorizes VA to retain proceeds from sales of properties and exchange existing facilities for construction of new facilities

• Authorizes pilot program for VA to exchange land or facilities for lease of space in multi-tenant facilities

• Increases the threshold above which VA is require to obtain congressional authorization for leases

Brownfield/Superfund reform

• Creates a superfund revolving loan fund and grant program and authorize national priorities list sites to be eligible for brownfield grants

• Provides liability relief for states and municipalities acquiring contaminated property through actions as sovereign governments

• Provides EPA express settlement authority to enter into administrative agreements

• Integrates cleanup, infrastructure and long-term stewardship needs by creating flexibility in funding and execution requirements

Infrastructure permitting improvement

• Creates a new, expedited structure for environmental reviews; increases delegation of more decision-making to States and enhancing coordination between State and Federal reviews; and authorizes pilot programs through which agencies may experiment with innovative approaches to environmental reviews while enhancing environmental protections.

Delegation to states

• Expands department of transportation NEPA assignment program to other agencies

• Allows states to assume FHWA responsibilities for approval of right-of-way acquisitions

• Broadens NEPA assignment program to include other determinations

Pilot programs and judicial reform

• Creates pilot programs to “experiment with new ways to address environmental impacts while delivering projects in a more timely and predictable way,” and includes proposals to reform judicial review standards for environmental reviews to

avoid protracted litigation and to make court decisions more consistent.

Workforce development

• Expands Pell Grant eligibility to high-quality, short-term programs

• Enacts reforms of the Federal Work Study program (FWS) and the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education (CTE) program

• Reforms licensing requirements to allow out-of-state individuals to work on infrastructure projects

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Using Drones for Good
Drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), have been a prominent and controversial topic in the news of late. Today, the Washington-based Stimson Center released its mendations and Report on US Drone Policy. The think tank, which assembled a bipartisan panel of former military and intelligence officials for the 81-page report, concluded that “UAVSs should be neither glorified nor demonized. It is important to take a realistic view of UAVs, recognizing both their continuities with more traditional military technologies and the...
The Disease of Self-Chosen Sacrifice
In our efforts to serve others and do good in the world, we humans have a remarkable tendency to fall short, no matter how carefully constructed or well intended our plans and designs may be. When failure occurs, economists are likely to point to some kind of knowledge problem, notingthat, for instance, Western Congregation X didn’t (and perhaps couldn’t)know or foresee that sending hundreds of free shoes to Developing Nation Y would put several local merchants out of business. To...
Calvin Coolidge’s warning against an entrenched bureaucracy
As we read about the increase of scandal, mismanagement, and corruption within our federal agencies, it is essential once again to revisit the words of Calvin Coolidge. Recent actions at the IRS, Veterans Administration, and the ATF gunwalking scandal all point to systemic problems e from an entrenched bureaucracy. As more and more of the responsibilities of civil society is passed over to centralized powers in Washington, federal agencies have exploded with power and control, leading to greater opportunities for...
Radio Free Acton: Culture Care with Makoto Fujimura
Makoto Fujimura with his personal copy of The Four Holy Gospels at Acton University 2014 What does it mean for Christians to use our gifts to fulfill God’s purposes in cultural flourishing? Makoto Fujimura, internationally renowned artist, intellectual, and founder of the International Arts Movement, is well placed to address this question. In this edition of Radio Free Acton, Fujimura joins host Paul Edwards to discuss his art, his story of faith, and how a “culture care” mindset can change...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: Part 8 of 12 — Capitalism and Cronyism Confused
[Part 1 is here.] In his case against capitalism, Wendell Berry argues that the average person not only is anxious because he depends upon so many other people for his wellbeing (truckers, panies, etc.) but that he ought to be anxious. There’s a grain of truth here. We shouldn’t e helpless sheep without a clue what to do were the power to go down for a couple of days in January. But inter-dependency, far from a sign of cultural sickness,...
Charitable Giving Increases, But Smaller Proportion Goes to Religious Groups
Despite the struggling-to-recover economy, charitable giving by Americans continues to rise. But a smaller proportion of this money is going to religious organizations. According to a newly released report by Giving USA, total estimated charitable giving in the U.S. rose 4.4 percent between 2012 and 2013, to $335.17 billion in contributions. The single largest contributor to the increase in total charitable giving was an increase of $9.69 billion in giving by individuals. In 2013, per capita giving by U.S. adults...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: Part 10 of 12 — The Free Market that Wasn’t
[Part 1 is here.] Some might answer any defense of the free economy by pointing to the housing and financial crisis that came to a head in 2008, holding it up as proof positive the free economy is a wrecking ball swinging munities and leaving all manner of economic and cultural destruction in its wake. The financial crisis did enormous damage, but the major drivers of the crisis were a series of public policies that manipulated the market in pursuit...
The Moral Value of Economic Growth
In 1820, America’s per capita e averaged $1,980, in today’s dollars. But by 2000, it had increased to $43,000. That economic growth has benefited the rich, of course. But it has also transformed the lives of the poor — and prevented many more from ing or staying poor. In this superb short video, the American Enterprise Institute briefly explains the moral value of economic growth. ...
World War I and the Break with History
Much of the art before World War I can be seen as moral in nature, says Bruce Edward Walker in this week’s Acton Commentary, while post-Armistice monly celebrates materialism if not outright hedonism: After the Great War, however, the genie was out of the bottle, leading to works meant only to shock, dismay or anger would-be censors and art consumers in general. These works lacked what Irish philosopher and statesman Edmund Burke were essential for a “moral imagination” of which...
A Cultural Case for Capitalism: 9 of 12 — Berry vs. Salatin
[Part 1 is here.] Jonah Goldberg’s Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning, details how the growth of government-corporate cronyism during the past 120 or so years has been largely a phenomenon of the socialist left. Wendell Berry misses this crucial historical insight in his running critique of capitalism, and his missing it draws him into flatly inaccurate claims, as when he asserts that “the United States government’s agricultural policy, or...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved