Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Explainer: What you should know about the Republicans’ bill to replace Obamacare
Nov 8, 2026 1:33 PM

Embed from Getty Images

Last night Congressional Republicans released two bills (here and here) which together constitute the current plan to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare). Here’s what you should know about the legislation known as the “American Health Care Act” (AHCA).

Does this legislation “repeal and replace” Obamacare?

Yes and no (but overall, not really).

No, the AHCA does pletely repeal Obamacare in toto and it merely replaces some aspects of the current law. But yes, it does repeal certain aspects of Obamacare and in some cases replaces them with new mandates and requirements.

Why doesn’t the GOP put forward a bill that simply repeals and replaces all of Obamacare?

The short answer is that Republicans in Congress don’t think they could pass such a bill. They would need 60 votes in the Senate to break a filibuster by the Democrats, and they only have 52. Instead, the GOP plans to use a process called “budget reconciliation” that allows them to make changes to federal revenue and spending with only 51 votes (which they may not be able to get since some Republicans in the Senate oppose the bill). The problem with this approach, as Avik Roy notes, is that “reconciliation can only repeal Obamacare’s taxes and spending; it can’t replace most of the law’s premium-hiking insurance regulations.”

What’s actually in the bill?

Here are some key changes that are included in the bill:

• Removes the “individual mandate,” the tax under Obamacare that people had to pay if they chose not to buy health insurance. However, the bill includes a “Continuous Health Insurance Coverage Incentive,” that provides a disincentive to dropping coverage and then picking it back up when a person gets ill. Those who reenroll would have to pay an “amount that is equal to 30 percent of the monthly premium rate.” (For example, if someone bought a policy that cost $6,000 a year ($500), they’d have to pay an additional $150 a month for one year before returning to the standard rate.)

• Rather than immediately repealing Obamacare’s Medicaid expansions, the bill allows them to remain in place until January 1, 2020. After that time, states will no longer be able to add new people to that program.

• Repeals almost all Obamacare-related taxes (e.g., tanning tax).

• Removes the regulation that prevented insurers from charging older enrollees more than three times as much as younger ones.

• Adds a per capita cap on states, which caps the federal funding per enrollee in the programs.

• Changes the structure of the Obamacare tax credits from being based solely on e to a means-based credit based mostly on age and partially on e.

• Prohibits almost all groups that provide abortions (e.g., Planned Parenthood) from receiving federal funds or Medicaid reimbursements. Also prohibits insurance policies that pay for abortions from being eligible for tax credits.

• Almost 10 percent of the bill (seven pages) is dedicated to a provision that prevents lottery winners who win over $80,000 from getting Medicaid. (This seems to be a cause championed by Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Penn.)

What major parts of Obamacare does it leave unchanged?

The two major provisions left unchanged are that parents will still be able to keep their kids on their insurance plans until the children reach age 26 and panies will still be required to ensure everyone, regardless of preexisting conditions.

How much will it cost and how many people will be affected?

No one knows just yet. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a non-partisan independent group that provides analyses of budgetary and economic issues as it pertains to legislation, has not yet had a chance to “score” the bill. The CBO will consider the legislation and make a estimate about how much it will cost taxpayers and how many citizens will be affected by the changes.

Who opposes this bill?

Generally speaking, both liberals and conservatives. Liberals are concerned that the changes will reduce access to health insurance for the poor while cutting taxes for the wealthy. They are also concerned that it dismantles Obamacare, the most significant liberal policy victory this century. Conservatives are concerned that it will explode the deficit and leave Obamacare largely intact. “It’s Obamacare in a different format,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.

Because of opposition from both sides of the political aisle, the AHCA is unlikely to pass the Senate in its current form.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religion & Liberty: A Rare and Tenuous Freedom
The new issue of Religion & Liberty, featuring an interview with Nina Shea, is now available online. A February preview of Shea’s interview, which was an exclusive for PowerBlog readers, can be found here. Shea pays tribute to the ten year collapse munism in Eastern Europe, which began in the fall of 1989. The entire issue is dedicated to those who toiled for freedom. Shea is able to make the connection between important events and times in the Cold War...
Finding Out What’s In The Health Care Bill is Fun!
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said that the House needed to pass the health care reform legislation so we could find out what was in it? Well, it turns out that she might have done Congress a big favor by slowing things down and allowing her House members to figure out what was in the bill before passing it. I mean, I’m only saying that because it seems that in the process of passing the bill Congress may have accidentally left...
Alejandro Chafuen Receives Global Leadership Award
Alex ChafuenCongratulations to Acton board member and Senior Fellow Alejandro A. Chafuen who received the Global Leadership Award at Wellington College in the UK on April 2. The award was co-sponsored by The World Congress of Families and The Bow Group. Alex is president of the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, and has been a great friend and advisor to Acton for many years. The work he and Atlas have done to support “intellectual entrepreneurs” worldwide — those who advance the...
Why Not Just Dispose of Nuclear Waste in the Sun?
PopSci follows up with the question I asked awhile back, “Why Not Just Dispose of Nuclear Waste in the Sun?” The piece raises doubts about launch reliability: “It’s a bummer when a satellite ends up underwater, but it’s an entirely different story if that rocket is packing a few hundred pounds of uranium. And if the uranium caught fire, it could stay airborne and circulate for months, dusting the globe with radioactive ash. Still seem like a good idea?” This...
Commentary: Prophet Jim Wallis and the Ecclesia of Economic Ignorance
Sign up for Acton News & Commentary here. This week, I contributed a piece on Jim Wallis’ new book. +++++++++ This class of the very poor – those who are just on the borders of pauperism or fairly over the borders – is rapidly growing. Wealth is increasing very fast; poverty, even pauperism, is increasing still more rapidly. – Washington Gladden, Applied Christianity (1886) For three decades, we have experienced a social engineered inequality that is really a sin –...
Government debt: We’re all in the same (leaky) boat
Edmund Conway, economics editor of The Telegraph, looks at a new analysis of government debt by Dylan Grice of Societe Generale. The charts are eye popping. It’s not just a Greek, or EU problem. It’s also something that Americans e to grips with, and soon. You might call it a moral issue — too long living beyond our means. Conway quotes Grice, and then sums up: “The most chilling similarity between the Greeks and everyone else isn’t in the charts...
Make Mine Freedom (1948)
A reader sends on this fun video. Anyone know where can I get a bottle of this Dr. Utopia’s Ism elixir? Looks tasty. Is one sip enough? ...
On Tax Day in SoCal: Michael Novak to speak on “The Moral Foundation of Markets”
Heads up to those in the Southern California area: Distinguished scholar, author, and former Ambassador Michael Novak will give an April 15 lecture at Fuller Theological Seminary on “The Moral Foundation of Markets.” Novak will argue for the need to re-establish an informed and well-reasoned understanding of both the value of markets for human well-being and the moral foundation necessary for their continued survival. Among other achievements, Novak is the 1994 winner of the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion,...
Will the health reform bill ‘improve the character’ of America?
A good back-and-forth at in character on health care reform between Karen Davenport and Heather R. Higgins. Question: Will the implementation of the health-care bill passed by Congress improve the character of our country? Davenport says “yes”: While we cede some rights, we also assume new responsibilities. First, we assume the responsibility to obtain and maintain coverage for ourselves, and acknowledge that we cannot wait to purchase health insurance until we are sick. We also take on greater responsibility for...
Brooks: ‘Spreading the Wealth’ Isn’t Fair
A very good piece on taxation, e inequality and fairness in today’s Wall Street Journal by Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute. Brooks, a frequent guest speaker at Acton events, is also author of “The Battle: How the Fight Between Free Enterprise and Big Government Will Shape America’s Future”, ing from Basic Books in June. Watch for the review on the PowerBlog soon. Simple facts about our tax system do not support the contention that it is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved