Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Panama Papers Scandal
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Panama Papers Scandal
Jan 20, 2026 6:01 AM

What are the Panama Papers?

The Panama Papers refers to the 11 million leaked files from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonsecathat shows how some of the richest, most powerful people on the globe use tax havens to hide their wealth.

According to the BBC, this is the biggest document leak in history — dwarfing the size of those released by the Wikileaks organization —and includes details on 214,000 entities, panies, trusts and foundations. The documents covered day-to-day business at Mossack Fonseca over the past 40 years.

Who is included in the leak?

The leaked documents shows 12 current or former heads of state, at least 60 people linked to current or former world leaders, and 140 politicians from more than 50 countries used Mossack Fonseca to hide their assets.

The list includes the current king of Saudi Arabia, the prime minister of Iceland, the president of the Ukraine, the president of Argentina, and the president of the United Arab Emirates. Also included are a number of former prime ministers from Georgia, Iraq, Jordan, Qatar, Sudan, and the Ukraine.

The files also reveal a suspected billion-dollar money-laundering ring involving close associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

So far no American politicians have been associated with the leaked documents.

What do the leaked documents reveal?

According to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the cross-border journalism collaboration that has been reviewing the documents, the leak reveals that:

• Associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin have “secretly shuffled” $2 billion in transactions through banks and panies.

• At least 33 people panies blacklisted by the U.S. government because of evidence that they’d been involved in wrongdoing, such as doing business with Mexican drug lords, terrorist organizations like Hezbollah or rogue nations like North Korea and Iran have used Mossack Fonsecato hide or transfer assets.

• Major banks have driven the creation of panies in offshore havens. More than 500 banks their subsidiaries and their branches – including HSBC, UBS and Société Générale – created more than 15,000 panies for their customers through Mossack Fonseca.

What is Mossack Fonseca?

Mossack Fonseca & Co. is a law firm and corporate service provider based in Panama with more than 500 employees in 40 offices worldwide. pany is considered one of the world’s five biggest wholesalers of offshore secrecy. In 2013, the firm had billings of more than $42 million.

What is a tax haven?

As Investopedia explains, a tax haven is a country that offers foreign individuals and businesses little or no tax liability in a politically and economically stable environment. Tax havens also provide little or no financial information to foreign tax authorities, allowing individuals and businesses that are non-citizens or non-residents to take advantage of the countries’ tax regime in order to avoid paying taxes in their home countries.

Roughly 15 percent of countries are tax havens. They tend to be countries that small and relatively affluent. The Republic of Panama is considered one of the most well established pure tax havens in the Caribbean, notes Investopedia, due to extensive legislation that strictly regulates the country’s offshore jurisdiction and financial services. Panama has no tax treaties with other countries, further protecting the financial privacy of offshore banking clients who are citizens of other nations.

What is wrong with using a tax haven?

While tax havens are often controversial, it is debatable whether it is inherently wrong to shield one’s wealth from a country’s tax system.

Also, although the uses of tax havens have e more sophisticated, it is an ancient practice. As Wikipedia helpfully note, “The use of differing tax laws between two or more countries to try to mitigate tax liability is probably as old as taxation itself.” A prime example is how in the early 1700s American colonies traded from Latin America to avoid British taxes.

What is problematic about tax havens is when corrupt politicians use them to hide wealth that was confiscated from their citizens or when criminals use the system to facilitate fraud, money laundering, terrorism, or other criminal practices.The following video discusses how corrupt politicians and criminals used Mossack Fonseca to harm others:

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religious liberty in Japan
For the past several decades in the United States many parents have gravitated toward one extreme or the other in terms of allowing religion in public schools. It is generally understood these days that our public school system is not a religious organization, and should not promote one religion as a state religion, over others. Of course, this does not mean that morality or other ideas that call on the revelation of religion cannot be taught, but we try to...
Subsidiarity in action
In January, I wrote about the Central Plains wildfires as a very personal crisis in my Oklahoma hometown. I underscored the importance of subsidiarity, which is the idea that a central authority should perform only those tasks which cannot be handled effectively at a more immediate or local level. I’ve now had opportunity to practice subsidiarity in Oklahoma. And I can tell you, it’s harder to do than to talk or write about in the abstract. The preceding months of...
Faith-based funding politicizes religion
Rev. Robert A. Sirico looks at the Bush Faith-Based Initiative following the departure of Jim Towey, who headed the office. “I would far rather see a president rally people to give more to charity than rally voters to support government programs that go to religious organizations, and to create incentives and lessen penalties when they do give,” Rev. Sirico writes. Read Rev. mentary here. ...
The long arm of corruption
As the immigration debate mentators dig deeper in the search for the “sources of the problem.” Many have rightly pointed out that a healthier Mexican economy would alleviate the need that spurs many Mexicans to seek financial recourse across the border. Whatever one’s views on the current debate, we ought to be able to agree that a more prosperous Mexico would be beneficial for everyone. But then others have correctly noted that talk about the Mexican economy is really a...
Improving Catholic education
For Catholics, few doubt the importance of quality Catholic secondary education. However, many know that the current state of Catholic secondary education in America leaves much to be desired. The question that naturally rises is “what can concerned people do to enact serious improvement?” The Acton Institute offers at least one solution. The Catholic High School Honor Roll is a unique evaluation system that assesses the overall quality of Catholic high schools based on academic excellence, Catholic identity, and civic...
Clear thinking on immigration
Andrew Yuengert, the author of Inhabiting the Land – The Case for the Right to Migrate, the Acton study on immigration, looks at the current debate and debunks mon misconceptions. “The biggest burdens from immigration are not economic – they are the turmoil caused by the large numbers of illegal immigrants,” Yuengert writes. Read mentary here. ...
Acton scholars on the immigration debate
Two Acton scholars, Andrew Yuengert and Fr. Paul Hartmann, were interviewed on “The World Over” (EWTN Studios) last Friday, April 28, about the Catholic response to immigration rights. Yuengert, author of the Acton monograph “Inhabiting the Land,” emphasizes the dignity of the human person as a foundation for looking at the issues surrounding immigration. Yuengert says that the “right to migrate” is not an absolute right, but to prevent people from assisting immigrants in need is immoral. e because they...
Spelling relief II
Jordan pretty well covered the territory in his earlier post on gas prices. But with the silliness from both Republicans and Democrats ongoing, it can’t hurt to suggest two additional sensible treatments of the subject: Thomas Nugent on National Review Online, and Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute on Fox News. ...
Ecobits
Two quick bits for your Tuesday: – Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? CRC says so! – Is “steady state ecological economics” the answer to environmental and economic woes? [also, a quick thanks to Jordan for inviting me to join the PowerBlog team.] Federal judges on green junkets at your expense? But the three organizations CRC singles out have an agenda that goes beyond education and is the equivalent of lobbying, Kendall contends. FREE, for example, describes itself...
Coercing charity
This section from Reinhold Niebuhr’s Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics strikes me as quite true: The coercive factors, in distinction to the more purely moral and rational factors, in political relations can never be sharply differentiated and defined. It is not possible to estimate exactly how much a party to a social conflict is influenced by a rational argument or by the threat of force. It is impossible, for instance, to know what proportion...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved