Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Panama Papers Scandal
Explainer: What You Should Know About the Panama Papers Scandal
Apr 20, 2025 2:49 PM

What are the Panama Papers?

The Panama Papers refers to the 11 million leaked files from the Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonsecathat shows how some of the richest, most powerful people on the globe use tax havens to hide their wealth.

According to the BBC, this is the biggest document leak in history — dwarfing the size of those released by the Wikileaks organization —and includes details on 214,000 entities, panies, trusts and foundations. The documents covered day-to-day business at Mossack Fonseca over the past 40 years.

Who is included in the leak?

The leaked documents shows 12 current or former heads of state, at least 60 people linked to current or former world leaders, and 140 politicians from more than 50 countries used Mossack Fonseca to hide their assets.

The list includes the current king of Saudi Arabia, the prime minister of Iceland, the president of the Ukraine, the president of Argentina, and the president of the United Arab Emirates. Also included are a number of former prime ministers from Georgia, Iraq, Jordan, Qatar, Sudan, and the Ukraine.

The files also reveal a suspected billion-dollar money-laundering ring involving close associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

So far no American politicians have been associated with the leaked documents.

What do the leaked documents reveal?

According to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the cross-border journalism collaboration that has been reviewing the documents, the leak reveals that:

• Associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin have “secretly shuffled” $2 billion in transactions through banks and panies.

• At least 33 people panies blacklisted by the U.S. government because of evidence that they’d been involved in wrongdoing, such as doing business with Mexican drug lords, terrorist organizations like Hezbollah or rogue nations like North Korea and Iran have used Mossack Fonsecato hide or transfer assets.

• Major banks have driven the creation of panies in offshore havens. More than 500 banks their subsidiaries and their branches – including HSBC, UBS and Société Générale – created more than 15,000 panies for their customers through Mossack Fonseca.

What is Mossack Fonseca?

Mossack Fonseca & Co. is a law firm and corporate service provider based in Panama with more than 500 employees in 40 offices worldwide. pany is considered one of the world’s five biggest wholesalers of offshore secrecy. In 2013, the firm had billings of more than $42 million.

What is a tax haven?

As Investopedia explains, a tax haven is a country that offers foreign individuals and businesses little or no tax liability in a politically and economically stable environment. Tax havens also provide little or no financial information to foreign tax authorities, allowing individuals and businesses that are non-citizens or non-residents to take advantage of the countries’ tax regime in order to avoid paying taxes in their home countries.

Roughly 15 percent of countries are tax havens. They tend to be countries that small and relatively affluent. The Republic of Panama is considered one of the most well established pure tax havens in the Caribbean, notes Investopedia, due to extensive legislation that strictly regulates the country’s offshore jurisdiction and financial services. Panama has no tax treaties with other countries, further protecting the financial privacy of offshore banking clients who are citizens of other nations.

What is wrong with using a tax haven?

While tax havens are often controversial, it is debatable whether it is inherently wrong to shield one’s wealth from a country’s tax system.

Also, although the uses of tax havens have e more sophisticated, it is an ancient practice. As Wikipedia helpfully note, “The use of differing tax laws between two or more countries to try to mitigate tax liability is probably as old as taxation itself.” A prime example is how in the early 1700s American colonies traded from Latin America to avoid British taxes.

What is problematic about tax havens is when corrupt politicians use them to hide wealth that was confiscated from their citizens or when criminals use the system to facilitate fraud, money laundering, terrorism, or other criminal practices.The following video discusses how corrupt politicians and criminals used Mossack Fonseca to harm others:

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
ExTORTion
S. T. Karnick over at The Reform ments on a recent suit filed against DuPont over Teflon, claiming that “DuPont lied in a massive attempt to continue selling their product.” Karnick observes that abuse of the tort system is rampant, in part because “it has been perverted into a proxy for the criminal justice system: a means of punishing supposed wrongdoers through the use of a weaker standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence instead of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”...
Labor unions and free association
The Service Employees International Union and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters have broken away from the plaining that the federation has focused too much on political activism in the face of declining union membership and influence. Dr. Charles Baird was a featured guest on yesterday’s edition of Kresta in the Afternoon on Ave Maria Radio, discussing Catholic perspectives on unionism and whether the modern American labor union movement patible with church teachings. Dr. Baird is Chair of the Department of...
Roadside Religion
Alan Warren / Associated Press ...
Cuba and China
Here’s a great interview from the Marketplace Morning Report with Chris Farrell, in which he argues for the lifting of trade sanctions against dictatorial and oppressive regimes. pares the cases of Cuba and China, in which two different strategies have been used, with vastly different results. We need to “stop the policy of broad based sanctions against nations that we don’t like,” says Farrell. This is directly opposite of the view, for example, which primarily blames economic engagement and the...
Great debate
Foreign Policy hosts this exchange on environmental issues and economics. Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, gets the first word and Bjørn Lomborg, adjunct professor at the Copenhagen Business School, gets the last word. ...
Close call on CAFTA
Close at Home The House of Representatives voted early this morning (12:03 am) to approve the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) after weeks of intense lobbying on both sides. The final vote was a close 217-215. My predictions: somehow, any dip in employment (if there is one) in the next six months will somehow be linked to CAFTA by its detractors. Detractors will attempt to take the moral high ground in American politics in ’06 and ’08, and even...
You catch more bees with honey
Following months of Zimbabwe’s brutal “Drive Out Trash” campaign, pleasantries exchanged between Mugabe and a UN delegation may have made some headway. The UN report on the situation, according to Claudia Rosett, began “with a delicacy over-zealously inappropriate in itself to dealings with the tyrant whose regime has been responsible for wreck of Zimbabwe” by describing Mugabe’s reception of the UN officials with a “warm e.” Despite the ings of the UN report with respect to policy solutions (more aid!),...
CAFTA/Culture of Life: enemies?
John Paul II gave us all a tremendous gift by endorsing the terms Culture of Life and Culture of Death. But as with all great gifts, we must guard these terms carefully so as not to wear them out with misuse, robbing them of their relevance. Unfortunately, this is precisely what is happening in the current debate over CAFTA. A group called Catholics for Faithful Citizenship (PDF) claims the following: “Clearly, supporting CAFTA is inconsistent with upholding a culture of...
SCOTU$
Slate features an article by Henry Blodget, a former securities analyst, which examines the investments of Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts. In an analysis that has more than you would ever need to know about a person’s finances (and perhaps reads a bit too much into the investments), Blodget writes of Roberts, “His fortune is self-made, which suggests a bias toward self-reliance rather than entitlements and subsidies.” That sounds promising. HT: Fast Company Now ...
Seeing the trees, missing the forest
The United Nations has released a report on the ongoing upheavals in Zimbabwe, where tyrant Robert Mugabe has been punishing his political opponents under the guise of “cleaning up” the country’s cities. The effect of Operation Murambatsvina (meaning either “Operation Restore Order” or “Operation Drive Out Trash,” depending on who’s translation you believe) has been to leave some 700,000 people homeless, jobless, or both. A downloadable copy of the UN report is available here. While the report does illuminate the...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved