Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the federal government’s two-year budget deal
Explainer: What you should know about the federal government’s two-year budget deal
Oct 26, 2026 9:30 PM

What just happened?

Yesterday the House of Representatives passed a passed a two-year budget and an agreement to once again raise the debt limit. The bill, known as the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019, is expected to be passed by the Senate next week.

What does the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 do?

The legislation amends the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to establish a congressional budget for fiscal years 2020 and 2021. The main actions of the bill are:

• Suspends the debt limit through July 2021

• Increases discretionary spending limits for defense and nondefense spending

• Specifies limits for Overseas Contingency Operations funding (which is exempt from discretionary spending limits)

• Requires the FY2020 discretionary spending limits to be adjusted to modate specified funding for the 2020 Census

What is the debt limit?

In most years the federal government brings in less revenue than it spends. To cover this difference, the Treasury Department has to issue government bonds which increases the national debt. The debt limit (or debt ceiling) is a legislative restriction on the total amount of national debt the Treasury is authorized to borrow to meet its existing legal obligations.

The current debt limit isroughly $22.03 trillion. This new law will suspend this limit to allow Congress to add to the national debt.

What is discretionary spending?

The federal budget contains two types of spending, mandatory and discretionary. Mandatory spending includes funding for programs that Congress has mandated must receive whatever funds are needed to keep the programs running, such as Medicare and Social Security. Discretionary spending includes all spending appropriated by Congress that is not part of mandatory spending.

How much will the discretionary spending be increased?

This bill would increase discretionary spending by $320 billion over the next two years.

What will the budget be for FY2020?

The new law establishes a $1.37 trillion budget agreement, with $738 billion for defense spending and $632 billion in nondefense spending for fiscal year 2020.

How much will this increased spending add to the national debt?

As the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget notes, by convention, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) assumes that uncapped discretionary spending grows with inflation. What this means is that since Congress rarely cuts spending, almost all new spending in one year increases spending in all subsequent years.

Increasing the 2021 cap therefore raises the level at which that spending would grow from, building in higher spending in future years as well. As a result, the two years of cap increases will actually raise spending by $1.7 trillion over ten years. (This estimate is the net effect of $1.5 trillion in discretionary spending increases, $250 billion in interest costs.)

Is the deal supported by the Trump administration?

Yes. Although conservatives opposed the legislation, President Trump struck a deal with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to get the spending increases through Congress.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Samuel Gregg: The American Left’s European Nightmare
On The American Spectator, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg observes that, “as evidence for the European social model’s severe dysfunctionality continues to mount before our eyes, the American left is acutely aware how much it discredits its decades-old effort to take America down the same economic path.” Against this evidence, some liberals are pinning the blame on passing fiscal and currency imbalances. No, Gregg says, there’s “something even more fundamental” behind the meltdown of the post-war West European social model....
Is the HHS Mandate A Game of Chicken?
In his homily on Lent Cardinal George warned that if the HHS Mandate is not changed Catholic schools, hospitals, and other social services will have to be shut down. Take a look at this post at by Ed Morrissey at Hot Air, What if the Catholic Bishops aren’t Bluffing? to see what closing down schools and hospitals would mean. Morrissey writes in his article for the Fiscal Times The Catholic Church has perhaps the most extensive private health-care delivery system...
What Care Bears can teach us about virtue ethics
Unless you’re a nostalgic Gen-Xer or a parent of a small child, you probably haven’t given much thought to the Care Bears. But since their debut in 1981, they’ve popped up everywhere. Although they were originally characters created for a line of greeting cards, the Care Bears have since appeared in a TV series, two TV specials, five feature films, several music albums, a video game, and ic book series. Books in which they’ve appeared have sold over 45 million...
Audio: Dr. Sam Gregg on Relativism & Ordered Liberty
Dr. Samuel Gregg, Acton’s Director of Research, has e something of a regular guest on Kresta in the Afternoon of late; below you’ll find audio of his two most recent appearances. Leading off, Sam appeared with host Al Kresta on February 15th to discuss Pope Benedict’s concept of the dictatorship of relativism in the context of the HHS mandate debate, and the potential consequences of the death of absolute truth. Listen via the audio player below: [audio: Then, on the...
The Economics of Contraception
One of the justifications for the HHS mandates (amended now to require panies to provide contraceptives free of charge) has been purely economic. The idea is that the use of contraceptives saves panies (and by extension the rest of us) money, as it is less expensive to pay for condoms or birth control pills than to pay for a pregnancy and birth. Of course the calculus e up with such a conclusion is flawed in myriad ways. But even if...
Can’t be said too often …
While working on an article today, I read Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger’s 2005 homily right before the was elected Pope. I wanted to recall a section about truth that cannot be repeated enough. It is especially pertinent in light of the Obama Administration’s promise on the HHS mandate. promise changes nothing. It is political sophistry. It still forces people to act against their conscience and support moral evil. The truth about good and evil cannot be swept away by an accounting...
Video: Europe’s Economic and Cultural Crisis
A week ago, Dr. Samuel Gregg addressed an audience here at Acton’s Grand Rapids, Michigan office on the topic of “Europe: A Continent in Economic and Cultural Crisis.” If you weren’t able to attend, we’re pleased to present the video of Dr. Gregg’s presentation below. ...
James Q. Wilson, Requiescat in pace
Political scientist and criminologist James Q. Wilson, co-author of the influential “Broken Windows” article in The Atlantic Monthly in 1982, which led to shift munity policing, died today at the age of 80. In 1999, Wilson spoke to Acton’s Religion & Liberty about how a free society requires a moral sense and social capital: R&L:Unlike defenders of capitalism such as Friedrich von Hayek and Philip Johnson, who view capitalism as a morally neutral system, you see a clear relationship between...
Bonhoeffer on ‘the view from below’
Dietrich Bonhoeffer: There remains an experience of parable value. We have for once learnt to see the great events of world history from below, from the perspective of the outcast, the suspects, the maltreated, the powerless, the oppressed, the reviled – in short, from the perspective of those who suffer. The important thing is neither that bitterness nor envy should have gnawed at the heart during this time, that we should e to look with new eyes at matters great...
No One Expects the Spanish Inquisition. (Except Those Who Oppose Conscience Protections.)
The New Yorker‘s George Packer believes, “The outcry over Obama’s policy on health insurance and contraception has almost nothing to do with that part of the First Amendment about the right to free religious practice, which is under no threat in this country. It is all about a modern conservative Kulturkampf that will not accept the other part of the religion clause, which prohibits any official religion.” Ross Douthat provides a devastating reply to Packer’s backwards view of religious liberty:...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved