Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the Constitution Party platform
Explainer: What you should know about the Constitution Party platform
Jun 17, 2026 2:55 AM

Note: This is the fifthin a series examining the positions of several minorparty and independent presidential candidates onissues covered by the Acton Institute. A previous series covered the Democratic Party platform (see here and here) and the Republican Party Platform (see here and here).

Although minor parties—often called “third parties” to distinguish them from the dominant two—have always been a part of American politics, the dissatisfaction with the Republican and Democratic parties in the current election season has led some Christians to give them more consideration. The intention of this series is to provide some basic information on where some of these parties stand on issues covered by the Acton Institute.

A couple of caveats are thus in order.

1. Because there are roughly 50 minor political parties in America this series will not be able to cover them all. The choice of what will be included is undeniably arbitrary and subjective. My intention is to highlight the four or five parties (or individual presidential candidacies) that would be of most interest to our readers. Currently, the plan is to include Evan McMullin (a conservative independent candidate), the Libertarian Party, the American Solidarity Party, the Green Party, and the Constitution Party. (Others will be added if there is sufficient interest/demand.)

2. In general, the PowerBlog covers issues related to economics and individual liberty, particularly religious freedom. For this reason some social issues of concern to Christians are not included. This is not because they are unimportant or because those of us at Acton do not care about the issues. It’s merely because they are outside the focus of this blog.

3. For the sake of simplicity, this series will highlight the position listed in a party’s platform or, if they are a non-aligned independent candidate, the positions listed on their website. Unlike with the two major parties, the nominees of the minor parties often have no direct control over their party’s platform. For this reason, the positions held by the particular presidential candidates may differ radically from the positions held by the party.

4. Minor parties tend to focus more on broad principles than specific policy prescriptions. Wherever possible, I’ll try to highlight the direct policy positions. Otherwise I’ll attempt to summarize their underlying philosophy on a public policy area.

Here are the positions of the Constitution Party as outlined in their 2016 Platform:

General Principles

• The goal of the Constitution Party is to “restore American jurisprudence to its Biblical foundations and to limit the federal government to its Constitutional boundaries.”

• “The Constitution Party gratefully acknowledges the blessing of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ as Creator, Preserver and Ruler of the Universe and of these United States. We hereby appeal to Him for mercy, fort, guidance and the protection of His Providence as we work to restore and preserve these United States.”

• “This great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions but on a foundation of Christian principles and values. For this very reason peoples of all faiths have been and are afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship here.”

• “The Constitution of the United States provides that “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” The Constitution Party supports the original intent of this language. Therefore, the Constitution Party calls on all those who love liberty and value their inherent rights to join with us in the pursuit of these goals and in the restoration of these founding principles.”

• “The U.S. Constitution established a Republic rooted in Biblical law, administered by representatives who are constitutionally elected by the citizens. In such a Republic all Life, Liberty and Property are protected because law rules.”

• “We affirm the principles of inherent individual rights upon which these United States of America were founded:”

That each individual is endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are the rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness;That the freedom to own, use, exchange, control, protect, and freely dispose of property is a natural, necessary and inseparable extension of the individual’s unalienable rights;That the legitimate function of government is to secure these rights through the preservation of domestic tranquility, the maintenance of a strong national defense, and the promotion of equal justice for all;That history makes clear that left unchecked, it is the nature of government to usurp the liberty of its citizens and eventually e a major violator of the people’s rights; andThat, therefore, it is essential to bind government with the chains of the Constitution and carefully divide and jealously limit government powers to those assigned by the consent of the governed.

Character and Moral Conduct

• Maintains that members and nominated candidates representing the Constitution Party and its state affiliates “recognize the importance of demonstrating good character in their own lives.”

Conscription (Military draft)

• Opposes imposition of the draft, the registration pulsory military training, or any other form pulsory government service.

• Supports a well-trained and highly organized volunteer state home militia, and voluntary Reserve Officer Training Corps (R.O.T.C.) military training in schools, colleges, and universities.

Copyrights and Patents

• Opposes transfer of authority over copyright and patent policy from Congress to other agencies, domestic or foreign.

• Supports “more vigorous efforts” in both domestic and foreign markets to protect the interests of owners in their copyrights and patents.

Criminal justice

• Supports limiting federal involvement in state and local criminal justice processes to what is “Constitutionally permitted.”

• Supports trial by jury upon request for all accusations of crimes.

• Supports jury nullification.

• Opposes defendants being charged and tried by both state and federal jurisdictions under different laws for the same alleged criminal act, “thus violating the constitutionally secured prohibition against double jeopardy.”

• Opposes “hate crime” legislation and to enhanced penalties for so called hate crimes.

Education

• Supports the “unimpeded right of parents” to provide for the education of their children in the manner they deem best, including home, private, or religious.

• Opposes all legislation from any level of government that would interfere with a parent’s right to educate their children.

• pulsory attendance laws.

• Supports the “free market principles which drive improvement of education” through non-traditional options such as internet-based schools, charter schools, Christian and private schools, as well as home schooling options.

• Supports the elimination of the federal Department of Education.

• Supports the repeal of all current federal legislation related to education.

• Opposes new federal laws subsidizing or regulating education.

• Opposes any federal agency, department, board, or other entity having jurisdiction over any aspect of children’s upbringing, education, training, or discipline.

• Opposes all federal government involvement in national teacher certification, educational curricula, textbook selection, learning prehensive sex education, psychological and psychiatric research testing programs, and personnel.

• Supports repeal of NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT (NCLB Act) and RACE TO THE TOP

Environment

• Supports returning to the states and to the people all lands which are held by the federal government without authorization by the Constitution.

• Supports repeal of federal wetlands legislation.

• Supports repeal of the federal Endangered Species Act.

• Opposes U.S. participation in UN programs such as UNESCO, Man and the Biosphere, and the UN Council on Sustainable Development.

• Opposes any attempt to designate private or public property as United Nations World Heritage sites or Biosphere reserves.

• Opposes environmental treaties and conventions such as the Biodiversity Treaty, the Convention on Climate Control, and Agenda 21, which “destroy our sovereignty and right to private property.”

Federal Budget and Debt

• Supports funding only “those duties, functions, and programs” specifically assigned to the federal government by the Constitution

• Supports restricting federal expenditures to no more than collected revenues.

• Supports paying interest on federal debt as it accrues and making annual reductions in the principal.

• Supports selling “certain lands and other federal assets, including foreign military bases,” and applying the proceeds exclusively to debt reduction.

• Oppose “dishonest accounting practices” such as “off-budget items” used to “hide unconstitutional spending practices.”

Gambling

• Opposed to government sponsorship, involvement in, or promotion of gambling such as lotteries, casinos or subsidization of Native American casinos.

Government

• Supports restoring to the States and to the people control over legislative, judicial, executive, and regulatory functions that are not constitutionally delegated to the federal government.

• Opposes any regionalization of governments, at any level, which results in removal of decision-making powers from the people or those directly elected by the people.

• Supports privatization of the Social Security system.

• Supports eliminating the Civil Service system.

• Opposes states accepting all monies from the federal government for any purpose not specifically and clearly articulated in the Constitution.

• Opposes all federal mandates and regulations that are “unconstitutional.”

• Opposed to public-private partnerships and is for a return to the “true ‘free enterprise’ system that once made our nation great and economically prosperous.”

Healthcare

• Opposes the “governmentalization and bureaucratization” of American medicine

Supports elimination of the federal Food and Drug Administration.

• Supports freedom of choice of practitioner and treatment for all citizens for their health care.

• Support the right of patients to seek redress of their grievances through the courts against insurers and/or HMO’s.

Money and banking

• Supports return to the principle of “coin” money as defined by the U.S. Constitution and the Mint Act of 1792

• Supports repeal of the Federal Reserve Act.

• Supports a prohibition on fractional reserve banking.

Private Property

• Supports mon-law rule that protects the people from any search or seizure whatsoever when that search or seizure violates the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

• Opposes legislation and executive action that deprive the people of Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights under claims of necessity to bat terrorism” or to “protect national security.”

• Opposes legislation and administrative action utilizing asset forfeiture laws.

• Opposes laws that allow for the monitoring and controlling of financial transactions.

• Supports privacy legislation that prohibits private parties from discriminating against individuals who refuse to disclose or obtain a Social Security number.

• Supports prohibiting all governmental entities from requiring the use of the Social Security number except for Social Security transactions.

• Supports the repeal of all laws, regulations, and statutes that require the use of the Social Security number for any purpose other than Social Security transactions.

Religious Freedom

• Opposes any form of taxation on churches and other religious organizations

• Supports allowing private organizations to determine their own membership, volunteers, and employment based on their oaths and creeds.

Tariffs and Trade

• Opposes the transfer of authority over U.S. trade policy from Congress to agencies, domestic or foreign, which “improperly exercise policy-setting functions” with respect to U.S. trade policy.

• Support the abolition of the Office of Special Trade Representative.

• Supports the withdrawal of the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and “all other agreements wherein agencies other than the Congress of the United States improperly assume responsibility for establishing American trade policies.”

• Supports a tariff based revenue system.

• Support increasing U.S. tariffs on any foreign import to prevent them from being less than the difference between the foreign item’s cost of production and the cost of production of a similar item produced in the United States.(“The cost of production of a U.S. product shall include, but not be limited to, pensation, including fringe benefits, paid to American workers, and environmental costs of doing business imposed on business by federal, state, and local governments.”)

• Opposes all international trade agreements which have the effect of “diminishing America’s economic self-sufficiency and of exporting jobs, the loss of which impoverishes American families, undermines munities, and diminishes America’s capacity for economic self-reliance, and the provision of national defense.”

• Opposes the trade concept of normal trade relations (Most Favored Nation status).

• Opposes “Trade Promotion Authority,” which transfers the establishment of trade policy from Congress to the Executive branch of government.

Taxation

• Supports abolishing the Internal Revenue Service.

• Supports repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment.

• Supports an end to all taxation and economic formulas that discourage marriage, incentivize co-habitation and child bearing outside of marriage or authorize or provide government funding for policies and programs that “further erode the jurisdiction of the family or parental rights.”

• Opposes all flat-rate tax, national sales tax, and value added tax proposals.

• Supports replacing including e taxes, payroll taxes, and estate taxes with a tariff based revenue system supplemented by excise taxes.

• Supports an apportioned “state-rate tax” in which the responsibility for covering the cost of unmet obligations will be divided among the several states in accordance with their proportion of the total population of the United States, excluding the District of Columbia. (“Thus, if a state contains 10 percent of the nation’s citizens, it will be responsible for assuming payment of 10 percent of the annual deficit.”)

• Supports motor fuel excise taxes, at rates not in excess of those currently imposed, to be used exclusively for the erection, maintenance, and administration of Federal highways.

• Supports taxation of corporations.

Wages and price controls

• Opposes allowing the civil government to have any authority to set wages and prices

Welfare

• “Under no circumstances should the taxpayers of the United States be obligated, under penalty of law through forced taxation, to assume the cost of providing welfare for other citizens. Neither should taxpayers be indentured to subsidize welfare for persons who enter the United States illegally.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Commerce and Counseling
My friend Joe Knippenberg notes some of my musings on the field of “philosophical counseling,” and in fact articulates some of the concerns I share about the content of such practice. I certainly didn’t mean to uncritically praise the new field as it might be currently practiced (I did say, “The actual value of philosophical counseling (or perhaps better yet, philosophical tutoring) might be debatable.”). There are, in fact, better and worse philosophers as there is better and worse philosophy,...
Proto-Marxists in Acts of the Apostles?
Commenting on Warren Buffet’s call to raise taxes on the “mega-rich,” North Carolina Minister Andrew Daugherty says this on Associated Baptist Press (HT: RealClearReligion): Unlike some of our political leaders and media pundits, the gospel does not make false distinctions between the “makers” and the “takers,” the deserving and the undeserving or the hard-working and the hardly-working. Instead, we are told that the first Christians had all things mon. They would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds...
Gregg: Two Principles Candidates Must Hold Dear
Director of Research Samuel Gregg has a piece in Public Discourse today as part of a series on the 2012 presidential election. “Fix America’s Economy: Two Principles for Reform” explains why limited government is better government, and how the principle of subsidiarity can guide regulation that governments undertake. From the essay: The economist Arthur Brooks is exactly right when he notes that the end-game of America’s free enterprise culture is not the endless acquisition of wealth. The goal is human...
The Church’s African, Middle Eastern and Asian Roots
The Brotherhood of St. Moses the Black, an Orthodox Christian organization that provides information about “ancient Christianity and its deep roots in Africa,” is holding a conference Aug. 26-28 in the Detroit area. In a story in the Observer & Eccentric newspaper about the ing conference, a reporter interviewed a woman by the name of Sharon Gomulka who had visited an Orthodox Church several years ago on the feast day of St. Moses the Black (or sometimes called The Ethiopian)....
What Would Jesus Cut? Who’s Asking, the Pharisees?
The next skirmish over the country’s financial direction e in September as Congress tries to prepare for the federal government’s new fiscal year, which starts October 1st. The Christian Left has quoted the Bible quite freely during the budget battle, throwing around especially the “red letter” words of Christ in its campaign to protect all of the federal government’s poverty programs (even those so riddled with fraud that the White House wants to cut them). It seems bizarre, then, that...
Debate: Capitalism vs Distributism
“More and more, I find Catholics dividing themselves into capitalist and distributist camps,” writes Bernardo Aparicio García, president of the Catholic journal Dappled Things. To help readers establish “a firm foundation” for thinking about economic questions, García opened up the pages of his journal to Robert T. Miller, for capitalism, and John C. Médaille, for distributism. The result is a lengthy exchange “On Truth and Trade: Economics and the Catholic Vision of the Good Life.” Miller is a professor of...
Richard Epstein takes on papal economics
Noted NYU law professor and free-market advocate Richard Epstein has written a provocative piece titled “How is Warren Buffett like the Pope? They are both dead wrong on economics.” Here’s the money quote: The great advantage petition in markets is that it exhausts all gains from trade, which thus allows individuals to attain higher levels of welfare. These win/win propositions may not reach the perfect endpoint, but they will avoid the woes that are now consuming once prosperous economies. Understanding...
The Folly of More Centralized Power
mentary this week addresses the importance of federalism and our fundamental founding principles in relation to the problems that plague the nation. There was once plenty mentary and finger pointing in regards to setting a new tone of political and civil discourse in the nation. However, the more the Washington power structure is threatened by those unsatisfied with where the leadership is taking us, the more those demanding a return to first principles will be splattered with, at times, revolting...
VIDEO: ‘Doing the Right Thing’ with Chuck Colson
On September 24, thousands of people from all over the United States will tune in to a live webcast ofDoing the Right Thing, a discussion of the ethical crisis our country faces and what’s to be done about it. Doing the Right Thing is national project intended to spark an ethical reexamination by Americans. The initiative is led by Chuck Colson and group of Christian luminaries, including Acton’s director of programs, Michael Miller. Through a six-part DVD curriculum and live...
Flash Mobbing King’s Dream
My contribution to this week’s Acton News & Commentary: Flash Mobbing King’s Dream by Anthony B. Bradley Every black person apprehended for robbing stores in a flash mob should have their court hearing not in front of a judge but facing the 30-foot statute of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. at his Washington memorial site. Each thief should be asked, “What do you think Dr. King would say to you right now?” I was not angry when I initially saw...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved