Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the 2018 omnibus spending bill
Explainer: What you should know about the 2018 omnibus spending bill
Jun 16, 2026 10:29 PM

On Friday, Congress passed—and President Trump signed into law—a massive new omnibus spending bill. Here are some key points you should know about this legislation:

What is an omnibus spending bill?

An omnibus (Latin meaning “for everything”) bill is one that includes diverse and unrelated topics into a single legislative package. An omnibus spending bill is thus a bill that includes a broad range of appropriations legislation related to federal government funding.

How much spending is included in the omnibus bill?

The 2,300-page bill includes $1.3 trillion in federal government spending.

How does the omnibus reflect President Trump’s budget priorities?

In his 2019 budget request, President Trump wanted:

Ÿ• To increase defense spending by $54 billion and then offset that by stripping money from more than 18 other agencies. Instead, non-military spending increased by $63 billion over last year.

Ÿ•Ÿ An additional $25 billion for a border wall. Instead, he got $1.6 billion for border security, of which only $38 million can be spent on “border barrier planning and design.”

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $152 million in funding for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Instead, the funding was increased by $3 million.

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $500 million in funding for the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER), a discretionary grant program launched as part of President Obama’s stimulus plan. Instead, the budget for TIGER was tripled to $1.5 billion.

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $3 billion in funding for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). Instead, the budget was nearly doubled at $5,778,000.

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $309 million in funding for the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E). Instead, the budget was increased to $353,314,000.

Ÿ•Ÿ To cut spending for a research office on renewable energy and efficiency by more than 65 percent, from $1.3 billion to $696 million. Instead, the budget was increased by 14 percent to $1.62 billion.

What noteworthy or unusual items were included?

Ÿ Election Security — Includes $380 million for Election Assistance Commission grants to “improve the administration of elections for Federal office, including to enhance election technology and make election security improvements.”

Ÿ NICS Fix —Includes a requirement that federal and state authorities report relevant criminal history records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).

Ÿ IRS Targeting —Prohibits the IRS from using agency funds “to target citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States” or “to target groups for regulatory scrutiny based on their ideological beliefs.”

Ÿ Tip-pooling — Prohibits employers from taking workers’ tips under a proposed Department of Labor rule that would allow the redistribution of tip money to back-of-house workers.

Ÿ Opioid Epidemic — Includes $500 million for research on opioid addiction. Also includes several billion more for opioid related programs and studies.

Ÿ Rural broadband — Includes $600 million for a new pilot program within USDA aimed at rural broadband.

Which special priorities wanted President Trump, the GOP, or Republican voters were not included?

Ÿ Sanctuary Cities —Does not defund “sanctuary cities” (i.e., cities that ply with federal immigration laws) as President Trump requested.

Ÿ Planned Parenthood — Does not defund Planned Parenthood.

Ÿ Obamacare — The proposals to deregulate the insurance market were not included.

Ÿ DACA Fix – Does not include any resolution on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

Ÿ Johnson Amendment —Does not repeal the amendment, pushed by Lyndon Johnson, which allows the IRS to threaten religious institutions with a loss of their tax-exempt status if they openly advocate their political views.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The cautionary tale of ‘government cheese’
When President Jimmy Carter first took office in 1977, America’s dairy farmers were struggling. Throughout the economic disruptions of the 1970s, the country had seen a shortage of dairy products, followed by a 30% spike in prices (due to government-inspired inflation), followed by a drastic decline in prices (due to government-inspired intervention). To solve the problem, President Carter and Congress took to a predictable solution: yet more government intervention. As part of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1977, the...
Turning points in Catholic social teaching
In a recent Acton Line podcast I began by asking Father Robert Sirico the very large question, what is Catholic social teaching and why is it important today? He answered that the Church has always had a social teaching but that when we usually discuss Catholic social teaching today we begin with Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Rerum Novarum. George Weigel’s latest book, The Irony of Modern Catholic Historysheds much historical and theological light on just why that is. Francesca Murphy,...
Acton Line podcast: Breaking down Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society with Amity Shlaes
On May 22nd, 1964, Lyndon B. Johnson launched his program for a “Great Society” in a speech at the University of Michigan. “The Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all,” Johnson began. “It demands an end to poverty and racial injustice, to which we are mitted in our time. But that is just the beginning.” 84 bills later, Johnson’s war on poverty was in full effect, expanding to sectors in education, medicine, housing, and many more. Did the...
A war on freelancers is a war on women
This year, California’s progressives decided to wage war on the nightmare of being your own boss. A new state law aimed at limiting the gig economy has already cost hundreds of people their jobs – and had a seriously harmful impact on women’s earnings and long-term happiness. Assembly Bill 5 curbs the ability panies like Uber and Lyft to classify their workers as independent contractors. The law, which codifies the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex decision into law, panies in the...
A new collection of essays on Catholic Social Teaching
The inauguration of modern Catholic social teaching that occurred when Pope Leo XIII published the first modern social encyclical Rerum Novarum in 1891 marked a new stage in the Catholic Church’s engagement with the modern world. It also breathed life into mentary on numerous political, social and economic questions. Exploring, analyzing and critiquing that tradition is the focus of a new collection of essays on Catholic social teaching, entitled Catholic Social Teaching: A Volume of Scholarly Essays (Cambridge University Press,...
A British perspective on the UK’s 2019 general election
Voters in the UK gave Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative Party its largest majority in more than 30 years. With one seat yet to report, the Tories added a smashing 47 seats. A victory of this magnitude presents Prime Minister Johnson with sweeping opportunities, but hidden pitfalls also lurk in plain sight. “Lesson one of this election is that you ignore the votes of such a large number of your core voters at your peril,” writes Rev. Richard Turnbull, the...
What happens when reason and faith are separated: An interview with Samuel Gregg
In a new interview on his book, Reason, Faith, and the Struggle for Western Civilization, Samuel Gregg lays out how crucial the integration of reason and faith is to the West and what specific consequences result when reason and faith are separated from each other. When reason and faith e “untethered” from each other, distortions, or “pathologies,” of reason and faith take shape. One such example is the “psuedo-religion” of Marxism. “Marxism, in one sense, is a pathology of reason,...
Think like Lenin
Gary Saul Morson has excellent and enlightening piece at the New Criterion on Vladimir Lenin and what he calls Leninthink. “Lenin did more than anyone else to shape the last hundred years. He invented a form of government we e to call totalitarian, which rejected in principle the idea of any private sphere outside of state control.” As we approach the 150th anniversary of Lenin’s birth, understanding him grows ever more important. Despite the fall of the Soviet Union, Leninist...
Acton Commentary: How socialism causes atheism
Most socialists have been atheists, but does accepting socialist economic principles make believers more likely to e atheists? This week’s Acton Commentary, which is the cover story of the newest issue of Religion & Liberty, explores survey data and anecdotal evidence that a socialist worldview can lead believers to lose their faith. A growing body of research reveals that as the welfare state grows, the church shrinks. Adam Kay of Duke University discovered that church and state have a “hydraulic...
What Churchill knew about tariffs could fill a bucket
Winston Churchill, like Benjamin Franklin and Mark Twain, has been the putative source of many a pseudonymous or misattributed quotation. However, one of his best-known aphorisms about taxes is authentic – but misunderstood. Churchill did, in fact, say, “To think you can make a man richer by putting on a tax is like a man thinking that he can stand in a bucket and lift himself up by the handle.” The quotation has had a long and storied history in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved