Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about the 2018 omnibus spending bill
Explainer: What you should know about the 2018 omnibus spending bill
Aug 18, 2025 12:00 PM

On Friday, Congress passed—and President Trump signed into law—a massive new omnibus spending bill. Here are some key points you should know about this legislation:

What is an omnibus spending bill?

An omnibus (Latin meaning “for everything”) bill is one that includes diverse and unrelated topics into a single legislative package. An omnibus spending bill is thus a bill that includes a broad range of appropriations legislation related to federal government funding.

How much spending is included in the omnibus bill?

The 2,300-page bill includes $1.3 trillion in federal government spending.

How does the omnibus reflect President Trump’s budget priorities?

In his 2019 budget request, President Trump wanted:

Ÿ• To increase defense spending by $54 billion and then offset that by stripping money from more than 18 other agencies. Instead, non-military spending increased by $63 billion over last year.

Ÿ•Ÿ An additional $25 billion for a border wall. Instead, he got $1.6 billion for border security, of which only $38 million can be spent on “border barrier planning and design.”

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $152 million in funding for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Instead, the funding was increased by $3 million.

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $500 million in funding for the Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER), a discretionary grant program launched as part of President Obama’s stimulus plan. Instead, the budget for TIGER was tripled to $1.5 billion.

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $3 billion in funding for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). Instead, the budget was nearly doubled at $5,778,000.

Ÿ•Ÿ To eliminate the $309 million in funding for the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E). Instead, the budget was increased to $353,314,000.

Ÿ•Ÿ To cut spending for a research office on renewable energy and efficiency by more than 65 percent, from $1.3 billion to $696 million. Instead, the budget was increased by 14 percent to $1.62 billion.

What noteworthy or unusual items were included?

Ÿ Election Security — Includes $380 million for Election Assistance Commission grants to “improve the administration of elections for Federal office, including to enhance election technology and make election security improvements.”

Ÿ NICS Fix —Includes a requirement that federal and state authorities report relevant criminal history records to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS).

Ÿ IRS Targeting —Prohibits the IRS from using agency funds “to target citizens of the United States for exercising any right guaranteed under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States” or “to target groups for regulatory scrutiny based on their ideological beliefs.”

Ÿ Tip-pooling — Prohibits employers from taking workers’ tips under a proposed Department of Labor rule that would allow the redistribution of tip money to back-of-house workers.

Ÿ Opioid Epidemic — Includes $500 million for research on opioid addiction. Also includes several billion more for opioid related programs and studies.

Ÿ Rural broadband — Includes $600 million for a new pilot program within USDA aimed at rural broadband.

Which special priorities wanted President Trump, the GOP, or Republican voters were not included?

Ÿ Sanctuary Cities —Does not defund “sanctuary cities” (i.e., cities that ply with federal immigration laws) as President Trump requested.

Ÿ Planned Parenthood — Does not defund Planned Parenthood.

Ÿ Obamacare — The proposals to deregulate the insurance market were not included.

Ÿ DACA Fix – Does not include any resolution on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA).

Ÿ Johnson Amendment —Does not repeal the amendment, pushed by Lyndon Johnson, which allows the IRS to threaten religious institutions with a loss of their tax-exempt status if they openly advocate their political views.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
What the flu can teach us about economics
Note: This is post #37 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. What can the flu teach us about economics? In this video, Alex Tabarrok of Marginal Revolution University explains how vaccines produce positive externalities that help people stay healthy. When someone receives the vaccine, they pass along the positive benefits of the vaccine to others, generating positive externalities (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching them at 1.5 to 2 times the...
When Lightning McQueen brought jobs to rural America
“Main street isn’t main street anymore. No one seems to need us like they did before.” Americans continue to face the violent winds of economic change, whether stemming from technology, trade, or globalization. Those pains have been particularly pronounced in rural areas, which the Wall Street Journal recently proclaimed as being the “new inner city” due to accelerating declines in key measures of “socioeconomic well-being.” In response to these trends, progressives and populists have been quick to turn to a...
Pierre Manent: Was the EU ever a good idea?
Recently the state and fate of the European Union have e topics of world-wide debate. The UK’s referendum vote to leave the EU last summer andthe recent snap election, which called that vote into question, have ignited discussion about whether supranational organizations like the EU are even a good idea. In anarticle for the Library of Liberty and Law, Samuel Gregg, research director at the Acton Institute, discussed the thought of Pierre Manent. Manent is a prominent French political philosopher...
A Christian defense of capitalism
Humanity knows just two theoretical forms of organizing public interactions, says Alex Tokarev. All real socio-economic systems that have evolved through the centuries are a mix of the two opposite ideological concepts: One of the systems uses political coercion. The other is based on voluntary cooperation. One depends on a central plan. The other relies on individual initiative. One treats citizens as children who need motherly care from the cradle to the grave. The other recognizes people as autonomous creatures...
Explainer: How do French parliamentary elections work (and why was June 11 historic)?
On Sunday, France held the first round of its parliamentary elections. After the June 11, 2017, the nation is poised to usher in a new era of French political history. How is French Parliament divided? The French Parliament is divided into two houses: the National Assembly (Assemblée nationale) and the Senate (Sénat). The general public votes to elect members of the National Assembly, known as députés. The Senate is elected separately by grands électeurs, such as local elected officials. The...
Audio: Samuel Gregg on Theresa May’s Election Blunder
On Friday afternoon, Acton Institute Director of Programs Samuel Gregg joins guest host Paul Kengor on Ave Maria Radio’s Kresta in the Afternoon to discuss the shocking results of last week’ssnap UK elections that saw Theresa May and the Tories lose their majority in the UK Parliament. Gregg looks at the coalitions likely to form as a result and the impact the election will have on the ing Brexit negotiations. You can listen to the interview via the audio player...
Why truly free trade is also truly fair
Throughout our political discourse, we continue to hear critiques of free trade from left and right, each of them ultimately aiming to prod us closer toan abstract notion of so-called “fair” or “fairer” trade. Evenwhen the value of free trade is recognized, such admissions tend to be quickly panied by fuzzy, convoluted qualifiers, such as “free trade must also be fair.” It’s a refrain that sounds agreeable enough on the surface, yet it bears an underlying ambivalence toward freedom and...
Has the European Parliament overlooked MEPs’ multimillion-dollar corruption?
A new report shows the European Parliament is spending nearly €40 million($45 million U.S.) a year to pay for offices that may not even exist. Further, the body does not require any documentation of how Members of European Parliament (MEPs) spend the funds entrusted to them. The report raises the question:Is it possible to concentrate money and power without luring theirstewards into corruption? A new articleinReligion & Liberty Transatlantic explores the intersection of power, temptation, and responsible stewardship raised by...
Radio Free Acton: Wonder Woman’s heartfelt humanity; Samuel Gregg on the UK elections
We’re back with a fresh edition of Radio Free Acton! This week, we talk with Acton’s Director of Research Samuel Gregg for some perspective on the surprising e of the June 8 snap parliamentary elections in Great Britain, and what the resurgence of Labour and the loss of a conservative majority mean for Prime Minister Theresa May and the ing Brexit negotiations with the EU. We’re also excited to introduce a new feature on Radio Free Acton:Upstream with Bruce Edward...
How will tax reform affect charitable giving?
In April the Trump administration released the president’s tax-reform proposal (see: Explainer: What you should know about President Trump’s tax reform plan). The plan was merely an outline and was short on details. Republicans in Congress, though, have released proposals that include three major policy changes: (1) increasing the value of the standard deduction to $11,000 for individuals and $22,000 for married couples, (2) extending the charitable tax deduction to non-itemizers, and (3) decreasing the highest marginal tax rate to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved