Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about congressional caucuses
Explainer: What you should know about congressional caucuses
Aug 27, 2025 7:51 AM

Wait, why should I care about this topic?

Americans tend to view partisan politics as being mostly binary—between Republicans and Democrats. But within Congress there are also factions that shape legislative agendas and determine the laws that affect our daily lives. For example, it was primarily opposition by the Freedom Caucus (about 40 members) that stopped the Republican healthcare proposal, the American Health Care Act (AHCA), from being voted on.

What is a congressional caucus?

A caucus is a faction within a legislative body that pursues its interests through the legislative process. In the U.S. Congress, such caucuses can be informal (called informal Member groups) or formal (i.e., Congressional Member Organization or CMO). In their formal form in the House, the group is registered with the Committee on House Administration. CMOs exist to affect public policy, either directly through policy advocacy for a region or an issue, or indirectly by attracting media attention, or through the socialization and orientation of their Members.

In addition to the term caucus, they are sometimes called conferences, coalitions, study groups, task forces, or working groups.

What do congressional caucuses do?

The primary function of CMOs is to develop legislative agendas and be forums for the exchange of information. Many of the groups hold regular member or staff meetings and may also invite outside speakers and groups to make presentations.

What are the types of CMOs?

According to the Congressional Research Service (CRS), there are seven types of CMOs:

(1) Intraparty CMOs: promote the policy views of like-minded Members within a political party.

(2) Personal interest CMOs (the most prevalent type): typically focus on a broad, single concern, such as the environment or children, that is often under the jurisdiction of more than mittee.

(3) Industry CMOs: advocate the interests of a particular industry.

(4) Regional CMOs: champion the interests of a particular region.

(5) State/district CMOs: advocate the interests of a particular state or district.

(6) National constituency CMOs: advocate the interests of particular constituencies, such as women, minorities, and veterans.

(7) Diplomacy CMOs: concern themselves with improving foreign relations with another country or region of the world.

How many CMOs are there in the current congress?

According to the CRS, there are 800 informal Member organizations listed in the Congressional Yellow Book or registered with the Committee on House Administration. According to self-reported information contained in the Congressional Yellow Book, the House’s 703 informal Member organizations had from one to 294 members, with an average membership of 21, and the Senate’s 87 informal Member organizations had from one to 71 members, with an average membership of nine.

On average, House Members report membership in 34 informal Member organizations (ranging from 0 to 136) and Senators report membership in 16 (ranging from 0 to 52). Of these 800 informal organizations, 300 registered with the Committee on House Administration during the 114th Congress as congressional Member organizations (CMOs).

Are their bipartisan CMOs?

Yes, usually for issues that are not as divided along partisan lines. For example, this month two Republicans and two Democrats co-founded the Congressional Estuary Caucus to “give the nation’s estuaries a stronger voice and presence in Congress by uniting lawmakers in support of these critical ecosystems.” (Estuaries are bodies of water usually found where rivers meet the sea.)

Can Senators be part of a House CMO?

Yes, members of both the House and Senate may participate in CMO, but at least one of the officers of the CMO must be a member of the House.

What are the rules for CMOs:

According to the Congressional Members Handbook:

• CMOs may not use the Frank [i.e., a way for members to send official mail for free], nor may a Member lend his or her Frank to a CMO.

• A Member may use official resources munications related to the purpose of a CMO. Any munications ply with the Franking Regulations.

• Members may devote a section of their official website to CMO issues.

• A Member may use inside mail municate information related to a CMO.

• Members may prepare material related to CMO issues for dissemination.

• Official funds may not be used to print or pay for stationery for the CMO.

• Members may refer to their membership in a CMO on their official stationery.

Can CMO’s hire staff?

No, CMOs cannot employ staff. The individual members are considered the employing entities, so CMO business is handled by the staffers who work for the Representatives or Senators.

According to the Congressional Members Handbook, a Member of a CMO, in support of the objectives of that CMO, may utilize employees (including shared employees) and official resources under the control of the Member to assist the CMO in carrying out its legislative objectives, but no employees may be appointed in the name of a CMO. Business cards for individuals who work on CMO issues must list the employing authority before the name of the CMO.

What are the largest CMOs?

Here are some of the largest caucuses:

• Congressional Diabetes Caucus (339 members)

• Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus (276 members)

• Republican Study Committee (172 members)

• International Conservation Caucus (119 members)

• Congressional Progressive Caucus(75 House members)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
AIDS: not that bad?
Bryan Caplan at EconLog says that he has long wondered about the validity of the statistics of the spread of AIDS on the African continent: The whole story had a quasi-Soviet flavor to it. The main difference: Soviet growth statistics were too good to be true, while African AIDS statistics were too bad to be true. Reflecting on the incentives cemented my skepticism: Just as the Soviet Union had a strong incentive to exaggerate its growth numbers in order to...
Catholics on immigration
Jordan’s post below observes the divisions among evangelicals on the hot-button issue of immigration. Its divisiveness—cutting across the usual lines of conservative/liberal and Democrat/Republican—has made the immigration debate an unusual and therefore extraordinarily interesting one. The issue also divides Catholics. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony has been among the most promising national voices in favor of immigrant rights. But ments have not gone unchallenged among Catholics. Activist Jim Gilchrist denounced Mahony’s views. Kathryn-Jean Lopez at NRO questioned them more delicately....
‘Overwhelmed by orphans’
Where will they go? Churches and religious relief organizations are playing a much more active role in U.S. foreign policy. And that has been obvious in recent months in the recovery efforts for the South Asian tsunami and the Pakistan earthquakes. In March, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life invited Andrew Natsios, who recently left the U.S. Agency for International Development as chief administrator, to talk about his five-year term there. This is a must-read for anyone who...
Connecting France with good economics
It seems that it may be possible. An interesting article from yesterday’s International Herald Tribune: Danielle Scache tries to avoid using the term “capitalism” in her economics class because it has negative connotations in France. Instead, she teaches her high school students about the market economy, a slightly less controversial term she started using last year after a two-month internship at the dairy giant Danone. That was an experience that did away with more than one of her own prejudices,...
First Things imbroglio
A former editor at First Things, Damon Linker, has written a piece for The New Republic, which attacks, among others, his former boss, Fr. Richard John Neuhaus. Linker claims that Neuhaus is a “theocon,” who wants to merge religious authority and political power. Rick Garnett at Mirror of Justice has all the details, including links to blog discussions and his previous post, criticizing Linker’s argument. I’ve read First Things for years and, in my judgment, the truth lies with Linker’s...
The sweetness of the Law
menting briefly on Psalm 19, C. S. Lewis observes the description of God’s Law as “sweeter than honey” and “more precious than gold,” the kind of descriptions that occur again and again throughout the Psalter. Lewis writes, In so far as this idea of the Law’s beauty, sweetness, or pireciousness, arose from the contrast of the surrounding Paganisms, we may soon find occasion to recover it. Christians increasingly live on a spiritual island; new and rival ways of life surround...
Chirac waves the white flag
French President Jacques Chirac has given in to the student protests in his country, protests that called for the removal of the First Employment Contract. This is a controversial new law giving employers greater freedom in whom they fire amongst under-26 employees. The law, as I am sure you’ve seen, sparked students protests for weeks. Michael Miller in last Wednesday’s Acton News and Commentary addressed the deeper issue here: economic ignorance and moral apathy–I won’t repeat his analysis here. But...
Immigration is a symptom
Large numbers of migrant populations going out of a particular area or nation should be viewed in large part as a signal of something. There are reasons for people to pick up and move, and policy and governing bodies would do well to examine these reasons. When business close facilities and open elsewhere, it is usually because the destination location has a better economic and business-friendly environment. So the natural course of action when examining this phenomena is to ask...
Surprise! Evangelical politics isn’t univocal
“Letter on Immigration Deepens Split Among Evangelicals,” trumpets a story from the Washington Post. Ever since evangelicals received such credit in the election and reelection of George W. Bush, the ins and outs of evangelical politics has recieved a greater share of media attention. A great part of this attention has focused on so-called “splits” among evangelicals, as a way to highlight the newly recognized reality that all evangelicals aren’t card-carrying Republicans. So from issues like immigration to global warming,...
French ‘security’ and economic reality
As student demonstrations in France mount, the government finds it increasingly difficult to dismantle restrictive labor laws that are directly tied to high unemployment rates. Michael Miller examines the political and cultural factors that are behind the French fear of economic risk taking. Read mentary here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved