Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal
Explainer: What you should know about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal
Dec 16, 2025 5:37 AM

What exactly is the Green New Deal?

Yesterday Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) released a proposed resolution titled, “Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.”

The document is a simple resolution, a proposal that addresses matters entirely within the prerogative of the House of Representatives. It requires neither the approval of the Senate nor the signature of the President, and it does not have the force of law. Simple resolutions concern the rules of one Chamber or express the sentiments of a single Chamber.

This resolution would merely express the opinion of the House on the “duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.” Implementing the policies proposed would require additional legislation.

What’s the Green New Deal’s basis for taking action?

The resolution claims that environmental and economic conditions require the federal government to take drastic action.

On the environmental side, the resolution cites the ‘‘Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5oC’’, which was produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in October 2018, and the Fourth National Climate Assessment, a report released in 2018. Those reports state that human activity is the dominant cause of observed climate change over the past century, and that a changing climate is causing sea levels to rise, an increase in wildfires, severe storms, droughts, and other extreme weather events that threaten human life, munities, and critical infrastructure.

On the economic side, the resolution claims a “4-decade trend of economic stagnation, deindustrialization, and antilabor policies” has lead to such problems as wage stagnation, reduced socioeconomic mobility, erosion of the earning and bargaining power of workers, and e inequality.

Additionally, the resolution claims “climate change, pollution, and environmental destruction” pose not only a threat to national security but have “exacerbated systemic racial, regional, social, environmental, and economic injustices” that are “disproportionately affecting munities of color, munities, munities, depopulated munities, the poor, e workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth.”

The resolution claims that “Federal Government-led mobilizations during World War II and the New Deal created the greatest middle class that the United States has ever seen” and that there is currently a “historic opportunity” to counteract the “systemic injustices” (listed above), create “millions of good, high-wage jobs,” and “provide unprecedented levels of prosperity and economic security.”

What does the Green New Deal propose as a solution?

The resolution proposes to plish numerous ‘‘Green New Deal goals’’ through a 10-year national mobilization (referred to in this resolution as the ‘‘Green New Deal mobilization’’), including:

• Meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources. [The plan calls for a “full transition off fossil fuels” and “would not include creating new nuclear plants.”]

• Upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, fort, and durability, including through electrification.

• Removing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry as much as is technologically feasible, including by expanding renewable energy manufacturing and investing in existing manufacturing and industry.

• Supporting family farming and investing in sustainable farming and land use practices that increase soil health.

• Overhauling transportation systems to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector, including by developing zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and manufacturing, increasing public transportation, and promoting high-speed rail.

What is necessary to implement the Green New Deal goals?

The resolution states that to achieve the Green New Deal goals and mobilization, a Green New Deal will require several additional goals and projects, including:

• Guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States.

• Providing all people of the United States with high-quality health care.

• Providing all people of the United States with affordable, safe, and adequate housing.

• Providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States.

• Providing all people of the United States with economic security and access to clean water and clean air.

• Ensuring that the Green New Deal mobilization creates high-quality union jobs that pay prevailing wages, hires local workers, offers training and advancement opportunities, and guarantees wage and benefit parity for workers affected by the transition.

What is the proposal for paying for the Green New Deal?

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez proposes paying for by using deficit spending and the Federal Reserve’s power to inject money into the economic system. In the FAQ issued by her staff, she answers the question, “How will you pay for it?” by saying:

The same way we paid for the New Deal, the 2008 bank bailout and extended quantitative easing programs. The same way we paid for World War II and all our current wars. The Federal Reserve can extend credit to power these projects and investments and new public banks can be created to extend credit. There is also space for the government to take an equity stake in projects to get a return on investment. At the end of the day, this is an investment in our economy that should grow our wealth as a nation, so the question isn’t how will we pay for it, but what will we do with our new shared prosperity.

Does anyone actually support this proposal?

While the resolution is unlikely to gain traction in the Democratic-controlled House, at least six senators who are seeking the Democratic nomination for president have endorsed the proposal: Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Kamala Harris of California, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Single-payer Schemes=Supply Shortages
Go to this page to watch a short video highlighting the story of one man’s fight against Canada’s health system. The film is focused on the defects of socialized medicine and so, naturally, does not deal with the serious problems existing in other systems (such as the United States). But it is an effective display of a problem that every attempt to manipulate prices encounters: how to make supply meet demand. ...
A Reflection on the Incarnation
Rev. Robert A. Sirico, president of the Acton Institute, passes along a Christmas message over at Phi Beta Cons on National Review Online. Reflecting on the Incarnation, Sirico says, “This belief teaches us to take seriously human history, its institutions, economies and social relationships, for all of this, and more, is the stuff from which human destiny is discovered and directed.” At the Christmas staff meeting Rev. Sirico passed on similar thoughts to us, and concludes with this, which I...
Never a Countdown on Effective Compassion
The “10 years after welfare reform” articles of this past summer are old news, of course. Not surprisingly, indications were that, like any public policy, reform hadn’t been the all-time poverty solution, but that policies had, in fact, helped a significant number of people to move themselves to self-sufficiency. A recent Wall Street Journal series highlighted the broad range of issues related to moving out of poverty. panion piece to the December 28 entry, “Economists Are Putting Theories to Scientific...
2006 in Review, 2nd Quarter
Our series on the year in review continues with the second quarter: April “Surprise! Evangelical Politics Isn’t Univocal,” Jordan J. Ballor So from issues like immigration to global warming, the press is eager to find the fault lines of evangelical politics. And moving beyond the typical Jim Wallis-Jerry Falwell dichotomy, there are real and honest disagreements among evangelicals on any number of political issues…. May “How Do You Spell Relief?” Jordan J. Ballor If Congress really wants to address the...
2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter
Our series on the year in review continues with the third fourth of 2006: July “Isn’t the Cold War Over?” David Michael Phelps I’ve got an idea for a new . Titled, Hugo and Vladi, it details the zany adventures of two world leaders, one of whom (played by David Hyde Pierce) struggles to upkeep his image of a friendly, modern European diplomat while his goofball brother-in-law (played by George Lopez) keeps screwing it up for him by spouting off...
2006 in Review, 1st Quarter
This series will take a representative post from each month of the past year, to review the big stories of the past twelve months. First things first, the first quarter of 2006: January “Who is Pope Benedict XVI?,” Kishore Jayabalan Despite his many writings, scholarly expertise and long service to the Church as Prefect of Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, there’s still much of an unknown quality surrounding Pope Benedict XVI…. February “The Mohammed...
Recidivism and Reform: Competing Views of the State’s Role in Prison
In this week’s mentary, I reflect on the past year’s developments for InnerChange Freedom Initiative, a ministry of Prison Fellowship. In June a federal judge in Iowa ruled against IFI’s work at Iowa’s Newton facility. In his ruling (PDF here), the judge wrote that the responsibility bating recidivism is “traditionally and exclusively reserved to the state.” This means that since reducing recidivism is a “state function,” anyone working bat recidivism is by definition a “state actor.” Panopticon blueprint by Jeremy...
Who Really Cares for the Poor?
Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks challenges perceived mainstream social orthodoxy in his new book, Who Really Cares: America’s Charity Divide – Who Gives, Who Doesn’t and Why It Matters. For generations it has been assumed that political and social liberals are generous towards the poor while conservatives are proverbial tightwads. At least since the days of Charles Dickens’ Scrooge this has been the popular view. Liberals continually remind us that they are the ones who really care about welfare since...
2006 in Review, 4th Quarter
Our 2006 year in review series concludes with the fourth quarter: October “Do You See More than Just a ‘Carbon Footprint’?” Jordan J. Ballor It’s a fair question to ask, I think, of those who are a part of the radical environmentalist/population control political lobby. It’s also a note of caution to fellow Christians who want to build bridges with those folks…there is plex of interrelated policies that are logically consistent once you assume the tenets of secular environmentalism…. November...
Remembering Gerald Ford
The Acton Institute’s offices are right across the Grand River from the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum (and what will be Ford’s final resting place). Having passed these sites every day for several years on my walk to work, news of the ex-president’s death was especially poignant. National Review Online offers an interesting symposium on Ford’s presidency and legacy. From the other side of the ideological divide, Newsweek provides several retrospective pieces. A striking thing about Ford that I hadn’t...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved