Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal
Explainer: What you should know about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal
May 15, 2026 11:13 AM

What exactly is the Green New Deal?

Yesterday Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) released a proposed resolution titled, “Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.”

The document is a simple resolution, a proposal that addresses matters entirely within the prerogative of the House of Representatives. It requires neither the approval of the Senate nor the signature of the President, and it does not have the force of law. Simple resolutions concern the rules of one Chamber or express the sentiments of a single Chamber.

This resolution would merely express the opinion of the House on the “duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.” Implementing the policies proposed would require additional legislation.

What’s the Green New Deal’s basis for taking action?

The resolution claims that environmental and economic conditions require the federal government to take drastic action.

On the environmental side, the resolution cites the ‘‘Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5oC’’, which was produced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in October 2018, and the Fourth National Climate Assessment, a report released in 2018. Those reports state that human activity is the dominant cause of observed climate change over the past century, and that a changing climate is causing sea levels to rise, an increase in wildfires, severe storms, droughts, and other extreme weather events that threaten human life, munities, and critical infrastructure.

On the economic side, the resolution claims a “4-decade trend of economic stagnation, deindustrialization, and antilabor policies” has lead to such problems as wage stagnation, reduced socioeconomic mobility, erosion of the earning and bargaining power of workers, and e inequality.

Additionally, the resolution claims “climate change, pollution, and environmental destruction” pose not only a threat to national security but have “exacerbated systemic racial, regional, social, environmental, and economic injustices” that are “disproportionately affecting munities of color, munities, munities, depopulated munities, the poor, e workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth.”

The resolution claims that “Federal Government-led mobilizations during World War II and the New Deal created the greatest middle class that the United States has ever seen” and that there is currently a “historic opportunity” to counteract the “systemic injustices” (listed above), create “millions of good, high-wage jobs,” and “provide unprecedented levels of prosperity and economic security.”

What does the Green New Deal propose as a solution?

The resolution proposes to plish numerous ‘‘Green New Deal goals’’ through a 10-year national mobilization (referred to in this resolution as the ‘‘Green New Deal mobilization’’), including:

• Meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources. [The plan calls for a “full transition off fossil fuels” and “would not include creating new nuclear plants.”]

• Upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, fort, and durability, including through electrification.

• Removing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry as much as is technologically feasible, including by expanding renewable energy manufacturing and investing in existing manufacturing and industry.

• Supporting family farming and investing in sustainable farming and land use practices that increase soil health.

• Overhauling transportation systems to eliminate pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector, including by developing zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and manufacturing, increasing public transportation, and promoting high-speed rail.

What is necessary to implement the Green New Deal goals?

The resolution states that to achieve the Green New Deal goals and mobilization, a Green New Deal will require several additional goals and projects, including:

• Guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States.

• Providing all people of the United States with high-quality health care.

• Providing all people of the United States with affordable, safe, and adequate housing.

• Providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States.

• Providing all people of the United States with economic security and access to clean water and clean air.

• Ensuring that the Green New Deal mobilization creates high-quality union jobs that pay prevailing wages, hires local workers, offers training and advancement opportunities, and guarantees wage and benefit parity for workers affected by the transition.

What is the proposal for paying for the Green New Deal?

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez proposes paying for by using deficit spending and the Federal Reserve’s power to inject money into the economic system. In the FAQ issued by her staff, she answers the question, “How will you pay for it?” by saying:

The same way we paid for the New Deal, the 2008 bank bailout and extended quantitative easing programs. The same way we paid for World War II and all our current wars. The Federal Reserve can extend credit to power these projects and investments and new public banks can be created to extend credit. There is also space for the government to take an equity stake in projects to get a return on investment. At the end of the day, this is an investment in our economy that should grow our wealth as a nation, so the question isn’t how will we pay for it, but what will we do with our new shared prosperity.

Does anyone actually support this proposal?

While the resolution is unlikely to gain traction in the Democratic-controlled House, at least six senators who are seeking the Democratic nomination for president have endorsed the proposal: Cory Booker of New Jersey, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York, Kamala Harris of California, Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Easter: The Resurrection & the Life
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. Do you believe this?” – John 11: 25, 26 The es from the account of Lazarus being raised to life by Christ after already being dead for four days. The question “Do you believe this?” was posed to the sister of Lazarus, Martha. There have been people who...
The Tax Code: Business as Usual
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I argue for simplifying the tax code. It should also be evident that any sort of tax reform should coincide with reforming the way Washington currently operates when es to spending. April 15th is of course tax day, and national protests will also be occurring across this nation under the historically significant title of “tea parties.” One of the points I made in my piece is that it is important that these protests are not...
PBR: The Old System under a New Guise
This past week, President Obama forced the CEO of General Motors to resign. The real significance of this may be lost on most people. Some might say, “Well, if General Motors is not doing well, the CEO should be replaced.” The major difficulty with this is that this is a special power of the GM Board of Directors, not the President of the United States. Effectively, this makes President Obama the Board of Directors of General Motors, and any pany...
Warren on the Faith-Based Initiative
In a wide-ranging interview with Christianity Today, Rick Warren discussed his view of the new vision for the faith-based initiative. Here’s that Q&A: Have you paid attention to the new faith-based initiatives released by President Obama and Joshua DuBois focusing on the four issues of responsible fatherhood, reducing unintended pregnancies, increasing interfaith dialogue, and reducing poverty? Those are great goals. My fear is that if all of a sudden you have promise your convictions to be part of the faith...
Fr. Z: The ‘social Magisterium’ and Acton Institute
Father John Zuhlsdorf, who runs the popular Catholic blog “What Does the Prayer Really Say?” has opened a new discussion thread on the work of the Acton Institute. He explains: In light of what is going on in the world’s economies, and in light of what will be increasing tension between secular governments and the Church, which has her body of teaching on social issues, it is a good idea to have a strong discussion about Acton and the Church’s...
PBR: A Cautionary Tale
AS NYT columnist Frank Rich observed earlier this week, it’s hard to find much sympathy for Rick Wagoner. “Sure, Rick Wagoner deserved his fate,” writes Rich. “He did too little too late to save an iconic American institution from devolving into a government charity case.” The delusions of the CEOs who lined up on Capitol Hill last year to lobby for bailouts extended beyond the arrogance of flying to congressional meetings in private jets. Duly chastened, the CEOs next made...
David W. Miller interviewed on PBS
Dr. David W. Miller, who was interviewed in Religion & Liberty for the Winter 2008 issue, was recently on a PBS program discussing corporate morality. Here is a portion of the PBS interview which relates to the theme in Acton’s R&L interview titled “Theology at Work: Faithful Living in the Marketplace:” (anchor) ABERNETHY: You, as I said, you used to work in the financial business. What do your friends there, the friends that you have who’ve worked there — what...
The more things change …
A 1934 cartoon by Pulitzer Prize winner Carey Orr published in the Chicago Tribune. Snopes is still checking. ...
PBR: President Obama Responds
President Obama took time out over the weekend to respond to this week’s PBR question: “Let me assure you in the days ahead my administration intends to do to every industry in this country exactly what we are doing to the automakers.” ...
PBR: Ministries that Matter
Starting this year, the Acton Institute is planning to give out the Samaritan Award every other year. This will allows us to better streamline the award process as well as to more smoothly integrate the results of the award into our Samaritan Guide database. In recent years the Samaritan Award finalists have been profiled in a special issue of WORLD Magazine (here’s the link to the 2008 issue). But this year the folks at WORLD are taking the opportunity to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved