Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: the ‘global minimum tax’
Explainer: the ‘global minimum tax’
Aug 4, 2026 3:39 AM

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has said she plans to impose a global minimum tax on U.S. corporations, which she will coordinate with global leaders to stop “a destructive, global race to the bottom.” How will this work; what will it do to petitiveness; and is it constitutional? Here are the facts you need to know.

What is a global minimum tax?

A global minimum tax would see wealthy nations agree not to lower their tax rates on corporations that are based, or (in some proposals) do business in, their nations below a specific level. Corporations would then pay a similar or identical amount of taxes regardless of where they are located, discouraging offshoring to low or no-tax nations and encouraging higher taxes and spending. Current proposals make this collaboration between sovereign governments voluntary rather pulsory.

Why do politicians want to impose a global minimum tax?

Corporations respond to tax incentives and disincentives, just as individuals often “vote with their feet” when a state’s taxes e too high. Politicians, especially in high-tax nations, want to prevent low-tax nations from attracting “their” businesses by allowing stockholders to keep more of their profits. Yellen’s former mentor, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, lamented that “every country thinks it can steal business from others by lowering taxes.”

Yellen has also said a global minimum tax would boost U.S. petitiveness” – after redefining the word. “Competitiveness is about more than how panies fare against panies in global merger-and-acquisition bids,” she said. “It’s about making sure that governments have stable tax systems that raise sufficient revenue to invest in essential public goods and respond to crises.” However, the IRS collected more than $3.5 trillion during the booming 2019 fiscal year – more than enough to provide for the delegated powers conferred upon the federal government by the Constitution.

How does the U.S. corporate tax pare to other nations?

Although President Donald Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, bined federal-state corporate tax rate is already higher than the global average of 24%. President Joe Biden’s “infrastructure” plan proposes raising the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28%, with an effective rate of 32% – making the U.S. even petitive in the traditional sense.

What would the global minimum tax rate on corporations be?

No one agrees. The Biden administration wants to set the global minimum tax at 21%, our current level, while European leaders support a rate of 12.5% – the corporate tax rate of its lowest-tax nation, Ireland. European leaders seem to realize the advantage lower corporate taxes give them over the United States and seek to make them permanent.

Do higher corporate tax rates bring greater revenue?

The Laffer Curve also applies to corporate taxes: Lower taxes bring higher revenue. In 1990, the average corporate tax rate was nearly 40%, but the revenue that corporate taxes generated in the 36 wealthiest nations amounted to 2.4% of GDP. Today, with corporate tax levels at nearly half that rate, corporate tax revenues in the same countries amount to 3.1% of GDP. In the UK, corporate tax revenues are as high today as in 1985, when the rate stood at 40%. “Lower rates do not always mean lower collections,” writes Scott Hodge of the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

How would the ‘global minimum tax’ affect the U.S. economy?

“Raising the U.S. corporate tax rate to 28 percent,as President Biden has proposed, would reduce the long-term size of our economy by 1 percent, reduce wages by 0.8 percent, and eliminate 187,000 jobs,” wrote Hodge.

How do higher corporate tax rates affect consumers and workers?

Corporate taxes get passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices. Higher corporate tax rates discourage investment, leading employers to fire workers, delay raises, or curtail hiring. A relatively low percentage of corporate tax e from shareholders’ earnings. A team of researchers led by Northwestern University’s Scott Baker found that consumers, workers, and shareholders each absorbed approximately one-third of corporate taxes (31%, 38%, and 31%, respectively).

How would the global minimum tax be implemented?

One proposal would reward confiscatory tax policies while violating national sovereignty. The Washington Post reported in March that one plan would have the OECD establish a global minimum tax rate – and allow high-tax nations to tax overseas earnings in lower-tax nations:

For example, Hungary could maintain its existing 9 percent corporate tax rate even after the new 12 percent minimum is enacted. But under the OECD agreement, France could collect taxes on the e earned by panies in Hungary amounting to the difference between Hungary’s corporate tax rate and the 12 percent global minimum — a measure known as a “top-up” tax.

It is unclear how U.S. politicians would explain their desire to let foreign nations enrich themselves by taxing U.S.-based firms, raising consumer prices, and costing American jobs.

Is the global minimum tax constitutional?

The notion of any policy being set by a supranational governing body is ipso facto unconstitutional. However, the global minimum tax on corporations – at least, as proposed now – is being presented as an informal, voluntary agreement among members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Specific collection mechanisms may well violate the Constitution. Then again, any administration considering a global tax long ago turned its back on constitutional limitations on leviathan government.

How does the global minimum tax affect American democracy and U.S. voters?

Even a “voluntary” global minimum tax harms American democracy and deprives Americans of self-determination. It allows foreign nations – whom U.S. voters have not, and cannot, elected – to set the parameters of policies that could harm hundreds of millions of Americans. It immerses the views of the American people into the sea of “world opinion,” diluting democratic decisions and watering down the will of the American people with those of Eurosocialists.

What should Christians think about this?

“The power to tax is the power to destroy,” said American statesman Daniel Webster. Christians are called to use their creative capacity to build. Corporate taxes destroy jobs, lower wages, and raise prices on average Americans. Meanwhile, American citizens would lose some measure of their control over their own government – a reality alone that makes such a scheme worth opposing.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The NHS: Lie or we’ll fine you
The former UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson oncesaid that “the NHS is the closest thing the English people have to a religion” – but as a new story shows, it is a religion that forces people to break the Ten Commandments. Certain British citizens must lie to the government or face a punishing fine for telling the truth. One person to suffer this fate is a domestic abuse survivor and single parent who did not want to deceive...
What are the unintended consequences of economic nationalism?
Protectionist policies are, on the surface, attractive. Through state means, they promise to protect industries and workers as well as boost a country’s industrial production. But like most top-down solutions, there’s a catch; the government has a knowledge deficiency. “No one knows what technological innovation or entrepreneurial insight will upend the present economic landscape in America—or any other country,” explains Samuel Gregg in an article in Law & Liberty. “Nor can such developments be anticipated by economic nationalist policies.” Evidence...
Capitalism, solidarity, and work: A view from the 16th century
Legal historian Wim Decock of the KU Leuven recently published a study of the economic thought of the Flemish Jesuit Leonardus Lessius (1554–1623). Last week the National Catholic Register posted an interview with Decock about his book and Lessius’s contribution to economics. Lessius was one of a host of significant early modern authors who addressed the economic realities of the burgeoning European market economies. These early modern authors, despite recovery efforts by Decock and other scholars, continue to be overlooked...
Richard Reinsch on Rubio’s ‘materialistic’ industrial policy
Last November, my colleague Dan Hugger ments by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) about his desire for mon good capitalism” informed by Roman Catholic social teaching. Generally speaking, this is an aspiration that many at the Acton Institute share, but the specifics of what that would look like are where the real differences lie. At the least, this demonstrates how people of good will, of the same (or similar) religious and ethical tradition, can still have divergent opinions about policy. Shared...
Happy New Year: The minimum wage is practically irrelevant
This morning, as Americans go to work for the first Monday of the New Year, a growing number will see their wages rise to $15 an hour or more – thanks, not to higher minimum wage laws, but to the bustling free market. Increasingly, economists agree that in the frenetic labor market of 2020, the minimum wage has e virtually irrelevant. No one disputes that workers are earning higher salaries in 2020, and the lowest earners have received the biggest...
Tyler Cowen’s “State Capacity Libertarianism”: A Straussian Reading
On a recent episode of the excellent podcast Conversations with Tyler the economist Tyler Cowen reflected on the direction his and co-author Alex Tabarrok’s blog Marginal Revolution has taken over the last ten years: [I]n 2009 I was still experimenting in some fresh way with blogging as a new medium and what it meant. In some ways the blog was better then for that reason. Whereas now, Marginal Revolution, it’s a bit like, well, the Economist magazine plus a dose...
The 2010s: The decade we (nearly) won the war on poverty
As a new decade begins, it bears pausing to celebrate the strides the human race has made toward eradicating poverty at home and around the world. This is doubly important, as the television retrospectives not only omit our growing prosperity, but so many people believe things are actually getting worse. The global misconception that poverty is spreading is especially pronounced among those who support state intervention in the economy. The website Common Dreams proclaimed, “The Evidence Pours In: Poverty Getting...
Doug Bandow: China exports its ‘social credit’ system to Venezuela
China’s social credit system seeks to tie each individual’s credit rating and privileges to his support for the Communist regime. Venezuela’s socialist dictator, Nicolás Maduro, has moved to import “perhaps the creepiest tool of repression” to his own country, writes Doug Bandow in this week’s Acton Commentary. Bandow, a senior rellow at the Cato Institute and former special assistant to President Ronald Reagan, writes that the metastasizing Big Brother program proves that government surveillance is an integral feature of socialism:...
Acton Line podcast: Remembering Gertrude Himmelfarb with Yuval Levin
On this week’s episode, we pay tribute to Gertrude Himmelfarb who passed away last Monday, December 30th, at the age of 97. Gertrude Himmelfarb was a historian and leading intellectual voice in conservatism. Throughout her career, she wrote many books about Victorian history, morality and contemporary culture. The New York Post named her one of America’s greatest minds, and the National Review called her the “paragon of intellectual plishment.” What did her work contribute to the conservative movement and how...
Alejandro Chafuen in Forbes: Corruption, not globalization, is to blame for poverty
When discussing globalization, advocates of the free economy usually start by stressing the large number of people who have risen out of extreme poverty in the last three decades. This period of poverty reduction showed a parallel growth in globalization. But it has not been even. Those who try to prove that we are living in the best of times usually use monetary statistics – they count the number and percentage of people who earn less than $1.90 per day....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved